On 11/6/05, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ajith / Folks1) Please can we do a release ASAP? The core
changes (like renaming to AxisService) mean that it would be good to
have a stable build with these in, plus the latest ADB.
+1
IMHO cutting another 0.x release soon seems to be make th
SanjivaThe stockquote service is a must - its SOAP101. I can take or leave the rest. I agree they are tufty maybe we could pressure XMethods to upgrade a little!!PaulOn 11/7/05,
Jim Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Funny you mention the Google search service - there is some funkinessthere too
Funny you mention the Google search service - there is some funkiness
there too. We found over a year or so ago that the WSDL was indeed
rpc/enc written in terms of XSD types - no "style points" but
certainly legal. But after invoking the service notice the responses
are actually "xsi:type"-ed from
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 14:17 +, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Anne
>
> I agree with Salesforce.com, ebay, UDDI. The XMethods ones I meant
Paul, I looked at the first one and it uses soapenc:arrayType. I'm -1
for requiring that to work; that's just flat out crufty and old. I know
I'm going to get be
Anne
I agree with Salesforce.com, ebay, UDDI. The XMethods ones I meant are:
XMethods Demo Services Usage Guidelines
Style
Service Name
Description
Implementation
RPC
Try It
XSpace
Store SOAP Envelopes in a shared space
Glue
RPC
Try It
XMethods Query Service
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 07:12 -0500, Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> I caution you regarding the "XMethods core services". As far as I'm
> aware, XMethods hasn't vetted any of the services listed on the site,
> and many contain invalid WSDL. I recommend that you stick with
> commercial WSDLs (Google, Amaz
I caution you regarding the "XMethods core services". As far as I'm
aware, XMethods hasn't vetted any of the services listed on the site,
and many contain invalid WSDL. I recommend that you stick with
commercial WSDLs (Google, Amazon, Yahoo, EBay, Salesforce.com, UDDI,
etc.) as well as whatever int
Ajith / Folks1) Please can we do a release ASAP? The core changes (like renaming to AxisService) mean that it would be good to have a stable build with these in, plus the latest ADB.2) The obvious list of services to support are:
All of Google, Amazon, Yahoo, XMethods core services (stockquote, cur
Hi All,
It's partly my fault that ADB did not get tested with Amazon or Google
or any other widely used WSDLs. However ADB does not understand SOAP
encoding (!) and the Google service cannot be directly codegned. One
other limitation of ADB is that it does not support imports (yet) which
I intend t
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 13:34 -0500, Tom Jordahl wrote
> What I would hope is that ADB can be used with a typical WSDL found in
> the wild – UDDI, Amazon.com, Google, etc, etc. If it doesn’t work
> with the WSDL users are likely to want to consume, then they will just
> walk away. Or maybe they wi
-
*From:* Eran Chinthaka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 02, 2005 9:06 PM
*To:* axis-dev@ws.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: [Axis2] Road Map for next release
One more comment.
Can you all remember that we agreed to have a "Simple" data binding
framework for Axi
ct:* Re: [Axis2] Road Map for next release
One more comment.
Can you all remember that we agreed to have a "Simple" data binding
framework for Axis2, during the second Axis2 f2f ? We were very clear that
we didn't want a full data binding tool. (Glen, Dims you all were there
too.)
9:06 PM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2] Road Map for next release
One more comment.Can you all remember that we agreed to have a "Simple" data binding framework for Axis2, during the second Axis2 f2f ? We were very clear that we didn't want a full data binding tool.
, 2005
9:06 PM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2] Road Map for
next release
One more comment.
Can you all remember that we agreed to have a "Simple" data binding
framework for Axis2, during the second Axis2 f2f ? We were very clear that we
didn't want a full data bind
One more comment.
Can you all remember that we agreed to have a "Simple" data binding
framework for Axis2, during the second Axis2 f2f ? We were very clear
that we didn't want a full data binding tool. (Glen, Dims you all were
there too.)
So Tom, its unfair for you to expect *everything* from
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 14:56 -0500, Tom Jordahl wrote:
> If users are trying to use the data binding and it doesn’t meet their
> needs, how can it be a slippery slope?
Where would you draw the line Tom? Substitution groups? Attribute
groups? Or would you not draw a line at all?
If we do all of XML
If users are trying to use the data
binding and it doesn’t meet their needs, how can it be a slippery slope?
--
Tom Jordahl
From: Ajith Ranabahu
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005
3:02 AM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2] Road Map
Hi paul,
Yep, I agree that we should push people to use ADB and give their
feedback. However my impression of ADB is that it's a 'simple'
databinding framework which means that it'll inevitably lack full
support for schema! if we push it too much there will be too much
expectations and we might end
Yes EranI think it is important we get people testing ADB and giving us feedback.PaulOn 10/31/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:+1 for a new release with the ADB stuff done & working.
Sanjiva.On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 08:47 +0600, Ajith Ranabahu wrote:> Hi All,> Agreed. Will do it ASAP
+1 for a new release with the ADB stuff done & working.
Sanjiva.
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 08:47 +0600, Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
> Hi All,
> Agreed. Will do it ASAP with right comments in the code and a seperate
> piece of documentation.
>
> On 11/1/05, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi All,
Agreed. Will do it ASAP with right comments in the code and a seperate piece of documentation.On 11/1/05, Eran Chinthaka <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 point taken. Thanks. I will create a wiki for the next release and
add the point.
But still I can't see any response from others. D
+1 point taken. Thanks. I will create a wiki for the next release and
add the point.
But still I can't see any response from others. Does this mean we do
not need a release ? Or is it natural when I ask about releases, people
stay silent ;-)
Chinthaka
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Eran
I'd lik
EranI'd like to see the ADB documented, fully tested and I'd like to be able to make it work myself!PaulOn 10/31/05, Steve Loughran <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Eran Chinthaka wrote:
> Hi all,>> We have advanced a lot since our last release. Especially we are almost> done with doc/lit handling both w
Eran Chinthaka wrote:
Hi all,
We have advanced a lot since our last release. Especially we are almost
done with doc/lit handling both with ADB and XMLBeans. And we had
numerous bug fixing also.
And I know that we are not done with RPC stuff, yet.
We know that there are lot of people trying eve
24 matches
Mail list logo
