Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Richard Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see any confusion at all. It's simply a question of where > does Dave draw the line between "you must share and copy this" and > "you must not share and copy this". He's previously given the very > strong impr

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Rob Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Richard Lockwood > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Certainly. Dave is forever banging on about how if information can be >> copied it *should* be copied and shared - not just free software, but

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Richard Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Certainly. Dave is forever banging on about how if information can be > copied it *should* be copied and shared - not just free software, but > anything; music, films etc, regardless of the wishes of the original > cre

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Tim Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Lockwood wrote: >>Dave Crossland wrote: >>> Just to clarify: I do not support the BNP, do not agree with their >>> foundational concepts, but think they have a right to exist and a >>> right to privacy - as MS says, p

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

Richard Lockwood wrote: >Dave Crossland wrote: >> Just to clarify: I do not support the BNP, do not agree with their >> foundational concepts, but think they have a right to exist and a >> right to privacy - as MS says, privacy matters. > > More than your oft-vaunted personal concept of "freedom"?

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

Dave Crossland wrote: > 2008/11/19 Ian Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> If you've not heard about the BNP member leak, you've obviously not reading >> Techcrunch UK > > "I have decided to take down the map" > > Good. IHMO, being a member of a political party (i.e. giving them money) shouldn't

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

More than your oft-vaunted personal concept of "freedom"? > > Just to clarify: I do not support the BNP, do not agree with their > foundational concepts, but think they have a right to exist and a > right to privacy - as MS says, privacy matters. > > Cheers, > Dave > - - Sent via the backstage.bbc

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

It's your argument, not mine Dave. It's just amusing to see you squirm when it doesn't quite fit what you think you should see as your personal beliefs. Har, and indeed, har. Rich. On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Dave Crossland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/11/19 Richard Lockwood <[EMAIL P

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

2008/11/19 Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wednesday 19 November 2008 16:18:17 Richard Lockwood wrote: >> So where's your problem? It's published, it's in the public domain. > > I personally think this is rather tasteless. > > Privacy matters. Just to clarify: I do not support the BNP, do not a

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

On Wednesday 19 November 2008 16:18:17 Richard Lockwood wrote: > So where's your problem?  It's published, it's in the public domain. I personally think this is rather tasteless. Privacy matters. Michael - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http:/

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

2008/11/19 Richard Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > And it was published, by an ex-member of the BNP. (Obviously despite > a high court injunction, but when it comes to little things like, say, > "the law", you don't think it applies to you when copying stuff, do > you?) > > So where's your problem

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

I'm a little unsure if being a member of a political party is a private or public matter, in fact. 2008/11/19 Richard Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > And it was published, by an ex-member of the BNP. (Obviously despite > a high court injunction, but when it comes to little things like, say, > "th

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

And it was published, by an ex-member of the BNP. (Obviously despite a high court injunction, but when it comes to little things like, say, "the law", you don't think it applies to you when copying stuff, do you?) So where's your problem? It's published, it's in the public domain. Rich. On Wed

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

Rob Myers wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Dominic Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm neither a member nor a supporter of the BNP, but I think it is >> entirely inappropriate for people to be perpetuating this list, in any form. >> > > Disbanding the BNP should do it. ;-)

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

There is lots of info about the BNP in public domain already. You can use this location based Google application tosearch for Youtube Videos within your local area. The application uses Gears Geolocation, Ajax and Youtube APis. Use the keyword "BNP" to locate BNP videos

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

2008/11/19 Richard Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That surprises me Dave. After all, you're always bleating on about > how just because information can be copied, it should be copied, and > how there's no such thing, morally, as copyright any more, and how all > information should be free. Unpub

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

That surprises me Dave. After all, you're always bleating on about how just because information can be copied, it should be copied, and how there's no such thing, morally, as copyright any more, and how all information should be free. Rich. On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Dave Crossland <[EMAIL

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

2008/11/19 Mark Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I totally agree with this comment. > I've Twittered as such also: > westpier is thinking we should collectively leave these mashups well alone. > They don't deserve our attention or interest > Best > Mark (@westpier) > At the level of 'lets find out w

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Dominic Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm neither a member nor a supporter of the BNP, but I think it is > entirely inappropriate for people to be perpetuating this list, in any form. Disbanding the BNP should do it. ;-) - Rob. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

I totally agree with this comment. I've Twittered as such also: westpier is thinking we should collectively leave these mashups well alone. They don't deserve our attention or interest Best Mark (@westpier) On 19 Nov 2008, at 15:01, Dominic Burns wrote: I'm neither a member nor a suppor

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

I'm neither a member nor a supporter of the BNP, but I think it is entirely inappropriate for people to be perpetuating this list, in any form. Ian Forrester wrote: > If you've not heard about the BNP member leak, you've obviously not reading > Techcrunch UK > - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.u

Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

2008/11/19 Ian Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > If you've not heard about the BNP member leak, you've obviously not reading > Techcrunch UK "I have decided to take down the map" Good. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/a

[backstage] BNP mashups

If you've not heard about the BNP member leak, you've obviously not reading Techcrunch UK http://uk.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/icanhaz-lol-griffin-pix-okthnkzbye/ - icanhazbnp? http://uk.techcrunch.com/2008/11/19/bnp-member-list-mashed-with-google-maps-creates-a-sea-of-red-dots/ - The map Ian