On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Mike ispbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12-07-13 01:50 PM, Bryan Keadle (.net) wrote:
I think I had a buddy try AoE and found it problematic - not yet ready
for prime time?
I've used it for a variety of things from software RAID to network
booting - no
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Ward... James Ward jew...@torzo.com wrote:
I have two etch BackupPC servers and two lenny BackupPC servers. All were
built at the OS level currently running. I like the new BackupPC interface
a lot and would like to upgrade the etch servers to lenny and
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Ward... James Ward jew...@torzo.comwrote:
Have you specifically done a dist-upgrade from etch to lenny?
On Jun 10, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Jim McNamara wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Ward... James Ward jew...@torzo.comwrote:
I have two etch BackupPC
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Les Mikesell l...@futuresource.com wrote:
Jim McNamara wrote:
Thanks again for everyone's help, I'm a longtime lurker on these boards,
and I was quite pleased to have support when my usualy install
conditions were thrown out!
I'm still curious about
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Adam Goryachev
mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.au wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm guessing your telephony system will be some commercial version of
asterisk? I would seriously question the idea of putting both your
telephony system
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Adam Goryachev
mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.au wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim McNamara wrote:
I didn't think it was incompatible with CentOS, I'm just stuck in
the position of having done this probably 20 times on Debian
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
n...@lemonbit.com wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Why is suexec involved?
Les is right, you don't need suexec. Trying to use it is probably
causing your problem.
[2008-12-15 10:37:00]: file is either setuid or setgid:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Mark Maciolek m...@sr.unh.edu wrote:
Jim McNamara wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
n...@lemonbit.com mailto:n...@lemonbit.com wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Why is suexec involved?
Les is right, you
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) n...@lemonbit.com
wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
[r...@telephony conf.d]# cat /etc/selinux/config
# This file controls the state of SELinux on the system.
# SELINUX= can take one of these three values:
# enforcing - SELinux
Hello all! I'm normally a Debian guy, but for a project I'm forced to use
CentOS 4.7. I installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from source. I'm trying to get
BackupPC running on that box, and I cannot seem to get BackupPC_Admin (or
the testsuid script found here -
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Les Mikesell l...@futuresource.com wrote:
Jim McNamara wrote:
Hello all! I'm normally a Debian guy, but for a project I'm forced to use
CentOS 4.7. I installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from source. I'm trying to get
BackupPC running on that box, and I cannot seem
Is that a cut/paste error or do you actually have targeted uncommented?
By the way, it takes a reboot to make a change take effect.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
That wasn't a cut/paste error, targeted came up uncommented from the get go.
I went through the install with
I have found that rsyncd usually needs to be run with administrator rights.
Trying to get it to run as a regular user or a system account has always
failed for me. With your connection refused message, I suspect that rsyncd
is not running at all. try either using nmap or telnetting to the windows
First things first. How did you install rsyncd on the server? Did you use
the cygwin-rsyncd package from the sourceforge site?
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=34854package_id=88133
Odds are very good that you have a windows or other software firewall in
place. You need to
On Feb 17, 2008 8:42 AM, Mirco Piccin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Creating the archive locally on the server (using BackupPC_tarCreate
or BackupPC_zipCreate) and then transferring it to the Windows machine
is not an option?
Yes, it is an option.
But I'm thinking to an option that not
On two windows machines using rsyncd, the one on the LAN with the backuppc
machine does 44 Gb fulls in 132 minutes, and incrementals (about 200 Mb of
new data per day) takes 30. The other machine is across a VPN, but still
does 25 Gb fulls in 125 minutes, and incrementals (about 6 Gb of new data)
before 3rd party apps start appearing that work.
Jim McNamara
On 5/19/07, Richard Maynard / Wessex Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have been an avid user of backuppc for both internal and use on client's
sites, and have had great success using cygwin-rsyncd in the past for
backing
I have a bit of hard data to offer on this subject, as I recently switched a
backup from tar+ssh (over cygwin) to rsyncd.
The backuppc server is on the same physical LAN, and connect to each other
via a 192.168 address. All the cabling and switches support 100 MB full
duplex communications, and
is 3.0 yet apt-getable?
Don't know, I always install from source.
-Dave
Yes, it is. It is only in unstable though, so you'll need to specify that
apt-get use the unstable repositories to get version 3.0.
Peace,
Jim
-
I agree with what Jason wrote, particularly in regards to a 3ware
controller. I also like reiserfs, but for 1.5 Tb a strong case could be made
for XFS or JFS, depending on your standard issues like many small files in
the backup, or fewer larger files.
I would also consider raid 5 or 6. Nothing
-x 2 root root 104 2007-02-22 22:18 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 168 2007-02-22 22:18 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root8 2007-02-22 22:18 image - ../image
-rwsr-xr-x 1 backuppc backuppc 3993 2007-02-14 17:14 index.cgi
Peace,
Jim
On 3/5/07, Filipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim
Hello again list!
I'm running into some trouble with excluding directories in rsyncd.conf on a
windows machine. The machine in question is dying quickly, and rarely stays
alive for more than 30 minutes or so. Because of that, I'm trying to
slowly increment what is being backed up to the debian
if that will work, but it sounds like it's worth a shot.
brien
Jim McNamara wrote:
Hello again list!
I'm running into some trouble with excluding directories in rsyncd.conf on
a windows machine. The machine in question is dying quickly, and rarely
stays alive for more than 30 minutes or so. Because
/bash/rsync.html
I'm guessing the translation from bash to winworld is where my problem is
occurring.
Peace,
Jim
On 2/28/07, Brien Dieterle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
perhaps the leading /s are causing it not to match? Have you tried
just
'Administrator/'
brien
Jim McNamara wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/28 11:19 , Jim McNamara wrote:
The main problem is the excludes list is supposed to be separated by
spaces,
and of course everyone's favorite OS has spaces in directory names.
I do excludes on things like that, using a '?' in place of the spaces. So
for example
On 2/21/07, Filipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've upgraded from 2.1.1 to 3.0.0 in a debian sarge, and some problems
arise..
First it was the error about the language, and resolved it by renaming
/etc/backuppc and reinstalling the 3.0.0 version.
I saw the same problem in the same situation.
to provide!
Jim
On 2/21/07, Filipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim McNamara wrote:
On 2/21/07, Filipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've upgraded from 2.1.1 to 3.0.0 in a debian sarge, and some problems
arise..
First it was the error about the language, and resolved it by renaming
/etc/backuppc
Yes, apparently I have sticky on the brain!
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief
Craig,
Thanks for your personal attention on this. The XferLOG is now available in
the images directory:
http://mail.stephanco.com/backuppc/images/
The log from the email you replied to has since been overwritten since it
was only considered a partial backup. The emails yesterday between the
locations if possible.
Thanks,
Jim
On 2/19/07, Jim McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According the the man page for rsyncd.conf, there should be no issue
with multiple shares, they have an example with 5 or so shares, some
publicly open and others password protected.
Since both shares were
I am having a problem with rsyncd between backuppc and a remote windows box
running the rsync package provided on the backuppc page at sourceforge. I
installed a clean version of backuppc 3.0.0, moving all the old backups from
2.1.1 to an alternate machine should I need them later.
The problem
Yes, it has. The colors are different, and depending on your
permissions the ability to modify the configuration of individual
hosts through the website may be present. The base is very similar,
and I don't think you'd have problems, but they are not identical.
Peace,
Jim
On 2/17/07, Rob Ogle
Hello list!
My thanks again go out to Craig for a great piece of software!
I have been running BackupPC 2.1.1 on a debian box, installed by the
apt-get package system. Tonight I upgraded by compiling 3.0.0, and
encountered a good number of problems, largely resulting from Debian
modifications.
Due to the code freeze in Debian for the release of Etch as stable
soon, it will be quite a while before a new deb package for backupPC
makes it to stable. The Debian backupPC maintainer is probably well
aware of the releases, but even if he made the packages, the code
freeze would prevent them
Hello again everyone!
I solved the earlier problems I had with rsyncd by using the package
from the backuppc page for cygwin rather than forcing my own install.
Rsyncd now seems to work, but I have a strange error. I have 2 full
backups from when the backuppc operated on smb, and have now
I've had particularly good results from the 3ware 9500 series 4port
controllers. They run about $325 US dollars. I work with a company
that archives massive amouts of video data, and before a client is
ready for the 15 SATA NAS, you can get spectacular results out of a 4
port with PCI interface.
Hello again everyone!
I solved the earlier problems I had with rsyncd by using the package
from the backuppc page for cygwin rather than forcing my own install.
Rsyncd now seems to work, but I have a strange error. I have 2 full
backups from when the backuppc operated on smb, and have now
/local/bin/rsync';
as that is the matching 2.6.6 version of rsync for the win box.
It seems to me that module /UPC/ is pretty well defined, but obviously
this is new territory to me. Do I need to define it differently
somehow?
Thanks for your time,
Jim
On 12/12/06, Jim McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED
, it is completely absent from the
rsyncd.conf on the winbox.
Thanks,
Jim
On 12/14/06, Randy Barlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 14 December 2006 21:50, Jim McNamara wrote:
[UPC]
/cygdrive/f/UPC
hosts allow = 192.168.2.1
strict modes = false
Connected to mas90-server:873, remote version
Jim McNamara wrote:
And the new error makes even less sense to me,
Contents of file /var/lib/backuppc/pc/mas90-server/XferLOG.bad.z,
modified 2006-12-14 22:12:40
Connected to mas90-server:873, remote version 29
Negotiated protocol version 26
Error connecting to module UPC at mas90
Jim McNamara wrote:
I used:
cygrunsrv --remove rsyncd
and then checked with:
cygrunsrv --list
which only showed sshd running. I still get the chroot error, and it
seems that rsync not running should produce an error long before
anything about chroot. Since cygwin shell seems
I got the impression that this problem may have been fixed in a newer
version of backuppc, would upgrading help?
I'll try reconfiguring backuppc to do rsyncd instead of rsync if not.
Thanks,
Jim
On 12/12/06, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/11 09:43 , Jim McNamara wrote
Hello all!
I found some mails in the archive that relates to this problem, but
what seemed to be the solution didn't work for me. I'd like to show
what's happening, and hope to get some input on what the problem is.
Here is the info I found in the archives:
43 matches
Mail list logo
