On Wednesday 13 December 2006 08:49, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
a Kern Sibbald writes:
patch-src-findlib-attribs.c
when restoring a symlink, use lchflags to restore the file flags
defined for the symlink (new feature)
when restoring a hardlink, don't call chmod, chown, utime because
Hello,
I've now taken a look at these patches and though they might be going in the
right direction, I cannot consider them for inclusion in version 1.40 for
several reasons:
1. They are not relative to the current CVS.
2. They are a significant change from the current code, which is not a
Kern Sibbald writes:
There is no such think as a hardlink. There is a hardlink operation. It is
very different from a softlink, and if you think about them the same way, you
will never get it right. Two files that are hardlinked (really poor
terminology) *are* one and the same file.
Hi Kern,
Kern Sibbald writes:
1. They are not relative to the current CVS.
Hm, they are applying to it, or? At least I tried that..
2. They are a significant change from the current code, which is not a
problem
during the development cycle, but *is* a major problem at this point.
Thanks Arno, you are a Saint :)
Alle 20:50, martedì 12 dicembre 2006, Arno Lehmann ha scritto:
Hello,
On 12/12/2006 11:59 AM, Alessio Mineni wrote:
Hi all,
I have 3 DAT drives and I want to group this drives into one autochenger
virtual device via multitape-changer script.
There
Alle 20:50, martedì 12 dicembre 2006, Arno Lehmann ha scritto:
Hello,
On 12/12/2006 11:59 AM, Alessio Mineni wrote:
Hi all,
I have 3 DAT drives and I want to group this drives into one autochenger
virtual device via multitape-changer script.
There was some discussion about
Hello,
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 10:11, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Hi Kern,
Kern Sibbald writes:
1. They are not relative to the current CVS.
Hm, they are applying to it, or? At least I tried that..
2. They are a significant change from the current code, which is not a
problem
Hi Kern,
it is ok when you want me to deliver the patch in a defined format. I've no
problems with that. I must say that I didn't read the developer manual
before I sent the patch, but I hope the patch does now comply to the rules.
I've changed the indention from my former patch so you can see
Hello,
I stumbled upon some pages that confirm a suspect I had about using postgres
with bacula:
- Postgres has autocommit by default, slowing down a lot any Bacula operation
because Bacula does not use any transaction during write.
If this is truedo I have any way to set up just the Bacula
Hello!
I have to restore data saved from windows into a linux box but I get
this error:Error: Win32 GZIP data stream not supported on this Client.
How shoud I do?
Thanks
Marco
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the
You've got to restore it to a Windows box.
The compression algorithm is different.
Ger.
Op woensdag 13 december 2006 14:33, schreef Marco Strullato:
Hello!
I have to restore data saved from windows into a linux box but I get
this error:Error: Win32 GZIP data stream not supported on this
In response to Gabriele Bulfon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I stumbled upon some pages that confirm a suspect I had about using
postgres with bacula:
- Postgres has autocommit by default, slowing down a lot any Bacula
operation because Bacula does not use any transaction during write.
If this
patch-src-findlib-create_file.c
Try to unset file flags of the sourcefile when the hardlink failed.
Retry to hardlink then. If the hardlink fails then again, restore the
file flags of the sourcefile. If the hardlink was created w/o errors,
restore the fileflags of the sourcefile.
Why
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 12:01, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Hi Kern,
it is ok when you want me to deliver the patch in a defined format. I've no
problems with that. I must say that I didn't read the developer manual
before I sent the patch, but I hope the patch does now comply to the
Thanks for your reply Robert.
I will make the change and see how it works.
- Michal
--
Michal J. Winsor, ISP
Information Technology Analyst
Open Systems Canada Limited
1627 Broad Street
Regina, SK S4P1X3
Tel.: 306.359.6725
http://www.oscl.ca
Robert Nelson wrote:
Short Answer:
I came across the performance problem with SPARC Sun280R machines, at first,
because they have a slower processor then modern AMD or x86 machines.
On sparc machines large backups cannot be managed, because the transfer rate of
the LTO is slowed down up to 1Mb/s or lower, because of the slow
Folks,
just to dropping into this discussion.
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 08:49, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
a Kern Sibbald writes:
patch-src-findlib-attribs.c
when restoring a symlink, use lchflags to restore the file flags
defined for the symlink (new feature)
This
Hello,
I've read a few messages ago that the new stable version of
bacula would be released 'till the end of 2006. Does this sting stand?
On The Current State of Bacula -- 1.39.29 (01 December 2006)
its says Configurable TLS (SSL) communications encryption
It seems that there are actually several permutations of systems by
which the IPv6 checks needs to take into account:
- Systems that don't support ipv6 (Minix)
- Systems that support ipv6 and have both kernel and userland support
compiled in and headers present
- Systems that shipped/installed
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:07, Attila Fülöp wrote:
Folks,
just to dropping into this discussion.
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 08:49, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
a Kern Sibbald writes:
patch-src-findlib-attribs.c
when restoring a symlink, use lchflags to
Need some guidance on how to restore a single file.
Successfully configured and did a full backup of filesystem
spanning 4 tapes in autochanger.
Renamed a test file from 'ob' to 'ob.orig'. Then requested a
restore of the file 'ob'.
Restore said it completed successfully, however the 'ob' file
Did you look for the file in the temp directory the file was restored
to? In your config below the restore process shows the base path where
the file was restored. The files will not be restored to the original
path unless you change that option when you run the restore, or change
the path in
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
Why do the chflags(attr-olname, s.st_flags) restore the fileflags of the
sourcefile twice?
once in case the 2nd linking failed (there is a return after that!)
and the 2nd time for the linking was successfull case.
Also the first reset of the chflags() should probably
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:40 AM, Robert Nelson wrote:
Do you mean the result was clientname-Day_12? If so that would be
expected.
Yes, these were the results. Good!
According to the grammar in the manual, the curly braces are
optional if you
are just expanding the name. If you
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
The solution proposed is to keep file flags in a list and set them after
all files have been restored, so that all hardlinks can be created. Though
it is probably enough to do this for hardlinked files. Looks like this
would make the restore code even
Can anyone else confirm this?
Rerun Failed Levels = yes
If an incremental job is scheduled to start before a full or differential
job has completed (ie, still running): When the incremental job starts the
previous (still running) job is detected as failed and the incremental
is
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Concerning all these differences on FreeBSD: if the changes needed to make
things work correctly on FreeBSD are extensive and require a bit of
#ifdefing, we are going to have to re-think how we do it. The code is
...
I just want to point out that
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 20:12, Alan Brown wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
The solution proposed is to keep file flags in a list and set them after
all files have been restored, so that all hardlinks can be created.
Though
it is probably enough to do this for
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 17:20, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
Why do the chflags(attr-olname, s.st_flags) restore the fileflags of the
sourcefile twice?
once in case the 2nd linking failed (there is a return after that!)
and the 2nd time for the linking was
Thanks for all the helpful responses,
that gives me a better idea of how the volumefiles field is used.
Wierd thing is the btape test and fill commands run without a hitch with the
bacula-sd.conf I'm using.
I've found a way to work around it so I can get some backups while I get it
working
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 15:57, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
I came across the performance problem with SPARC Sun280R machines, at first,
because they have a slower processor then modern AMD or x86 machines.
On sparc machines large backups cannot be managed, because the transfer rate
of the LTO
Kern Sibbald wrote:
I encourage you to re-submit a patch for the above problem once 1.40.0 is
out,
possibly coordinating with Attila, since he seems to be working on something
a bit more encompasing (attribs + ACLs, ...).
Ok, no problem - I'll do so.
--
Oliver Lehmann
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 14:33, Marco Strullato wrote:
Hello!
I have to restore data saved from windows into a linux box but I get
this error:Error: Win32 GZIP data stream not supported on this Client.
How shoud I do?
Try upgrading your FD to the latest 1.39.30 BETA release. It is
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:07, Attila Fülöp wrote:
Folks,
just to dropping into this discussion.
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 08:49, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
a Kern Sibbald writes:
patch-src-findlib-attribs.c
when restoring a symlink, use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Moving the DB on another x86 / amd machine solve the problem, but I anyway
can reach a maximum rate of 8-10Mb/sec, that is not the maximum transfer rate
I may have on those LTO drives (that may run from 15 to 60 to 120 Mb/s
Hello,
Since this is directed to me, and assuming I wrote the double 'ed sections
below (which sound a lot like me but so much is snipped that I cannot be
sure), I can assure you that, my intention, if I am the guity party was not
to insult any person or any particular OS, but just to point
Hello,
On 12/12/2006 11:47 PM, Thomas Glatthor wrote:
Hi Arno,
Ok, I understand that setup. I even see a solution for it:
Set up your storage devices with different media types.
When transfering tapes, change the media types of the tapes according to
the location they're going to.
if
Hi,
On 12/13/2006 1:07 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
Can anyone else confirm this?
Rerun Failed Levels = yes
If an incremental job is scheduled to start before a full or differential
job has completed (ie, still running): When the incremental job starts the
previous (still running) job
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 22:48, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
On 12/12/2006 11:47 PM, Thomas Glatthor wrote:
Hi Arno,
Ok, I understand that setup. I even see a solution for it:
Set up your storage devices with different media types.
When transfering tapes, change the media types
Hi,
On 12/13/2006 4:54 PM, Kamen Medarski wrote:
I have a strange situation here. I can't find any reason why bacula
always try to upgrade scheduled or even manualy runed incremental job.
Full job appear to be done without errors for any client, but next
incremental job was upgraded to
Hi,
On 12/13/2006 4:57 PM, jpg wrote:
Need some guidance on how to restore a single file.
Successfully configured and did a full backup of filesystem
spanning 4 tapes in autochanger.
Renamed a test file from 'ob' to 'ob.orig'. Then requested a
restore of the file 'ob'.
Restore said it
Hello,
On 12/13/2006 10:34 AM, Alessio Mineni wrote:
Thanks Arno, you are a Saint :)
It's christmas time :-)
Alle 20:50, martedì 12 dicembre 2006, Arno Lehmann ha scritto:
Hello,
On 12/12/2006 11:59 AM, Alessio Mineni wrote:
Hi all,
I have 3 DAT drives and I want to group this
Yes TLS communication is supported by the Windows version. Openssl is
installed as part of the Bacula installation. Configuration is similar to
the UNIX environment and requires some hand editing of the configuration
files.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Thank you, Robert, for you reply.
Those are very good news, since the current stable version didnt.
Robert Nelson wrote:
Yes TLS communication is supported by the Windows version. Openssl is
installed as part of the Bacula installation. Configuration is similar to
the UNIX environment and
I have an LTO3 library installed behind a modern AMD machine, a Sun v20z
biprocessor.
Again with Solaris 10 and postgres 8.
The avarage rate is 8Mb/s, and I have just some peak transfer rate of 14Mb/s
(and this is
way
tooslow for an LTO3), and this happens ONLY when Bacula is backing-up
I forgot about the link I found about this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-performance@postgresql.org/msg19584.html
what do you think?
Gabriele Bulfon - Sonicle S.r.l.
Tel +39 028246016 Int. 30 - Fax +39 028243880
Via Felice Cavallotti 16 - 20089, Rozzano - Milano - ITALY
http://www.sonicle.com
Hi,
There are some error message appear when I install Bacula. Would you
kindly help me?
Execute the command:
./configure \
--sbindir=$HOME/bacula/bin \
--sysconfdir=$HOME/bacula/bin \
--with-pid-dir=$HOME/bacula/bin \
--with-subsys-dir=/var/bacula/subsys \
47 matches
Mail list logo
