On 2/14/19 12:36 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
I've been working with the Gentoo maintainer on this for a while to
update and fix the ebuild.
OH?
OK, well then, this just became even more interesting to me. :)
Perhaps one of you know the magic recipe which might allow me to compile
On 2/14/19 2:26 PM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
>
> I guess the subject should now be "Cannot build bacula-9.4.2 on Arch Linux"
> since the Gentoo ebuild seems to be fine.
>
> And, since the Gentoo ebuild of Bacula is now quite current, maybe I can
> switch back to installing it from portage, and
I have had several of those incidents over the years.
Never got to the bottom of it.
Every once in a while, I have to manually purge a volume Bacula should
have recycled of its own.
Am 14.02.2019 um 12:08 schrieb Ben Laurie:
> I had this problem the other day, even tho I do have automatic volume
On 2/14/19 12:18 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 2/14/19 12:26 PM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
On 2/14/19 6:17 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
Bill,
The app-backup/bacula ebuild just updated to 9.4.2 this morning.
Hi Phil!
Thanks for the tip!
My problem is that my primary SD is on Arch, so I cannot
On 2/14/19 12:26 PM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
> On 2/14/19 6:17 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> Bill,
>> The app-backup/bacula ebuild just updated to 9.4.2 this morning.
>
> Hi Phil!
>
> Thanks for the tip!
>
> My problem is that my primary SD is on Arch, so I cannot update the DIR
> (Running on
Replying to my own last post...
OK, emerging bacula-9.4.2 on Gentoo gets past compiling everything in the
'console' directory tree:
8<
[...snip compiling output of the console sources...]
Make of console is good
make[1]: Leaving directory
On 2/14/19 6:17 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
Bill,
The app-backup/bacula ebuild just updated to 9.4.2 this morning.
Hi Phil!
Thanks for the tip!
My problem is that my primary SD is on Arch, so I cannot update the DIR
(Running on Gentoo) without breaking my backup environment.
And, since I
Hello,
I have a new bacula setup and for the last two day, has been running the first
large scheduled job. Sometimes early this morning, it looks like bacula
stopped writing to the tape
I was monitoring it using this command:
*list volumes
Repost from - devel.
Hi
We are ending up breaking up volumes artificially to support bacula,
because of the single threaded nature of the filedaemon. We have LTO6,
spooling and 10Gbit network. When a full backup end up spanning 3 weeks
run time - it get very very painfull. (Example below)
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:46:29 -0500, mark bergman said:
>
> == new_client ===
> 1 [root@new_client ~] # cat /tmp/bacula-fd.debug.log
> 2new_client: bsock.c:847-0 socket=4 who=client host=172.16.0.159
> port=7306
> 3
On 2/13/19 2:13 PM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
> On 2/6/19 2:33 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are pleased to announce the release of Bacula version 9.4.2. It is
>> already released to Source Forge and bacula.org. Binaries for selected
>> should be available in the near future.
>>
>> This
I had this problem the other day, even tho I do have automatic volume
recycling, which has always worked in the past. I had to purge one of the
expired volumes to get it to accept it...
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 10:51, Radosław Korzeniewski <
rados...@korzeniewski.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> śr., 6
Hi,
Thanks for 9.4.2 rpm on CentOs.
I install and no problem ( 9.2.2 -> 9.4.2 on test host ).
Do you know , if the bsnapshot binary package is in the
"bacula-client.x86_64" ?
I want to test zfs + bacula client ( for my test i use 9.2.2 srv + clt ).
And thanks again :)
Le 14/02/2019 à
Hello,
śr., 6 lut 2019 o 16:15 byron napisał(a):
> Hi
>
> I write my backups to LTO 7 tape. I have 3 sets of tapes which i rotate
> every month. I run one full backup at the start of the month and then
> incrementals for the rest of the month.
>
> I've been running these jobs for a few months
Hello,
śr., 6 lut 2019 o 23:58 Dimitri Maziuk via Bacula-users <
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> napisał(a):
> On 2/6/19 4:14 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
>
> I would look at using pmset to disable sleep in Before and re-enable in
> AfterJob -- though it's probably a PITA if you have custom
Hello,
czw., 7 lut 2019 o 02:34 Adam Nielsen napisał(a):
> > Spooling can reduce overall throughput because the data is
> > sequentially written to disk and then read back.
>
> This is what got me. I thought it was a buffer to ride out variations
> in disk read speed (like the mbuffer program)
Hello Ken,
Bacula 9.4.2 rpm packages are available on www.bacula.org
If you still need rpms for version 9.4.1, just let me know.
Best regards
Davide
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 05:25, KEN SAWADA wrote:
> Hi Davide
> Thank you for your reply.
> After that the rpm package has not been updated, is
17 matches
Mail list logo
