I have this working now. The script is below, as per Bill's script with an
extention. It is called from a Runscript as "Command =
/full-path/run-copy-job.sh copy-job-name". There is a copy job defined for
each backup job. The $1 parameter passes the copy job name to the script.
#!/bin/bash
#usage
On 4/9/24 6:53 AM, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
Regarding the suggestion to put a Runafter block in the job to run the copy job at the end, that doesn't seem to be allowed.
Run job=xx commands are not permitted in a Runscript as I just found out. It gives a not allowed command error.
Perhaps there
Regarding the suggestion to put a Runafter block in the job to run the copy
job at the end, that doesn't seem to be allowed. Run job=xx commands are
not permitted in a Runscript as I just found out. It gives a not allowed
command error.
Perhaps there is another way to accomplish this?
-Chris-
Em 02/04/2024 19:58, Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users escreveu:
On 4/2/24 12:01 PM, Roberto Greiner wrote:
Hi,
I've installed Bacula recently in a server with a 7TB RAID5 storage, and
a LTO-6 tape unit.
I have configured 9 remote servers (most Linux, one Windows) to have the
backup made in this
On 4/2/24 12:01 PM, Roberto Greiner wrote:
Hi,
I've installed Bacula recently in a server with a 7TB RAID5 storage, and
a LTO-6 tape unit.
I have configured 9 remote servers (most Linux, one Windows) to have the
backup made in this server in the disk storage, and I'm finish to
understand how
Hi,
I've installed Bacula recently in a server with a 7TB RAID5 storage, and
a LTO-6 tape unit.
I have configured 9 remote servers (most Linux, one Windows) to have the
backup made in this server in the disk storage, and I'm finish to
understand how to do the tape backup. Now, I have a
Matthias Kellermann wrote:
Hi everyone,
I want to use Bacula to backup my files to disk AND to tape at the same
time. The backup on disk should be available for 3 months or so while
the backup on tape should not be overwritten before 12 months.
Is this possible with Bacula? How do I
Hi,
thanks for your answer, Arno.
Arno Lehmann schrieb:
Hi,
No, that's not possible.
There are a number of workarounds possible, but the ideal thing is
currently not possible. It's discussed, though, and I think anyone
(relevant :-) thinks such athing would be useful.
Which
Hi,
Would be nice to have the files on disk for some period to get a file
back quickly ;)
You could backup to disk and migrate the files, when you
don't need them quickly any more, to tape.
Eric
pgpcRbpKfGt1m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
24.09.2007 11:09,, Eric Böse-Wolf wrote::
Hi,
Would be nice to have the files on disk for some period to get a file
back quickly ;)
You could backup to disk and migrate the files, when you
don't need them quickly any more, to tape.
Or run two jobs, one to disk, one to tape. The
Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unless you have a carousel, does anyone really use tapes anymore?
I'm speaking of small networks, but it seems to me that hard drives
are much cheaper than tapes for the $$/GB ratio.
That's really a good question. Yes hard drives have a better money/GB
That's really a good question. Yes hard drives have a better money/GB
ratio,
After you get over the cost of the tape drive LTO2 and better are
cheaper than hard disks.
but cheap hard drive keep your data safe only for 3 - 4 years for
sure (maybe longer) and some tapes (DLT, LTO) are specified
The reality is that if you really need reliable data for 10 years you're
probably stuck with technology like paper, optical media (choose wisely
as many of these formats are gone too), or online hard drive space that
you'll be continually checking and carrying along with each upgrade (and
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Bob Hetzel wrote:
In summary... backup software is extremely important for disaster
recovery but should not be considered for long term (5+ years, possibly
even less depending on what you need it for) storage needs in my humble
opinion.
Anyone considering backups for
In the message dated: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:04:00 EDT,
The pithy ruminations from Bob Hetzel on
Re: [Bacula-users] Backup to disk AND tape were:
= The reality is that if you really need reliable data for 10 years you're
= probably stuck with technology like paper, optical media (choose wisely
Bob Hetzel wrote:
The reality is that if you really need reliable data for 10 years you're
probably stuck with technology like paper, optical media (choose wisely
as many of these formats are gone too), or online hard drive space that
you'll be continually checking and carrying along with
Hi everyone,
I want to use Bacula to backup my files to disk AND to tape at the same
time. The backup on disk should be available for 3 months or so while
the backup on tape should not be overwritten before 12 months.
Is this possible with Bacula? How do I accomplish this without the need
to run
Hi,
21.09.2007 15:27,, Matthias Kellermann wrote::
Hi everyone,
I want to use Bacula to backup my files to disk AND to tape at the same
time. The backup on disk should be available for 3 months or so while
the backup on tape should not be overwritten before 12 months.
Is this possible
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Bill Moran wrote:
I backup ~20Tb to LTO2. The tapes run almost as fast as most of the
disk arrays (MSA 1000 and Nexsan Atabeast)
I guess I didn't make my point.
The tapes are several orders of magnitude slower than disk.
Then get faster tapes.
If things are that
On Tue, 2 May 2006 11:18:53 +0100 (BST)
Alan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Bill Moran wrote:
I backup ~20Tb to LTO2. The tapes run almost as fast as most of the
disk arrays (MSA 1000 and Nexsan Atabeast)
I guess I didn't make my point.
The tapes are several
_never_ replaces backup. I can have 1000 redundant systems dispersed
across the entire galaxy, and if a user accidentally deletes an
important record, I'll still need to go to backup to recover it,
since the redundant systems will faithfully delete it from all
mirrors.
There are filesystem
On Tue, 2 May 2006 23:38:42 +1000
James Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
_never_ replaces backup. I can have 1000 redundant systems dispersed
across the entire galaxy, and if a user accidentally deletes an
important record, I'll still need to go to backup to recover it,
since the
On Tue, 2 May 2006, Bill Moran wrote:
The time it takes to get them back onsite alone is too slow for most
recovery scenerios.
Hence the necessity for job cloning - AND a decent data firesafe.
What does a firesafe have to do with this?
Data backed up to disk can still be erased.
A New
Hi all,
I work in a ICT company and we are looking to replace Amanda. I figured
Bacula would be te best solution, but we hit a snag.
A feature my boss feels is paramount to a back-up package is write the
data to disk, then to tape. Bacula does that in a way, but data
spooling does only
On Monday 01 May 2006 09:11, John Gerritse wrote:
Hi all,
I work in a ICT company and we are looking to replace Amanda. I figured
Bacula would be te best solution, but we hit a snag.
A feature my boss feels is paramount to a back-up package is write the
data to disk, then to tape. Bacula
On Monday 01 May 2006 10:11, John Gerritse wrote:
Great! Thanks for the quick reply.
I'm looking forward to the new release that will include migration.
Is there a workaround, so we can use Bacula anyway until the new feature
is implemented?
I don't think so, but it depends on what you are
John,
We do that here (Backup to disk and then to tape). We have just started
using Bacula but we us it to backup to tape. I use Microlite's
BackupEDGE to backup my remote Servers to disk on my main backup server.
I have a network that is only used by me over night so differentials at
night are a
27 matches
Mail list logo
