Thank you Gary,
I fully concur that memory adds rose to the glasses.
I am drilling a bit deeper, based on my fire ground and court work.
In all fields of activity, there are prescriptive rules and these are
vehemently applied
and defended by some.
In many fields of activity it has since been
A conversation that has never been formally had within the sport is the ‘value’
of an Australian registration.
>From my end, that registration held by an elderly airframe has meant that from
>1949 onward it has been possible to trace the provenance (a la ‘Who do you
>think you are’) until the
On 21 Apr 2016, at 5:52 am, Justin Couch wrote:
> We don't get to pick and choose how we interpret "relevant" rules when we
> don't like one that is not in our favour. I looked through at least another
> dozen gliders of varying age. All state cloud flying permitted, none,
This is indicative of the dilemma about corporate knowledge, as each generation
succeeding the one before
only knows what they know, and records that for posterity.
Like the re-imagining of the history of the sport’s formation and early growth
by the late Maurice Little when the current magazine
It is great to see conversation in full flow.
One issue confounding understanding in the conversation might be the quite
different definitions being placed on elements of gliding, with different
contributors coming at things from differing points of view.
It is possibly a difficult ask, but it
My understanding is that at present we have a
Project beyond 3000 underway
(encouraging clubs around Australia to have current members look to re-engage
former members or engage friends).
To be active in April 2017.
This may sit within a business plan. As it seems similar to an Executive
As occurs in other parts of gliding, the issue of pilot responsibility vs
club/instructor ’supervision’
has many constituent parts.
- the existing fiction is that the national body ‘controls’ the sport
whereas a reality is that at each individual flying site the control/supervision
relies on
To all contributors to the conversation on gliding the sport:
a thank you.
The conversation serves the same function as did the production in
1996 of the GFA Development Guide.
It gets together the thinking across the breadth of issues:responses
of the day.
It helps people like me to cast my
Thank you Richard,
even though my contribution is spread over 50 years, I am still in there
pitching for a future for gliding at the coal face. In the last 6 months I have
-
- contributed to a neighbouring club whose CFI ‘retired’ because of the ever
increasing onerous impositions by GFA on
It is pleasurable to see aus-soaring delivering a broad range of thoughts on
serious gliding core subjects.
Contributing elements to the diverse breadth of commentary are both
the diversity of ‘gliding’ styles (as previously listed) and
the variety of attitudes brought by individual pilots
Some use
http://www.aircraftbookingsystem.com/default.aspx
On 17 Feb 2017, at 11:16 am, Ben Coleman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Are there any gliding clubs using a booking system of some sort to organise
> training activities? This may be as simple as who is turning up and
The point that has been made in other forums is that
- the gain of a new member
does not equal
- the loss of an existing member.
Because the former needs support, mentoring and encouragement
whereas
the latter needs respect and encouragement but delivers knowledge and
competencies.
Hence I
I saw it tonight.
With my emergency management background
I could see the continuous theme on human factors which culminate at the end.
Told in a slightly subdued style to suit the general audience it is intended
for.
Length felt slightly short for someone in my mindset.
On 13 Sep 2016, at
13 matches
Mail list logo