Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-30 Thread Rich
On 2007.11.29. 23:53, John Stoffel wrote: mark == mark bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: mark = I've got a plan to sit down and sketch out more consistent and clear mark = set of commands for manipulating bacula from the command line. Anyone mark = else like the 'bcli' name? mark =

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-29 Thread mark . bergman
In the message dated: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:13:18 EST, The pithy ruminations from John Stoffel on Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula were: = [SNIP!] = Shon here, I wouldn't have come as far as I have. For instance, the = Shon full abilities of the commands aren't well

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-29 Thread John Stoffel
mark == mark bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: mark = I've got a plan to sit down and sketch out more consistent and clear mark = set of commands for manipulating bacula from the command line. Anyone mark = else like the 'bcli' name? mark = mark No! No! This will only exacerbate the

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-28 Thread John Stoffel
Shon Like I said its a rant. Probably a poor choice to post, but I've Shon really been having some inexplicable problems lately and kirk'd Shon out something bad this morning. Setting up Bacula to test Shon certain things went relatively smoothly. Its been setting it up Shon for production that

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-22 Thread Foo Bar
--- Robert LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/21/07 7:11 AM, Foo Bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: all set up (I can't get BAT to compile for example, hopefully the Debian stable package will be updated soon). Debian stable will never get the new version until Lenny is released as

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-22 Thread Ralf Gross
Foo Bar schrieb: all set up (I can't get BAT to compile for example, hopefully the Debian stable package will be updated soon). Debian stable will never get the new version until Lenny is released as stable. I've used the testing and sid packages in Lenny without any problems.

[Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Shon Stephens
Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to later. I just have to vent. Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and its still not working correctly. Things that should be easy that Bacula makes overly complex: Labeling tapes Assigning tapes to pools

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Dan Langille
On 21 Nov 2007 at 8:07, Shon Stephens wrote: Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to later. I just have to vent. Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and its still not working correctly. You are unique. Things that should be easy that

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 21.11.2007 14:07,, Shon Stephens wrote:: Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to later. I just have to vent. I don't think your mail will be removed as that's rather difficult with a mailing list :-) Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Ludovic Strappazon
Shon Stephens a écrit : Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to later. I just have to vent. Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and its still not working correctly. Things that should be easy that Bacula makes overly complex: Labeling

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread John Drescher
Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to later. I just have to vent. Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and its still not working correctly. If you would have asked questions about the problems you were experiencing we would have helped.

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Foo Bar
--- Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 21 Nov 2007 at 8:07, Shon Stephens wrote: Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to later. I just have to vent. Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and its still not working correctly.

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread John Drescher
Basically I can't see that its useable for anything more than backing up a single system, and even then better be careful. I backup 50+ computers over gigabit network with the director, database and storage on different machines. Actually I have several bacula-sd machines because I have

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread John Drescher
I have mostly problems with documentation and the learning curve, which is especially going to be a problem for those that will use it once I get it all set up (I can't get BAT to compile for example, hopefully the Debian stable package will be updated soon). BAT is a very recent addition to

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Foo Bar
--- John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have mostly problems with documentation and the learning curve, which is especially going to be a problem for those that will use it once I get it all set up (I can't get BAT to compile for example, hopefully the Debian stable package will

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Shon Stephens
Like I said its a rant. Probably a poor choice to post, but I've really been having some inexplicable problems lately and kirk'd out something bad this morning. Setting up Bacula to test certain things went relatively smoothly. Its been setting it up for production that has presented its biggest

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Janco van der Merwe
Shon, If it took you four months to figure out how Bacula works maybe you shouldn't be allowed near any computer! There are ways and means to do things in Bacula and let me tell you this if you couldn't do it or find a way you are really incompetent and again should be allowed to operate a PC.

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Shon Stephens
Like I said its a rant. Probably a poor choice to post, but I've really been having some inexplicable problems lately and kirk'd out something bad this morning. Setting up Bacula to test certain things went relatively smoothly. Its been setting it up for production that has presented its biggest

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 21.11.2007 15:43,, Janco van der Merwe wrote:: Shon, If it took you four months to figure out how Bacula works maybe you shouldn't be allowed near any computer! Janco, calm down please! Even if you or others don't agree with Shon don't resort to name-calling! Bacula as a whole - and

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread DAve
Janco van der Merwe wrote: Shon, If it took you four months to figure out how Bacula works maybe you shouldn't be allowed near any computer! Everyone is entitled to their opinion, including me. However, continued belittling of Bacula, Bacula developers, Bacula users, the Bacula disenchanted,

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Janco van der Merwe
Guys, Sorry, but - there must be a but - I deal with this sort of people everyday and it has come to a point where being nice and keeping quite is not a solutions anymore. Ok, I do understand that Bacula can be difficult some times but that is why this list is theream I wrong? I also have

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Wes Hardaker
DL == Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and its still not working correctly. DL You are unique. I doubt he's unique. I constantly think to myself wow, bacula is really cool; but why isn't it doing that? The configuration is

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread David Gardner
Everything is a learning experience, even a mistake. - Original Message From: Wes Hardaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: bacula-users bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 8:02:57 AM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Robert LeBlanc
On 11/21/07 7:11 AM, Foo Bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: all set up (I can't get BAT to compile for example, hopefully the Debian stable package will be updated soon). Debian stable will never get the new version until Lenny is released as stable. I've used the testing and sid packages in

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Robert LeBlanc
On 11/21/07 9:02 AM, Wes Hardaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Final word: I love bacula and wouldn't switch away from it if I had a choice. But I'm still on the learning curve, and it isn't small. But very very worth it. Thanks again! I've seen Bacula as an enterprise level product.

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Sean Cardus
Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its taken 4 months and its still not working correctly. DL You are unique. I doubt he's unique. I constantly think to myself wow, bacula is really cool; but why isn't it doing that? The configuration is complex to set up (but with flexibility

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Alan Brown
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Shon Stephens wrote: For instance, the full abilities of the commands aren't well documented. They're there, just that you do have to read the entire manual BEFORE starting to set it up. groking why it does things is 3/4 of the effort. once you umderstand the philosophy

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Alan Brown
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Wes Hardaker wrote: I doubt he's unique. I constantly think to myself wow, bacula is really cool; but why isn't it doing that? So do I - and then usally find out I've set it up wrong, or that users are doing stupid things (like chown -R /path/to/directory/) which result

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread John Drescher
It required searching the bacula-users posts to discover that I could do label slots=1-12 pool=scratch barcodes. There's no need to label blank tapes. Just add the entries to the appropriate pools, apply matching barcodes and update slots. When bacula encounters a blank tape which is has

Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula

2007-11-21 Thread Chris Lee
: Wednesday, 21 November, 2007 07:19 To: bacula-users Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] All the problems with Bacula On 21 Nov 2007 at 8:07, Shon Stephens wrote: Ok. This is a rant and you can remove it from the list if you want to later. I just have to vent. Bacula is incredibly complex to setup. Its