Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External DAC on Transporter: best output option

2017-05-26 Thread drmatt
Golden Earring wrote: > Would I be right in guessing you have a Mytek Stereo192? > > I don't know how the display works on the earlier models, but the > Brokkly has a summary display (which you can set to extinguish after a > delay if you wish) which shows the sampling frequency in reasonably >

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External DAC on Transporter: best output option

2017-05-26 Thread Golden Earring
Since it's too hot today in my concrete box of a lounge for me to ingest anything technical I thought I'd chuck out a couple of links I've had up my sleeve for other people to peruse (& doubtless have a pop at, we could do with a bit of controversy it's all gone a bit flat). The first one is the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External DAC on Transporter: best output option

2017-05-26 Thread darrenyeats
I wouldn't down-sample a high rate file. It's not always a good idea, I'd leave it alone. Under some circumstances, you might up-sample before sending the file to the DAC, but this would only make sense if you knew you could up-sample at higher quality than the DAC's internal up-sampling.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hifiberry Digi+Pro + RPi3?

2017-05-26 Thread cliveb
Julf wrote: > That would make sense, except that the OP states "I thought that RPi3 > with Digi+Pro would eliminate the connection of the SBT to the server > (RPi3) over the network. Thus, giving me better sound?", so it is all > about the network, not the connection to the DAC. OK, sorry I

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External DAC on Transporter: best output option

2017-05-26 Thread Golden Earring
drmatt wrote: > Mine only has fast and slow filter settings. I don't remember seeing > documentation about the cut-off points for pcm either. Would I be right in guessing you have a Mytek Stereo192? I don't know how the display works on the earlier models, but the Brokkly has a summary display

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External DAC on Transporter: best output option

2017-05-26 Thread drmatt
Golden Earring wrote: > Having dug through all the stuff about the dimensions of King Solomon's > Temple in the user manual, I can't find a definite answer to this. For > PCM playback there are 3 filter *-shapes-* selectable by the user, viz: > 1. Minimum Phase; 2. Slow Roll-Off; & 3. Fast

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External DAC on Transporter: best output option

2017-05-26 Thread Golden Earring
arnyk wrote: > A proper job of upsampling avoids this problem. Anti-aliasing is part > of a good implementation of upsampling. This results in a 24/96 file > that lacks any meaningful content above 22 KHz. Morning Arny! It must be seriously early in Michigan, so don't rush to reply to this

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External DAC on Transporter: best output option

2017-05-26 Thread Golden Earring
Morning Doc! drmatt wrote: > Are you sure the Brooklyn doesn't still use a 22khz-ish filter even when > upsampling? I don't remember reading about that. Having dug through all the stuff about the dimensions of King Solomon's Temple in the user manual, I can't find a definite answer to this.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hifiberry Digi+Pro + RPi3?

2017-05-26 Thread Julf
celo wrote: > I thought that RPi3 with Digi+Pro would eliminate the connection of the > SBT to the server (RPi3) over the network. Thus, giving me better sound? What makes you think it would? The network connection is a buffered, bit-perfect path, and actually might pose less of a load on the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hifiberry Digi+Pro + RPi3?

2017-05-26 Thread Julf
cliveb wrote: > All of what you say would make sense if the OP were talking about the > Hifiberry DAC+. > But he's referring to the DIGI+, which is an SPDIF output board, which > would then be used to feed an external DAC. > Given the known flaws in the RPi's USB system, I think using a DIGI+ to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hifiberry Digi+Pro + RPi3?

2017-05-26 Thread celo
Sorry for missing out on the details. Yes, I am using an older DAC with no USB and only up to 44.1 support. Don't want to change my DAC. Just purchased and love it. I thought that RPi3 with Digi+Pro would eliminate the connection of the SBT to the server (RPi3) over the network. Thus, giving

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External DAC on Transporter: best output option

2017-05-26 Thread arnyk
Golden Earring wrote: > > > However the question arises as to whether a 24/96 format recording might > actually sound -*worse*- than 16/44.1 on account of the anti-aliasing > filtering not being applied until a much higher frequency, which > potentially would permit the onward transmission of

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External DAC on Transporter: best output option

2017-05-26 Thread drmatt
Are you sure the Brooklyn doesn't still use a 22khz-ish filter even when upsampling? I don't remember reading about that. Do you always manually set your sample rate in the Brooklyn? I have one of its predecessors and leave it to sync to input and I can't say I've ever really noticed any

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External DAC on Transporter: best output option

2017-05-26 Thread Golden Earring
Morning peeps! Having been (fairly) reprimanded for being frivolous on this august forum I thought I'd make a concerted effort to be serious. It has been mentioned to me more than once on this forum that I would obtain as much audible satisfaction from the (relatively small proportion, in the