Kern Sibbald wrote:
Another thing to check for is HP printers on the network, which have the
nasty habit of using non-registered ports e.g. 9001, 9002, or 9003, which
can cause disconnects by Bacula. If you find printers probing/using those
ports, either reconfigure the printers or Bacula
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
Should the need to introduce incompatible changes in the protocol arise, which
I guess would be Bacula 3.0, maybe a different set of default ports could be
considered ? HP networked printers are fairly common.
HP should be prevailed upon to fix it.
On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:28, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Another thing to check for is HP printers on the network, which have
the nasty habit of using non-registered ports e.g. 9001, 9002, or
9003, which can cause disconnects by Bacula. If you find printers
probing/using
Dan Langille wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:28, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Another thing to check for is HP printers on the network, which have
the nasty habit of using non-registered ports e.g. 9001, 9002, or
9003, which can cause disconnects by Bacula. If you
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 1:29 pm, Dan Langille wrote:
Port conflicts are a known annoyance, but maybe it would help to
disseminate the information about Bacula usage, for example here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
The Bacula ports are listed there.
On 31 Jan 2007 at 10:38, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:28, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Another thing to check for is HP printers on the network, which
have the nasty habit of using non-registered ports e.g. 9001,
On 31 Jan 2007 at 16:43, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 1:29 pm, Dan Langille wrote:
Port conflicts are a known annoyance, but maybe it would help to
disseminate the information about Bacula usage, for example here:
In response to Chris Hoogendyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
I passed an earlier message from this thread along to my network expert,
because we have had some complaints about recent HP stuff. I'm only
casually up on that stuff.
I was surprised by his answer, but not by his depth of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Langille wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 at 16:43, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 1:29 pm, Dan Langille wrote:
Port conflicts are a known annoyance, but maybe it would help to
disseminate the information about Bacula usage, for
On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:24, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
So, I guess in summation, Nothing to see here, or What's the
problem?
*IANA port list: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
Well, HP does use those ports:
http://www.isecom.info/cgi-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Langille wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:24, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
So, I guess in summation, Nothing to see here, or What's the
problem?
*IANA port list: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
Well, HP does use those ports:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 16:38, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:28, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Another thing to check for is HP printers on the network, which have
the nasty habit of using non-registered ports e.g. 9001, 9002, or
9003,
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 5:50 pm, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Even so, a very small overlap:
* 9100 TCP port is used for printing. Port numbers 9101 and 9102 are for
parallel ports 2 and 3 on the three-port HP Jetdirect external print
servers.
...and if I'm not mistaken, this is
please read to the bottom before commenting on stuff in the middle. --
Chris H.
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Chris Hoogendyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
I passed an earlier message from this thread along to my network expert,
because we have had some complaints about recent HP
Hello Dan,
Thanks. Finally! You have provided the proof straight from HP's own documents
that they do use Bacula registered ports. It also proves that our users know
what they are talking about.
Regards,
Kern
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 17:39, Dan Langille wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:24,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Ryan Novosielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:24, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
So, I guess in summation, Nothing to see here, or What's the
problem?
*IANA port list:
Onsdag 31 januar 2007 17:50 skrev Ryan Novosielski:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 31 Jan 2007 at 11:24, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
So, I guess in summation, Nothing to see here, or What's the
problem?
*IANA port list: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
Well, HP does use those ports:
17 matches
Mail list logo
