Awesome thanks Lonnie. Some great options there.
Not at 1.4 yet (coming soon) so might try the iPoE option initially.
The PPPoE options look very interesting. Think I may do some fine tuning in my
1.4.4 release. Would be interesting to see if CAKE improves anything too.
Regards
Michael Knill
On
Hi Michael,
Nicely described issue.
1) Adjust lcp-echo-* settings (requiring AstLinux 1.4.1 or later)
By default the pppoe ppp peer options include:
--
lcp-echo-interval 20
lcp-echo-failure 3
--
Try adding a PPPOE_PPP_OPTIONS variable in your /mnt/kd/rc.conf.d/user.conf
file:
--
PPPOE_PPP_OPTI
Hi Group
I have a site that for years intermittently has periods where it loses PPPoE
connectivity on a regular basis. After further investigation by one of my
techs, it appears that when this is happening there is significant upstream
congestion on the service due to a Veeam backup in progress
subnet in router mode. Say the modem was
>>>> 192.168.0.1/24 in router mode. When I switched to pppoe or bridge mode I
>>>> made my internal LAN ssay 192.168.10.0/24. This way if I browse to
>>>> 192.168.0.1 the traffic went to the modem which it still would intercept
&
;> made my internal LAN ssay 192.168.10.0/24. This way if I browse to
>>> 192.168.0.1 the traffic went to the modem which it still would intercept
>>> and I could reach the stats and programming pages of the modem still...
>>> Christopher
>>>
>>> From
mming pages of the modem still...
>> Christopher
>>
>> From: Michael Knill ;
>> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List ;
>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] PPPoE and Ethx
>> Sent: Tue, Aug 14, 2012 4:11:17 AM
>>
>> Yes there is an IP Address configured on the mod
mming pages of the modem still...
> Christopher
>
> From: Michael Knill ;
> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List ;
> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] PPPoE and Ethx
> Sent: Tue, Aug 14, 2012 4:11:17 AM
>
> Yes there is an IP Address configured on the modem however it is only
&
On Aug 14, 2012, at 5:42 AM, Michael Keuter wrote:
>
> Am 14.08.2012 um 03:54 schrieb Michael Knill:
>
>> Just wondering:
>>
>> Is there any way to have both the PPPoE and its associated Ethx interface
>> both activated at the same time with separate IP Addresses.
>> The reason is that I am u
Am 14.08.2012 um 03:54 schrieb Michael Knill:
> Just wondering:
>
> Is there any way to have both the PPPoE and its associated Ethx interface
> both activated at the same time with separate IP Addresses.
> The reason is that I am using a DSL modem in bridge mode that I would like to
> view the
The trick on my cable and dsl modems was to make sure my internal subnet was
different that the modem subnet in router mode. Say the modem was
192.168.0.1/24 in router mode. When I switched to pppoe or bridge mode I made
my internal LAN ssay 192.168.10.0/24. This way if I browse to 192.168.0.1 t
Yes there is an IP Address configured on the modem however it is only connected
to the PPPoE Ethernet interface so this network cannot be configured
simultaneously. Thats why I will probably connect up another Ethernet DMZ with
the network configured on it.
Thanks
Mike
On 14/08/2012, at 1:31 PM
Mike,
There is no official way to do this.
Are you certain the DSL modem stats can't be reached via some address (possibly
private) when in bridge mode ?
This is old data, but you get the idea:
http://www.dslzoneuk.net/adsl_line_stats.php
Lonnie
On Aug 13, 2012, at 8:54 PM, Michael Knill wro
Just wondering:
Is there any way to have both the PPPoE and its associated Ethx interface both
activated at the same time with separate IP Addresses.
The reason is that I am using a DSL modem in bridge mode that I would like to
view the stats on.
If this cant work then I will just use a third DM
Gosh how embarrassing. I was sure I put the correct password in. Time for beer
I think.
Sorry for the post.
Mike
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
thr
Am 13.07.2012 um 09:26 schrieb Michael Knill:
> Well I have just spent all afternoon trying to get my PPPoE working on my
> Alix box to no avail. Just getting No pppoe-status available and this in the
> syslog:
>
> Jan 1 11:04:20 Home-UCLink daemon.debug pppd[246]: Send PPPOE Discovery V1T1
Well I have just spent all afternoon trying to get my PPPoE working on my Alix
box to no avail. Just getting No pppoe-status available and this in the syslog:
Jan 1 11:04:20 Home-UCLink daemon.debug pppd[246]: Send PPPOE Discovery V1T1
PADI session 0x0 length 12
Jan 1 11:04:20 Home-UCLink dae
Agreed. The scripts are a mess, and someone should file a bug and
(preferably) submit fixes. David is pretty good about getting new
releases out.
The scripts are part of rp-pppoe, I believe, and not pppd. Also, we
install the pppoe scripts pretty much unmodified (for better or worse).
-Phil
Yes, it is the standard symlink. The issue is the redefinition of
$CONFIG for the pppoe scripts (/usr/sbin/pppoe-start, etc).
The default config location for these scripts is /etc/ppp/pppoe.conf
(doesn't matter if it is a symlink or not).
The network init script writes the values out to the co
Terry Markovich wrote:
> I have found an error in the
> /trunk/target/generic/target_skeleton/etc/init.d/network script
> regarding PPPoE.
>
> The script writes to /tmp/etc/ppp/pppoe.conf
>
> CONFIG=\"/etc/ppp\"
> CF_BASE=\"pppoe.conf\"
>
> The problem is that $CONFIG is used all over the pppoe-sta
I have found an error in the
/trunk/target/generic/target_skeleton/etc/init.d/network script
regarding PPPoE.
The script writes to /tmp/etc/ppp/pppoe.conf
CONFIG=\"/etc/ppp\"
CF_BASE=\"pppoe.conf\"
The problem is that $CONFIG is used all over the pppoe-start and
pppoe-status scripts, so $CONFIG
Dominko Vrljic wrote:
>
>
> */"Darrick Hartman (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
>
> Dominko Vrljic wrote:
> > Darrick,
> > script pppoe-connect checks pppoe connection and new script is
> not if
> > necessary. But script pppoe-start terminate pppoe-connect if first
>
"Darrick Hartman (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dominko Vrljic wrote:
> Darrick,
> script pppoe-connect checks pppoe connection and new script is not if
> necessary. But script pppoe-start terminate pppoe-connect if first
> attempt does not succeed.
> I comment out lines 191 and 194 in fil
Dominko Vrljic wrote:
> Darrick,
> script pppoe-connect checks pppoe connection and new script is not if
> necessary. But script pppoe-start terminate pppoe-connect if first
> attempt does not succeed.
> I comment out lines 191 and 194 in file pppoe-start:
> #kill $CONNECT_PID > /dev/null 2>&1
>
Dominko Vrljic wrote:
> > Guy,
> > I have several astlinux box in production with pppoe. This is
> changes I
> > made in version 0.4.8:
> > In file /usr/sbin/pppoe-status replace line 64 with
> > for i in /var/run/ppp*.pid ; do
> >
> > In file file /usr/sbin/p
Guy Neale wrote:
> Hi Dominko
>
> Thanks a million, works a treat. Great idea with crontab
>
> Regards Guy
> / /
>
> /Dominko Vrljic wrote:/
>
> Guy,
> I have several astlinux box in production with pppoe. This is changes I
> made in version 0.4.8:
> In file /usr/sbin/pppoe-status replace li
>
> Regards Guy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Darrick Hartman (lists)
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2007 12:04 AM
> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] PPPoE
>
&
ppd" "$PIDFILE.pppoe" "$PIDFILE.start"
fi
Regards Guy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Darrick Hartman (lists)
Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2007 12:04 AM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] PPP
Guy Neale wrote:
> Hi Dominko
>
> Thanks a million, works a treat. Great idea with crontab
>
> Regards Guy
> / /
>
> /Dominko Vrljic wrote:/
>
> Guy,
> I have several astlinux box in production with pppoe. This is changes I
> made in version 0.4.8:
> In file /usr/sbin/pppoe-status replace line
lhofner
Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2007 2:42 AM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] PPPoE
On Nov 20, 2007 6:39 AM, Michael Knill
wrote:
> YAY I have PPPoE working.
>
> Thanks Darrick.
>
> PS can anyone please tell me why I get this on bootup even though it
w
netd.pid
./var/run/sshd.pid
./var/run/dnsmasq.pid
./var/run/ppp0.pid
Regards Guy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kristian Kielhofner
Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2007 2:42 AM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] PPPoE
On N
/ppp0.pid
Regards Guy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kristian Kielhofner
Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2007 2:42 AM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] PPPoE
On Nov 20, 2007 6:39 AM, Michael Knill
<[EMAIL PROTECT
Could this be why my connection is dropping out and not re-establishing?
Regards
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kristian
Kielhofner
Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2007 2:42 AM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users
On Nov 20, 2007 6:39 AM, Michael Knill
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> YAY I have PPPoE working.
>
> Thanks Darrick.
>
> PS can anyone please tell me why I get this on bootup even though it works?
>
> Attempting to bring up PPPoE on eth2
> This could take some time...
> .NET: Registered protocol famil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 November 2007 3:40 PM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] PPPoE
Oh no! That typo has been dogging me for years! Good spot Darrick!
On 11/13/07
Oh no! That typo has been dogging me for years! Good spot Darrick!
On 11/13/07, Darrick Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Knill wrote:
>
>
>
> > ##make sure to let me know about it.
> > PPPOEUSER="my username"
> > PPPOEPASS="my password"
>
> OOOPS read the next variable...
>
> > PPOEIF
Michael Knill wrote:
> ##make sure to let me know about it.
> PPPOEUSER="my username"
> PPPOEPASS="my password"
OOOPS read the next variable...
> PPOEIF="eth2"
This should be PPPOEIF="eth2"
--
Darrick Hartman
DJH Solutions, LLC
http://www.djhsolutions.com
--
Hi all
I just want to make sure I am actually doing this right cause its not
working:
I have a DSL modem which I am setting to bridge mode (or RFC1483 Bridge
Mode?). I have my ASTLinux box (net4801) connected to the modem's ethernet
on eth2 as a PPoE client with rc.conf as follows. I am running 0
37 matches
Mail list logo
