Re: [Bacula-users] Use purged volumes first (before fresh ones)

2007-08-17 Thread Stephan Mueller
* Steen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16.08.2007]: On Thursday 16 August 2007 21:30:36 Stephan Mueller wrote: Hi, if I remember correctly, in older versions bacula preferred unused volumes over purged ones, so that all volumes were used over the time. I now have switched to an usb disc based

[Bacula-users] upgrade 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, got The number of files mismatch

2007-08-17 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
So, What did I do wrong here? I upgraded bacula from 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6. Yesterdays nightly job failed big time, each backup failed with 16-Aug 21:46 candyman-sd: Volume UNW259L2 previously written, moving to end of data. 16-Aug 21:47 candyman-sd: mars.2007-08-16_21.30.02 Error: Bacula

[Bacula-users] Problems with recycling

2007-08-17 Thread Juan Asensio Sánchez
Hi I am tetsing Bacula. I have configured it to work with mysql. I have one pool with only one tape. There are 5 jobs to be backed up on that tape. Jobs are running weekly. This is the pool configuration: Pool { Name = PoolCintasDiariasMartes Pool Type = Backup AutoPrune

Re: [Bacula-users] NFS or bacula-fd, which one is faster?

2007-08-17 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Ivan Adzhubey wrote: I have a Linux NFS fileserver which has to be backed up to a bacula server on another Linux box. The fileserver in question exports everything that's needed to be backed up so all files are actually accessible on bacula server via NFS as well. Should

[Bacula-users] bacula windows 2.2.0 uninstall crash and installer config issue?

2007-08-17 Thread Bob Hetzel
I'm trying to create internal documentation for others to install the bacula-fd on various windows computers around here. I just installed bacula 2.2.0. Since it didn't give me most of the configuration screen prompts, I decided to backup my config file then uninstall it. The uninstaller

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL (Innodb) - table is full ???

2007-08-17 Thread Alan Brown
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Alan Brown wrote: innodb_data_file_path = ibdata1:26000M;ibdata2:2000M:autoextend (As I understand it, this should grow the tablespace as needed) Doh! FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroupMSSLAY01-LogVolSQL

Re: [Bacula-users] upgrade 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, got The number of files mismatch

2007-08-17 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Per olof Ljungmark wrote: So, What did I do wrong here? I upgraded bacula from 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6. Yesterdays nightly job failed big time, each backup failed with 16-Aug 21:46 candyman-sd: Volume UNW259L2 previously written, moving to end of data. 16-Aug 21:47 candyman-sd:

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL (Innodb) - table is full ???

2007-08-17 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Drew Bentley wrote: You'll either need to add more InnoDB by adding more to your /etc/my.cnf file or convert the tables to use MyISAM. Usually depends on what MySQL will use as default or if someone else created the InnoDB space but you can easily add more by editing the

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL (Innodb) - table is full ???

2007-08-17 Thread Drew Bentley
On 8/17/07, Alan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Alan Brown wrote: innodb_data_file_path = ibdata1:26000M;ibdata2:2000M:autoextend (As I understand it, this should grow the tablespace as needed) Doh! FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on

[Bacula-users] pwd of RunBeforeScript

2007-08-17 Thread Dan Langille
Has anyone encountered this situation? The pwd of the RunBeforeScript is the directory into which the source code was unpacked. To reproduce, use this RunBeforeScript: #!/bin/sin echo $PWD The output is: 17-Aug 13:28 ducky-dir: BeforeJob: run command /home/dan/bin/test_pwd 17-Aug 13:28

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL (Innodb) - table is full ???

2007-08-17 Thread Alan Brown
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Drew Bentley wrote: Yeah, autoextend for InnoDB seems to have bitten you. I usually never do this and have monitors to tell me if it's reaching a certain threshold, as you're probably not even using all of the InnoDB space allocated, as it's not particularly nice in

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL (Innodb) - table is full ???

2007-08-17 Thread Drew Bentley
On 8/17/07, Alan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Drew Bentley wrote: Yeah, autoextend for InnoDB seems to have bitten you. I usually never do this and have monitors to tell me if it's reaching a certain threshold, as you're probably not even using all of the InnoDB

Re: [Bacula-users] pwd of RunBeforeScript

2007-08-17 Thread Martin Simmons
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:51:34 -0400, Dan Langille said: Has anyone encountered this situation? The pwd of the RunBeforeScript is the directory into which the source code was unpacked. To reproduce, use this RunBeforeScript: #!/bin/sin echo $PWD The output is: 17-Aug 13:28

Re: [Bacula-users] upgrade 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, got The number of files mismatch

2007-08-17 Thread Martin Simmons
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:27:17 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark said: Per olof Ljungmark wrote: So, What did I do wrong here? I upgraded bacula from 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6. Yesterdays nightly job failed big time, each backup failed with 16-Aug 21:46 candyman-sd: Volume UNW259L2

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with recycling

2007-08-17 Thread Martin Simmons
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:21:02 +0200, Juan Asensio Sánchez said: Hi I am tetsing Bacula. I have configured it to work with mysql. I have one pool with only one tape. There are 5 jobs to be backed up on that tape. Jobs are running weekly. This is the pool configuration: Pool {

Re: [Bacula-users] Software Compression only sometimes works

2007-08-17 Thread Martin Simmons
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:38:40 -0500 (CDT), Andrew Noonan said: Importance: Normal On Thu, August 16, 2007 2:29 pm, Martin Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:02:05 -0500 (CDT), Andrew Noonan said: Importance: Normal Hi all, I'm running 2.0.3 on several

Re: [Bacula-users] dual-NICs and traffic balancing

2007-08-17 Thread Martin Simmons
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:36:48 -0400, Ivan Adzhubey said: Hi, I am having trouble with my dual-NIC servers: it seems there is no way to force bacula client on a remote server use a particular fixed interface/address for data transfers. Even though I have set FDAddress to a preferred one

Re: [Bacula-users] upgrade 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, got The number of files mismatch

2007-08-17 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Martin Simmons wrote: On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:27:17 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark said: Per olof Ljungmark wrote: So, What did I do wrong here? I upgraded bacula from 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6. Yesterdays nightly job failed big time, each backup failed with 16-Aug 21:46 candyman-sd: Volume

Re: [Bacula-users] dual-NICs and traffic balancing

2007-08-17 Thread Ivan Adzhubey
Hi Martin, On Friday 17 August 2007 04:46:24 pm you wrote: where x.x.x.227 is client's external NIC address, x.x.x.136 is bacula server's external address; 192.168.0.{253,200} are the corresponding private addresses. As you can see, while fd daemon on client has indeed been bound to the

[Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-17 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail: Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:48:56 + (CEST) For the recipient the above message appears to have been receieved at 03:48, two hours ahead. The correct timezone is UTC +2, the above header should have read Date: Sat, 18 Aug

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-17 Thread Dan Langille
On 18 Aug 2007 at 2:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail: Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:48:56 + (CEST) For the recipient the above message appears to have been receieved at 03:48, two hours ahead. The correct timezone is