Chris,
Hi. Am awaiting a reply from the powers that be for your original request re
the rally. Please bear with me.
In regard to trailers, I think one of the trailers I took to the last rally
was registered. I'm not sure of the others. I found some plates so I use
them. I figure if I get sprung the
Thanks to all on IS 28 canopy mould.
Anthony Smith suggested the IS28 and 32 are the same fuz and from much
internet surfing and picture comparing I believe he is right. Emilis is OK
with me taking a mould of his canopy so all is well. Ill get on to it
ASAP.If all those requiring one in the short
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Borgelt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] What is Safer?
|
| At Toowoomba, 200 feet with instructor, 500 feet for solo
I found this interesting. When talking to Norm Block a few years ago he told
me a B767 if it could take off from Coolie full of fuel is going thru
1ft at 19mn(Mt Warning) and my experience of flying out of Coolie in
B767 was far better than this (14ft at 19nm - I was just going to
Sydney)
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 11:33, Adam Woolley wrote:
> G'day All,
>
> The club that I'm currently flying at has a rule that, a Pilot that hasn't
> done a paddock check is NOT allowed outside the CTAF (10mile) because it is
> considered unsafe. I was chatting to a number of the members last night
>
Maybe the 2% should do what those without a computer must do - find someone
who has a "98% system", or just read Bob Hall's summary and get a copy of the
"Reference Guide" issued by the National Airspace Implementation Group
(1800 007 024)
--Brian Wade
Personal Computer ConceptsControl SPAM
>> (Now suppressing the urge to rant about people who assume that
>everyone runs> Windows...)
> 98% is pretty close to everyone!! :)
Does anyone respect sheep for their decision making?
___
Aus-soaring mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.inte
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 15:11, David Conway wrote:
> 98% is pretty close to everyone!! :)
But it is NOT everyone - and for safety issues like airspace, the
coverage needs to be 100%
--
Robert Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strategic IT & open source consulting
Good stuff Mike. I expect the lobbying to get stronger against the change,
and I have similarly written to the local newspaper in support of the
change. I suggest others do also, as the anti lobby needs to be balanced.
I note a few nay sayers within GFA. To them I would say this change has
taken
At 08:23 AM 21/11/03 +1100, you wrote:
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Mike Borgelt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:30 PM
>Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] What is Safer?
>
>
>| If it wa
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Borgelt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] What is Safer?
| If it was up to me a pilot wouldn't be allowed out of the
At 02:29 AM 21/11/03 +1100, you wrote:
>Mike
>
>I think you misunderstood Bob's reply - what he actually said was that the
>educational material did not mention CTAFs and MBZs because there were no
>changes in that area.
I thought the piece of paper with the climb descent profiles of regional
t
Recently had a visit from a Swedish Air Traffic Controller and this young
girl told us we have some of the best radar and ATC in the world and gave
her reasons. Recently as a group we visited Coolie Tower and it was indeed
interesting - that computer that drives the screens from the various radar
At 17:48 20-11-03 +1000, you wrote:
The rule was probably made up to ensure that you could get back to the field
with a headwind from any direction for any novice pilot in a Blanik or
lesser performance A/C.
PeterS
Peter - that was probably the intent, as you say. Would it actually
achieve th
Mike
I think you misunderstood Bob's reply - what he actually said was that the
educational material did not mention CTAFs and MBZs because there were no
changes in that area. He is correct, though I question the proposed "US
CTAF" without proper education to help pilots make the right choice
Does'nt help when the cuntstable gets out his tape measure Leigh.
- Original Message -
From: "Leigh Bunting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, 20 November 2003 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] RE: registe
He will be down at Corowa.
Cheers Miles G-B
>
> From: "Stuart & Kerri Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat 15/11/2003 3:10 AM GMT+08:00
> To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] Peter Zander
>
> Narromine Cup week
Steve Fossett continues to keep gliding in the news:
"Last Friday (November 14) Steve Fossett (USA) and Terry Delore (New
Zealand) had an astounding wave flight in the Andes - an out and return
of 2002.44km adding nearly 300km to the existing record of 1715.5km held
by German Klaus Ohlmann (Nimbu
At 11:33 AM 20/11/03 +1000, you wrote:
>G'day All,
>
>The club that I'm currently flying at has a rule that, a Pilot that hasn't
>done a paddock check is NOT allowed outside the CTAF (10mile) because it is
>considered unsafe. I was chatting to a number of the members last night
>about their rule
At 09:24 PM 20/11/03 +1100, you wrote:
If desperate 1. remove cover (have a good fitting X screwdriver as they can
be real tight) and 2. locate the square EPROM at the back of the LCD
display. 3 Remove this IC with a remover using appropiate static earthing.
4. All the leg loops need to come out fu
Ron Sanders wrote:
> I am having trouble registering my Nimbus 3DM trailer in NSW re width and
> overhang.
Buy an old trailer and use the plate and rego if you are really desperate.
I have just rebuilt my trailer by renewing everything forward of the tail
light and number plate. I burnt the old
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Borgelt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 8:58 PM
Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] NAS
> At 11:51 AM 20/11/03 +1030, you wrote:
> >At 10:31 AM 19/11/03 +1100,
At 12:01 AM 20/11/03 +1100, you wrote:
>
>Of all the material that has been published so far, the GFA/HGFA material
>in the covering letter from Bob Hall that points the relevant aspects
>relating to gliding is by far the best-targeted with genuine practical
>advice as to how to be a responsible
Microair radio which start to show Chinese
characters on LCD screen
Sorry about the yellow again but need your attention. While at Camden
a few weeks ago I saw this problem again in the DG1000 If you also have
this problem please do not use the radio until it is fixed. The problem is
cause
At 11:51 AM 20/11/03 +1030, you wrote:
>At 10:31 AM 19/11/03 +1100, Alan wrote:
>>Support the new arrangement and lobby against those who will certainly vent
>>against the change.
>
>There have already been some 'news items' in media by air traffic controller
>and IFR operator sources announcing th
At 03:25 PM 20/11/03 +1100, you wrote:
>Try CONDAMINE BRIDGE 26:55.617S 150:07.8E Source Borgelt's "thelot.map" file
>
>Or in decimal form ,
>Condamine Bridge 26.926950s 150.13E from Kingaroy Nationals a while
>back.
>
>Ron Sanders
>
thelot.map data is old and was never intended to be definit
Adam,
you ask an interesting question to which the simple answer is: yes,
you are safe at 1' 11 miles from the airfield.
BUT...
I think if you asked them, the notion of not going out of final glide is
already a given. I am sure the club would not be happy with you 10m(18km)
away on a
The rule was probably made up to ensure that you could get back to the field
with a headwind from any direction for any novice pilot in a Blanik or
lesser performance A/C.
PeterS
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November
Why should that be so when it has been used in the USA for donkey's years
and they have many times more traffic? I have flown in a light a/c around
Seattle and they had a glider/light a/c airfield and multiple airfields near
multiple jet ports and they all got on very well. Many more aircraft of
98% is pretty close to everyone!! :)
(Now suppressing the urge to rant about people who assume that everyone runs
Windows...) ___
Aus-soaring mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
Try CONDAMINE BRIDGE 26:55.617S 150:07.8E Source Borgelt's "thelot.map" file
Or in decimal form ,
Condamine Bridge 26.926950s 150.13E from Kingaroy Nationals a while
back.
Ron Sanders
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Hart
Sent:
31 matches
Mail list logo
