Upgrading LMS to something more current might help.
Stratmangler's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20387
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97305
+1 Try more current LMS and player fw ! ( if it/was a bug it could have
been fixed ages ago and everyone have already forgot about it ) ,
I have no trouble running 48khz or 96khz or 44.1 or 88.2
What are the file formats involved ? If you haven't try flac , this is a
good baseline and no weird
Mnyb wrote:
in fact all the reasoning you cited (cant find that post ) is clearly
the usual spiel from someone who actually don't understand the sample
theorem and is influnced by audiophile beliefs .
Yes - the next thing he will be claiming is that you get a clearer and
shinier sound by
Julf wrote:
Yes - the next thing he will be claiming is that you get a clearer and
shinier sound by using USB cables with silver instead of copper wires.
A lot of old-school audiophiles don't understand digital technology, but
still apply their analog-age beliefs to digital.
I still
Mnyb wrote:
And this used to be a nice hobby and past time, something really bad
happened a couple of decades ago.
You might be right. The National Science Foundation stated that
pseudoscientific beliefs in the U.S. became more widespread during the
1990s, peaked near 2001, and declined
Good times and we're all in agreement :)
But.
The one-liner scientific argument (Nyquist) doesn't carry through to the
end (the analog outputs of Your DAC). While Nyquist is a very nice
result, its theoretical and for practical purposes, non-constructive. So
an implementation is forced to take
ralphpnj wrote:
will only invoke lots of nasty comments because the simple fact is that
regardless of the DAC and the audio system used the sonic differences
between that DAC and the Transporter's analog outputs will be, at best,
subtle. Please leave all the hyperbole and the greatest
bhaagensen wrote:
Good times and we're all in agreement :)
But.
The one-liner scientific argument (Nyquist) doesn't carry through to the
end (the analog outputs of Your DAC). While Nyquist is a very nice
result, its theoretical and for practical purposes, non-constructive. So
an
Mnyb wrote:
So given modern studios the CD's or downloads is a mathematical exercise
so imo it is close to the theory
Maybe, but you can't argue that by referring to (only) Nyquist - the
main point of my first post.
Mnyb wrote:
And have a listen , in practice I do this now and then I
bhaagensen wrote:
Maybe, but you can't argue that by referring to (only) Nyquist - the
main point of my first post.
Definitive is a strong word, but how about maybe...?
Usually, but not always, and by who's count - oh my head hurts :)
That begs the question - suppose there
Mnyb wrote:
Well, funny enough, I downloaded a bunch of 24-bit hi-res downloads
Bowers Wilkins Society of Sound site after a bunch of audiophiles
described them in superlative terms and wrote about how much better they
were than the normal 16-bit material. I guess you are not surprised
bhaagensen wrote:
Maybe, but you can't argue that by referring to (only) Nyquist - the
main point of my first post.
I think you can. Remember Nyquist (or, more formally, the
NyquistShannon sampling theorem) states that If a function x(t)
contains no frequencies higher than B hertz, it is
:) enjoy your coffee mnyb! I am listening to some recently released
stuff i havent bought yet on Spotify in shrug Mp3...
bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418
View this thread:
Julf wrote:
I think you can. Remember Nyquist (or, more formally, the
NyquistShannon sampling theorem) states that If a function x(t)
contains no frequencies higher than B hertz, it is completely determined
by giving its ordinates at a series of points spaced 1/(2B) seconds
apart.
Julf wrote:
Well, funny enough, I downloaded a bunch of 24-bit hi-res downloads
Bowers Wilkins Society of Sound site after a bunch of audiophiles
described them in superlative terms and wrote about how much better they
were than the normal 16-bit material. I guess you are not surprised to
Mnyb wrote:
in reality no clock does 1/(2B) perfectly so the actual nyqkvist
frequency may fluctuate slightly so in practical implementation you
leave a little slush margin.
Sure - engineering is applying the science in real world situations. But
that doesn't make the science invalid or
Julf wrote:
Sure - engineering is applying the science in real world situations. But
that doesn't make the science invalid or irrelevant in any way. The
NyquistShannon sampling theorem still applies 100%.
Yes i agree 100% and that extends to all laws of physics there is no
special laws of
Mnyb wrote:
quantum
But I guess this is the point. There is some wiggly room in the
interface where science meets the real world. And I know, in the
sciences its usually controlled and abstracted using some kind of
error-model, but such error models can't be denied of being extremely
bhaagensen wrote:
But I guess this is the point. There is some wiggly room in the
interface where science meets the real world. And I know, in the
sciences its usually controlled and abstracted using some kind of
error-model, but such error models can't be denied of being extremely
Neh :) Of course, a claim - wether positive or negative - presented
without argument is not worth a penny. But this just resolves into what
constitutes an argument. Here traditions vary depending on the science,
and I'm sure some audiophile story-tellers are in fact able to present
sequences
bhaagensen wrote:
But I guess this is the point. There is some wiggly room in the
interface where science meets the real world. And I know, in the
sciences its usually controlled and abstracted using some kind of
error-model, but such error models can't be denied of being extremely
jh901 wrote:
Well, had I not heard a night/day, then I'd have passed on the
expenditure. Not many of us likely have $6 grand or more to burn. I
can't describe my own experience in a way that will allow any given
reader of this forum (or any other) to truly grasp exactly what I'm
getting
I've been looking for a small integrated amp with a digital input to put
in a bedroom system with a Squeezebox Touch and some Martin Logan
Electromotion ESLs. I've found the Cyrus 8QX amp and Perreaux 80i (which
is made locally here in NZ) and I have also been recommended the Linn
Majik DSM at
23 matches
Mail list logo
