Abrahamsen of Norway uses this in their new cd player, not sure about
their separate dac though.
--
Anne
Squeezebox 3 Stereovox XV2 Bryston B100-DA SST Martin Logan Aeon I
Sennheiser HD580 Precision
Anne's Profile:
On the datasheet of the Transporter, it says:
- True 802.11g wireless networking (can be disabled)
How do I disable 802.11g so that the wifi radio isn't trying to
transmit/receive?
--
fredz
fredz's Profile:
the new one www.mp3skyline.com
low prices
--
Kainnik
Kainnik's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11862
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=31616
I believe that simply using Ethernet disables the Wifi, you can hear
that click, I hope that's the Wifi, don't laugh if I'm off base with
the click :)
And remove the antennas.
--
nuhi
nuhi's Profile:
It's for using the Transporter as a transport, receiving a clock signal
from an external DAC...
--
PhilNYC
Sonic Spirits Inc.
http://www.sonicspirits.com
PhilNYC's Profile:
snarlydwarf;210112 Wrote:
A quick look at the source makes it seem that 'transporter' as the 3rd
value will work.
(Despite what the comments in convert.conf say.)
Thank you Snarlydwarf.
I have done some testing, and basically it works! The high noise floor
I noticed when streaming my 96
Ron, good work, seems you are on the right track.
Youre just doing low pass filtering, right?
So the stream will still be 96 khz?
Would it be possible to add a -r 48000 argument to do resampling as
well?
--
Veggen
Veggen;210189 Wrote:
Ron, good work, seems you are on the right track.
Youre just doing low pass filtering, right?
So the stream will still be 96 khz?
Would it be possible to add a -r 48000 argument to do resampling as
well?
Thanks Veggen,
Yes, I am still streaming at 96 KHz.
It would
Sounds good.
Yes I agree resampling to 48kHz using sox makes more sense, eases the
load both on the network and the SB
Also I suppose the convert.conf rule will affect all flac files, also
the 44.1 and 48kHz ones?
Wondering if there is a way to have the rule active for 96 kHz (and
maybe 88.2khz)
Hi again,
I've received the new PS today (see recent post). Initial testing:
- Improved the analogue out, more dynamics and refinement.
- Improved the digital out but only slightly, more dynamics and
refinement.
The latter sounds better in my set up.
I still hear a difference between the
darrenyeats;210214 Wrote:
Hi again,
I've received the new PS today (see recent post). Initial testing:
- Improved the analogue out, more dynamics and refinement.
- Improved the digital out but only slightly, more dynamics and
refinement.
The latter sounds better in my set up.
I
nuhi;210160 Wrote:
I believe that simply using Ethernet disables the Wifi, you can hear
that click, I hope that's the Wifi, don't laugh if I'm off base with
the click :)
And remove the antennas.
The click is a power relay, nothing to do with wifi. Wifi disable is
simply done by not
SuperQ;210226 Wrote:
The click is a power relay, nothing to do with wifi. Wifi disable is
simply done by not enabling the PCI device when the system boots on a
wired network.
I would bet that I heard the click when switching wired/wireless, not
just on turning on, please confirm.
--
nuhi
Quote:
Originally Posted by highdudgeon
Peter Lyngdorf himself said that the difference between a modified and
stock power source was a tiny bit of hiss from a tweeter that one could
hear from a few inches away.
P Floding;134959 Wrote:
I found that a PS upgrade made a massive difference to
aberdeencomponents;210232 Wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highdudgeon
Peter Lyngdorf himself said that the difference between a modified and
stock power source was a tiny bit of hiss from a tweeter that one could
hear from a few inches away.
I know the threads a bit dated,
325xi;186718 Wrote:
Andy, I would be thrilled to know your findings. It's especially
interesting because nearly all posters on the previous 10 pages
declined the very possibility of Toslink connection to be more jittery
then coax.
Right, as promised! I've just finally got round to spending
Veggen;210197 Wrote:
Sounds good.
Yes I agree resampling to 48kHz using sox makes more sense, eases the
load both on the network and the SB.
Also doesn't sox apply filtering automatically when downsampling?
I suppose the convert.conf rule will affect all flac files, also the
44.1 and 48kHz
Phil Leigh;210238 Wrote:
Which rather begs the question, why then did he not improve the PSU of
the retail TACT?
I'm very sceptical of this since I just did an experiment by
inserting/removing my TACT from the digital chain and can detect no
audible difference when the TACT is in or out
aberdeencomponents;210255 Wrote:
A good question to ask yourself, would be:
What makes one components sound better than the other?
Take the answer and implement than answer to another component.
What whould you have?
AP
A good question to ask yourself, would be:
Does the designer look
Phil,
I smiled when I read your message, especially the vinyl comment.
No offence taken. It is difficult to tell what is better sometimes. I
think it can depend on the rest of your system.
In a nutshell, the SB3 sounds a tad more shouty and the Monarchy
sounds a bit more dynamic. By dynamic I
Last night 1 of my Amperex 6922 tubes went bad and needs to be replaced.
So I'm stuck with using these cheap Sovtek 6922s as a replacement - a
temporary measure let's hope - for my Kora Hermes DAC.
It's been a while since I last shopped around for these tubes and alas,
came to a realization
mswlogo;208748 Wrote:
Check out dbpoweramp.
It will convert your whole directory tree from almost anything to
almost anything in just a few clicks.
Then use Music Brains to tag it all.
Audacity - blah !!
I second dbpoweramp. One of those no frills software.
Another good program is
mswlogo;210257 Wrote:
A good question to ask yourself, would be:
Does the designer look at the WHOLE power solution?
The power solution is staged and a good design takes the initial stage
into consideration.
If you bought a Porche would you pull the motor and put in a ferrari
engine?
I've been happy using regular ElectroHarmonix 6922 tubes in my preamp
and hybrid amp. Definitely smoother and more refined than the Sovteks,
and still only about $12/each. You can spend a little more and get the
gold-pin version for a slightly warmer and richer tone...
--
PhilNYC
Sonic
Eric Carroll;184206 Wrote:
Wire them both up to the destination device.
Cover your eyes and do something like the following (coopt the SO as an
assistant):
- have the assistabnt ..
Did the same and was going to suggest that al do the same. I can't
hear _any_ difference
pablolie;184223 Wrote:
Unless there's a good bottle of red wine involved, really. Try it out.
You have to be chilled out to qualify for subjectively valid listening
tests. Heaven knows what they hand out in audiophile mags. :-)
Okay... I second that one to!
--
kphinney
SB3
CIAudio DVA-2
If you do some searches, Sean (one of (or the, not sure) squeezebox
designers) says it's silly. It immediately hits two regulators that
dominate the quality of the voltage distributed internally. If your
gonna bother you need to tap in after the regulators.
Sorry, but I'd trust Bob at Meridian
jhm731;210285 Wrote:
As a percentage of product cost/development, Porche puts a lot more
time money into designing and building their engines than TacT or
Meridan puts into power supplies.
Perhaps this can be considered evidence of the relative importance of
the power supply in the
My vote is for the Siemens CCA 6922. I used to own a Kora Equinox and
the Siemens tubes matched perfectly with this preamp. However, these
tubes are not cheap.
--
F-100
F-100's Profile:
29 matches
Mail list logo
