Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-23 Thread Julien Danjou
On Wed, Mar 23 2011, Kelly Clowers wrote: Are you pro-wayland then? Or simply pragmatic? Simply ironic, actually. :) -- Julien Danjou ❱ http://julien.danjou.info pgpBb0kqjvrDo.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-22 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 14:02, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: On Mon, Mar 21 2011, Peter Lewis wrote: If Cairo-XCB does become old and crufty, then I suppose the OP's question was what will Awesome do?. Move to Wayland, of course. -- Julien Danjou ❱ http://julien.danjou.info

XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Mika Fischer
Hi, it seems that in the latest versions of ArchLinux and OpenSuSE (and maybe others), cairo is being built without support for xcb. This makes it impossible to build awesome on these distributions. The justification seems to be that cairo-xcb is experimental and buggy and does not have a

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Sammy Fischer
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:07:07 +0100 Mika Fischer mika.fisc...@zoopnet.de wrote: Hi, it seems that in the latest versions of ArchLinux and OpenSuSE (and maybe others), cairo is being built without support for xcb. This makes it impossible to build awesome on these distributions. The

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Uli Schlachter
Am 21.03.2011 13:07, Mika Fischer wrote: Will newer versions of awesome work without cairo-xcb? Will newer versions of awesome work without an X server? Will newer secure logins work without any kind of authentication? Will newer computers work without electricity? Will newer humans work without

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Mika Fischer
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 13:26, Sammy Fischer sammy.fisc...@gmail.com wrote: it seems that in the latest versions of ArchLinux and OpenSuSE (and maybe others), cairo is being built without support for xcb. This makes it impossible to build awesome on these distributions. The justification seems

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, Mar 21 2011, Uli Schlachter wrote: cairo-xcb never changed its state. It's been what it is for years now. Only some idiot at ArchLinux decided that enabling the cairo-xcb backend breaks firefox (which it does not do!) and thus went rampage. Did they? Holy shit. -- Julien Danjou ❱

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Uli Schlachter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21.03.2011 14:28, Julien Danjou wrote: On Mon, Mar 21 2011, Uli Schlachter wrote: cairo-xcb never changed its state. It's been what it is for years now. Only some idiot at ArchLinux decided that enabling the cairo-xcb backend breaks

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, Mar 21 2011, Uli Schlachter wrote: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20960 (I just noticed that I got one of the bug numbers in the list of dupes wrong, whoops) Closing that bug by quoting RedHat bug report. Priceless. -- Julien Danjou ❱ http://julien.danjou.info pgpgIngO8yKoO.pgp

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:09 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: On Mon, Mar 21 2011, Uli Schlachter wrote: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20960 (I just noticed that I got one of the bug numbers in the list of dupes wrong, whoops) Closing that bug by quoting RedHat bug report.

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Gregor Best
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:21:23PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:09 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: On Mon, Mar 21 2011, Uli Schlachter wrote: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20960 (I just noticed that I got one of the bug numbers in the list of dupes wrong,

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Gregor Best g...@ring0.de wrote: FWIW, here in Gentoo land, it's just a matter of running    emerge awesome In Arch land, most users have an AUR helper, so it really just takes yaourt -S awesome or whatever. It would be nice to have awesome in the official

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Peter Lewis
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Gregor Best g...@ring0.de wrote: FWIW, here in Gentoo land, it's just a matter of running    emerge awesome In Arch land, most users have an AUR helper, so it really just takes yaourt -S awesome

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Remy CLOUARD
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 05:32:09PM +0100, Gregor Best wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:21:23PM +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:09 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: On Mon, Mar 21 2011, Uli Schlachter wrote: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20960 (I just noticed that I

Re: XCB support in cairo phased out?

2011-03-21 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, Mar 21 2011, Peter Lewis wrote: If Cairo-XCB does become old and crufty, then I suppose the OP's question was what will Awesome do?. Move to Wayland, of course. -- Julien Danjou ❱ http://julien.danjou.info pgpekZbd2QAMU.pgp Description: PGP signature