Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#11119] Orphan Request for pcs-git

2018-04-12 Thread Stefan Husmann
Noel Kuntze via aur-requests writes: > Hello Eli, > > On 12.04.2018 23:13, Eli Schwartz via aur-requests wrote: >> On 04/12/2018 04:41 PM, Noel Kuntze wrote:> In this particular case, the >> last request for a PKGBUILD update was >>> only made this morning at around 8 AM. The requester submitted

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#11119] Orphan Request for pcs-git

2018-04-12 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-requests
On 04/12/2018 05:33 PM, Noel Kuntze wrote: > The last package of mine that a request was made against > (pacemaker-stable) was merged (int pacemaker) rather quickly through > an aur request, so I'm pretty sensitive about such things. Whenever I > do requests myself, I give the maintainers ususally

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#11119] Orphan Request for pcs-git

2018-04-12 Thread Noel Kuntze via aur-requests
Hello Eli, On 12.04.2018 23:13, Eli Schwartz via aur-requests wrote: > On 04/12/2018 04:41 PM, Noel Kuntze wrote:> In this particular case, the > last request for a PKGBUILD update was >> only made this morning at around 8 AM. The requester submitted the >> request today at 8 PM. His claim that th

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#11119] Orphan Request for pcs-git

2018-04-12 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-requests
On 04/12/2018 04:41 PM, Noel Kuntze wrote:> In this particular case, the last request for a PKGBUILD update was > only made this morning at around 8 AM. The requester submitted the > request today at 8 PM. His claim that there were many comments with > working PKGBUILDs is irrelevant, because the o

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#11119] Orphan Request for pcs-git

2018-04-12 Thread Noel Kuntze
Hello list, The claim made in the message is unsubstantiated, as can easily be seen on the package's page. I think the submitter is a package hoarder, because he has 383(!) packages on the AUR, most probably acquired through such requests. This has happened before and leads to a centralization o