On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:05 PM wrote:
>
> Also, I find btrfs snapshots to be very valuable. Especially, if I am
> messing/playing around with backuppc... that way I can easily revert
> if I mess something up...
>
> Snapshots have also saved me when I have run across the occasional
> backuppc
Michael Stowe wrote at about 03:57:34 + on Friday, February 5, 2021:
> On 2021-02-04 16:27, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > --On Thursday, February 04, 2021 5:13 PM +0100 Alexander Kobel
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Distro support is a serious thing to consider. In general, backuppc
> >> will
> >>
On 2021-02-04 16:27, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Thursday, February 04, 2021 5:13 PM +0100 Alexander Kobel
wrote:
Distro support is a serious thing to consider. In general, backuppc
will
happily work with whatever is the default file system of your
distribution. For CentOS and RedHat, XFS is
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 6:29 PM Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> The biggest pain is finding an MUA that can support both and allows the
> different quoting style. In interleaved, prefix the quote with "> ". In
> top-post, copy the message below a separator line with no prefix. Has
> anyone found a
Kenneth Porter wrote at about 16:26:19 -0800 on Thursday, February 4, 2021:
> --On Thursday, February 04, 2021 11:24 AM +0100 Sorin Srbu
> wrote:
>
> > I'll continue to end-post as before. :-)
>
> Not end/bottom post! That's really no better than top-posting, because we
> still have to
> On Feb 4, 2021, at 7:28 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> --On Thursday, February 04, 2021 11:24 AM +0100 Sorin Srbu
> wrote:
>
>> I'll continue to end-post as before. :-)
>
> Not end/bottom post! That's really no better than top-posting, because we
> still have to scroll down through the
--On Thursday, February 04, 2021 11:24 AM +0100 Sorin Srbu
wrote:
I'll continue to end-post as before. :-)
Not end/bottom post! That's really no better than top-posting, because we
still have to scroll down through the massive post you're quoting.
Brutally trim the post you're replying
--On Thursday, February 04, 2021 5:13 PM +0100 Alexander Kobel
wrote:
Distro support is a serious thing to consider. In general, backuppc will
happily work with whatever is the default file system of your
distribution. For CentOS and RedHat, XFS is the obvious choice, and BTRFS
will not give
On 2/3/2021 9:09 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hello all,
Years ago when I last worked daily, and before my timeout, with BPC, the
deal was to not top post. There were usually corrective comments if somebody
forgot him/herself and in no uncertain terms.
Has that changed over the years, and one can now
Hi,
On 2/4/21 5:02 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On 2/3/2021 6:54 PM, backu...@kosowsky.org wrote:
I just built backuppc for my Raspberry PI and ordered an external SSD
drive that I plan to format in btrfs.
I'm using CentOS, and it looks like Red Hat is dropping btrfs in favor
of other
When backups number N is initiated, it is initially labeled as
'active'. If interrupted, it is labeled as 'partial'.
Then when a backup is tried again, it is numbered 'N+1' and again
labeled as 'active'. This proceeds ad-infinitum until a successful
backup is completed.
The result can be large
On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 14:51 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 1:41 PM wrote:
> > Paul Leyland wrote at about 18:59:24 + on Wednesday, February 3, 2021:
> > > I have, very reluctantly, been forced to accept top-posting.
> >
> > Sadly, that has become too true. My solution
12 matches
Mail list logo
