Re: [aur-general] Reply to your request SGE

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:57:52 -0400 Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote: > You are right that I don't know what 'out of state' or 'out of date' or > 'out of whatever' is. All I know is that I suddenly lost the ownership and > will have to change my cluster maintenance code tomorrow. > > In

Re: [aur-general] Reply to your request SGE

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:38:02 -0400 Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote: > I actually did read your email. You said I cannot get a simple thing such > as pkgver right. > > Let me explain to you, from your point of view, you certainly want to have > some rule or guideline to make all the package

Re: [aur-general] Reply to your request SGE

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:30:11 -0400 Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote: > Thanks a lot for your reply! I commented on the package hoping the new > maintainer can return the maintainer to me. > > But I am willing to answer your question. > > A pull request needs a lot of effort to check. The

Re: [aur-general] Reply to your request SGE

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:01:45 -0400 Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote: > The comments were sent to me indeed. However, I didn't receive any email > notification about the package is marked as out of state. And what in the world does "out of state" even mean? Of course there's no notification

Re: [aur-general] Reply to your request SGE

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:26:07 -0400 Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote: > Hi Freswa, > > Somebody pointed me to your reply in the list. I didn't even know that > the request in the AUR request system was sent to this email list, nor I > know such an email list existed. > > I agree that you

Re: [aur-general] Package clonable via git but not on the web interface?

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:14:32 -0400 Ian Denhardt wrote: > Hi, > > I recently went looking for a package for [entr][1], didn't find one, > and so put together a PKGBUILD myself. When I went to submit it I found > the git repo already exists; if you do: > > git clone

Re: [aur-general] TU application - raster

On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:09:50 -0400 Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 09:15:34AM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > Hi Everyone. > > > > I'm Carsten - or Raster. > > > > Sponsors: eschwartz and shibumi agreed to +1 me > > > > I'm upstream founder of

Re: [aur-general] What is pkgrel and why/how should I use it?

On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:29:30 -0600 karx via aur-general wrote: > Hi Georg, thank you for your reply. > If I am understanding correctly, pkgrel is for changes to the > PKGBUILD, and pkgver is for changes to the actual sources. Is this > correct? > > Yash > > On 3/3/20, Georg wrote: > > Hi Yash,

Re: [aur-general] Anydesk 404 not found

On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 16:36:04 +0330 Amin Vakil wrote: > This page gives 404 not found: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/anydesk/ > > But this url works: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/anydesk.git > > What am I missing? > Both 404 in a browser. If you're cloning the second one with git,

Re: [aur-general] review of getax2019 PKGBUILD

On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 13:17:44 +0100 Yoan Blanc via aur-general wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've built my first PKGBUILD based on Brunio Renié's vaudtax, > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vaudtax/ > > https://gitlab.com/greut/getax > > Do you think I could propose it as is to aur-request? Do you

Re: [aur-general] AUR Merge request for kubebox and kubebox-bin

On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 12:47:22 -0500 David Rodriguez via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > I am the maintainer of both kubebox and kubebox-bin. It has been > brought to my attention that kubebox, since it is not built from > source, would be more appropriately named "kubebox-bin". I've already >

Re: [aur-general] xmrig-amd package deleted?

On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:14:36 -0500 Matt Harrison via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like the xmrig-amd [1] was recently deleted from the AUR. I don't > currently see any mention anywhere of why or how it was deleted, so I am > wondering why it was deleted? > > I can re-created it from

Re: [aur-general] request for action on orphan request

On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 20:15:34 + Joel Shapiro via aur-general wrote: > Hi all, > > I (jshap[1]) put in a request on `nvidia-docker`[2] for it to be orphaned 2 > weeks ago and seeing as some reasonable time has gone by I'd like to ask that > the request be granted. > It is preventing me

Re: [aur-general] Kernel version requirement

On Tue, 07 May 2019 15:56:47 -0400 Mark Weiman wrote: > Is there a plan to change this to include such a line in the packages? > > Mark No, because they don't provide the same thing as the linux package.

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On Tue, 7 May 2019 13:42:16 -0400 Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 5/3/19 1:09 PM, Bruno Pagani wrote: > > They came for mesa-git, did not took care about which dependency were > > pulled. They update mesa-git, but don’t think of llvm-git because they > > were never informed this is

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On Tue, 7 May 2019 13:42:05 -0400 Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 5/3/19 11:41 AM, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > > On Fri, 3 May 2019 11:32:57 -0400 > > Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > >> Apparently, he *really* thinks that that is a bad idea a

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On Fri, 3 May 2019 11:32:57 -0400 Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 5/3/19 11:25 AM, Bruno Pagani wrote: > > Yes, and he can solves that by *pinning a comment telling so*. ;) > > Pinning a comment telling people how to get the default expected User > Experience in a non-default way,

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On Fri, 3 May 2019 10:04:39 -0400 Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 5/1/19 10:53 AM, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > > On Wed, 1 May 2019 12:38:41 +0200 > > Lone_Wolf wrote: > >> Assumptions : > >> > >> mesa-git depends on llvm and llv

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On Wed, 1 May 2019 12:38:41 +0200 Lone_Wolf wrote: > On 01-05-2019 05:18, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > > You're still not getting it. The diff you gave shows that the only > > differences > > are in the depends and madedepends arrays. If that'

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On Wed, 1 May 2019 01:07:43 +0200 Lone_Wolf wrote: > Thanks for speaking freely, scimmia. > > The env var idea has been thrown out of the window. > > > > Time to summarize and tally . > > Option A. mesa-git depends on llvm trunk and PKGBUILD editing is needed > for those that want to build

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 01:32:58 +0200 Lone_Wolf wrote: > Thanks for all replies. > > > I've thought about this and think I have found a way that will work for > all users. > > > My idea is to introduce a new environment variable, mesa_use_llvm . > > It can have the following values : > > 1 >

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:19:37 +0200 Lone_Wolf wrote: > Hi, > > > recently a mesa developer contacted me and asked me to change mesa-git > to depend on released llvm/clang instead of llvm/clang trunk. > > He did convince me there's a demand for such a package. > > > Currently people wanting

Re: [aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 23:53:10 -0700 Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > On 2019-03-06 01:24, James Knight via aur-general wrote: > >Hello -- new user to AUR and hoping if anyone is willing to review a > >PKGBUILD [1] definition for me. I have been reading PKGBUILD [2] and > >"AUR - Submitting

Re: [aur-general] Package present in aur-git, but not in the aur

On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 15:37:00 +0100 pianoslum via aur-general wrote: > Hi@all, > > I searched whether elster (a program for German tax declaration) was > present in the aur (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=elster) and > found out it wasn't. When I finished my own PCKBUILD and tried to

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD git remote branch issue

On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 15:47:59 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 08:40 -0600, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 15:16:22 +0100 > > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > > "Configure finished, type 'make' to build. > >

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD git remote branch issue

On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 15:16:22 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > "Configure finished, type 'make' to build. > /usr/src/claws-mail-gtk3-git/PKGBUILD: line 85: --enable-ldap: command > not found > ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). > Aborting..." That error is a mistake in the PKGBUILD,

Re: [aur-general] Automatic package version

On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:33:12 +0300 Shay Gover via aur-general wrote: > > > > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 19:09:36 +0100 > > From: Konstantin Gizdov > > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Automatic package version > > Message-ID: <8cf660ad-d2cc-d275-7678-cbb32b0d4...@kge.pw>

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Konstantin Gizdov

On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 18:09:50 + Maksim Fomin via aur-general wrote: > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Friday, October 26, 2018 8:23 PM, Doug Newgard via aur-general > wrote: > > > > You did thank Felix, but then went on to make your true intent extremel

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Konstantin Gizdov

On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:29:31 +0100 Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > On 26/10/2018 15:27, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > > I must point out this very recent mailing list thread: > > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-September/034279.html > > &g

Re: [aur-general] Automatic package version

On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 19:26:43 +0300 Shay Gover via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > I have a pakage in AUR that uses an automatic package versioning. I use a > pkgver() and pkgrel(). > However I just noticed that the package version in AUR is old. I checked > the functions and everything is OK.

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Konstantin Gizdov

I must point out this very recent mailing list thread: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-September/034279.html In this thread, you: 1) whine about someone taking over *your* packages, because you're the one that knows them and has cared for them and, after all, they're

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel Bermond (dbermond)

On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 18:35:53 -0300 Daniel Bermond via aur-general wrote: > I usually don't use pgp on my aur packages because people tend to > complain a lot about building issues. They fail to handle the keys and > start complaining to the packager, and this is a big stress. When > dealing with

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel Bermond (dbermond)

On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:38:54 +0200 Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > Hi, > > On 14-10-18, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > > Decided to take a quick look at your PKGBUILDs, and just a few spot checks > > makes me wonder. The first one I click on is apache-flex-sdk, I se

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel Bermond (dbermond)

Decided to take a quick look at your PKGBUILDs, and just a few spot checks makes me wonder. The first one I click on is apache-flex-sdk, I see that you aren't the original submitter, so I look at the git log and see that the first thing you did when taking over this was to remove pgp checks from

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: FS#60333: namcap exits 0 when errors found (Task closed)

On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 13:23:03 +0700 Tom Hale wrote: > I noticed that even when namcap prints out errors, it still exits 0. > > I raised this at: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/60333 > > It was closed: > > Reason for closing: Not a bug > Additional comments about closing: namcap runs fine, so

Re: [aur-general] RFC: PKGBUILD for nixnote2-git

On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 23:09:57 +0700 Tom Hale wrote: > I want avoid the latest commit for greater stability. > > Updated attachment: I've dropped the "-git" from the pkgname as I build > from the latest annotated tag. > > On 6/10/18 10:48 pm, Doug Newgard via

Re: [aur-general] RFC: PKGBUILD for nixnote2-git

On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 22:41:43 +0700 Tom Hale wrote: > I took over the disowned package nixnote2-git. > > Attached is my first attempt at a PKGBUILD. I would appreciate > constructive feedback. > > Thanks in advance, > > -- > Tom Hale -git PKGBUILDS need to build from the latest commit on

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:59:28 -0500 Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:51:47 +0100 > Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > > > Denied resolution? > > > ... > > > I fail to see how you're being "denied" anything. > > > &g

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:51:47 +0100 Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > Denied resolution? > > ... > > I fail to see how you're being "denied" anything. > > Call it what you want, I tried to re-open all 3 bugs but was denied with > little to no comment/explanation. I wanted to know if python2 is going

Re: [aur-general] pkgrel - Is it correct that some "fixes" aren't "fixes"?

On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 19:33:05 +0200 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Moving a package from AUR to Community or vice versa also doesn't > change the content. I guess the pkgrel should inform about each change > done to a package providing the same pkgver. You're confusing package with PKGBUILD. Changes to

Re: [aur-general] Basilisk pkgbuild is facing a trademark violation?

On Mon, 21 May 2018 23:17:39 -0400 Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > All this being said: > > [11:07:23 PM] eschwartz: if you plan to go that > route, that's fine and someone can have a look over your build > configuration (which I could do as

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:54:33 -0400 Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote: > On April 4, 2018 5:32 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > > > On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:23:34 -0400 > > > > Jordan Glover via aur-general aur-general@archlinux.org wrote: > > > >

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#11055] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go | [PRQ#11056] Deletion Request for dnscrypt-proxy-go-git

On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:23:34 -0400 Jordan Glover via aur-general wrote: > I'm sorry for the harsh words. If those requests were made AFTER update > package > in repo there won't be this conversation. I found situation where killing > other people > efforts to make

Re: [aur-general] packaging error in network manager?

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:21:06 +0100 Tom Zander via aur-general wrote: > I just updated my machine and rebooted, the network manager failed to get > up. > Checking the journal logs I get message > that /usr/bin/NetworkManager can't read the shared library libpsl.so.6 >

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:39:43 +0530 Ankit R Gadiya wrote: > >> > >>install -Dm755 "${srcdir}/${pkgname/-/_}-${pkgver}/plugin/tcomment.vim" > >> \ > >>"${pkgdir}/usr/share/vim/vimfiles/plugin/tcomment.vim" > >>install -Dm755

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 19:45:48 +0530 Ankit R Gadiya wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I added two new PKGBUILD(s) today in the AUR, both are plugins for vim. > Any advice, suggestions or feedback will be greatly appreciated. > And if anybody would like the *-git versions of these I will be

Re: [aur-general] Please remove gsmartcontrol-svn package from AUR

On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 13:13:37 -0200 Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > I don't see it as mandatory, but if I was the maintainer of this > development package I would do as the developer says and request > package deletion. > I, on the other hand, wouldn't. The entire point of -

Re: [aur-general] Special Removal of an Inactive TU: speps

On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 22:05:10 +0100 Thorsten Toepper wrote: > Whether the votes happens in the AUR web interface or on a separate > private mailing list is unimportant for the real process I agree, just > at the moment it's the AUR webinterface and the second point is

Re: [aur-general] Rage-git package exists but pkg web page 404 + seems unmaintained

On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:33:41 +0900 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 23:28:19 -0600 Doug Newgard via aur-general > <aur-general@archlinux.org> said: > > > A whole lot of orphans with no votes got deleted. When a package is deleted >

Re: [aur-general] Rage-git package exists but pkg web page 404 + seems unmaintained

On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 12:40:29 +0900 Carsten Haitzler wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rage-git > > Is gone but repo is alive: > git clone ssh://a...@aur.archlinux.org/rage-git.git > > Works. As does: > git clone https://aur.archlinux.org/rage-git.git > >