Em 18/02/2022 07:33, Adam Goryachev via BackupPC-users escreveu:
On 17/2/2022 23:43, Bruno Rogério Fernandes wrote:
Maybe I've got a solution
Instead of modifying backuppc behavior, I'm planning to disable
compression setting at the server and create a FUSE filesystem that
transparently
On 17/2/2022 23:43, Bruno Rogério Fernandes wrote:
Maybe I've got a solution
Instead of modifying backuppc behavior, I'm planning to disable
compression setting at the server and create a FUSE filesystem that
transparently compresses all the images using jpeg-xl format and put
backuppc pool
I tend to agree. It sounds like an image library archive project, not a
backup project.
Robert Trevellyan
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:36 AM Greg Harris
wrote:
> Yet another sideline sitter here. However, here goes with a very
> questionable thought. Maybe BackupPC is the wrong tool for this
Yet another sideline sitter here. However, here goes with a very questionable
thought. Maybe BackupPC is the wrong tool for this particular
directory/instance? Perhaps something like Amazon Glacier with Cryptomator is
a wiser choice in this one scenario?
Thanks,
Greg Harris
On Feb 17,
G.W. Haywood via BackupPC-users wrote at about 13:24:26 + on Thursday,
February 17, 2022:
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, brogeriofernandes wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering if would be possible to run a command just after
> > client transfers file data but before it's stored in
Bruno Rogério Fernandes wrote at about 09:43:13 -0300 on Thursday, February 17,
2022:
> Maybe I've got a solution
>
> Instead of modifying backuppc behavior, I'm planning to disable
> compression setting at the server and create a FUSE filesystem that
> transparently compresses all the
"G.W. Haywood via BackupPC-users" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, brogeriofernandes wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering if would be possible to run a command just after
> > client transfers file data but before it's stored in backuppc
> > pool. My idea is to do an image compression, like jpeg-xl
Hi there,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, brogeriofernandes wrote:
I'm wondering if would be possible to run a command just after
client transfers file data but before it's stored in backuppc
pool. My idea is to do an image compression, like jpeg-xl lossless,
instead of the standard zlib one.
Have you
Maybe I've got a solution
Instead of modifying backuppc behavior, I'm planning to disable
compression setting at the server and create a FUSE filesystem that
transparently compresses all the images using jpeg-xl format and put
backuppc pool on top of that.
The only problem I can think of is
>
> Unless I am missing something...
>
No, you're not missing anything. Effectively THIS is the hard part:
> Even if you did somehow pre-compress files and pipe them onto the
> client side rsync, you would probably break the ability for rsync to
> tell changed files based on stat'ing the file
Guillermo Rozas wrote at about 22:37:09 -0300 on Wednesday, February 16, 2022:
> >
> > > Certainly, this would be more bandwidth-friendly if it was possible to
> > > do this compression before transferring to server, but I can't figure
> > > out how I could accomplish this.
> > Presumably
>
> > Certainly, this would be more bandwidth-friendly if it was possible to
> > do this compression before transferring to server, but I can't figure
> > out how I could accomplish this.
> Presumably harder as it would require host-side code to do things
> such as running a patched host version
Thanks for answering
Em qua, 2022-02-16 às 13:39 -0500, backu...@kosowsky.org escreveu:
> brogeriofernan...@gmail.com wrote at about 15:21:10 -0300 on
> Wednesday, February 16, 2022:
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > Currently, I'm using urbackup to backup a lot of image files and
> > thinking of
brogeriofernan...@gmail.com wrote at about 15:21:10 -0300 on Wednesday,
February 16, 2022:
> Hi everyone
>
> Currently, I'm using urbackup to backup a lot of image files and
> thinking of migrating to backuppc.
>
> I'm wondering if would be possible to run a command just after client
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
