Hi all,
I need *lib32-portaudio* package complying to Multilib standards in order to
install PCSX2 emulator (ex: *pcsx2-svn*), but the maintainer seems to be
missing, busy, in outer space or whatever and doesn't reply requests in
comments or emails. And I already have the PKGBUILD ready for it!
Thanks, Fixed!
2011/2/3 Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:11 AM, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I need *lib32-portaudio* package complying to Multilib standards in order
to
install PCSX2 emulator (ex: *pcsx2-svn*), but the maintainer seems
Hi there.
I read Licenses https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Licenses and
PKGBUILDhttps://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILDpages at
Archwiki and I've been wondering: case a software's license is one
the common ones (ex: GPL), if the PKGBUILD should do some kind of reference
(symlink) from
/LGPL folder to ${pkgname} ? Or do nothing - and leave
as it is?
2011/2/7 Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:50 PM, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
I read Licenses https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Licenses and
PKGBUILDhttps://wiki.archlinux.org
Got it! Thanks all!
2011/2/7 Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:20 PM, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply, Kaiting. I actually understand what license is for
each packages. My question is if, in the PKGBUILD, I should set a
folder
Hi there.
I tried to have the maintainer of *lib32-gtk-engines* and *lib32-libidl2* to
fix the PKGBUILDs to comply Multilib, but got no answer by email for 10 days
now. I got it ready to upload.
Please disown these 2 packages?
Thanks
2011/2/7 Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:22 PM, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there.
I tried to have the maintainer of *lib32-gtk-engines* and *lib32-libidl2*
to
fix the PKGBUILDs to comply Multilib, but got no answer by email for 10
days
2011/2/7 Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:28 PM, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/7 Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:22 PM, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi there.
I tried to have the maintainer
Hi all,
I'm trying to build gobject-introspection for lib32 version for my Arch64,
but it is failing in the configure command saying that Python headers were
not found. This 32 bit library package seems to be dependecy (not sure,
though) for some lib32 packages (afaik at-spi, gconf, polkit,
2011/2/9 Det nimetonma...@gmail.com
On 2/8/11, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
And hello to you too
I'm trying to build gobject-introspection for lib32 version for my Arch64,
but it is failing in the configure command saying that Python headers were
not found. This 32
2011/2/12 Rémy Oudompheng remyoudomph...@gmail.com:
On 2011/2/11 rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Here some links:
* http://aur.pastebin.com/xCPCmxR4 lib32-gobject-introspection PKGBUILD
* http://aur.pastebin.com/tYPWHz64 build attempt for
lib32-gobject-introspection (same old error
The packages below don't comply with Multilib and are built from Archlinux
binaries, even after I provided the solution (in a src.tar.gz) to the
maintainer. Also, I didn't get any reply. Can you please disown them so I
can fix the PKGBUILDs?
lib32-gdbm
*Package*: lib32-gobject-introspection
*Reason*: I currently own it. It happens that I was able to build only from
binary (failed to build from source). Therefore, I created another -bin
package.
The package lib32-esd[1] is out-of-date, built from binary and orphan, while
the package lib32-esound[2] provides the same application, is update and
built from source.
Delete lib32-esd please?
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14022
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41702
2011/3/14 Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org
On 14 March 2011 11:44, Tony C crt@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies for the noise. AUR does not reject my package now after first
creating the directory name for the package I have. I do not ever
remember needing to create a special directory before.
2011/5/8 Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net:
Hi everybody, I just started using Arch a few weeks ago, and I've been
mightily impressed. I want to help out, so I started looking in the
AUR for things to do. I noticed that there doesn't seem to be a
package for the devel version of SWI-Prolog.
PCSX2 Dev Team provides pcsx2 in two ways: binary tarball and svn
source code. I'd like to organize things up about this emulator in
AUR: my plan is to have pcsx2 [1] as binary package and pcsx2-svn
[2] getting from source code.
Considering that the maintainer of pcsx2-bin [3] does not update
2011/5/15 cantabile cantabile.d...@gmail.com:
If your package simply installs a precompiled binary, it should have the
-bin suffix.
--
cantabile
Jayne is a girl's name. -- River
I thought this would apply to software that were distributed in source
tarballs... But it is fine. So, can you
2011/5/16 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com:
I removed [4] as I see you already take over the [1].
For some time now I'm the maintainer of pcsx2, pcsx2-svn-bin and
pcsx2-svn. My intention is to have in AUR only a binary as source
(pcsx2 or pcsx2-bin) and another with SVN as source.
2011/5/16 Iñigo Álvarez alvarez...@gmail.com:
I did a new PKGBUILD of the rodent file manager. I really think, after
discovering it in gentoo, it is a must be in arch. It consist in a very
lightweight, but complete file manager, aimed to expert users which stick to
the console. It permets
2011/5/24 pauline martin 321enil...@gmail.com:
My apologies, I must have not even noticed that. I am sorry. Should the
package that I submitted be entered into the AUR or is it not needed? I am
just trying to help keep the AUR updated as much as I can. I once again
apologize for the
Hi all!
I currently maintain lib32-allegro [1] in its version 5.0. However, I
wanted to change its version to 4 (anything less than version5) and
add a lib32-allegro5 (anything =5). The idea is to follow packages
allegro [2] and allegro5 [3].
I found a variable epoch[4], which if not set in
Hi all!
Just to let you know that there is a sticky thread in PCSX2 forum
specifically for Archlinux users. The intention is to put issues,
patches and other things in the same thread, which might make easier
for arch users have their answer or to contribute. Y'all are welcome!
(I'm the maintainer of all them)
Packages:
- lib32-gobject-introspection-bin
- lib32-flex
- lib32-python2
Reason:
- They just make no sense. Not needed and don't work.
Thanks,
Rafael
2011/6/4 Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com:
On 5 June 2011 00:18, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
(I'm the maintainer of all them)
Packages:
- lib32-gobject-introspection-bin
- lib32-flex
- lib32-python2
All removed. Please include links to each package in the future.
Ah, I
lib32-libjpeg-turbo [1] is already in multilib repository [2].
Maintainer copied in this email.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46972
[2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/lib32-libjpeg-turbo/
Thanks,
Rafael
The maintainer of lib32-libjpeg6 [1] doesn't seem to be around for
long time and won't fix the PKGBUILD to build from source code, even
though I email him the source tarball in last January. Please disown,
so I can fix it.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29929
Thanks,
Rafael
2011/6/8 Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
Seriously? If someone can not find the time to update a package in 3
months, there will be other people who can do a better job. If we waited 6
months for updates, we might as well be using Ubunutu.
I agree that waiting that long is too much. IMHO,
This package is not lib32, is out-of-date for long time and capt is
already provided in another package, amazingly called capt. /irony
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45916
Thanks,
Rafael
2011/6/9 rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com:
This package is not lib32, is out-of-date for long time and capt is
already provided in another package, amazingly called capt. /irony
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45916
Thanks,
Rafael
Please delete this package...
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19447
source URL is not available anymore, the package is not updated
anymore since 2008 and hadn't much votes (only 2). No need to be at
AUR, as far as i can tell.
Thanks,
Rafael
caffeine-dev [1] is orphan, it is a bzr without -bzr, have the same
source as caffeine [2]. Doesn't seem to make sense keeping it in AUR.
Please delete caffeine-dev.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30188
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29762
2011/6/16 cantabile cantabile.d...@gmail.com:
On 06/16/2011 05:27 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On 16 June 2011 05:19, Seven sevenforauro...@gmail.com wrote:
Please delete libhupnp-svn
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44352and
libtorrent-rasterbar-dev
2011/6/27 Jeremiah Dodds jeremiah.do...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
prefer apache-mod_name
Big +1, it's consistent and clear what the package is, and is likely to turn
up in common searches.
Would this be a case for adding apache modules in
2011/7/13 Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl:
On 07/13/2011 06:54 PM, Marat Mukhametshin wrote:
Looks good.
--
Jelle van der Waa
If this package is not specifically for x86 or x86_64 (no
arch-specific ELF file inside), then you should use: arch=(any)
Also, avoid commented and blank lines.
Hi all,
I'm the maintainer of the package pcsx2-svn[1]. PCSX2 from now on will
install files in a different folder than /opt/pcsx2 - I'm still going
to adapt the PKGBUILD. Plugins, as I can see in Archlinux Packaging
Standards [2], should go to /var/lib/pcsx2/PLUGINNAME.so... However,
pcsx2 is a
2011/7/14 Justin Davis jrc...@gmail.com:
I think that you mean /usr/lib/pcsx2 instead of /var/lib/pcsx2. (...)
Indeed, thanks for correcting me.
Using two different folders depending on the host architecture is
overly complicated. The advantage of a lib32 directory name is to
separate lib32
2011/7/15 Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org:
On 15 July 2011 16:35, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
32-bit libs-related stuff belong in /usr/lib32 on Arch64, nowhere else.
Good point. I'll will use /usr/lib/pcsx2 for 32-bit and
/usr/lib32/pcsx2 for 64-bit system, then.
See file list of
caffeine-gnome3 [1] is based in a branch that was already merged [2]
to trunk, which is provided by package caffeine [3]. Therefore, no
need for this package package anymore.
Please delete caffeine-gnome3.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49831
[2]
2011/7/24 Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com
Also, the AUR might not accept the package without a build function.
I'm not sure if this has been fixed, but if you get a submission error
try adding:
build() {
true
}
above the package function.
Actually it accepts no build()
the PKGBUILD with Unknown47's
suggestion.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19615
Thanks,
-- Rafael
-- Forwarded message --
From: rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/7/22
Subject: AUR package update: nautilus-dropbox
To: archlinux@christianmorlok.de
Hi
2011/7/29 Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de
I would keep grub-gfx and remove grub-legacy-gfx. The package in [core]
is also called grub and not grub-legacy. And the source package is also
called grub-0.97.tar.gz and not grub-legacy-0.97.tar.gz. So grub-gfx is
the better name.
Heiko
+1
2011/7/29 KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 00:58, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:47:03 +0530
schrieb KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 00:36, KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Please
lib32-gmp-dev [1] is outdated for a thousand years and the maintainer seems
to have forgotten this poor. Also, this resource is already provided by
another package (lib32-gmp4).
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28554
Please delete lib32-gmp-dev.
Thanks,
-- Rafael
:
calltvweydyg8dgnhupq4rxk2gzdrll2m1o7hsno_1oeuvkr...@mail.gmail.com
Subject: AUR packages fix
From: rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com
To: allspark@cyb0rg.0rg
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e642d6446ab46704ab102615
Hi there,
The packages you are maintaining, lib32-libsexy and lib32-libsexymm, are not
built
2011/8/22 Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:17 AM, rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
The packages lib32-libsexy [1] and lib32-libsexymm [2] have PKGBUILD set to
build from binary and install libs in the invalid directory
'/opt/lib32/usr/lib
Hi all,
I'm running into segment fault when starting skype (from [multilib]).
After some tests, I notice that when i uninstall lib32-gconf, it seems
to solve the problem. Can someone reproduce the error for me?
Basically
1- Have installed skype and lib32-gconf
2- Run skype (error expected)
3-
2011/9/1 Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com:
Excerpts from Gordon JC Pearce's message of 2011-09-01 20:15:28 +0200:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:55:57 +0200
Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Do I understand it correctly that https-everywhere goes through a lot of
trouble
2011/9/2 Gordon JC Pearce gordon...@gjcp.net:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:36:34 +0200
Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com wrote:
What happens if you *don't want to use https*?
I still have difficulties to understand why people would like to purposely
avoid using https.
I still have
2011/9/3 Gordon JC Pearce gordon...@gjcp.net:
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 01:18:58 -0300
rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote:
's' stands for Secure. Maybe security is a good reason.
Oh, okay, so you put an S in and it waves the magic secure stick. Very
good.
What happens if you're using
lib32-scim - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21523
The install file is missing, lib folder is not correct, source file is
all scim binaries from Arch and, last, this package is wrong for
more than 1 year.
Thanks
lib32-portaudio-pulse [1] is a redundancy of lib32-portaudio, as
stated by the maintainer. Please delete.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51584
Thanks in advance
2011/9/20 Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:26:35AM +0200, nem wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:23:54 +0200 Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
I kind of like the idea of adding a comment field. I wondered why some
package has been flagged
2011/9/28 Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Max Roder maxro...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
please remove python-libchamplain
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40969
It was needed by kismon only, but is not anymore. As 0.6.1, the latest
version supporting
intellij-idea-ultimate-edition-openjdk -
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44402
This package contains WARNING not recommended by JetBrains in the
pkgdesc, is flagged as out-of-date since Feb/2011 and the previous
maintainer (linx56) confirmed that the package should be deleted, as
you
Username: PLEASE_DELETE
Account Type: User
Email Address: x...@y.com
Real Name: PLEASE_DELETE
IRC Nick: PLEASE_DELETE
View this user's packages
https://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfoID=22469
Looks like this account wants to be deleted, right?
2011/10/7 Daniel Hilst Selli danielhi...@gmail.com:
Hey, its me again.. It compiles fine from my i686 installation .. So is
there any way to install it in my x86_64 system
tks
This seems to be a 32 bit software. If multilib support was added to
gngeo's PKGBUILD, maybe it could work in
2011/10/8 Daniel Hilst Selli danielhi...@gmail.com:
On 10/08/11 13:13, rafael ff1 wrote:
binutils-multilib
gcc-multilib
libtool-multilib
Yes I have!
binutils-multilib 2.21.1-2
gcc-multilib 4.6.1-4
libtool-multilib 2.4-5
Please post your config.log (from src/gngeo-0.7/) online so I
2011/10/23 Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 09:00:29PM +0200, Ondřej Kučera wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to upload and updated PKGBUILD for my package
spring-framework but I'm getting the error message Invalid name:
only lowercase letters are allowed.. I've never seen
2011/10/27 Maciej Sitarz macieksit...@wp.pl:
Hi all,
I'm maintaining hunspell-pl AUR package
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44331).
The problem with the package is that the maintainer of the source provides
only the latest(daily) tarball snapshot. The md5sum of the tarball
2011/11/29 Jekyll Wu adap...@gmail.com:
... and AFAIK the patch is already commited in upstream
Yes, it was commited, as can be verified in gnome's git.
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?id=d3274e8e0619bad02a7fa31874943707dc209fc8
lib32-allegro5 [1] is not needed anymore, as lib32-allegro was updated
from 4.x to 5.x
Please delete lib32-allegro5.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49527
Thanks
accerciser is very out-of-date (pkg: 1.12.1, current: 3.3.1), with
last update in Oct 2010. This, IMHO shows the lack of interest of the
maintainer to fix the package.
Please disown, so I can update it.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252
Thanks
2011/12/4 Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:19:09PM +, Jonathan Steel wrote:
The name of this package doesn't seem quite right:
lib32-gstreamer0.10-base `pacman -Q|grep gstreamer0\.10\-
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15586
That's what happens when
lib32-gail has a broken URL, is not updated for long time (since
October 2008) and this software is implemented by Gnome's ATK since
version 3.0.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17078
Please delete.
lib32-libcurl3 URL is broken, orphan and not update since September 2008
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19376
2011/12/24 WorMzy Tykashi wormzy.tyka...@gmail.com:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:37:22 +0800
郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezh...@gmail.com wrote:
All Arch Linuxer,
Merry Christmas,have a nice holiday!
Merry Christmas everyone!
May you all consume copious amounts of food and alcohol (within
lib32-nvidia-utils-71xx [1] is not updated since 2007, doesn't comply
with multilib (installs libs in /opt/lib32/usr/lib), orphan, flagged
as out-of-date since Feb 2011 and... no one seems to complain about
it.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12008
Please delete
I am (or was) the maintainer of lib-compat. I will upload it again as
soon as I get home- can't do from here.
Rafael
2012/2/11, Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at:
On 11.02.2012 07:20, Anton Larionov wrote:
Please, merge 'lib32-lib-compat'
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17208
into
2012/2/11 Florian Pritz bluew...@xinu.at:
On 11.02.2012 07:20, Anton Larionov wrote:
Please, merge 'lib32-lib-compat'
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17208
into 'lib-compat' https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17207
Reason: 'lib-compat' provides both i686 and x86_64
speex replaced SVN repo by GIT repo. Therefore, I uploaded speex-git
to replace speex-svn.
Please delete speex-svn (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17012)
Thanks,
Rafael
lib32-libnl [1] is out-of-date for some time now and fails to build.
Sent email to the maintainer, but he didn't replay. By the way, all
his packages are out-of-date.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36007
Please disown lib32-libnl.
Thanks
2012/3/5 Taylor Lookabaugh jesus.christ.i.l...@gmail.com:
I have orphaned the package[1] by the way, after updating and then
realizing there was a better alternative PKGBUILD available yesterday.
Taylor Lookabaugh
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 19:04, Taylor Lookabaugh
2012/3/20 Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
Is there a way to avoid both the redundancy and the wrong
interpretation at aur.archlinux.org?
This is the package we are talking about:
2012/3/21 Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:34:52PM -0300, rafael ff1 wrote:
This will display a weird source URL line in AUR interface, and that's
what the author of the thread want's to avoid. Therefore, not that
obvious.
in the end, it's the aur's problem
2012/3/23 Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de:
I guess mysql-gui-tools can be completely removed. As far as I know
this has been renamed to MySQL Workbench by upstream.
Correct. It is the successor to DBDesigner 4 from fabFORCE.net, and
replaces the previous package of software, MySQL GUI Tools
2012/3/25 Daniel Wallace daniel.wall...@gatech.edu:
not sure if this is the same guy, but
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57961
I just saw this pop up in the new packages
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:32:56AM +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
On 25 March 2012 01:32, Det
2012/3/26 Det nimetonma...@gmail.com:
I guess this is a good summary of all the talk in virtualbox-sun's comment
section[1].
The reality here is that virtualbox-bin[2] has evolved into something _at
least_ as good as virtualbox-sun. While it's true that -sun is the original
one it's also the
lib32-libopenssl2 has bad naming, wrong lib folder
(/opt/lib32/usr/lib), is orphan and is not a dependency for any
package.
Please delete
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19380
Thanks
scribus-ng is release candidate package with an outdated (old)
version and hasn't been updated for a year now. Plus this outdated
package is the only one of this maintainer, so I guess he doesn't
really want to maintain it.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47919
(note: there is another
lib32-file [1] is outdated for some time now (it's in version 5.0.4
while 'file' in [core] repo is in version 5.1.1 already), orphan and
no one seems to need or care about this package. IMO, this package has
no use.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43990
Please delete
gizmo5 [1] provides a software that was shutdown in April 3, 2011,
according to wikipedia [2]. Indeed it doesn't build, reporting http
error 404.
Please delete
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30417
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gizmo5
I created glib2-unstable [1] to provide a newer version than glib2
2.30, which got updated to 2.32. Therefore, no need for glib2-unstable
anymore.
Please delete
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57190
lib32-libgdu [1] was uploaded and is maintained by me, when it was a
dependency for other package, but right now it is not needed. And
gnome-disk-utility (that would replace this package) doesn't have
library to replace this package, so... please delete.
I notice the same thing about AlienArena - that the project was dead -
before this thread started, but I just notice that the latest version,
7.53, is dated December 2011 in http://icculus.org/alienarena/ . Then
I found what seems to be the current site:
http://red.planetarena.org/... So, I guess
oops, it seems I mixed things up badly right now, as AlienArena !=
ArenaLive. So, it might be dead indeed.
Ignore my previous email. :D
2012/5/9 rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com:
I notice the same thing about AlienArena - that the project was dead -
before this thread started, but I just
'atrinik-client' [1] is orphaned and duplicated of
'atrinik-client-devel'. first submitted by same the user, it looks
like he preferred to keep maintain the second one.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34857
2012/5/10 Jorge Barroso jorge.barroso...@gmail.com:
Hello, I'm trying to submit the web browser Iceweasel to aur, but I'm
having a problem with the md5sum.
I wrote the PKGBUILD, used makepkg -g to generate the md5sum and put the
output into the PKGBUILD. I made the soruce package with makepkg
2012/5/10 Jorge Barroso jorge.barroso...@gmail.com:
2012/5/10 Jorge Barroso jorge.barroso...@gmail.com:
Hello, I'm trying to submit the web browser Iceweasel to aur, but I'm
having a problem with the md5sum.
I wrote the PKGBUILD, used makepkg -g to generate the md5sum and put the
output
2012/5/10 speps sp...@gmx.com:
[13]bin32-miniaudicle - [14]miniaudicle
[13]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35283
[14]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34472
bin32-miniaudicle should not be touched in the actual status.
miniaudicle (like chuck) is known to not work on
source=(foobar)
[ $CARCH == i686 ] source=(lib32-foobar)
ops, it seems I #fail. The correct would be:
source=(foobar)
[ $CARCH == x86_64 ] source=(lib32-foobar)
guichan-allegro4 [1] was meant to provide a fix for guichan's bug
FS#29824, therefore it is just a temporary package. The bug report was
solved, so the time has arrived: please nuke it!
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59206
p.s.: I'm the maintainer.
Thanks,
Rafael
2012/5/14 Pierre-Antoine Vanpe pavanp...@yahoo.fr:
Hi all,
I own the uTorrent-serveur package [1] lots of people asked me to run the
utserver deamon as utserver instead of root, so I tried my best with another
member, but we can't get it to work right. It works but only after installing
2012/5/18 Myles English mylesengl...@gmail.com:
(The instant package migrated to instan-bzr because the source package
name was too long to call it instant-bzr.)
What do you mean too long? If I'm not totally mistaken we don't have any
kind of file name length limitations.
When I
2012/5/21 Jorge Barroso jorge.barroso...@gmail.com:
2012/5/22 Auguste Pop augu...@gmail.com
i suggest installing a script doing what you want to do in $HOME
directory and print out an instruction in post_install function to
remind the user to run that script as normal user without sudo.
2012/5/22 Jorge Barroso jorge.barroso...@gmail.com:
2012/5/22 rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com
sed -e '325s#then#then\n\t[ ! -d ~/.LMD ] \\ lmd -reconf#' -i
${pkgdir}/usr/bin/lmd
Mmm yes it helps, I know what you mean, adding a line on the own lmd binary
script that checks if .LMD
2012/5/22 Jorge Barroso jorge.barroso...@gmail.com:
2012/5/22 rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com
If you're not comfortable with sed, you can always create a patch
using 'diff -u foo1 bar2 foo-bar.patch' and add to source=() ... But
since we are here:
My sed command executes an expression
adobe-air-beta [1] and adobe-air-sdk-beta [2] are both currently
outdated and unnecessary. Unnecessary because Adobe doesn't provide
support anymore for Linux after version 2.6.0, which is already
provided by adobe-air-sdk.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36919
[2]
2012/6/6 Jorge Barroso jorge.barroso...@gmail.com:
2012/6/6 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@osvaldobarrera.com.ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-05-08 14:42, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote:
ti, 2012-05-08 kello 18:16 +0200, Jorge Barroso kirjoitti: snip
All that could be
2012/6/6 Jorge Barroso jorge.barroso...@gmail.com:
2012/6/6 rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com
option: '-o' or '--owner=OWNER'
See this and more in the man page
Ok, thanks, but the problem is that I can't set an specific username,
because it has to be the installer username and trying
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
