Re: [asterisk-users] TDM04B FIOS No Hangups Often
Hi Mike - It seems like since we got FIOS installed (including switching to fios phone lines which are supposed to be the same on our end) i am having massive problems with asterisk not hanging up dead calls for days, even weeks if i dont catch it. It slowly builds up randomly not ending a call and then next thing i know all our lines are busy and they all say a call is active in show channels. i have to shutdown asterisk and then restart and then it goes back to normal. Some things to try: 1) Set the FIOS/zaptel lines to kewlstart signalling (if you haven't already done that). 2) Set callprogress=yes in zapata.conf (if you haven't already done that). 3) Do you have explicitly declared hangup() statements in your dialplan? If not, you could try adding a few in key places as a test. 4) Verify with Verizon that you have disconnect supervision on your lines. I would think that they should be able to provide disconnect supervision on these high tech lines, but maybe the demuxer you mentioned screws this up. - Noah ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TDM04B FIOS No Hangups Often
Noah Miller wrote: 2) Set callprogress=yes in zapata.conf (if you haven't already done that). If you set callprogress=yes you will have the opposite problem -- active calls will be randomly disconnected. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] TDM04B FIOS No Hangups Often
Hi Mike, I think that callprogress=yes is right. but Noah Miller also right. so the solution will be. callprogress=yes busydetect=yes busycount=4 ; suitable values is above then 4 choose minimum ; as More value more time to wait before hangup. rxgain=7; you can adjust this value by error trial ; method check with different values. and ; choose what works best for you. ; note: if you face invalid hangup try to reduce rxgain ; or If you face no-hangup problem try to increase rxgain I hope it will work for you. Regards Nasir Iqbal On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 16:03 -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote: Noah Miller wrote: 2) Set callprogress=yes in zapata.conf (if you haven't already done that). If you set callprogress=yes you will have the opposite problem -- active calls will be randomly disconnected. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] tdm04b strange noise when answering calls
Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1' HERE I START TO HEAR THE HIGH PITCH TONE Jul 4 22:50:12 WARNING[6658]: chan_zap.c:6135 ss_thread: CallerID returned with error on channel 'Zap/2-1' -- Executing Answer(Zap/2-1, ) in new stack -- Executing Playback(Zap/2-1, hello-world) in new stack -- Playing 'hello-world' (language 'en') -- Executing Hangup(Zap/2-1, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (mefdialinc, s, 3) exited non-zero on 'Zap/2-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1' Looks to me you are catching the end of the Caller ID signalling. Perhaps your telco is not behaving. Try putting a wait in your dialplan before answering. This should workaround the problem, or at least it has worked for me in the past. Regards, Raymond McKay President RAYNET Technologies LLC http://www.raynettech.com (860) 693-2226 x 31 Toll Free (877) 693-2226 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] tdm04b strange noise when answering calls
Did not work. Same fax/modem-like tone Note that I use phonepstntdm04b When I call the tdm04b from the pstn I start to hear the tone as soon as asterisk displays this line: -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1' and it does not go away even after asterisk do a hangup(). Zap/1-1 answered SIP/1004-f499 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1' Jul 5 11:46:07 WARNING[10415]: chan_zap.c:6135 ss_thread: CallerID returned with error on channel 'Zap/2-1' -- Executing Wait(Zap/2-1, 2) in new stack -- Executing Answer(Zap/2-1, ) in new stack -- Executing NoOp(Zap/2-1, ) in new stack -- Executing Playback(Zap/2-1, hello-world) in new stack -- Playing 'hello-world' (language 'en') -- Executing Hangup(Zap/2-1, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (incomingfxo, s, 5) exited non-zero on 'Zap/2-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1' On 7/5/06, Raymond McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1' HERE I START TO HEAR THE HIGH PITCH TONE Jul 4 22:50:12 WARNING[6658]: chan_zap.c:6135 ss_thread: CallerID returned with error on channel 'Zap/2-1' -- Executing Answer(Zap/2-1, ) in new stack -- Executing Playback(Zap/2-1, hello-world) in new stack -- Playing 'hello-world' (language 'en') -- Executing Hangup(Zap/2-1, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (mefdialinc, s, 3) exited non-zero on 'Zap/2-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1' Looks to me you are catching the end of the Caller ID signalling. Perhaps your telco is not behaving. Try putting a wait in your dialplan before answering. This should workaround the problem, or at least it has worked for me in the past. Regards, Raymond McKay President RAYNET Technologies LLC http://www.raynettech.com (860) 693-2226 x 31 Toll Free (877) 693-2226 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Erick Perez Panama Sistemas Integradores de Telefonia IP y Soluciones Para Centros de Datos Panama, Republica de Panama Cel Panama. +(507) 6694-4780 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B sound volume
jonny hashem wrote: HI: Is there any way to raise up sound volume on fxo on TDM04B without changing tx-gain and rx-gain ? No. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B/TDM2401E Card
Hello,The cards you referenced are BRI cards. We are located in México and do not use ISDN. Instead I could install a optional E1 interface to the D-1232 and purchase for example a TE110P card from Digium.But this solution will cost a lot more money and I am limited with my budget. I dont no if it is worth to spend that extra money. I need to find the best cost effective solution.I appreciate all suggestions.Thanks Housi Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 13 February 2006 20:43, housi mueller wrote: Hi there, I plan to use Aterisk in our small office. Until now we used a Panasonic D-1232 Super Hybrid System. The figure is representing the future ; configuration I where thinking about to have in the office. Question 1: We need only 4 lines and I thought to buy a TDM04B or a TDM2401E card. There is quite a price difference. Which card would you recommend me to buy. Question 2: Is such a configuration as shown on the figure with a TDM04B/TDM2401E card at all realizable?I am not familiar with that model in particular, but I've done some reasurch about D500. I think all of them have BRI interface so you may consider a BRI http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk/page17.htmlor http://www.avm.de/en/Produkte/Server-Produkte/C4/index.js.htmlor http://www.eicon.com/worldwide/products/MediaGateways/diva-server-v4bri.htmto interconnect Panasonic and your Asterisk.By my opinion Digium cards are more end user/provider oriented which is not your case. Like they say "card that supports FXS and FXO station interfaces for connecting an alog telephones and analog POTS lines through a PC".Let me know how did you do it.benchev___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Yahoo! Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B/TDM2401E Card
On Monday 13 February 2006 20:43, housi mueller wrote: Hi there, I plan to use Aterisk in our small office. Until now we used a Panasonic D-1232 Super Hybrid System. The figure is representing the future configuration I where thinking about to have in the office. Question 1: We need only 4 lines and I thought to buy a TDM04B or a TDM2401E card. There is quite a price difference. Which card would you recommend me to buy. Question 2: Is such a configuration as shown on the figure with a TDM04B/TDM2401E card at all realizable? I am not familiar with that model in particular, but I've done some reasurch about D500. I think all of them have BRI interface so you may consider a BRI http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk/page17.html or http://www.avm.de/en/Produkte/Server-Produkte/C4/index.js.html or http://www.eicon.com/worldwide/products/MediaGateways/diva-server-v4bri.htm to interconnect Panasonic and your Asterisk. By my opinion Digium cards are more end user/provider oriented which is not your case. Like they say card that supports FXS and FXO station interfaces for connecting analog telephones and analog POTS lines through a PC. Let me know how did you do it. benchev ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B FXO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, In my remember. The AAH will automatic config the TDM04B card. try the CLI command"zap show channels" regards, kevin From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nelson GranadosSent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 7:18 AMTo: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B FXO [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would like to install a TDM04B with [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.4 and [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.5 but I didn't finddocumentation about this installation. Thanks in advance, Nelson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B FXO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, The magical incarnation is: 0. Fix /etc/udev./rules.d/50-udev.rules if it has been banged up by yum. 1. rebuild_zaptel 2. reboot 3. genzaptelconf 4. reboot That should do the job. There are more elegant ways than reboot'ing ... but wtf. BTW. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.5 is out now. It includes some important bugfixes so consider that instead. Also check out these links: http://mundy.org/blog/index.php?p=112 http://asteriskathome.sourceforge.net/handbook/ http://members.optusnet.com.au/~bsharif/asterisk/AsteriskDumbMeGuide.htm /John [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/06 11:06 am Hi, In my remember. The AAH will automatic config the TDM04B card. try the CLI command zap show channels regards, kevin _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nelson Granados Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 7:18 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B FXO [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would like to install a TDM04B with [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.4 and [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.5 but I didn't find documentation about this installation. Thanks in advance, Nelson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B
After making some research, I am done.Thanks!yrving rivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:Hi all:I just bought and installed a TDM04B (4 fxo ports). It is running and ok. I have 2 lines from my provider. I can make two incoming calls come through my box to its extensions, but only one going out. I would like to make 2 calls from different extensions at the same time from my box out.¿Where can I find information about? (I couldn´t find any at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk%40home+Handbook+Wiki)I´ll appreciate your help.Regards, Yrving Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y 2GB extra a tu correo por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y 2GB extra a tu correo por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B
yrving rivas wrote:
Hi all:
I just bought and installed a TDM04B (4 fxo ports). It is running and ok.
I have 2 lines from my provider.
I can make two incoming calls come through my box to its extensions,
but only one going out.
I would like to make 2 calls from different extensions at the same
time from my box out.
¿Where can I find information about? (I couldn´t find any at
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk%40home+Handbook+Wiki)
I´ll appreciate your help.
Regards,
Yrving
Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y *2GB* extra a tu correo
por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Could you please post your extensions.conf section that references how
outbound calls work? My assumption would be that you are only
referencing one of the zap interfaces and should either be using a group
or listing the zap interfaces sequentially in the dialplan so that if
the first one is in use the second one will be used.
Example of using a group would be, in zapata.conf for the lines you are
trying to dial out on:
group=2
in extensions.conf:
TRUNK=ZAP/g2
exten = _NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN})
exten = _NXX,2,Congestion
Doing it without a group would work as follows:
exten = _NXX,1,Dial(Zap/1/${EXTEN})
exten = _NXX,2,Dial(Zap/2/${EXTEN})
exten = _NXX,3,Congestion
Using a group lets you setup several lines to be used when the group is
referenced.
More complex than you probably need but the letter used when referencing
the group will change how the group works:
; g: select the lowest-numbered non-busy Zap channel
;(aka. ascending sequential hunt group).
; G: select the highest-numbered non-busy Zap channel
;(aka. descending sequential hunt group).
; r: use a round-robin search, starting at the next highest channel than
last
;time (aka. ascending rotary hunt group).
; R: use a round-robin search, starting at the next lowest channel than last
;time (aka. descending rotary hunt group).
So Zap/g1 starts at the lowest line and Zap/G1 starts at the top of the
available lines, etc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04b on FreeBSD
Jason Becker wrote: Alejandro Mejia Evertsz wrote: Hi list! I successfully installed a Digium TDM04B card on FreeBSD 5.4 using zaptel drivers for FreeBSD (installed with ports). I'm using Asterisk CVS-Head and the card works fine, but when placing or recieving a call on any of the 4 fxo ports, users hear (both sides) a clicking noise. I also have a Wildcard X100P installed, and uses the same configuration (on zapata.conf) but that card doesn't make that strange noise during conversations. Please let me know if someone had this problem before me, and what you did to correct it. I don't know what else to try. Could the TDM400P be sharing an interrupt? systat? Regards, use should write it to bsd ML. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04b on FreeBSD
Alejandro Mejia Evertsz wrote: Hi list! I successfully installed a Digium TDM04B card on FreeBSD 5.4 using zaptel drivers for FreeBSD (installed with ports). I'm using Asterisk CVS-Head and the card works fine, but when placing or recieving a call on any of the 4 fxo ports, users hear (both sides) a clicking noise. I also have a Wildcard X100P installed, and uses the same configuration (on zapata.conf) but that card doesn't make that strange noise during conversations. Please let me know if someone had this problem before me, and what you did to correct it. I don't know what else to try. Could the TDM400P be sharing an interrupt? systat? Regards, -- Jason Becker Director CEO Coalescent Systems Inc. Enabling Open Source Telephony 403.244.8089 www.coalescentsystems.ca ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B NEW CARD WITH zaptel 1.0.7
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:19:54AM +0600, Tharanga wrote: do i have another way to use this new TDM04B card with aterisk,zaptel. 1.0.7 version . OR can i use 1.0.7 on one end and othe end 1.0.9 ?? is it make any problem..to my IP Calls Via IAX2 channel . You can upgrade zaptel alone. No need to upgrade asterisk. Alternatively, see the diff between 1.0.8 and 1.0.9 . (IIRC) and try to apply it manually to your zaptel, and rebuild. -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849755 | | friend ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B card with only 3 lines connected using chanisavail
I noticed that using a TDM04B and only having 3 analog lines connected at this time (4th is coming) I was using ChanIsAvail(Zap/4Zap/3Zap/2Zap1) which gives me an available line no problem. However Zap/3 did not actually have a line connected at this time. Yet asterisk still gave me it as an option for dialout even though no dial tone or anything Is that expected... Obviously I can edit zapata and not use it. but I just thought asterisk would potentially detect no line connected and not even give me it for chanisavail? Nope, there is no code to detect an unconnected pstn line. The chipset has far more capabilities for such stuff then has been implemented, but obviously those functions have not been addressed. (Note: there was, and maybe still is, a compile-time option to detect unconnected pstn lines, but not sure the option still exists.) Per the chipset spec sheets, the TDM card can detect bridged handsets, unconnected pstn lines, reverse polarity, and much more. Adding the code to support that stuff is not a trevial task given the different country standards that should be addressed, etc. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B + Voicemail poor Quality
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/18/2005 11:56:06 AM: Recently, I installed TDM04B 4 FXO card on to my Asterisk box and installation went perfect. The only problem I am facing is the Voice mail has very poor quality when any users leave voice message via PSTN line. We can not hear either from the extension nor from the WAV email attached. Has anyone experienced this problem before, please help? Yes, its well known. See bug #2023 in the bug tracker. Kevin would like to address this along with addressing missed frames (common complaint when attempting to use spandsp) before the next formal Stable release. But, its too early to guess whether that will actually happen (as of right now). Does this relate to the e-mail you just sent to the list regarding volume issues with voicemail files not saved as uncompressed WAV's? Tim Massey ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04b and echo
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 08:45:34PM -0500, chris gamble wrote: the echo isnt horrible most of the time, and seems extremely random in that i can call a number once without echo, then dial the same number a second time and get echo. things i am currently considering (and would like to know if these might be useful) 1 upgrade from 1.09 ( asterisk at home ) to 1.2 cvs code base That is worth a shot. There are a few new echo-related features that have been added: 1.) fxotune - try this first. There is a file called README.fxotune that explains how to use it. It is primarily for doing echo related line tuning (which in your case possibly won't help). 2.) Also, there is a new echo canceller in CVS-HEAD zaptel that has received a lot of positive feedback. Look in zconfig.h for ECHO_CAN_KB1 for further information. -- Matthew Fredrickson ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04b and echo
Matt Fredrickson wrote: On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 08:45:34PM -0500, chris gamble wrote: the echo isnt horrible most of the time, and seems extremely random in that i can call a number once without echo, then dial the same number a second time and get echo. things i am currently considering (and would like to know if these might be useful) 1 upgrade from 1.09 ( asterisk at home ) to 1.2 cvs code base PS you dont' need to upgrade asterisk to CVS Head to use the Zaptel from CVS head and the new Echo setup. I just installed it on 3 systems and they all improved. Using the KB1 That is worth a shot. There are a few new echo-related features that have been added: 1.) fxotune - try this first. There is a file called README.fxotune that explains how to use it. It is primarily for doing echo related line tuning (which in your case possibly won't help). 2.) Also, there is a new echo canceller in CVS-HEAD zaptel that has received a lot of positive feedback. Look in zconfig.h for ECHO_CAN_KB1 for further information. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] tdm04b hangup problem
Hi, I'm sorry about the false information. It seems after the crash, the problems is still exist. Anyone can help me? Could it be IRQ issue? Here is output from cat /proc/interrupt: CPU0 0: 92807252 XT-PIC timer 1: 8 XT-PIC i8042 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 5: 92732654 XT-PIC ohci_hcd, wctdm 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc 9: 0 XT-PIC acpi, ehci_hcd 10: 92730937 XT-PIC SiS SI7012, ohci_hcd, wctdm 11: 95761662 XT-PIC eth0, ohci_hcd, wctdm 12: 66 XT-PIC i8042 14: 163276 XT-PIC ide0 15: 997605 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 Best Regards, Stevanus stevanus wrote: Hi, Yesterday, the asterisk machine was crash :S. But after the crash, it seems the previous problems were eliminated. I will notice it in about a week or two. If it's stable now, so the recommended solution when there are problems with asterisk is to restart the machine? Weird. Does nobody like to share any comments? Just curious :P Best Regards, Stevanus stevanus wrote: Any thought anyone? stevanus wrote: Hi, I have severe problem here.. My asterisk server use tdm04b from digium and is often incapable of detecting hangup signal. It is happened occasionally in incoming call so I have to watch fop all the time and hangup the channel manually there. Another problem is when an outgoing call was placed and the caller ended the conversation, the tdm04b did not hangup the channel. So when the caller does off hook too fast and interpreted by asterisk as hold, both zap channel will be connected by asterisk as the caller hangup the second call. Anyone experiences this issue? Is it possible that this is caused by improper setting in rxgain or txgain? Currently, I set rxgain = 15.0 and txgain = 5.0.. Thanks.. Best Regards, Stevanus ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] tdm04b hangup problem
Hi, Yesterday, the asterisk machine was crash :S. But after the crash, it seems the previous problems were eliminated. I will notice it in about a week or two. If it's stable now, so the recommended solution when there are problems with asterisk is to restart the machine? Weird. Does nobody like to share any comments? Just curious :P Best Regards, Stevanus stevanus wrote: Any thought anyone? stevanus wrote: Hi, I have severe problem here.. My asterisk server use tdm04b from digium and is often incapable of detecting hangup signal. It is happened occasionally in incoming call so I have to watch fop all the time and hangup the channel manually there. Another problem is when an outgoing call was placed and the caller ended the conversation, the tdm04b did not hangup the channel. So when the caller does off hook too fast and interpreted by asterisk as hold, both zap channel will be connected by asterisk as the caller hangup the second call. Anyone experiences this issue? Is it possible that this is caused by improper setting in rxgain or txgain? Currently, I set rxgain = 15.0 and txgain = 5.0.. Thanks.. Best Regards, Stevanus ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] tdm04b hangup problem
Any thought anyone? stevanus wrote: Hi, I have severe problem here.. My asterisk server use tdm04b from digium and is often incapable of detecting hangup signal. It is happened occasionally in incoming call so I have to watch fop all the time and hangup the channel manually there. Another problem is when an outgoing call was placed and the caller ended the conversation, the tdm04b did not hangup the channel. So when the caller does off hook too fast and interpreted by asterisk as hold, both zap channel will be connected by asterisk as the caller hangup the second call. Anyone experiences this issue? Is it possible that this is caused by improper setting in rxgain or txgain? Currently, I set rxgain = 15.0 and txgain = 5.0.. Thanks.. Best Regards, Stevanus ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B, trunk group
During the install [EMAIL PROTECTED] will add all the lines on your card to group 0. Make a trunk for g0 and it will use all the lines. --- Sascha Ferley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am just trying to figure out how to setup a TDM04B card for incoming/outgoing calls. I have 4 lines, which are provided as a rotary trunk group, currently hooked into a Nortel system, which asterisk will replace. I have setup a Dell 1800 (Tower) system with the TDM04B card, which seems to work. The question is how do I set it up that all 4 lines are part of a trunk group, such that all 4 lines can be used for incoming aswell as outgoing calls? I am using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.4. Please let me know Thanks S. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B, trunk group
I think it should be simple if I understand your question correctly. Make 4 trunks ZAP/g0,ZAP/g1, ZAP/g2,ZAP/g3in AMP. In outbound routing makeoutbound routing with almostall dialpatterns Select the trunk sequence starting from the last one in the hunt group. If your main number is connected to ZAP/g0, it should be last in the sequence. In your scenarioifwill behelpful to get aSIP outbound route for long distance. This will reduce your cost and load on ZAP trunks. Obaid. - Original Message - From: Sascha Ferley To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 4:37 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B, trunk group Hi, I am just trying to figure out how to setup a TDM04B card for incoming/outgoing calls. I have 4 lines, which are provided as a rotary trunk group, currently hooked into a Nortel system, which asterisk will replace. I have setup a Dell 1800 (Tower) system with the TDM04B card, which seems to work. The question is how do I set it up that all 4 lines are part of a trunk group, such that all 4 lines can be used for incoming aswell as outgoing calls? I am using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.4. Please let me know Thanks S. ___Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B, trunk group
Thanks for the reply The phone lines here are already setup in a hunt group from the telco provider. The reason I asked was that I saw somewhere, which I cant seem to find right now, that one could configure all 4 lines into 1 group, like the channels in a PRI. This was basically what I was trying to do. S. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of OMS Sent: August 17, 2005 3:33 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B, trunk group I think it should be simple if I understand your question correctly. Make 4 trunks ZAP/g0,ZAP/g1, ZAP/g2,ZAP/g3in AMP. In outbound routing makeoutbound routing with almostall dialpatterns Select the trunk sequence starting from the last one in the hunt group. If your main number is connected to ZAP/g0, it should be last in the sequence. In your scenarioifwill behelpful to get aSIP outbound route for long distance. This will reduce your cost and load on ZAP trunks. Obaid. - Original Message - From: Sascha Ferley To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 4:37 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B, trunk group Hi, I am just trying to figure out how to setup a TDM04B card for incoming/outgoing calls. I have 4 lines, which are provided as a rotary trunk group, currently hooked into a Nortel system, which asterisk will replace. I have setup a Dell 1800 (Tower) system with the TDM04B card, which seems to work. The question is how do I set it up that all 4 lines are part of a trunk group, such that all 4 lines can be used for incoming aswell as outgoing calls? I am using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.4. Please let me know Thanks S. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B, trunk group
Quoting Sascha Ferley [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks for the reply The phone lines here are already setup in a hunt group from the telco provider. The reason I asked was that I saw somewhere, which I can't seem to find right now, that one could configure all 4 lines into 1 group, like the channels in a PRI. This was basically what I was trying to do. S. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of OMS Sent: August 17, 2005 3:33 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B, trunk group I think it should be simple if I understand your question correctly. Make 4 trunks ZAP/g0, ZAP/g1, ZAP/g2,ZAP/g3 in AMP. In outbound routing make outbound routing with almost all dial patterns Select the trunk sequence starting from the last one in the hunt group. If your main number is connected to ZAP/g0, it should be last in the sequence. In your scenario if will be helpful to get a SIP outbound route for long distance. This will reduce your cost and load on ZAP trunks. Obaid. - Original Message - From: Sascha mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ferley To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Non-Commercial Discussion' Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 4:37 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B, trunk group Hi, I am just trying to figure out how to setup a TDM04B card for incoming/outgoing calls. I have 4 lines, which are provided as a rotary trunk group, currently hooked into a Nortel system, which asterisk will replace. I have setup a Dell 1800 (Tower) system with the TDM04B card, which seems to work. The question is how do I set it up that all 4 lines are part of a trunk group, such that all 4 lines can be used for incoming aswell as outgoing calls? I am using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.4. Please let me know Thanks S. _ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize...
hi we are also working in asterisk pbx .and we have try it with softphone (diax and xlite) it works good but the problem we got is when installed the TDM04B and try to phone the pstn we got this problem.; ul 19 11:25:33 NOTICE[2924]: app_dial.c:764 dial_exec: Unable to create channel of type 'Zap' == Everyone is busy/congested at this time -- Executing Hangup(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/11, ) in new stack == Spawn extension (test, 1001, 2) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/11' -- Hungup 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/11' and when we execute : *CLI zap show channels Chan Extension Context Language MusicOnHold pseudodefault 1default *CLI show channel 1 1 is not a known channel *CLI zap show channel 1 Channel: 1 File Descriptor: 20 Span: 1 Extension: Dialing: no Context: default Caller ID string: 123 Destroy: 0 InAlarm: 0 Signalling Type: FXS Kewlstart Owner: None Real: None Callwait: None Threeway: None Confno: -1 Propagated Conference: -1 Real in conference: 0 DSP: no Relax DTMF: no Dialing/CallwaitCAS: 0/0 Default law: ulaw Fax Handled: no Pulse phone: no Echo Cancellation: 128 taps, currently OFF Actual Confinfo: Num/0, Mode/0x Actual Confmute: No Actual Hookstate: Onhook could you help us ,thanks a lot De: Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Objet: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize... Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:17:39 -0700 callerid=no - Original Message - From: Nitesh Divecha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 2:04 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize... Hello All, I got my TDM04B card installed and configured. Everything works fine I can receive calls and route to appropriate extensions. The only problem I am facing is Slowness. When I dial the PSTN number which is connected to Zap 1-1 after two ring it answers and then run the AGI script. What I did was assign it to a specific extension. So all inbound call on that PSTN number should ring on that extension. But its too slow... First Zap 1-1 takes time to initialize and then transferring the call to extension takes time. Is there any way to speed up the process or reduce the timings, I can not find any info. Please help... Thanks Neel ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com a href=http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users/a To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: a href=http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users/a ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com a href=http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users/aTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: a href=http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users/a Protek-on: CaraMail met en oeuvre un nouveau Concept de Sécurité Globale - www.caramail.com___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize...
On Monday 18 July 2005 18:11, Chad Osmond wrote: Remove Callerid and set immediate=yes Callerid is sent between the first and second rings, so asterisk has to wait for it. There should be no need for immediate=yes on FXO POTS ports. The first ring will cause the dialplan to be entered at 's', or the second if Asterisk is set to try and detect Caller*ID. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize...
Thanks for your replies, But is there any way to speed up the process with CallerID=yes? This helps with person leaves a voice mail, his phone number is automatically on email. Thanks, Neel On Jul 18, 2005, at 8:17 PM, Steve Totaro wrote: callerid=no - Original Message - From: Nitesh Divecha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 2:04 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize... Hello All, I got my TDM04B card installed and configured. Everything works fine I can receive calls and route to appropriate extensions. The only problem I am facing is Slowness. When I dial the PSTN number which is connected to Zap 1-1 after two ring it answers and then run the AGI script. What I did was assign it to a specific extension. So all inbound call on that PSTN number should ring on that extension. But its too slow... First Zap 1-1 takes time to initialize and then transferring the call to extension takes time. Is there any way to speed up the process or reduce the timings, I can not find any info. Please help... Thanks Neel ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Nitesh Divecha VoIP/Network Engineer Viper Networks 2070 Business Center Drive, Suite 210 Irvine, California 92612 Tel: 1-949-851-8737 Fax: 1-949-851-8011 Cell: 1-909-964-5181 vPhone: 544-416-0067 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.vipernetworks.com Your Internet Phone Company A publicly traded Company, OTC: VPER ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize...
Get a PRI - Original Message - From: Nitesh Divecha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize... Thanks for your replies, But is there any way to speed up the process with CallerID=yes? This helps with person leaves a voice mail, his phone number is automatically on email. Thanks, Neel On Jul 18, 2005, at 8:17 PM, Steve Totaro wrote: callerid=no - Original Message - From: Nitesh Divecha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 2:04 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize... Hello All, I got my TDM04B card installed and configured. Everything works fine I can receive calls and route to appropriate extensions. The only problem I am facing is Slowness. When I dial the PSTN number which is connected to Zap 1-1 after two ring it answers and then run the AGI script. What I did was assign it to a specific extension. So all inbound call on that PSTN number should ring on that extension. But its too slow... First Zap 1-1 takes time to initialize and then transferring the call to extension takes time. Is there any way to speed up the process or reduce the timings, I can not find any info. Please help... Thanks Neel ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Nitesh Divecha VoIP/Network Engineer Viper Networks 2070 Business Center Drive, Suite 210 Irvine, California 92612 Tel: 1-949-851-8737 Fax: 1-949-851-8011 Cell: 1-909-964-5181 vPhone: 544-416-0067 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.vipernetworks.com Your Internet Phone Company A publicly traded Company, OTC: VPER ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B + Voicemail poor Quality
Recently, I installed TDM04B 4 FXO card on to my Asterisk box and installation went perfect. The only problem I am facing is the Voice mail has very poor quality when any users leave voice message via PSTN line. We can not hear either from the extension nor from the WAV email attached. Has anyone experienced this problem before, please help? Yes, its well known. See bug #2023 in the bug tracker. Kevin would like to address this along with addressing missed frames (common complaint when attempting to use spandsp) before the next formal Stable release. But, its too early to guess whether that will actually happen (as of right now). ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize...
Remove Callerid and set immediate=yes Callerid is sent between the first and second rings, so asterisk has to wait for it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nitesh Divecha Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 5:05 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize... Hello All, I got my TDM04B card installed and configured. Everything works fine I can receive calls and route to appropriate extensions. The only problem I am facing is Slowness. When I dial the PSTN number which is connected to Zap 1-1 after two ring it answers and then run the AGI script. What I did was assign it to a specific extension. So all inbound call on that PSTN number should ring on that extension. But its too slow... First Zap 1-1 takes time to initialize and then transferring the call to extension takes time. Is there any way to speed up the process or reduce the timings, I can not find any info. Please help... Thanks Neel ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize...
callerid=no - Original Message - From: Nitesh Divecha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 2:04 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B - Takes long to initialize... Hello All, I got my TDM04B card installed and configured. Everything works fine I can receive calls and route to appropriate extensions. The only problem I am facing is Slowness. When I dial the PSTN number which is connected to Zap 1-1 after two ring it answers and then run the AGI script. What I did was assign it to a specific extension. So all inbound call on that PSTN number should ring on that extension. But its too slow... First Zap 1-1 takes time to initialize and then transferring the call to extension takes time. Is there any way to speed up the process or reduce the timings, I can not find any info. Please help... Thanks Neel ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Outbound calls
I just install a Digium TDM04B card. I created 4 separate Zap channels and one outbound routing containing zap channels from 1 to 4. If a phone line is plug in Zap/1 then works fine, but if I unplug phone line from Zap/1 (simulating fail) the system keep dialing out on Zap/1, even with no dial tone; Only if Zap/1 is busy it will use Zap/2. There is any work around or different setting to avoid this situation? I don't believe asterisk has any code to detect whether a pstn line is plugged in or not. The chipset on the TDM-fxo modules do support that function, but the drivers don't do anything with it right now. Mark added code for that about a year ago, but commented it out within a day or two as it caused problems for some folks. Don't know if that code remains in the drivers as yet or not. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Outbound calls
If that is the case, then why on one port FXO (WCFXO) it work different. If there is no dial tone on this card system will play All circuit are busy now and if a second card is installed the call will rollover to the second card automatically. My concern is on a 4 line system if the first line loose dial tone nobody can make outgoing calls unless first channel is busy. - Original Message - From: Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 1:42 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Outbound calls I just install a Digium TDM04B card. I created 4 separate Zap channels and one outbound routing containing zap channels from 1 to 4. If a phone line is plug in Zap/1 then works fine, but if I unplug phone line from Zap/1 (simulating fail) the system keep dialing out on Zap/1, even with no dial tone; Only if Zap/1 is busy it will use Zap/2. There is any work around or different setting to avoid this situation? I don't believe asterisk has any code to detect whether a pstn line is plugged in or not. The chipset on the TDM-fxo modules do support that function, but the drivers don't do anything with it right now. Mark added code for that about a year ago, but commented it out within a day or two as it caused problems for some folks. Don't know if that code remains in the drivers as yet or not. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B problems
I have a TDM04B installed that isn't working 100% with Asterisk. I'm using the cvs-head of the zaptel drivers and asterisk with FC3 on a 2.6 kernel. I have successfully created a call on one of the channels, but there are a few problems. Even on channels with no analog line connected to them, after a few seconds (without reporting ringing) Asterisk will report that the call has been answered. On channels that have an analog line connected to them, I just hear some static that is light and pretty consistent. For some reason, the last channel seems to always give very loud and harsh static. My configuration appears to be correct based on other posts that I've read. I've read some documentation that says that the zaptel card should not share IRQs, especially not with an ethernet card. Well, my card shares an IRQ with the ethernet card. Turning off USB, parallel port, ACPI, APIC, etc. does free up a great deal of IRQs, but Linux 2.6.11-1.27_FC3 still allocates them to the same IRQ. Is this likely to be the problem? Are there known issues with this configuration? Does anybody have any advice on how to configure the kernel not to share those IRQs? I have the same config OS and don't have any major problems. The irq sharing is very likely contributing to the problem. Given what you're tried above, try moving the TDM card to another slot on the motherboard. It will likely be assigned to a different irq. If you don't have any other slots, consider replacing the mobo. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Echo on Only One Channel
I have not seen the problem, but here's a thought... You might try moving the daughterboard for that port. If the trouble still follows the port, then I'd suspect it's a hardware problem with that daughterboard. If it does not, then perhaps a software/configuration issue. -Original Message- From: Steve Totaro Sent: Tue, June 28, 2005 6:45 pm I have a system that is experiencing profound echo on channel 4. I switched POTS lines around to see if it was the line or the port and it is still a problem on port four. Has anyone ever seen this before? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Echo on Only One Channel
Good thought and after replacing the module on port four, everything is great. - Original Message - From: qrss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 1:49 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Echo on Only One Channel I have not seen the problem, but here's a thought... You might try moving the daughterboard for that port. If the trouble still follows the port, then I'd suspect it's a hardware problem with that daughterboard. If it does not, then perhaps a software/configuration issue. -Original Message- From: Steve Totaro Sent: Tue, June 28, 2005 6:45 pm I have a system that is experiencing profound echo on channel 4. I switched POTS lines around to see if it was the line or the port and it is still a problem on port four. Has anyone ever seen this before? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B
I did that once on a cheap linejack card. Took a week to get the smell out of the office, and the bright orange from inside the server was quite interesting :) Only took 1 second to start a small flame going, but fortunately I cought it quick. I wonder if the zaptel cards have any kind of protection from this sort of thing... Greg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Kohlsmith Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 6:37 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B On Thursday 09 June 2005 08:21, Ariel Batista wrote: This board is FXO which you plug incoming phone lines into it. So plugging in a handset unless it's a butt set it will not give you any dial tone. In fact you damage the port doing this to it. A butt set will not give you dialtone either. And plugging telephones into FXO ports will *not* damage anything, since both the phone and the card are expecting the other side to source battery and ring. It's plugging POTS lines into FXS ports that causes nastiness. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B
-Original Message- From: Gregory Wiktor - ADCom Corp. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I did that once on a cheap linejack card. Took a week to get the smell out of the office, and the bright orange from inside the server was quite interesting :) Only took 1 second to start a small flame going, but fortunately I cought it quick. Reminds me of when I smoked cheap a sound card connecting it to the tape output of a tube amp. The sound card apparently had no DC blocking capacitor on its input, and the tube amp had some DC on its output... I wonder if the zaptel cards have any kind of protection from this sort of thing... No, they don't. Someone mentioned damaging one this way just a couple weeks ago. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B
Is it true that a FXO port will NOT provide a dial tone? On Wed Jun 08, 2005 at 08:23:54PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I recently got a TDM04B and after installing and getting asterisk up and running I connected a handset to one of the ports. Unfortunately I don't get a dial tone when I lift the handset. What could be the cause of this? Could someone point me in the direction of a proper config for a TDM04B? Thanks. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B
On Thursday 09 June 2005 06:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it true that a FXO port will NOT provide a dial tone? FXO means it connects to a central Office -- it accepts dialtone and ring (it acts as a telephone) FXS means it connects to a Station (telephone) -- it provides dialtone and ring (it acts as a telephone network) Easy to remember: FXO connects to an Office, FXS connects to a Station or Set. You ordered a TDM04B which is four FXO ports, which is for connecting four telephone lines to. I *think* you want a TDM40B which is four FXS ports, which is for connecting four telephones to. I'm *positive* that Digium (or your reseller) will swap this out for no extra charge unless there's a restocking fee for having to order it in. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B
I'm *positive* that Digium (or your reseller) will swap this out for no extra charge unless there's a restocking fee for having to order it in. Actually, last time I looked there wxas a difference in price. Weren't the FXO a little more expensive? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I recently got a TDM04B and after installing and getting asterisk up and running I connected a handset to one of the ports. Unfortunately I don't get a dial tone when I lift the handset. This board is FXO which you plug incoming phone lines into it. So plugging in a handset unless it's a butt set it will not give you any dial tone. In fact you damage the port doing this to it. What could be the cause of this? Could someone point me in the direction of a proper config for a TDM04B? Thanks. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B
I recently got a TDM04B and after installing and getting asterisk up and running I connected a handset to one of the ports. Unfortunately I don't get a dial tone when I lift the handset. What could be the cause of this? Could someone point me in the direction of a proper config for a TDM04B? Assuming you have the part number correct, the TDM04B is meant to connect to analog pstn lines, not to telephones. If you want a TDM card to connect to analog telephones, the part number is TDM40B. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B
Thanks. Seems I misunderstood quite a bit. On Thu Jun 09, 2005 at 07:43:11AM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: I recently got a TDM04B and after installing and getting asterisk up and running I connected a handset to one of the ports. Unfortunately I don't get a dial tone when I lift the handset. What could be the cause of this? Could someone point me in the direction of a proper config for a TDM04B? Assuming you have the part number correct, the TDM04B is meant to connect to analog pstn lines, not to telephones. If you want a TDM card to connect to analog telephones, the part number is TDM40B. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B
On Thursday 09 June 2005 07:27, Wilson Pickett wrote: I'm *positive* that Digium (or your reseller) will swap this out for no extra charge unless there's a restocking fee for having to order it in. Actually, last time I looked there wxas a difference in price. Weren't the FXO a little more expensive? You're absolutely right; I overlooked that. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B
On Thursday 09 June 2005 08:21, Ariel Batista wrote: This board is FXO which you plug incoming phone lines into it. So plugging in a handset unless it's a butt set it will not give you any dial tone. In fact you damage the port doing this to it. A butt set will not give you dialtone either. And plugging telephones into FXO ports will *not* damage anything, since both the phone and the card are expecting the other side to source battery and ring. It's plugging POTS lines into FXS ports that causes nastiness. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] tdm04b slow response
I had that with a TDM400P if I had it set for incoming caller id in zapata.conf It was allowing time to detect CID. We weren't interested in CID, so I just turned it off. Now incoming calls ring the phones in about 1 second rather than a few seconds. Might be what you are getting? On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 12:01 +0700, stevanus wrote: Hi, After days tinkering with this digium card (TDM04B), I notice that this card has a slow response in detecting ring signal from pstn and hanging up when the call is over. The delay can consume up to several seconds... Is this normal? Best regards, Stevanus ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B in a Mac
The best way to get PSTN into a Mac or Windows Asterisk setup is with a Sipura SPA-3000. You can set it up as a trunk and it works great. I am actually working on an article on how to configure it right now. Kerry http://geekgazette.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Roy Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 7:37 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B in a Mac As anyone been able to make a TDM04B work in a Mac with Yellow Dog 3.01? (unless I have to use another version of Yellow Dog?) I tried on a Power Mac 8500, a G3 Beige Desktop, G3 Blue White and G4 tower... I can compile zaptel and asterisk witthout any problem. The card is seen but when I try to make a call or when I receive one I have no audio at all on aany of the computer above... I know the card is working fine in a PC I tested it with the same config. I heard people been able to make an X100P card work in a Mac but couldn't find anything about a TDM400 card... Anyone found a way to make it work? Thanks Martin Roy ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B doesn't hang up after Voicemail
Have a look at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Disconnect+Supervision Julian J. M. On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:21:09 +, Robson Ribeiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After the call is finished if the user doesn't press # the line hangs forever. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B doesn't hang up after Voicemail
I have the same problem in my setup here, the TDM card deosn't detect
line hangup or any call progress related frequencies as they are
different for every country (does anybody know the progress frequencies
in Egypt?).
So my workaround for this was to add maxsilence and maxmessage in the
voicemail.conf, and add a hangup after the voicemail line in
extensions.conf, thus voicemail will detect silence and if it doesn't it
doesn't leave the line picked up for an infinite period of time.
Ezabi
Robson Ribeiro wrote:
Hello all,
I am having a serious problem installing my * with a TDM04B. I made everything
work, call are coming in and going out including using a GSM Box in channel
Zap/2-1. I did setup voicemail like this on extensions.conf:
[incoming]
exten = s,1,Dial(SIP/2246,20)
exten = s,2,Wait,2
exten = s,3,Voicemail(u${ME})
exten = s,4,Hangup
exten = s,102,Wait,2
exten = s,103,Voicemail(b${ME})
exten = s,104,Hangup
After the call is finished if the user doesn't press # the line hangs forever.
Unfortunately I found it out after i did a zap show... 26 minutes after
the call ended :(. I looked into the threads but no answer seems to resolve
the problem (maxthreashhold or maxsilence and there is even a patch to one of
the voicemail files which i have no idea how to implement). The other strange
thing it is happening is that after i hang up the call from the phone if the
outside caller hasn't hang up it recreates the Zap channel and rings it
again.any clues please?
Thanks for the help.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B doesn't hang up after Voicemail
maxsilence in voicemail.conf
- Original Message -
From: Robson Ribeiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 6:21 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B doesn't hang up after Voicemail
Hello all,
I am having a serious problem installing my * with a TDM04B. I made
everything
work, call are coming in and going out including using a GSM Box in
channel
Zap/2-1. I did setup voicemail like this on extensions.conf:
[incoming]
exten = s,1,Dial(SIP/2246,20)
exten = s,2,Wait,2
exten = s,3,Voicemail(u${ME})
exten = s,4,Hangup
exten = s,102,Wait,2
exten = s,103,Voicemail(b${ME})
exten = s,104,Hangup
After the call is finished if the user doesn't press # the line hangs
forever.
Unfortunately I found it out after i did a zap show... 26 minutes after
the call ended :(. I looked into the threads but no answer seems to
resolve
the problem (maxthreashhold or maxsilence and there is even a patch to one
of
the voicemail files which i have no idea how to implement). The other
strange
thing it is happening is that after i hang up the call from the phone if
the
outside caller hasn't hang up it recreates the Zap channel and rings it
again.any clues please?
Thanks for the help.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B lock up
I have a strange situation. Once in a while (non-deterministic) the 2 TDM04B cards lock up at the same time and stop processing incoming and outgoing calls even though * shows that it is trying to communicate to ZAP channels (at least on the outgoing). The only cure is to reboot the system when it happens. It makes me very apprehensive of the system Has anyone seen this problem. Could this be something to do with the IRQ sharing. Here is the output of lspci -v. I see that one of the cards shares IRQ # with VGA controller and the other one with ICH4 IDE. Any help would be appreciated. The TDM04b card is known to do that and its been reported to digium by several users. Seems to lock up about once every week or two, and varies from one system to another. The digium folks aren't saying anything as yet about what needs to be fixed. But, best open a trouble ticket with them for the records. There is a very high probability it is a hardware design issue. I've added a capacitor to my card under the assumption that noisy on-card logic is distrubing the chipsets. So far I'm not had a lockup, but it's a little to early to say that actually fixed it. irq sharing has been known to be an issue in some cases, however its generally over-blown on this list. If you want to eliminate that as an issue, either move you cards around to different slots or take a look in your bios config to disable those irq's on in use (or both). I'd guess the probability of an irq issue causing your problems is in the neighborhood of about a 20% chance. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B lock up
I had an issue with the same setup except only channel 1 on each card would work for incoming. All would work for outgoing, but asterisk never saw the other channels ringing. Restarting asterisk didn't help either. I panicked and just rebooted and the problem went away. I wish I had taken the time to have tried unloading and reloading the drivers. The system had been up for 22 days when this happened so I now just restart every sunday morning to be safe. On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 09:36, Goutam Shaw wrote: Hi I have a strange situation. Once in a while (non-deterministic) the 2 TDM04B cards lock up at the same time and stop processing incoming and outgoing calls even though * shows that it is trying to communicate to ZAP channels (at least on the outgoing). The only cure is to reboot the system when it happens. It makes me very apprehensive of the system Has anyone seen this problem. Could this be something to do with the IRQ sharing. Here is the output of lspci -v. I see that one of the cards shares IRQ # with VGA controller and the other one with ICH4 IDE. Any help would be appreciated. 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82845G/GL [Brookdale-G] Chipset Host Bridge (rev 01) Subsystem: Dell Computer Corporation: Unknown device 0160 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Memory at f000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] Capabilities: [e4] #09 [1105] 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82845G/GL [Brookdale-G] Chipset Integrated Graphics Device (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Subsystem: Dell Computer Corporation: Unknown device 0160 Flags: fast devsel, IRQ 11 Memory at e800 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] Memory at feb8 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K] Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 1 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB PCI Bridge (rev 81) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=32 I/O behind bridge: d000-dfff Memory behind bridge: fe90-feaf 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801DB ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 01) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0 00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DB ICH4 IDE (rev 01) (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP]) Subsystem: Dell Computer Corporation: Unknown device 0160 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 9 I/O ports at ignored I/O ports at ignored I/O ports at ignored I/O ports at ignored I/O ports at ffa0 [size=16] Memory at feb7fc00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K] 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801DB SMBus (rev 01) Subsystem: Dell Computer Corporation: Unknown device 0160 Flags: medium devsel, IRQ 3 I/O ports at efe0 [size=32] 01:04.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Intel 537 Subsystem: Unknown device b100:0003 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 11 I/O ports at dc00 [size=256] Memory at fe9fc000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 01:05.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) Subsystem: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RT8139 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 3 I/O ports at dd00 [size=256] Memory at fe9fbf00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 01:06.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Intel 537 Subsystem: Unknown device b100:0003 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 9 I/O ports at de00 [size=256] Memory at fe9fd000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 Regards Goutam Shaw ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B lock up
Goutam Shaw wrote: Hi I have a strange situation. Once in a while (non-deterministic) the 2 TDM04B cards lock up at the same time and stop processing incoming and outgoing calls even though * shows that it is trying to communicate to ZAP channels (at least on the outgoing). The only cure is to reboot the system when it happens. It makes me very apprehensive of the system Has anyone seen this problem. Could this be something to do with the IRQ sharing. Here is the output of lspci -v. Get the cards on their own interrupts - use the BIOS, turn off unneeded onboard devices etc. If you still have problems and the FXO modules are marked Rev C on the non pin side, talk to Digium support. I had ongoing problems with FXO modules stopping responding and requiring reboots to restore. Regdumps of the offending module show ff loaded in almost all registers. After contacting Digium, I was told this was a hardware issue and after having them replaced with modules marked X100B RevB, I have so far had no problems. Regards, Richard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B lock up
Should ACPI be turned off in the kernel? In the bios I can only set cards to the 1-15 interrupt range, but linux and acpi it seems moves these to the 20's. I looked last night on the lists and found no true answer to this question. I have 4 TDM's so interrupts below 15 are few and far between, but I do have enough. On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 13:50, Richard Scobie wrote: Goutam Shaw wrote: Hi I have a strange situation. Once in a while (non-deterministic) the 2 TDM04B cards lock up at the same time and stop processing incoming and outgoing calls even though * shows that it is trying to communicate to ZAP channels (at least on the outgoing). The only cure is to reboot the system when it happens. It makes me very apprehensive of the system Has anyone seen this problem. Could this be something to do with the IRQ sharing. Here is the output of lspci -v. Get the cards on their own interrupts - use the BIOS, turn off unneeded onboard devices etc. If you still have problems and the FXO modules are marked Rev C on the non pin side, talk to Digium support. I had ongoing problems with FXO modules stopping responding and requiring reboots to restore. Regdumps of the offending module show ff loaded in almost all registers. After contacting Digium, I was told this was a hardware issue and after having them replaced with modules marked X100B RevB, I have so far had no problems. Regards, Richard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B lock up
As far as I can tell, the main kernel configuration issue is to make sure APIC and IO-APIC support is turned on, if your system supports it. (All SMP motherboards do, and many single-processor ones do as well.) This seems to give access to 32 interrupts instead of 16, minimizing interrupt sharing. -Original Message-From: Dennis Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 2:51 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B lock up Should ACPI be turned off in the kernel? In the bios I can only set cards to the 1-15 interrupt range, but linux and acpi it seems moves these to the 20's. I looked last night on the lists and found no true answer to this question. I have 4 TDM's so interrupts below 15 are few and far between, but I do have enough. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B lock up
David Brodbeck wrote: As far as I can tell, the main kernel configuration issue is to make sure APIC and IO-APIC support is turned on, if your system supports it. (All SMP motherboards do, and many single-processor ones do as well.) This seems to give access to 32 interrupts instead of 16, minimizing interrupt sharing. http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-December/076983.html -- Kristian Kielhofner ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:01:07PM -0800, Michael Swan spake thusly: I've struggled for several days trying to get a Digium TDM04B 4-port wxfco card working on a Dell 1U PowerEdge 750 machine running Fedora Core 1. I finally got a call back from Digium who indicated that snip a power cycle to get it running again. After the power cycle, if I look in /var/log/messages I see a long cycle of the following messages before reboot: kernel: Dazed and confused, but trying to continue kernel: Do you have a strnage power saving mode enabled? kernel: Uhhuh, NMI received for unknown reason 20 on CPU 0 Did you ever get this problem resolved? I had the exact same issue with a Dell PowerEdge 750. I went round and round with digium over it and never got anywhere. I was talking to digium support around the same time you were or possibly a week or so after. They seemed to know nothing of the problem. I ended up sending my card back and getting a Mediatrix FXO-SIP gateway which works perfectly. -- Tracy Reedhttp://copilotcom.com This message is cryptographically signed for your protection. Info: http://copilotconsulting.com/sig pgp1upIFM1toB.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 16:01 -0800, Michael Swan wrote: Hi all, I've struggled for several days trying to get a Digium TDM04B 4-port wxfco card working on a Dell 1U PowerEdge 750 machine running Fedora Core 1. I finally got a call back from Digium who indicated that there is a fundamental conflict between the card and the PowerEdge having to do with PCI interrupts. Asterisk version is stable v1-0 12/29/04. Sorry to revive this older thread, but I thought it might be of interest to add a new data point into this. I have a Dell 750 with a T100P card in it now and it is seeing interupts just fine. Granted it is missing some from time to time on a system not even running asterisk yet. -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell revisited
Hi Michael, I just got my TDM04B and I have successfully installed it into an IBM Netfinity 3000 with a PIII 500 Mhz processor. I'm running Gentoo 2004.3 and haven't had any issues with interrupts. Good luck! Calvin On Jan 13, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Michael Swan wrote: Hi, A week or so ago I wrote about the problems I was having using a Digium TDM04B card in a Dell PowerEdge 750 IU running Fedora Core 1. Digium steadfastly indicates their card won't work in any PowerEdge 650, 700 and 750 series machines do (sic) to a failure in interrupt handling between the pci bus and the card. My question to the list is: for those of you using a TDM04B card, can you recommend a vendor/model of hardware to replace the Dell? I need it to be rack-mountable and, of course, to work well with *, preferably on FC 1. TIA. Michael Swan Neon Software, Inc. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- S i x F e e t U p | Nowhere to go but open-source Silicon Valley: +1 (650) 401-8579 | Midwest: +1 (317) 861-5948 Toll-Free: 1-866-SIX-FEET mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sixfeetup.com | Zope Hosting from $19.95/month ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell revisited
On Jan 13, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Michael Swan wrote: A week or so ago I wrote about the problems I was having using a Digium TDM04B card in a Dell PowerEdge 750 IU running Fedora Core 1. Digium steadfastly indicates their card won't work in any PowerEdge 650, 700 and 750 series machines do (sic) to a failure in interrupt handling between the pci bus and the card. My question to the list is: for those of you using a TDM04B card, can you recommend a vendor/model of hardware to replace the Dell? I need it to be rack-mountable and, of course, to work well with *, preferably on FC 1. I saw this whilst booting my 2.6 machine yesterday - might be of use: PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing ** PCI interrupts are no longer routed automatically. If this ** causes a device to stop working, it is probably because the ** driver failed to call pci_enable_device(). As a temporary ** workaround, the pci=routeirq argument restores the old ** behavior. If this argument makes the device work again, ** please email the output of lspci to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** so I can fix the driver. -Ronan ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell revisited
I am running an HP DL320 1RU on FC2 kernel 2.6.5 with no problems - Card is the digium quad port T1/E1 (3.3volt). This chassis only has a single PCI slot. Thanks for the info. Guess not many people are running with a TDM04B... I think there are a large number of folks using the TDM04b (as I am), however many of those are not able to describe the Mobo for many different rather valid reasons. Just about any system with pci slots will work, however some work better then others in terms of throughput at the pci bus level. I have personally communicated with people that have the card running in old systems (600mhz and slower PIII's), eMachines (with 2ghz celery), up to high end dual-processor systems. The dell system that would not work (which started this thread) is the very first that I've heard of where the card doesn't work at all. (It really would be rather interesting to know why that system doesn't work right though.) ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell revisited
I am running an HP DL320 1RU on FC2 kernel 2.6.5 with no problems - Card is the digium quad port T1/E1 (3.3volt). This chassis only has a single PCI slot. Craig - Original Message - From: Michael Swan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 3:10 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell revisited Hi, A week or so ago I wrote about the problems I was having using a Digium TDM04B card in a Dell PowerEdge 750 IU running Fedora Core 1. Digium steadfastly indicates their card won't work in any PowerEdge 650, 700 and 750 series machines do (sic) to a failure in interrupt handling between the pci bus and the card. My question to the list is: for those of you using a TDM04B card, can you recommend a vendor/model of hardware to replace the Dell? I need it to be rack-mountable and, of course, to work well with *, preferably on FC 1. TIA. Michael Swan Neon Software, Inc. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell revisited
At 10:41 AM 1/14/2005 +0800, you wrote: I am running an HP DL320 1RU on FC2 kernel 2.6.5 with no problems - Card is the digium quad port T1/E1 (3.3volt). This chassis only has a single PCI slot. Craig Hi Craig, Thanks for the info. Guess not many people are running with a TDM04B... Michael Swan Neon Software, Inc. - Original Message - From: Michael Swan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 3:10 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell revisited Hi, A week or so ago I wrote about the problems I was having using a Digium TDM04B card in a Dell PowerEdge 750 IU running Fedora Core 1. Digium steadfastly indicates their card won't work in any PowerEdge 650, 700 and 750 series machines do (sic) to a failure in interrupt handling between the pci bus and the card. My question to the list is: for those of you using a TDM04B card, can you recommend a vendor/model of hardware to replace the Dell? I need it to be rack-mountable and, of course, to work well with *, preferably on FC 1. TIA. Michael Swan Neon Software, Inc. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell
On 6 Jan 2005, at 00:01, Michael Swan wrote: Hi all, I've struggled for several days trying to get a Digium TDM04B 4-port wxfco card working on a Dell 1U PowerEdge 750 machine running Fedora Core 1. I finally got a call back from Digium who indicated that there is a fundamental conflict between the card and the PowerEdge having to do with PCI interrupts. Asterisk version is stable v1-0 12/29/04. snip... 3. issue modprobe wcfxs which immediately returns with no feedback, however the four lights on the card go on and then the machine locks up completely, requiring a power cycle to get it running again. After the power cycle, if I look in /var/log/messages I see a long cycle of the following messages before reboot: kernel: Dazed and confused, but trying to continue kernel: Do you have a strnage power saving mode enabled? kernel: Uhhuh, NMI received for unknown reason 20 on CPU 0 Yes, that's what I saw on the 1U HP DL140 I have. I gave up having concluded that the problem was either: 1) the passive PCI Riser that is used in many 1U cases 2) the on-board server management ASIC (lights out managment, fan speed etc) It would be great to track this problem down. Tim. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell
If this is a single CPU system try loading the smp kernel yum install kernel-smp then force this to boot in grub.conf This will force your interrupts to be handled with IO-APIC handler instead of the old style XT-PIC interrupts handler. Switching to APIC from XT will normally fix a lot of interrupt issues. If you have them. On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 17:35 -0800, Michael Swan wrote: At 06:53 PM 1/5/2005 -0600, you wrote: I've struggled for several days trying to get a Digium TDM04B 4-port wxfco card working on a Dell 1U PowerEdge 750 machine running Fedora Core 1. I finally got a call back from Digium who indicated that there is a fundamental conflict between the card and the PowerEdge having to do with PCI interrupts. Asterisk version is stable v1-0 12/29/04. That sounds a little hard to believe. I agree. Perhaps I have too much faith in Digium support. Does anyone else disagree with Digium's assessement? The symptoms of the problem were as follows: 1. issue modprobe zaptel which immediately returns with no feedback 2. issue modprobe wcfxo which returns init_module: No such device Hint: isnmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters 3. issue modprobe wcfxs which immediately returns with no feedback, however the four lights on the card go on and then the machine locks up completely, requiring a power cycle to get it running again. After the power cycle, if I look in /var/log/messages If you have a tdm04b, that says you have four fxo ports. Why are you trying to load wcfxs? Actually, I tried modprobe wctdm which was supposed to load the correct TDM driver and this resulted in the same behavior described above (lights on, system locks.) In an attempt to figure out why the system locked up I subsequently issued a modprobe wcfxs to confirm that was causing the problem. I see a long cycle of the following messages before reboot: kernel: Dazed and confused, but trying to continue kernel: Do you have a strnage power saving mode enabled? kernel: Uhhuh, NMI received for unknown reason 20 on CPU 0 4. if I cat /proc/interrupts, I don't see any entry for a wcfxo module. In any case, I did follow the setup instructions on the Digium site (make install in /usr/src/zaptel, edit /etc/zaptel.conf, edit /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf, etc.) and we currently have a X100P wcfxo card in another machine running well so we've already had experience getting a card working. If anyone has insight into what might be wrong, please do let me know. Ultimately, if I trust the Digium support information, then this card will never work, so I'd be grateful to hear about any other PCI card that provides four or so wcfxo interfaces that might work with the PowerEdge. I don't use Fedora, but it seems those that do have had problems loading the drivers. Try the modprobe wcfxo then zaptel, then check your /proc/interrupts. If that doesn't work, try modprobe zaptel only. I think someone mentioned a readme in the src/zaptel directory for Fedora as well. Might look. Thanks for the advice. However, modprobe zaptel didn't do anything (that I could tell) and modprobe wcfxo returned the error. And, greping for Fedora in src/zaptel didn't turn up any matches. Michael Swan Neon Software, Inc. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell
I've struggled for several days trying to get a Digium TDM04B 4-port wxfco card working on a Dell 1U PowerEdge 750 machine running Fedora Core 1. I finally got a call back from Digium who indicated that there is a fundamental conflict between the card and the PowerEdge having to do with PCI interrupts. Asterisk version is stable v1-0 12/29/04. That sounds a little hard to believe. The symptoms of the problem were as follows: 1. issue modprobe zaptel which immediately returns with no feedback 2. issue modprobe wcfxo which returns init_module: No such device Hint: isnmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters 3. issue modprobe wcfxs which immediately returns with no feedback, however the four lights on the card go on and then the machine locks up completely, requiring a power cycle to get it running again. After the power cycle, if I look in /var/log/messages If you have a tdm04b, that says you have four fxo ports. Why are you trying to load wcfxs? I see a long cycle of the following messages before reboot: kernel: Dazed and confused, but trying to continue kernel: Do you have a strnage power saving mode enabled? kernel: Uhhuh, NMI received for unknown reason 20 on CPU 0 4. if I cat /proc/interrupts, I don't see any entry for a wcfxo module. In any case, I did follow the setup instructions on the Digium site (make install in /usr/src/zaptel, edit /etc/zaptel.conf, edit /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf, etc.) and we currently have a X100P wcfxo card in another machine running well so we've already had experience getting a card working. If anyone has insight into what might be wrong, please do let me know. Ultimately, if I trust the Digium support information, then this card will never work, so I'd be grateful to hear about any other PCI card that provides four or so wcfxo interfaces that might work with the PowerEdge. I don't use Fedora, but it seems those that do have had problems loading the drivers. Try the modprobe wcfxo then zaptel, then check your /proc/interrupts. If that doesn't work, try modprobe zaptel only. I think someone mentioned a readme in the src/zaptel directory for Fedora as well. Might look. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell
TDM400's use the wcfxs module to drive both FXO and FXS ports on them. I have an IBM xSeries 305 (1U P4 2.4ghz 1gb of RAM) server and I just picked up a TDM04B today, and I am getting the exact same problem. When I make calls to/from the TDM04B card I get this really really staticky sound. Calls show up however. Any resolutions to this? -Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 6:54 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell I've struggled for several days trying to get a Digium TDM04B 4-port wxfco card working on a Dell 1U PowerEdge 750 machine running Fedora Core 1. I finally got a call back from Digium who indicated that there is a fundamental conflict between the card and the PowerEdge having to do with PCI interrupts. Asterisk version is stable v1-0 12/29/04. That sounds a little hard to believe. The symptoms of the problem were as follows: 1. issue modprobe zaptel which immediately returns with no feedback 2. issue modprobe wcfxo which returns init_module: No such device Hint: isnmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters 3. issue modprobe wcfxs which immediately returns with no feedback, however the four lights on the card go on and then the machine locks up completely, requiring a power cycle to get it running again. After the power cycle, if I look in /var/log/messages If you have a tdm04b, that says you have four fxo ports. Why are you trying to load wcfxs? I see a long cycle of the following messages before reboot: kernel: Dazed and confused, but trying to continue kernel: Do you have a strnage power saving mode enabled? kernel: Uhhuh, NMI received for unknown reason 20 on CPU 0 4. if I cat /proc/interrupts, I don't see any entry for a wcfxo module. In any case, I did follow the setup instructions on the Digium site (make install in /usr/src/zaptel, edit /etc/zaptel.conf, edit /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf, etc.) and we currently have a X100P wcfxo card in another machine running well so we've already had experience getting a card working. If anyone has insight into what might be wrong, please do let me know. Ultimately, if I trust the Digium support information, then this card will never work, so I'd be grateful to hear about any other PCI card that provides four or so wcfxo interfaces that might work with the PowerEdge. I don't use Fedora, but it seems those that do have had problems loading the drivers. Try the modprobe wcfxo then zaptel, then check your /proc/interrupts. If that doesn't work, try modprobe zaptel only. I think someone mentioned a readme in the src/zaptel directory for Fedora as well. Might look. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell
At 06:53 PM 1/5/2005 -0600, you wrote: I've struggled for several days trying to get a Digium TDM04B 4-port wxfco card working on a Dell 1U PowerEdge 750 machine running Fedora Core 1. I finally got a call back from Digium who indicated that there is a fundamental conflict between the card and the PowerEdge having to do with PCI interrupts. Asterisk version is stable v1-0 12/29/04. That sounds a little hard to believe. I agree. Perhaps I have too much faith in Digium support. Does anyone else disagree with Digium's assessement? The symptoms of the problem were as follows: 1. issue modprobe zaptel which immediately returns with no feedback 2. issue modprobe wcfxo which returns init_module: No such device Hint: isnmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters 3. issue modprobe wcfxs which immediately returns with no feedback, however the four lights on the card go on and then the machine locks up completely, requiring a power cycle to get it running again. After the power cycle, if I look in /var/log/messages If you have a tdm04b, that says you have four fxo ports. Why are you trying to load wcfxs? Actually, I tried modprobe wctdm which was supposed to load the correct TDM driver and this resulted in the same behavior described above (lights on, system locks.) In an attempt to figure out why the system locked up I subsequently issued a modprobe wcfxs to confirm that was causing the problem. I see a long cycle of the following messages before reboot: kernel: Dazed and confused, but trying to continue kernel: Do you have a strnage power saving mode enabled? kernel: Uhhuh, NMI received for unknown reason 20 on CPU 0 4. if I cat /proc/interrupts, I don't see any entry for a wcfxo module. In any case, I did follow the setup instructions on the Digium site (make install in /usr/src/zaptel, edit /etc/zaptel.conf, edit /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf, etc.) and we currently have a X100P wcfxo card in another machine running well so we've already had experience getting a card working. If anyone has insight into what might be wrong, please do let me know. Ultimately, if I trust the Digium support information, then this card will never work, so I'd be grateful to hear about any other PCI card that provides four or so wcfxo interfaces that might work with the PowerEdge. I don't use Fedora, but it seems those that do have had problems loading the drivers. Try the modprobe wcfxo then zaptel, then check your /proc/interrupts. If that doesn't work, try modprobe zaptel only. I think someone mentioned a readme in the src/zaptel directory for Fedora as well. Might look. Thanks for the advice. However, modprobe zaptel didn't do anything (that I could tell) and modprobe wcfxo returned the error. And, greping for Fedora in src/zaptel didn't turn up any matches. Michael Swan Neon Software, Inc. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell
I dug around and found my newest UpdateXpress cd from IBM and ran it on this box and updated the BIOS and my problem went away. *shrugs* -Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Swan Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:35 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell At 06:53 PM 1/5/2005 -0600, you wrote: I've struggled for several days trying to get a Digium TDM04B 4-port wxfco card working on a Dell 1U PowerEdge 750 machine running Fedora Core 1. I finally got a call back from Digium who indicated that there is a fundamental conflict between the card and the PowerEdge having to do with PCI interrupts. Asterisk version is stable v1-0 12/29/04. That sounds a little hard to believe. I agree. Perhaps I have too much faith in Digium support. Does anyone else disagree with Digium's assessement? The symptoms of the problem were as follows: 1. issue modprobe zaptel which immediately returns with no feedback 2. issue modprobe wcfxo which returns init_module: No such device Hint: isnmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters 3. issue modprobe wcfxs which immediately returns with no feedback, however the four lights on the card go on and then the machine locks up completely, requiring a power cycle to get it running again. After the power cycle, if I look in /var/log/messages If you have a tdm04b, that says you have four fxo ports. Why are you trying to load wcfxs? Actually, I tried modprobe wctdm which was supposed to load the correct TDM driver and this resulted in the same behavior described above (lights on, system locks.) In an attempt to figure out why the system locked up I subsequently issued a modprobe wcfxs to confirm that was causing the problem. I see a long cycle of the following messages before reboot: kernel: Dazed and confused, but trying to continue kernel: Do you have a strnage power saving mode enabled? kernel: Uhhuh, NMI received for unknown reason 20 on CPU 0 4. if I cat /proc/interrupts, I don't see any entry for a wcfxo module. In any case, I did follow the setup instructions on the Digium site (make install in /usr/src/zaptel, edit /etc/zaptel.conf, edit /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf, etc.) and we currently have a X100P wcfxo card in another machine running well so we've already had experience getting a card working. If anyone has insight into what might be wrong, please do let me know. Ultimately, if I trust the Digium support information, then this card will never work, so I'd be grateful to hear about any other PCI card that provides four or so wcfxo interfaces that might work with the PowerEdge. I don't use Fedora, but it seems those that do have had problems loading the drivers. Try the modprobe wcfxo then zaptel, then check your /proc/interrupts. If that doesn't work, try modprobe zaptel only. I think someone mentioned a readme in the src/zaptel directory for Fedora as well. Might look. Thanks for the advice. However, modprobe zaptel didn't do anything (that I could tell) and modprobe wcfxo returned the error. And, greping for Fedora in src/zaptel didn't turn up any matches. Michael Swan Neon Software, Inc. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B vs Dell
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 18:53 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: The symptoms of the problem were as follows: 1. issue modprobe zaptel which immediately returns with no feedback Right, there isn't any output from loading this module. 2. issue modprobe wcfxo which returns init_module: No such device Hint: isnmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters Correct, you don't have any cards that need this driver, so it error'ed and refused to load - good. 3. issue modprobe wcfxs which immediately returns with no feedback, however the four lights on the card go on and then the machine locks up completely, requiring a power cycle to get it running again. After the power cycle, if I look in /var/log/messages If you have a tdm04b, that says you have four fxo ports. Why are you trying to load wcfxs? No, ALL modules on the TDM card use the wcfxs module, or in CVS the wctdm module (renamed because of the above mis-understanding). I see a long cycle of the following messages before reboot: kernel: Dazed and confused, but trying to continue kernel: Do you have a strnage power saving mode enabled? kernel: Uhhuh, NMI received for unknown reason 20 on CPU 0 So, this is the problem 4. if I cat /proc/interrupts, I don't see any entry for a wcfxo module. Again, you shouldn't because the module never loaded because you don't have a X101P card installed. In any case, I did follow the setup instructions on the Digium site (make install in /usr/src/zaptel, edit /etc/zaptel.conf, edit /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf, etc.) and we currently have a X100P wcfxo card in another machine running well so we've already had experience getting a card working. If anyone has insight into what might be wrong, please do let me know. Ultimately, if I trust the Digium support information, then this card will never work, so I'd be grateful to hear about any other PCI card that provides four or so wcfxo interfaces that might work with the PowerEdge. Well, IMHO, there are two option, blame digium for producing a card that doesn't meet the PCI spec, or blame Dell for producing a motherboard that doesn't meet the PCI spec (or whatever is the spec that is causing this problem). If it is Dell, then harass them to either give you a different server, or just return it and purchase a different server from someone else, or harass dell to fix the problem (if it is BIOS software then it should be easier)... This same conversation applies to the recent thread about some HP/Compaq server models. We need to determine who is 'at fault' not so we can point the finger etc, but so we know either to avoid Dell model xxx or Compaq yyy, or, that digium have got it wrong, and maybe they can provide some sort of new hardware version which fixes it, or a software workaround, or something. Just my 0.02c worth. PS, either way, all of this should be resolved as much as possible with digium directly, not on this list. Also, regardless of how good/bad your experience in dealing with digium support, consider that it isn't going to help your case by bad mouthing them on the list, nor is it really pertinent to your problem. So just skip it. Currently, you might say they have an excuse due to their recent holidays, plus probably some sort of backlog due to holidays. However, Digium should probably take note of these comments and try to do something about this. Also, like any other company, if you are not satisfied with the level of customer service, then write a letter of complaint to the *relevant* person. Not this list. There, that's 0.04c worth now. Regards, Adam -- -- Adam Goryachev Website Managers Ph: +61 2 8304 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +61 2 9345 4396www.websitemanagers.com.au ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Dead?
On Jul 23, 2004, at 1:22 AM, Andres Junge wrote: What is a RMA? Return Merchandise/Materials(something like that) Authorization. It's a number from the mfr, that when the product arrives with it on the box, tells them to expect some dead hardware. rt ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Dead?
What is a RMA? Isamar Maia escribió: Just for curiosity, Let us know how much time you'll gonna get a RMA of it. Isamar On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Andres Junge wrote: I had the same problem, and it was that the power suppply coudn't handle the new card. My solution (until i get a new power supply) was to unplug a very big fan that i have in the case. Salu2 Andr?s Greg Hulands escribi?: Hi, I just received in the mail my TDM04B card and put it in the computer, now the computer won't even show the video card bios or the post screen. From the digium website I could not find any specific requirements for the pci card, like 32 or 64 bit slot. The motherboard for the computer I put it in is an Asus A7V333 with PCI 2.2 compliant slots. I am thinking that maybe I just got a dud card. Is there anything I need to change or I can test to see why it is not letting the computer boot? Any help is greatly appreciated. Regards, Greg ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Dead?
I just received in the mail my TDM04B card and put it in the computer, now the computer won't even show the video card bios or the post screen. From the digium website I could not find any specific requirements for the pci card, like 32 or 64 bit slot. The motherboard for the computer I put it in is an Asus A7V333 with PCI 2.2 compliant slots. I am thinking that maybe I just got a dud card. Is there anything I need to change or I can test to see why it is not letting the computer boot? Any help is greatly appreciated. This may be a stupid question, but did you plug in the power on the molex connector on the card? -- Ryan Thrash ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Dead?
I had the same problem, and it was that the power suppply coudn't handle the new card. My solution (until i get a new power supply) was to unplug a very big fan that i have in the case. Salu2 Andrés Greg Hulands escribió: Hi, I just received in the mail my TDM04B card and put it in the computer, now the computer won't even show the video card bios or the post screen. From the digium website I could not find any specific requirements for the pci card, like 32 or 64 bit slot. The motherboard for the computer I put it in is an Asus A7V333 with PCI 2.2 compliant slots. I am thinking that maybe I just got a dud card. Is there anything I need to change or I can test to see why it is not letting the computer boot? Any help is greatly appreciated. Regards, Greg ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Dead?
Yes I did. I sent it back to the distributor and will be getting a replacement sent today. Greg On 23/07/2004, at 2:14 AM, Ryan Thrash wrote: I just received in the mail my TDM04B card and put it in the computer, now the computer won't even show the video card bios or the post screen. From the digium website I could not find any specific requirements for the pci card, like 32 or 64 bit slot. The motherboard for the computer I put it in is an Asus A7V333 with PCI 2.2 compliant slots. I am thinking that maybe I just got a dud card. Is there anything I need to change or I can test to see why it is not letting the computer boot? Any help is greatly appreciated. This may be a stupid question, but did you plug in the power on the molex connector on the card? -- Ryan Thrash ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM04B Dead?
Just for curiosity, Let us know how much time you'll gonna get a RMA of it. Isamar On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Andres Junge wrote: I had the same problem, and it was that the power suppply coudn't handle the new card. My solution (until i get a new power supply) was to unplug a very big fan that i have in the case. Salu2 Andrés Greg Hulands escribió: Hi, I just received in the mail my TDM04B card and put it in the computer, now the computer won't even show the video card bios or the post screen. From the digium website I could not find any specific requirements for the pci card, like 32 or 64 bit slot. The motherboard for the computer I put it in is an Asus A7V333 with PCI 2.2 compliant slots. I am thinking that maybe I just got a dud card. Is there anything I need to change or I can test to see why it is not letting the computer boot? Any help is greatly appreciated. Regards, Greg ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] tdm04b stopped taking inbound calls - todays cvs: CONFIRMED
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Rich Adamson wrote: Has anyone tried the current Head cvs with TDM04b (4-port fxo)? The card stopped answering inbound calls (no CLI indications whatsoever), although outbound pstn calls via the card work just fine. Kind of looks like one of the changes from yesterday (probably wcfxs.c) might be causing the problem. (Total new checkout, install, reboot, etc, result in the same no-answer condition.) Anyone else seeing this? Yup, I had the same problem, updated from CVS last night. I was able to check out 1 day old zaptel code, and it worked fine. TDM04B ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] tdm04b stopped taking inbound calls - todays cvs: CONFIRMED
Has anyone tried the current Head cvs with TDM04b (4-port fxo)? The card stopped answering inbound calls (no CLI indications whatsoever), although outbound pstn calls via the card work just fine. Kind of looks like one of the changes from yesterday (probably wcfxs.c) might be causing the problem. (Total new checkout, install, reboot, etc, result in the same no-answer condition.) Anyone else seeing this? Yup, I had the same problem, updated from CVS last night. I was able to check out 1 day old zaptel code, and it worked fine. kram is aware of it, and made another change today, but that didn't fix it either. I'm also now back a day or so and working. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
