Hi folks,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:12:37 +0100, Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My major criteria for inclusion would be:
. general usability (i.e. covers at least a good number of AVRs if not
all of them)
. same license as avr-libc to improve re-usability in closed source
projects
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of David Bourgeois
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 9:33 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
Hi folks,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:12:37 +0100
On Jan 7, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Weddington, Eric wrote:
- a circular buffer (I spent quite some time on this one to
get it clean
and optimized.)
I also have a ring buffer implementation that's been tested.
- an I2C library (I made one inspired from Procyon AVRlib but want to
rebuild a new one
Weddington, Eric wrote:
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of David Brown
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 1:30 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
Weddington, Eric wrote:
. same
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of David Brown
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 1:30 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
Weddington, Eric wrote:
. same license as avr
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
You're going to have to back up your claims on this one. I have
never seen, nor heard of such a limitation.
It's also what I recall from my last reading of the LGPL (which has
arguably been quite some time ago). The official reasoning for the
requirement to ship
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:12 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
FYI, the libgcc library that ships with GCC
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
Thanks for the reminder; you're right it's GPL+exception. Then I
would be OK with a library having such a license.
I find it quite complicated, compared to the plain old BSD-style
license we've been using for avr-libc for years now. Is there any
specific reason you
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:42 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
Thanks
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
Dean Camera wrote:
What sort of contributions did you have in mind? Would the
util library code be moved over to the new library? How
would you imagine it structured?
I really thought of things that are currently available in libraries
like Procyon AVRlib.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 2:13 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
Dean Camera
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Weddington, Eric wrote:
I'm open to having the LGPL license on such a library project.
(Definitely not the GPL, though.) I can be persuaded to either the BSD
or LGPL license.
There's another (I'd argue, better) alternative: the CDDL. Certianly
worth evaluating...
--
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 3:00 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
As Rich Teer wrote:
There's another (I'd
Weddington, Eric wrote:
. same license as avr-libc to improve re-usability in closed source
projects (that's the major distinction from Procyon AVRlib)
I'm open to having the LGPL license on such a library project.
(Definitely not the GPL, though.) I can be persuaded to either the BSD
or
As Rich Teer wrote:
... In other words, under BSD, someone could take the AVRlibC code
and change it, but not be obliged to return those changes back to
the community.
And this is exactly intentional for our purpose. In the embedded
world, people can quickly become nervous if they even feel
15 matches
Mail list logo
