Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH RFC v3 3/3] ath9k: parse the device configuration from an OF node

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 01:38:43AM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Christian Lamparter > wrote: > > I've added lede-dev and Luis since this is relevant for them. > > Maybe between the sysloadfw.sh and owl-loader, there's another > >

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: fix NULL-deref in hw_per_calibration() for ar9002

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 12:54 PM, John W. Linville linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote: Is there any hope for getting a more complete fix from the ath9k guys in short order? Wait, who are the ath9k folks now exactly ? Luis ___ ath9k-devel mailing list

Re: [ath9k-devel] 3.14 Regression, kernel panic when suspend, looks ath9k / wireless related

A patch has been sent to stable that fixes this, the patch is already upstream fortunately. Luis ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Re: [ath9k-devel] 3.14 Regression, kernel panic when suspend, looks ath9k / wireless related

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Michael Leun lkml20140...@newton.leun.net wrote: 2a901468c221e778af52603e006a53 Odd -- its unclear how you ended up with this bisect given that REGULATORY_COUNTRY_IE_IGNORE is not set for any driver currently. To see this you can try: mcgrof@ergon

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k not connecting to one particular network..

Adding linux-wireless, not sure if many people read this list. Luis On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Jouni Malinen jo...@qca.qualcomm.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:25:20AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: Ok, added to the bugzilla. I'm still in the condo, but I'm leaving soon and need

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k : Fix ieee80211 work while going to suspend

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:13:42AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:33:31PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: OK how about this for stable for now: diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/link.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/link.c index 39c84ec..7fdac6c

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k : Fix ieee80211 work while going to suspend

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:42:20PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 02:03:08PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/link.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/link.c @@ -158,7 +158,8 @@ void ath_start_rx_poll(struct ath_softc *sc

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k : Fix ieee80211 work while going to suspend

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:13:41PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: Any comments from the ath9k folks? On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:38:14PM -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote: During suspend below warning is seen when ath9k is active. Attached patch fixes the warning for me. Tested to work across

Re: [ath9k-devel] [Announce] open ath9k_htc firmware

Many thanks to Adrian for his hard work on all this and to everyone else who volunteered to help make this happen, including the understanding by our management at QCA and even Tensilica requires some handsome applause for their commitment, understanding on letting us get this out. We now have a

Re: [ath9k-devel] Allow over-riding regdomain in NIC when CFG80211_CERTIFICATION_ONUS is enabled?

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote: There are out-of-tree patches for ath9k (at least) that allow overriding the eeprom reg domain via a module option. Any chance something like that could make it upstream if it were dependent on

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ath9k: RX timestamp is reported at end of frame

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Thomas Pedersen tho...@cozybit.com wrote: Tested with AR9280. Signed-off-by: Thomas Pedersen tho...@cozybit.com --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] qca-swiss-army-knife: Add a tool to dump EEPROM

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Sujith Manoharan c_man...@qca.qualcomm.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Sujith Manoharan c_man...@qca.qualcomm.com Wow, awesome, applied and pushed, thanks! Luis ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] qca-swiss-army-knife: Add a tool to dump EEPROM

Oh and as for the other stuff please feel free to send patches as I already merged and pushed Sujith's patch. git://github.com/mcgrof/qca-swiss-army-knife.git Luis ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] qca-swiss-army-knife: Add a tool to dump EEPROM

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Is a commit to also do EEPROM writes likely to be accepted into qca-swiss-army-knife.git? EEPROM writing means you can modify a compliant card to be not compliant. For the kernel we now have things like

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] qca-swiss-army-knife: Add a tool to dump EEPROM

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Peter Stuge wrote: Is a commit to also do EEPROM writes likely to be accepted into qca-swiss-army-knife.git? EEPROM writing means you can modify a compliant card to be not compliant. Yes, and it also means you can

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k : stability issue in a noisy environment

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:12:38PM +0800, Hewitt Lee wrote: Hi All, This patch unlink a skb comes from ath_tx_form_aggr() which is freed at ath_tx_get_buffer() when tx buffers are full. Please kindly review it. Please see:

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Add files to ATHEROS_DEPS.

On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Sujith Manoharan c_man...@qca.qualcomm.com wrote: Peter Stuge wrote: What repository do these patches apply to? https://github.com/mcgrof/initvals-tool (On a side note IMO the first commit message line looks much nicer without the full stop on the end.)

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 2/4] ath9k: set PHYRADAR in RX filter when on DFS channel

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:23:58PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2012-04-23 11:12 AM, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: On 22.04.2012 22:00, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2012-04-22 9:50 PM, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: From: Zefir Kurtisizefir.kurt...@neratec.com Signed-off-by: Zefir

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ath9k: Fix kernel panic in AR2427 in AP mode

On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 09:19:13PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: Cc: sta...@kernel.org For future reference please use from now on sta...@vger.kernel.org instead of the older one [1]. [1] http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/stable-status-01-2012.html Luis

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH wireless-next] ath: Convert ath_dbg(bar, ATH_DBG_FOO, to ath_dbg(bar, FOO

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Joe Perches j...@perches.com wrote: Add ATH_DBG_ to macros to shorten the uses and reduce the line count. Coalesce ath_dbg formats. Add missing spaces to coalesced formats. Add missing newline terminations to ath_dbg formats. Align ath_dbg arguments where

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH wireless-next] ath: Convert ath_dbg(bar, ATH_DBG_FOO, to ath_dbg(bar, FOO

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Joe Perches j...@perches.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 15:00 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Joe Perches j...@perches.com wrote: Add ATH_DBG_ to macros to shorten the uses and reduce the line count. Coalesce ath_dbg

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: Support RSN Mesh

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Thomas Pedersen tho...@cozybit.com wrote: From: Chun-Yeow Yeoh yeohchuny...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Chun-Yeow Yeoh yeohchuny...@gmail.com Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@qca.qualcomm.com Luis ___ ath9k-devel

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ath9k: integrate initial DFS module

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote: On 11/15/2011 04:24 PM, Mohammed Shafi wrote: Hi Zefir, just few doubt, sorry for the late reply On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote: This patch integrates the DFS

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 0/2] ath9k: DFS radar detection

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:37 AM, John W. Linville linvi...@tuxdriver.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 05:34:02PM +0100, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: This patch series proposes DFS radar pulse detection for ath9k. The first patch adds a new DFS module, the second turns those knobs to enable the HW

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 5/6] ath9k: enable DFS pulse detection

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Just FYI, that's what I'm likely to do for FreeBSD 10 (as I just don't have time to try and make all the required regulatory changes before the upcoming 9.0 release.) Ie: * DFS station mode (net80211) is going to be

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 5/6] ath9k: enable DFS pulse detection

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez rodri...@qca.qualcomm.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Christian Lamparter chunk...@googlemail.com wrote: Is this something about politics/laws I don't know about [I'm just curious, because I don't really buy testing here, since

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 5/6] ath9k: enable DFS pulse detection

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote: As said above, disabling a driver's capability through a Kconfig option should be enough (one ifdef per driver). OK cool. Since regulatory compliance and open source by principle form a gray-zone combination [2],

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 5/6] ath9k: enable DFS pulse detection

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote: On 06.10.2011 22:41, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Zefir Kurtisizefir.kurt...@neratec.com   wrote: As said above, disabling a driver's capability through a Kconfig option should be enough

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 4/6] ath9k: add DFS build parameter

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote: On 2011-10-04 11:55 AM, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: On 10/03/2011 08:26 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:  On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Zefir Kurtisizefir.kurt...@neratec.com  wrote:  Signed-off-by: Zefir Kurtisizefir.kurt

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 5/6] ath9k: enable DFS pulse detection

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote: On 10/03/2011 08:27 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com ---  drivers/net/wireless

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 5/6] ath9k: enable DFS pulse detection

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Christian Lamparter chunk...@googlemail.com wrote: On Monday, October 03, 2011 09:31:12 PM Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Christian Lamparter chunk...@googlemail.com wrote: On Monday, October 03, 2011 08:27:39 PM Luis R. Rodriguez

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 5/6] ath9k: enable DFS pulse detection

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Also whilst I'm at it, SPECTRUM_MANAGEMENT is a very broad flag to set. For example: you may not want to do DFS on the AR5416 NICs because (as documented in the open hal and earlier ath9k bits) there isn't support for

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 5/6] ath9k: enable DFS pulse detection

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: The port of the fusion radar detection module didn't end up being all that big. Adrian, please keep terms like fusion codebase out of public lists. I think that's silly. But you already knew

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 5/6] ath9k: enable DFS pulse detection

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com ---  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c |   12  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 4/6] ath9k: add DFS build parameter

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com ---  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/Kconfig  |    7 +++  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/Makefile |    2 ++  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 1/6] ath9k: add DFS statistics to debugfs

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com ---  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c |   51  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.h |   29 ++  2

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 2/6] ath9k: add DFS debug flag

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com ---  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath.h |   34 ++  1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 6/6] ath9k: handle pulse data reported by DFS HW

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote: Note: calculation of mactime had to be shifted before ath9k_rx_skb_preprocess() since it is used to time-stamp the radar pulse. Do this in a separate patch and provide a valid commit log here of what the addition

Re: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 5/6] ath9k: enable DFS pulse detection

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Christian Lamparter chunk...@googlemail.com wrote: On Monday, October 03, 2011 08:27:39 PM Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurt...@neratec.com

Re: [ath9k-devel] 'Superchannel'?

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 25 August 2011 15:43, Joe Semler josef.sem...@gmail.com wrote: Hy guys, I'm following this discussion according regulatory, frequency and power limitation now for a while in this forum. Oc it's a good policy to have a

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: make driver usable standalone

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote: When ath9k is the only wireless driver included in the build WIRELESS_EXT configuration option becomes undefined. Because of that driver becomes essentially unusable as you can't actually connect to any WiFi network. By

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: add module option for disabling 11n functionality

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote: On 06/28/2011 12:46 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: Some wireless base stations implement 802.11n mode in ways that open-source drivers cannot handle properly, resulting in very unstable connections. This patch

Re: [ath9k-devel] PROBLEM: No config definition for ATHEROS_AR71XX

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 08:03:54AM -0700, Sarah Nadi wrote: #ifdef CONFIG_ATHEROS_AR71XX int ath_ahb_init(void); void ath_ahb_exit(void); #else static inline int ath_ahb_init(void) { return 0; }; static inline void ath_ahb_exit(void) {}; #endif This was present in openwrt tree, Gabor has

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 0/8] ath9k_htc patches

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Sujith m.suj...@gmail.com wrote: The required firmware version is now 1.3 and the new firmware will be uploaded to http://wireless.kernel.org/download/htc_fw/ once Luis comes out of his slumber. *Yawn* OK its up. Luis

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 0/8] ath9k_htc patches

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Keith Berkoben berko...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! When following this process (it has a couple steps...), is it generally a true statement that changes from wireless-testing-wireless-next--net-next--etc. are usually pushed by Merges, or should I also be

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ath9k_htc: Dump base eeprom header for UB91/94/95

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:54:17AM -0700, Sujith wrote: Christian Lamparter wrote: Do you really think that everyone will be happy to recompile their stripped heavily customised embedded kernels/or compat-wireless just to enable DEBUG and waste precious resources? Even with a PC, this

Re: [ath9k-devel] [Fwd: Re: Sparklan WPEA-121N AR9382 168c:abcd]

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:43:46AM -0700, Michael Renzmann wrote: My dell desktop has PCI-E-16 slot and PCI-E1 slot. I use mini-PCI-E1 to PCI-E1 adapter card so that Sparklan ar9390 card can work in Dell desktop installed with Slackware 13.1 and updated kernel 2.6.37. 1. When I plug in

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 00/40] ath9k_htc AP mode

Sexy On Apr 12, 2011 10:49 PM, Sujith m.suj...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This patch series adds AP mode for ath9k_htc. New firmware is required, which will be submitted to linux-firmware. This has been languishing for quite some time internally, at least wider testing/review would happen if

Re: [ath9k-devel] Ath9k: changing regulatory domain

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:33:05AM -0700, Adrien Decostre wrote: Hello all, I am quite new to the ath9k driver and I am currently trying to use this driver for an access point on the 5GHz band. The problem is that my card has a regulation domain set to WORA_WORLD 0x6A which prevents the

Re: [ath9k-devel] Regulatory domain

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 03:49:30AM -0700, Baldomero Coll wrote: Luis, Peter, I don't want to break any rule. I'm only interested in working on the 5735000 KHz - 5835000 band (with its restrictions), but It seems that my wireless card doesn't follow the regulatory domain. Based on the

Re: [ath9k-devel] Regulatory domain

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: So ultimately with Atheros cards you should not have to muck with anything, Except fixing invalid information on cards. As I noted, regulatory agencies have never address this, or simply assume

Re: [ath9k-devel] Regulatory domain

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:59:40AM -0700, Peter Stuge wrote: Baldomero Coll wrote: Is there a way of overriding regulatory domain No. and being able to configure any channel in IBSS mode with no restriciton in the transmission power The only option would be to reprogram the reg

Re: [ath9k-devel] Regulatory domain

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: Need to make that utility. Blindly overwriting EEPROMs is a bad idea, Such a utility must do the right thing of course! :) Only change the right bits, in the right way. I haven't looked yet but I

Re: [ath9k-devel] solaris 10

On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 05:52:12PM -0800, fredlev-austin wrote: Where can i download a RPM for ath9k for solais 10 with a Dlink DWA-552 pci card? fred Solaris can make use of ath9k driver code as it is ISC licensed, they would just need to take the code from ath9k, ath9k_hw, ath, and port it

Re: [ath9k-devel] Is AR9280 stable with recent hostapd and ath9k?

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Mohammed Shafi shafi.at...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:27 PM, crocket crockabisc...@gmail.com wrote: I've started reading this list recently. There are some people who say AR9280 doesn't work with hostapd or ath9k. Some said he or she had a good

Re: [ath9k-devel] Is AR9280 stable with recent hostapd and ath9k?

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:27 PM, crocket crockabisc...@gmail.com wrote: What about https://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/2011-February/005157.html This is a FreeBSD issue, not Linux issue, see: The problem is RX'ing packets on the FreeBSD station

Re: [ath9k-devel] What would be the best chipset for wireless router/AP on linux?

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:54 PM, crocket crockabisc...@gmail.com wrote: I am a newbie in wireless area, so I don't understand well what you guys talk about. I read all messages about regulatory domain. Do those messages imply that I can't use 5Ghz frequencies in AP mode with ath9k and

Re: [ath9k-devel] What would be the best chipset for wireless router/AP on linux?

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: crocket wrote: Do those messages imply that I can't use 5Ghz frequencies in AP mode with ath9k and AR9280? Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: this varies by card. To clarify further that's the card itself, and not the chipset

Re: [ath9k-devel] What would be the best chipset for wireless router/AP on linux?

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Completely agreed. I understand and agree that drivers can and should not deal with changing the reg domain of cards. But I don't see a reason for a third party to develop a tool that allows the changes. That would make it

Re: [ath9k-devel] What would be the best chipset for wireless router/AP on linux?

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:28 AM, David Willmore davidwillm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@gmail.com wrote: If we want proper upstream drivers we essentially want to help vendors with their considerations, and as such we need to respect regulatory

Re: [ath9k-devel] DMA issues with ar9280 cards

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:55:35AM -0800, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: Hi, I have some issues using any of my AR9280 cards, identified as: - Ubiquiti SR71E [ 172.321483] ieee80211 phy0: Atheros AR9280 Rev:2 mem=0xf976, irq=11 - Sparklan WPEA-110N [ 58.456404] ieee80211 phy0: Atheros

Re: [ath9k-devel] What would be the best chipset for wireless router/AP on linux?

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 06:20:27AM -0800, crocket wrote: ath9k supports AP mode for all chipsets, but according to people evidences, AP mode support for AR5xxx chipsets ceases to work several minutes after the chipsets are turned into AP mode. Below is the amazon review of AR9280.(

Re: [ath9k-devel] Regulatory domains

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Nothing's stopping someone from forking ath9k (for example) and creating ath9k-without-regulatory-enforcement. :-) That only will discourage companies doing the right thing from doing it. We worked hard at putting in place

Re: [ath9k-devel] Regulatory domains

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:40:14PM -0800, Peter Stuge wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: Unfortunately due to regulatory considerations which have also come under recent stress [4] we cannot feature-wise let users overwrite their own EEPROM, even if they know better. I think this is good

Re: [ath9k-devel] What chipsets does ath9k support AP mode for?

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:52:49AM -0800, Sujith wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 1:15 AM, crocket crockabisc...@gmail.com wrote: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k says Features and modes of operation All of these modes of operation are supported

Re: [ath9k-devel] What chipsets does ath9k support AP mode for?

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 1:15 AM, crocket crockabisc...@gmail.com wrote: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k says Features and modes of operation All of these modes of operation are supported and should work on all ath9k cards. Modes of operation * Station Mode * AP Mode *

Re: [ath9k-devel] Should we remove all the virtual wiphy code from ath9k?

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:27:01AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote: Seems I saw a note a long time ago about virtual wiphy being removed sometime soon. Should we go ahead and remove it? It doesn't seem useful to me (virtual interfaces appear to work much better), and it would likely simplify the

Re: [ath9k-devel] UNDERRUN / PHY ERR in /sys/kernel/debug/ath9k/phy0/recv

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Bernhard Walle wa...@corscience.de wrote: Hello ath9k experts, can somebody explain what [...]            PHY ERR :      96196 [...]           UNDERRUN :      96196 [...] in /sys/kernel/debug/ath9k/phy0/recv actually means. Is that normal, or a hardware

Re: [ath9k-devel] RIFS Support

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 08:50:46AM -0800, Galen wrote: On Jan 6, 2011, at 1:21 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Galen gal...@zinkconsulting.com wrote: Last I checked, RIFS support was not implemented in ath9k. Is the lack of support due to mac80211

Re: [ath9k-devel] RIFS Support

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:31:18AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: You're on point with what we will be adding and what we would need help with to get upstream, resource wise. The best I can recommend is that you please post what you intend to work on in the wiki TODO list for ath9k: http

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: Keep track of stations for debugfs.

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:17:32PM -0800, Ben Greear wrote: On 01/06/2011 06:49 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 06:45:33PM -0800, Ben Greear wrote: On 01/06/2011 06:30 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:46 PM,gree...@candelatech.com wrote

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: Keep track of stations for debugfs.

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 07:36:07AM -0800, Peter Stuge wrote: Ben Greear wrote: but at least other clueless users would not go over stable limit you have found. I think it's very likely that the problems I find are general issues that are just much easier to hit with lots of stations.

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ath9k: Decrease skb size to fit into one page.

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:34:52AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote: On 01/07/2011 02:58 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 16:46 -0800, gree...@candelatech.com wrote: From: Ben Greeargree...@candelatech.com Patch is from Eric Dumazet, as described here:

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] ath9k: Keep track of stations for debugfs.

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:49:12PM -0800, gree...@candelatech.com wrote: From: Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com The stations hold the ath_node, which holds the tid and other xmit logic structures. In order to debug stuck xmit logic, we need a way to print out the tid state for the

Re: [ath9k-devel] Extended 5 GHz / 802.11j Channels

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 09:23:57AM -0800, Galen wrote: At the moment, it seems that ath9k + mac80211 only supports channels 36-64; 100-140; 149-165. Obviously, available channels (and on what basis) are determined based on various regulatory settings in your particular configuration.

Re: [ath9k-devel] RIFS Support

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:39:25AM -0800, Daniel Halperin wrote: On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez lrodrig...@atheros.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:31:18AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: Note that there is a section dedicated to AR9003 family alone: http

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: Keep track of stations for debugfs.

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:01:01PM -0800, Luis Rodriguez wrote: On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 07:36:07AM -0800, Peter Stuge wrote: Ben Greear wrote: but at least other clueless users would not go over stable limit you have found. I think it's very likely that the problems I find are

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: Keep track of stations for debugfs.

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:25:31PM -0800, Luis Rodriguez wrote: On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:01:01PM -0800, Luis Rodriguez wrote: On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 07:36:07AM -0800, Peter Stuge wrote: Ben Greear wrote: but at least other clueless users would not go over stable limit you have

Re: [ath9k-devel] Extensive AR9280 Documentation

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Daniel Halperin dhalp...@cs.washington.edu wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Daniel Halperin wrote: Give and take. Want sit on IP go ahead, people will route around to find useful solutions. I'm really not going to

Re: [ath9k-devel] RIFS Support

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Galen gal...@zinkconsulting.com wrote: Last I checked, RIFS support was not implemented in ath9k. Is the lack of support due to mac80211 limitations, or due to ath9k limitations? RIFS support can be enabled for AR9003 but there has been no interest for it as its

Re: [ath9k-devel] Extensive AR9280 Documentation

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 01:45:48PM -0800, Peter Stuge wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: It helps if the community acknowledges efforts and tries to work with companies who are putting good effort on things. I would love to ack effort if I had experienced some. I've touched on a plethora

Re: [ath9k-devel] Extensive AR9280 Documentation

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote: On 01/06/2011 02:17 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: so it takes time. In the meantime we do enable active developers to work with engineers through our private internal list but since ath9k is Actively maintained

Re: [ath9k-devel] [ath9k] skbuff alloc of size 3872 failed

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote: Le jeudi 06 janvier 2011 à 16:05 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez a écrit : Eric, also please make sure you read and understand what using a SOB means: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f

Re: [ath9k-devel] [ath9k] skbuff alloc of size 3872 failed

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote: On 12/22/2010 11:22 AM, Matt Turner wrote: With the ath9k driver, I get skbuff alloc of size 3872 failed I hit this again today after not using wireless for quite sometime. It looks like it was originally reported

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ath9k: Decrease skb size to fit into one page.

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:46 PM, gree...@candelatech.com wrote: From: Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com Patch is from Eric Dumazet, as described here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104271/ Reported-by: Michael Guntsche m...@it-loops.com Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ath9k: Decrease skb size to fit into one page.

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote: Le vendredi 07 janvier 2011 à 02:04 +0100, Christian Lamparter a écrit : On Friday 07 January 2011 01:46:03 gree...@candelatech.com wrote: From: Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com Patch is from Eric Dumazet, as

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ath9k: Keep track of stations for debugfs.

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:46 PM, gree...@candelatech.com wrote: +#define ATH9K_MAX_STATIONS 1024 How about making this a Kconfig with a default to a value of the known (by you) max workable number of STAs that one can use on ath9k, which is modifiable to other values by power of two up to 1024.

Re: [ath9k-devel] [ath9k] skbuff alloc of size 3872 failed

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote: With the ath9k driver, I get skbuff alloc of size 3872 failed I hit this again today after not using wireless for quite sometime. It looks like it was originally reported against 2.6.35-rc1. Eric Dumazet provided a patch

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/4] initvals: update AR9003 initvals based on latest from Atheros

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 05:30:31AM -0800, Felix Fietkau wrote: Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org Hey Felix, thanks a lot. These didn't apply though, do you have this as your top patch from upstream? commit f1379b3189509355e29eed3b4bb110ea9829a555 Author: Luis R. Rodriguez lrodrig

Re: [ath9k-devel] Build Error Report

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:47:19PM -0800, Masahiro Inoue wrote: Hello, The build error occurs by compat-wireless-2010-12-12. My kernel is 2.6.27. CC [M] /home/miyabi/test/compat-wireless/compat-wireless-2010-12-12/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/pci.o

Re: [ath9k-devel] Build Error Report

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Masahiro Inoue miyabi.-.in...@nifty.com wrote: Mr. Luis Thank you for the reply. Like you just need PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_ES defined added via 322162a7 on v2.6.29-rc1~181^2~19.  Can you try this simple patch? --- include/linux/compat-2.6.29.h.orig        

Re: [ath9k-devel] .36 ath9k patches for .35-longterm

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote: I sent this to the athk9 maintainers earlier, but it looks like Atheros' mailserver doesn't like my mailserver and I got a bounce. Resending to the lists. Heh, odd. -Andi - Forwarded message from Andi Kleen

Re: [ath9k-devel] Problems with ath9k on IXP400, using Linux 2.6.35.8 and compat-wireless-2010-12-07

On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 11:48:15PM -0800, Mohammed Shafi wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:14 AM, B. James Phillippe bryan...@comcast.net wrote: Hi All, I'm new to this list and a bit new to using this project; hopefully I'm not doing something obviously stupid. :) I have an ARM-based

Re: [ath9k-devel] .36 ath9k patches for .35-longterm

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:22:34AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 07:56:37AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote: I sent this to the athk9 maintainers earlier, but it looks like Atheros' mailserver doesn't

Re: [ath9k-devel] Country code setting issue

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: My preference is to automate this and not let the user be involved and expand the way we propagate location learning information. Meanwhile, what is needed is a simple tool to reconfigure cards to have

Re: [ath9k-devel] Country code setting issue

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: some other countries like Japan also do not allow country selection. As a matter of fact US and JP are the only ones I am aware of that have this explicit restriction. Aha! Well, there are lots

Re: [ath9k-devel] Country code setting issue

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: I have considered opening up a tool that lets you do this if we can determine your country is not US or JP by using GeoClue. I already had some initial glue code with geoclue for iw Great idea

Re: [ath9k-devel] Country code setting issue

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Alexander Simon simon_a...@web.de wrote: No. ath9k cards always respect the regulatory domain programmed into the hardware's EEPROM, the APIs for users only let the user help compliance further, never to allow more channels. Which is a really stupid behaviour

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 0/4] ath: logging message conversion

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:05:28AM -0800, John W. Linville wrote: On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:12:34PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: ath_print is misleading as it's only used with CONFIG_ATH_DEBUG. Add and use the more normal subsystem_printk and subsystem_level printk equivalents. (ath_printk

Re: [ath9k-devel] Script to crash ath9k with DMA errors.

On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 09:18:50PM -0800, Ben Greear wrote: On 12/04/2010 06:41 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2010-12-03 9:14 AM, Ben Greear wrote: On 12/01/2010 03:22 PM, Ben Greear wrote: On 11/29/2010 04:44 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:28:51PM -0800, Ben Greear

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >