Noel Kuntze via aur-requests writes:
> Hello Eli,
>
> On 12.04.2018 23:13, Eli Schwartz via aur-requests wrote:
>> On 04/12/2018 04:41 PM, Noel Kuntze wrote:> In this particular case, the
>> last request for a PKGBUILD update was
>>> only made this morning at around 8 AM. The requester submitted
On 04/12/2018 05:33 PM, Noel Kuntze wrote:
> The last package of mine that a request was made against
> (pacemaker-stable) was merged (int pacemaker) rather quickly through
> an aur request, so I'm pretty sensitive about such things. Whenever I
> do requests myself, I give the maintainers ususally
Hello Eli,
On 12.04.2018 23:13, Eli Schwartz via aur-requests wrote:
> On 04/12/2018 04:41 PM, Noel Kuntze wrote:> In this particular case, the
> last request for a PKGBUILD update was
>> only made this morning at around 8 AM. The requester submitted the
>> request today at 8 PM. His claim that th
On 04/12/2018 04:41 PM, Noel Kuntze wrote:> In this particular case, the
last request for a PKGBUILD update was
> only made this morning at around 8 AM. The requester submitted the
> request today at 8 PM. His claim that there were many comments with
> working PKGBUILDs is irrelevant, because the o
Hello list,
The claim made in the message is unsubstantiated, as can easily be seen on the
package's page. I think the submitter is a package hoarder, because he has
383(!) packages on the AUR, most probably acquired through such requests.
This has happened before and leads to a centralization o
