>>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes:
> Uwe Brauer writes:
> Hi Uwe,
>> Here is a patch, this time completely done with hg, please tell me
>> whether this format is ok, if not I give hg up for providing patches
> It is technically ok, and I've
Uwe Brauer writes:
Hi Uwe,
> Here is a patch, this time completely done with hg, please tell me
> whether this format is ok, if not I give hg up for providing patches
It is technically ok, and I've committed it. However, I had to rework
some parts afterwards (see below). I
>>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes:
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> Subject: [PATCH] Add informations about prettify and semi WYSIWYG
sigh
Here is a patch, this time completely done with hg, please tell me
whether this format is ok, if not I give hg up for
Uwe Brauer writes:
> Subject: [PATCH] Add informations about prettify and semi WYSIWYG
"information" is already plural.
> * doc/auctex.texi (Display): Repair some markup
> questions. Add sentences about
> prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point. Add paragaph about Semi WYSIWYG.
Here is the patch, finally done with git since in hg I cannot fix the
commit message to Emacs/auctex standard when rebasing.
>From 4bbb2980366078c29b174a65ce39ce911e13330e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Uwe Brauer
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 15:41:29 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add
Uwe Brauer writes:
> > I do as many local commits as necessary. If it takes longer to
> > finish my work, I "git pull --rebase" so that my commits stay on
> > top. When I’m done, I do "git rebase -i" and squash my commits
> > into one. This is also the time I
> Uwe Brauer writes:
> I do as many local commits as necessary. If it takes longer to finish
> my work, I "git pull --rebase" so that my commits stay on top. When I’m
> done, I do "git rebase -i" and squash my commits into one. This is also
> the time I
Uwe Brauer writes:
>> Oh, and "Correct incorrect filling" is not a good commit message
>> for a patch against auctex. That's part of the history in your
>> repository while creating the final patch. We want just the very
>> final, perfectly shaped end result.
> Uwe Brauer writes:
> Hi Uwe,
> Am I right that I can ignore this patch since your other two mails with
> questions regarding your other patch and my suggestions are older than
> this mail?
Yes please.
> Looks like that's not intended. ;-)
> Oh, and
Uwe Brauer writes:
Hi Uwe,
> This is a real git patch, not one from hg, the commit message is somehow
> improved. Still don't understand why this step is necessary.
Am I right that I can ignore this patch since your other two mails with
questions regarding your other patch and
10 matches
Mail list logo