Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? It seems that they have been investigating SARS viruses since 2002, so its not one year. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621683/#p621683 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? You are close, but not very close.According to the data, The patients died of their underlying disease in a coincidental time with the vaccination. They were very seriously ill patients with many underlying diseases.If the elderly, or people with severe pre-existing

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? You are close, but not very close.According to the data, The patients died of their underlying disease in a coincidental time with the vaccination. They were very seriously ill patients with many underlying diseases.If the elderly, or people with severe pre-existing

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? You are close, but not very close.According to the data, The patients died of their underlying disease in a coincidental time with the vaccination. They were very seriously ill patients with many underlying diseases.If the elderly, or people with severe pre-existing

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? But as far as I'm concerned there's a slight chance each vaccine you take can kill you. The older you are, the higher the risk. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621638/#p621638 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @11 I just posted what I said. I didn't say that I believe it or not, but yes, my sentence was kinda incorrect=, because I said that many people died because of Pfizer, not that I read that many people died because of Pfizer. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Btw, I liked 91's intentional throwing of an implicit message in the form of a joke to kick the butts of those conspiracy theory whiners For your information, the op has died after taking his shot yesterday.I mean, that's what he's told me some seconds ago. URL

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @97, Yeah, point taken. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621603/#p621603 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @1Fuck it bruh, why not take both!  Just violently thrust one into each arm while roaring a mighty battle cry, and see which one kicks the most COVID ass  amiright?  Worst case scenario, you end up with blood which can explosively destroy all corona variants instantly

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @1Fuck it man, why not take both!  Just violently thrust one into each arm while roaring a mighty battle cry, and see which one kicks the most COVID ass  amiright?  Worst case scenario, you end up with blood which can explosively destroy all corona variants instantly

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @1Fuck it man, why not take both!  Just violently thrust one into each arm while roaring a mighty battle cry, and see which one kicks the most COVID ass  amiright?  Worst case scenario, you end up with blood which can explosively destroy all corona variants instantly

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @1Fuck it man, why not take both!  Just jam one in each arm while roaring a battle cry, and see which one kicks the most COVID ass  amiright?  Worst case scenario, you end up with blood which can explosively destroy all corona variants instantly on contact with skin

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @1Fuck it man, why not take both!  Just jam one in each arm while roaring a battle cry, and see which one kicks the most COVID ass  amiright?  Worst case scenario, you end up with blood which can explosively destroy all corona variants instantly on contact with skin

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @1Fuck it man, just take both one in each arm, and see which one kicks the most COVID ass  amiright?  Worst case scenario, you end up with blood which can destroy all corona variants instantly on contact with skin or ingested!Note to idiots: Never do this.P.S. Ghost

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? 95, I really see no point in arguing with you, as you keep repeating the same points over and over. As I said about a thousand times before, I never claimed to be an expert in this field, and you can't ever proove I did, so drop that. And congrats to you for reducing

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @94, Nice way of criticizing me while simultaneously completely failing to recognize your own faults and failures. And yes, your "advanced degree" is completely meaningless in this discussion. The skills you may have attained during the degree can also be at

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @94, Nice way of criticizing me while simultaneously completely failing to recognize your own faults and failures. And yes, your "advanced degree" is completely meaningless in this discussion. The skills you may have attained during the degree can also be at

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @94, Nice way of criticizing me while simultaneously completely failing to recognize your own faults and failures. And yes, your "advanced degree" is completely meaningless in this discussion. The skills you may have attained during the degree can also be at

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Star fire, Ethin is still hot headed, as can be evidenced  by his posts. And no ethin, an advanced degree doesn't magically stop meaning anything if it isn't in biology, it just means you aren't an authority in that field. It doesn't also mean you lack other skills

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Star fire, Ethin is still hot headed, as can be evidenced  by his posts. And no ethin, an advanced degree doesn't magically stop meaning anything if it isn't in biology, it just means you aren't an authority in that field. It doesn't also mean you lack other skills

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @92Hell yeah. Also factor in that if I tell the world I'm joking, someone will think I'm being coerced by the nanites swarming through my blood stream. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621479/#p621479 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @91This is funny.  Until you realize that a not-insignificant number of people on here are going to take you seriously.  Then it's just depressing. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621473/#p621473 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? So I had my first dose of the Oxford vaccine today, and now my arm - near the injection site - seems to respond to fridge magnets. Is this normal?Also, when I walk past our router, there's a high pitched beeping sound and the internet drops out entirely, or redirects

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @82 I am not really sure, I've read studies where they said that the antibodies disappear but it could be very possible too that your theory is right. However the result is the same at the end, by the time we vaccinate new people, the old vaccines will be outdated

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Imho, we should all nope out of here, nothing's gonna come from this. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621339/#p621339 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Well, okay, I understand it.This should do it, if not, then I am seriously out.@Ghost, sent you a PM, thank you. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621333/#p621333 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @86, Oh, I'm not trying to fight with Ghost, just pointing out flaws that they refuse to acknowledge. If things heat back up in here, I'm outa here. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621318/#p621318 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? So, I see that Ghost is now calm. Please be calm, Ethin. We're now getting hot... Please resolve it with peace.re: Translation, I get it now. Guess I was going very harsh on you.This topic is now moving to a war, now, so it's departure time for me. URL: https

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @84, Uh... You should look in the mirror. I do know a little something about debate, actually. Considering that your the *only* person spewing your tripe, I'd shut up if I were you. Your tactics aren't gaining you *any* favor or making you look good at all. You were

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @84, Uh... I'm not going to even bother replying. You should look in the mirror, though. I do know a little something about debate, actually. Considering that your the *only* person spewing your tripe, I'd shut up if I were you. Your tactics aren't gaining you *any

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? OK Sorry  Ethin,  but  pointing  out the spelling mistake in the way is clearly  an attack. Any idiot with  a few neurons still alive in their brain can  very clearly   see that. And it is an ivasion tactic that shifts focus away from the actual argument. You are like

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Good point, 82.Well, I guess I was going harsh in my last post. My aim was not to bash Ghost, I was telling him about that spelling thing. I was tired last night, so I got annoyed on that translator thing , more the translator I use, it will hurt me, rather than

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Good point, 82.Well, I guess I was going harsh in my last post. My aim was not to bash Ghost, I was telling him about that spelling thing. I was tired last night, so I got annoyed on that translator thing , more the translator I use, it will hurt me, rather than

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @79, are you sure that the antibodies leaving/people getting reinfected thing isn't because of the variants? If so, I theorize that this may just become one of those things you have to do periodically -- go in every six-eight months or so to get a Covid shot. We do

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @79, are you sure that the antibodies leaving/people getting reinfected thing isn't because of the variants? If so, I theorize that this may just become one of those things you have to do periodically -- go in every six-eight months or so to get a Covidd shot. We do

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Okay, stopping in here real quick to say one thing, and one thing only.This argument appears to be over. The kicking of Ghost stops now.There were some bad arguments, and there was some less-than-charitable stuff said, but this is getting painfully close to personal

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Ghost's over Inflated ego is enough to fill up several ofThese12 foot inflatable giant beach balls URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621145/#p621145 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Ghost's over Inflated ego is enough to fill up several ofThese12 foot inflatable giant beach balls URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621145/#p621145 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Ghost's over Inflated ego is enough to fill up several of These 12 foot inflatable giant beach balls URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621145/#p621145 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Ghost's over Inflated ego is enough to fill up several ofhttps://www.amazon.com/Behemoth-Inflata … N476]These12 foot inflatable giant beach balls URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621145/#p621145 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Ghost's over Inflated ego is enough to fill up several of these 12 foot giant inflatable beach balls.https://www.amazon.com/Behemoth-Inflata … N476]These URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621145/#p621145 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Ghost's over Inflated ego is enough to fill up several of https://www.amazon.com/Behemoth-Inflata … N476]These 12 foot inflatable giant beach balls URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621145/#p621145 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Ghost's over Inflated ego is enough to fill up several of these 12 foot giant inflatable beach balls.https://www.amazon.com/Behemoth-Inflata … B01AYKN476 URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621145/#p621145 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? I actually can see both sides of the debate, however as pointed out in post 77 Ghost has serious problems accepting to lose an argument, and alters his ideas many times then he never accepts to admit that he lost a particular point, and rather try to defend

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? I actually can see both sides of the debate, however as pointed out in post 77 Ghost has serious problems accepting to lose an argument, and alters his ideas many times then he never accepts to admit that he lost a particular point, and rather try to defend

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? I love this advanced degree we keep hearing about. Unless it was in cockamamie bullshit, it's irrelevant here as it clearly did not teach you how to debate. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/621127/#p621127 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? I would think that pointing out that spelling the thing you're arguing against properly is important doesn't count as a personal attack in any context, but especially in a context where the person misspelling it is trying to portray themselves as an expert

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @75, Just gonna jump in here and say that yes, you were actually stretching it out. You've completely ruined any kind of image you've tried to cultivate here. Your arrogant, boastful, and melodramatic. If you can't see that, well... That's only your problem, and only

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @75, Just gonna jump in here and say that yes, you were actually stretching it out. You've completely ruined any kind of image you've tried to cultivate here. Your arrogant, boastful, and melodramatic. If you can't see that, well... That's only your problem, and only

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @75, Just gonna jump in here and say that yes, you were actually stretching it out. You've completely ruined any kind of image you've tried to cultivate here. Your arrogant, boastful, and melodramatic. If you can't see that, well... That's only your problem, and only

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @75, Just gonna jump in here and say that yes, you were actually stretching it out. You've completely ruined any kind of image you've tried to cultivate here. Your arrogant, boastful, and melodramatic. If you can't see that, well... That's only your problem, and only

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Well, I wasn't stretching it out, when someone  tries to bash you through spelling instead of your points, and insultingly nittpicks mistakes out of your text, regardless of the fact this is a forum and not a thesis project, that is an attack, and you gotta shoot back

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Oh give me a break. I don't need to use translators, I understand English enough, and can type/write it without making any typos. I am not showing off my skills and all that. Though I'll reconsider what I said in that post. I guess I'm being rude, I was doing a wrong

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? 69,  I recommend you use some translator app to better understand posts here. As for spelling, it is universally known as pettyness if you are arguing a point with someone, and instead of  addressing your points, that person takes shots  at your spelling to make them

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @71, agreed. And I know, I was getting hot about this, but this is ridiculous. Like I said, I'm outa here. I have better things to do than to debate with Ghost when they're gonna be like this. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620913/#p620913 -- Audiogames

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Okay, this is the moment where I wave my hands and ask that we dial it back. I'm not asking for you to stop talking, but maybe scale things down a little. I'm not even doing so with my admin face on, but I will if I have to. And no, this isn't targeted. Ethin, I think

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @69, replied to your PM. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620910/#p620910 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @Ethin, sent you a PM.Gotta go off topic, no choice left...@Ghost, this is not good, others haven't said about you that you don't know this, you just know that and that's not enough, and you are saying to Camlorn and Ethin, you don't know this, you don't know

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @Ethin, sent you a PM.Gotta go off topic, no choice left...@Ghost, this is not good, others haven't said about you that you don't know this, you just know that and that's not enough, and you are saying to Camlorn and Ethin, you don't know this, you don't know

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @67, it... Doesn't actually prove your point at all. Your the one who decided to come in here and do your armchair biology, not me. Your the one who got the flack for it. Your the one acting like you know everything about biology, not Camlorn or I.As for your insult

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @67, it... Doesn't actually prove your point at all. Your the one who decided to come in here and do your armchair biology, not me. Your the one who got the flack for it. Your the one acting like you know everything about biology, not Camlorn or I.As for your insult

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? you just proove my point. You have such an insane inflated sense of self worth. That code example just prooves that, and the fact that you withhout knowing anything about any of my works, presume to see yourself above me. Any objective person  reading this would see

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? you just proove my point. You have such an insane inflated sense of self worth. That code example just prooves that, and the fact that you withhout knowing anything about any of my works, presume to see yourself above me. Any objective person  reading this would see

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @65, Um... I don't even know what to say. That... That was the worst comeback I've ever seen in my entire life. Just... Just wow, dude. Just wow. Your acting like a know-it-all -- and lets not kid ourselves, because you are, not me or Camlorn or Jayde -- and your

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @65, Um... I don't even know what to say. That... That was the worst comeback I've ever seen in my entire life. Just... Just wow, dude. Just wow. Your acting like a know-it-all -- and lets not kid ourselves, because you are, not me or Camlorn or Jayde -- and your

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @65, Um... I don't even know what to say. That... That was the worst comeback I've ever seen in my entire life. Just... Just wow, dude. Just wow. Your acting like a know-it-all -- and lets not kid ourselves, because you are, not me or Camlorn or Jayde -- and your

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @65, Um... I don't even know what to say. That... That was the worst comeback I've ever seen in my entire life. Just... Just wow, dude. Just wow. Your acting like a know-it-all -- and lets not kid ourselves, because you are, not me or Camlorn or Jayde -- and your

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @65, Um... I don't even know what to say. That... That was the worst comeback I've ever seen in my entire life. Just... Just wow, dude. Just wow. Your acting like a know-it-all -- and lets not kid ourselves, because you are, not me or Camlorn or Jayde -- and your

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? 63, enjoy thinking you're the king of the world because you know some code. Except remember thatv doesn't make you all knowing and give you the ability to look down on  others. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620904/#p620904 -- Audiogames-reflector

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? 61,You are correct of us raping and destroying the earth, but in a fundemental way humans have more potential. Think about it for a second from your own life. How many people did you interact with so far in your life? Thousands? Did you consdier you pushed at least

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @62, I... I seriously want to know what your smoking, man. Camlorn and petty do not go in the same sentence. Sorry, man, but its you who's being petty because you keep invalidating your own point by bringing up things that you've already been majorly criticized

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @62, I... I seriously want to know what your smoking, man. Camlorn and petty do not go in the same sentence. Sorry, man, but its you who's being petty because you keep invalidating your own point by bringing up things that you've already been majorly criticized

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Ok,Some  additional points.  The only reason China was more successful is because of their totalitarian government and their citizens are dogmatically used to obeying the government.  So when they locked down, they had no more of that yeaah my freedom thing we had

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Ghost, I see what you're driving at, with at least a few of your points. I don't agree, but I'm not here to demonize you.A few rebuttals though.You say that humans have more potential than rats.I guess this is subjective. If you mean that humans have more potential

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @58, I'm happy to be a lab rat, thank you very much, if it means I'll be helping save huge numbers of people. And as Camlorn said, stop straw-manning our posts. It doesn't help your supposed point, if there ever was one to begin with. None of us are saying we should

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @58, I'm happy to be a lab rat, thank you very much, if it means I'll be helping save huge numbers of people. And as Camlorn said, stop straw-manning our posts. It doesn't help your supposed point, if there ever was one to begin with. None of us are saying we should

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @58, I'm happy to be a lab rat, thank you very much, if it means I'll be helping save huge numbers of people. And as Camlorn said, stop stra-manning our posts. It doesn't help your supposed point, if there ever was one to begin with. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @54, 55 and 56, very well said. I've been saying that repeatedly in the like the last 20 posts but Ghost just wants to keep spreading his FUD even though he isn't qualified to do so. Not to mention he happily distorts the reality of the situation.Like I said before

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Jayde,Several things here. Some of the articles I have sent, you will see that many medical professionals  say that challenge trials wouldn't accomplish anything, and would be unethical because all the complications and longterm effects of covid aren't well known

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @52Yeah, I guess I'm double posting.  You're using a study which was predicated around lying to the participants at the counterexample to what I'm saying.  I have not once in this thread said "let's lie to the participants" or "let's not treat t

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? The difference between me and you is that I know I'm not qualified, and so when there's more than a 99% consensus of experts who are qualified, I listen to the experts rather than going off and forming my own theories on the topic, working myself up over

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Okay, let's start from the start. I haven't checked this topic after 7 posts before, but now I did.I will agree with all what Camlorn, Ethin and Jayde said.@Nuno, What if any other vaccine is better than the Chinese vaccine?Do you have any proof that any other vaccine

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Trump absolutely does bear responsibility for hamstringing the processes that Obama put in place for pandemic action. No doubt.Also, those horrible trials you're bringing up are not a good look. You're quite correct to represent them as monstrous, because they were

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @49, By the 4 percent I explicitly was talking about the general rate of complications. And yes, I've tried to say what 50 has said -- your being far too melodramatic about challenge trials. And, as I've said before, you just go on with your life and let millions die

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @49, By the 4 percent I explicitly was talking about the general rate of complications. And yes, I've tried to say what 50 has said -- your being far too melodramatic about challenge trials. And, as I've said before, you just go on with your life and let millions die

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Here's why I see both sides.Challenge trials have done some monstrous things, but the idea of experimenting on live, willing subjects - subjects who are not being pressured in any way whatsoever to participate - could yield huge dividends. This is an extremely

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? And a timeline of the tuskagee studyhttps://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620871/#p620871 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Oh for christ sake, no one is saying give untested drugs to disadvantaged minorities. Stop being so melodramatic. There's no reason not to do challenge trials. Some people are willing to actually do what's necessary to end this, even at the cost of their own lives

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? 47, I very much doubt any vaccene had a  4% death rate. That is massively high, and any vaccene with such a high death rate would be withdrawn. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620866/#p620866 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? Maybe the president shouldn't have disbanded the pandemic office rather than giving his billionaire friends massive  tax cuts? You know, if that office hadn't been shut down by trump, they would have had a plan to manage pandemics like these. And yes, a vaccene

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @46, yes... And in that context, MRNA is just a notification followed by an algorithm. It can't modify DNA at all or anything like that. And as I said in one of my posts above, the likelihood of death with the vaccine right now is so low as to be nearly absolute zero

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @46, yes... And in that context, MRNA is just a notification followed by an algorithm. It can't modify DNA at all or anything like that. And as I said in one of my posts above, the likelihood of death with the vaccine right now is so low as to be nearly absolute zero

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? A quick aside here:I can see both sides of this debate...but isn't biology just a form of organic programming? Think about it? URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/620859/#p620859 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @44, I swallow it because, unlike you, I want to save as many lives as I can. If my countries medical testing procedure isn't equipped to handle a world-wide pandemic, then its badly designed and needs to be overhauled. But I guess your quite happy to sacrifice

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? oh,    now oyu  start bashing me too? You  are really eager to point out I don't have  a biology major, yet camlorn doesn't have one iether, and  is spouting bullcrap   about challenge trials, but you swallow  that eagerly too. Look  at what the experts withthe

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @41-42, ah, I see. Oh, lets lockdown for 8-10 years while we over-extensively test a vaccine for something while hundreds of millions of people parish. Good idea! (I get the sense that you don't have a biology major, yet its you who's doing the armchair biology

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @41-42, ah, I see. Oh, lets lockdown for 8-10 years while we over-extensively test a vaccine for something while hundreds of millions of people parish. Good idea! (I get the sense that you don't have a biology major, yet its you who's doing the armchair biology

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @41-42, ah, I see. Oh, lets lockdown for 8-10 years while we over-extensively test a vaccine for something while hundreds of millions of people parish. Good idea! (I get the sense that you don't have a biology major, yet its you who's doing the armchair biology

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @41-42, ah, I see. Oh, lets lockdown for 8-10 years while we over-extensively test a vaccine for something while hundreds of millions of people parish. Good idea! (I get the sense that you don't have a biology major, yet its you who's doing the armchair biology

Re: Pfizer or Oxford?

Re: Pfizer or Oxford? @41-42, ah, I see. Oh, lets lockdown for 8-10 years while we over-extensively test a vaccine for something while hundreds of millions of people parish. Good idea! (I get the sense that you don't have a biology major, yet its you who's doing the armchair biology

  1   2   >