Re: [Bacula-users] file size error when restoring multiple jobs

2007-02-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 15:46, Jörn Beutner wrote: >Hello, > > I get the following error messages when I restore two backup > jobs simultaneously: > > Error: attribs.c:409 File size of restored file /mnt/file1 not >correct. Original 340517841, restored 151715840. > Error: attribs.

Re: [Bacula-users] Full Backup on WinXP 64-bit System Slow

2007-02-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
Read the Win32 chapter of the manual. It has a number of possible remedies for this problem -- I suspect that you are getting hit by a network buffer that is too large for your Win32 ethernet card. On Wednesday 28 February 2007 16:19, Mike Hanby wrote: > Howdy, > > > > I'm running bacula 2.0.2 d

Re: [Bacula-users] Few notes regarding the restricted console commands

2007-02-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 19:48, Zeratul wrote: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:05:16 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote > ... > > > > - the command "help" retuns the full commands list and, for a > > > restricted user, > > > > I'll look into filtering t

Re: [Bacula-users] bextract and Win32 data stream not suppo rted on this Client.

2007-02-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 19:53, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Please always copy the list, as this is community support, not one-on-one. > > What became of the full backup anyway? > > This one I don't know the answer to... I personally didn't know the > Win32 version did not ship with bextract. Pe

Re: [Bacula-users] bweb job status log

2007-03-01 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 01 March 2007 03:00, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm using the most recent version of bacula-gui's bweb. I've gotten > everything working so far, but the one thing that concerns me is that > jobs that have run don't show the log. Therefore, you can click on a job > that ran

Re: [Bacula-users] Messages to console(s)

2007-03-01 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 01 March 2007 02:57, Zeratul wrote: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:06:20 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote > ... > > > A configuration setting for the timeout time would be fine :-) > > Hmm, perhaps in the console resource in the DIR conf? > > Someone (Kern, if I remembe

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape drive mount problems

2007-03-01 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 01 March 2007 03:58, Michael Brennen wrote: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Sunday 25 February 2007 09:42, Michael Brennen wrote: > >> Hello again, > >> > >> The long weekend backups started running Friday night. This is a 4

[Bacula-users] Misc

2007-03-01 Thread Kern Sibbald
fo with ReadFIFO = yes ... restore: mkfifo fifo cat some-file & run a restore of fifo with ReadFIFO = yes ... If you want to use this and have problems with it, please ask the bacula-users list for help. Best regards, Kern

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade autochanger configuration?

2007-03-01 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 01 March 2007 12:30, Robert Nelson wrote: > > > Since Bacula pretty much works with any autochanger that mtx supports you > could use the database on the mtx website at mtx.opensource-sw.net. > > If there is enough interest I could set up something similar for Bacula. > We would just

Re: [Bacula-users] multiple concurrent jobs issue

2007-03-01 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, >From what you have described here, it appears that Bacula is recycling a volume while it is being used or has been reserved for use. I am not sure what is going on for the following reasons: 1. You speak of rotation of volumes, but there is no such concept in Bacula. I am assuming yo

Re: [Bacula-users] Few notes regarding the restricted console commands

2007-03-01 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 01 March 2007 21:13, Zeratul wrote: > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:27:12 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote > > > On Thursday 01 March 2007 16:06, Zeratul wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:05:16 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote > > > ... > > > > > > > This

Re: [Bacula-users] multiple concurrent jobs issue

2007-03-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 01 March 2007 21:19, lists wrote: > Hi, > > Kern Sibbald skrev: > > Hello, > > > >>From what you have described here, it appears that Bacula is recycling a > > > > volume while it is being used or has been reserved for use. I am not > >

Re: [Bacula-users] multiple concurrent jobs issue

2007-03-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 02 March 2007 00:59, Simon Ekstrand wrote: > Steen skrev: > > Torsdag 01 marts 2007 21:36 skrev Simon Ekstrand: > > Maybe not, but I think that is what your configuration does > > > >> A typical sample pool definition we're using: > >> > >> Pool { > >>Name = Default-Windows-94 > >>

Re: [Bacula-users] multiple concurrent jobs issue

2007-03-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 02 March 2007 13:27, Simon Ekstrand wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Thursday 01 March 2007 21:19, lists wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Kern Sibbald skrev: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> >From what you have described here

Re: [Bacula-users] multiple concurrent jobs issue

2007-03-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 02 March 2007 13:18, Simon Ekstrand wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Friday 02 March 2007 00:59, Simon Ekstrand wrote: > >> Steen skrev: > > [...] > > >>> You need to set a Maximum Volume Size in order for Bacula to "rotate" > >&

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 02 March 2007 16:54, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/2/2007 4:33 PM, Michel Meyers wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > John Drescher wrote: > >>On 3/2/07, Stéphane Lardier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>hi, > >>>is it possible (and does have sense) to

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling questions

2007-03-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 02 March 2007 18:46, Richard White wrote: > We had an adventure Friday. We had errors in backup and > later, when re-starting the server, in MySQL. To make a long > story short, it turned out that the disk was full. I > eventually found the culprits. They were spool files from > past jobs

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum logical file size?

2007-03-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 03 March 2007 02:35, Darien Hager wrote: > > Am I missing something? (Or does the SD split the file into chunks > > only at the very end of the process?) > > Followup: No, the final humungous file wasn't broken up at the end of > the run. > > Either "Maximum File Size" is broken, I'm re

Re: [Bacula-users] Different pools for incremental and full backups without prior full backup

2007-03-03 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 03 March 2007 11:44, Christian Nolte wrote: > Hello! > > I use the following schedule: > > Schedule { > Name = "WeeklyCycle" > Run = Level=Full Pool=Full 1st sun at 23:05 > Run = Level=Differential Pool=Full 2nd-5th sat at 23:05 > Run = Level=Incremental Pool=Incremental sun-fri

Re: [Bacula-users] file size error when restoring multiple jobs

2007-03-03 Thread Kern Sibbald
f things to implement ... > > -Original Message----- > From: "Kern Sibbald"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 1/03/07 3:11:50 AM > To: > "bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net", > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: > [Ba

Re: [Bacula-users] Using smarctl to retrieve error counts

2007-03-04 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Nice tip. smartctl has much better info than tapeinfo, so I have added it to the default bacula-sd.conf file. On Sunday 04 March 2007 09:20, Stephen Kitt wrote: > Hi, > > There was a discussion recently about retrieving tape error counts at the > end of a job; I actually do this already, u

Re: [Bacula-users] FD Not Sending OK Status to Dir

2007-03-04 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 05 March 2007 07:47, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Tim Schaab wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > What could be preventing a FD from sending the OK status to the Director > > after a backup? > > I don't know how important this is, but I often almost forget to change > the "Messages" resource at the bot

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula upgrade from 1.38.9 -> 2.0.2

2007-03-04 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 05 March 2007 06:41, Zakai Kinan wrote: > I have rebuilt from source twice and sure enough > certain things are not upgraded such as bcopy. I cannot say for sure if you are installing from a package, but bcopy *is* "installed" every time you do a "make install". However, if you chang

Re: [Bacula-users] Post upgrade 1.36.1 -> 2.0.2

2007-03-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
Recommendation: always read the full ReleaseNotes for all major versions when upgrading. In your case: 1.38.11 and 2.0.2. You are apparently missing the new Autochanger resource introduced in 1.38.x, which is required. On Monday 05 March 2007 13:56, Andrew Paterson wrote: > Hi, > Sola

Re: [Bacula-users] backup tapes at home

2007-03-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 05 March 2007 16:48, Alan Brown wrote: > On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Bill Moran wrote: > > Interesting, but I suspect that's a little out of the price range for > > someone wanting to protect their data at home. I know I wouldn't > > even know where to put such a thing at my house. > > Small dat

Re: [Bacula-users] FD Not Sending OK Status to Dir

2007-03-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 05 March 2007 16:12, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Monday 05 March 2007 07:47, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Tim Schaab wrote: > >>> Howdy, > >>> > >>> What could be preventing a FD from sending the OK status t

Re: [Bacula-users] reusing tapes in Error-State

2007-03-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 05 March 2007 16:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:28:29PM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote: > > On 3/3/2007 12:24 PM, Christoph Litauer wrote: > > > a few of my autochanger tapes have VolStatus: Error. This is because > > > the number of files in the catalogue didn't mat

Re: [Bacula-users] Watchdog timer killed long-running backup

2007-03-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
This is not a bug, but rather an insanity check. If you want to have idle jobs remain in the system longer, take a looks at src/lib/watchdog.c -- someplace in that file there should be a tag that sets the timeout, which you can make longer as you wish. On Monday 05 March 2007 20:35, Alan Davis

Re: [Bacula-users] backup tapes at home

2007-03-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 05 March 2007 19:58, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Monday 05 March 2007 16:48, Alan Brown wrote: > >> On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Bill Moran wrote: > >>> Interesting, but I suspect that's a little out of the price range for > >&g

Re: [Bacula-users] reusing tapes in Error-State

2007-03-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 05 March 2007 20:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:34:08PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Monday 05 March 2007 16:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:28:29PM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote: > > > > On 3/3/20

Re: [Bacula-users] Watchdog timer killed long-running backup

2007-03-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 04:39, Alan Brown wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > This is not a bug, but rather an insanity check. If you want to have > > idle jobs remain in the system longer, take a looks at src/lib/watchdog.c > > -- someplace in that file

Re: [Bacula-users] Watchdog timer killed long-running backup

2007-03-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
er got. > > > > Alan Davis > Senior Architect > Ruckus Network, Inc. > 703.464.6578 (o) > 410.365.7175 (m) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > alancdavis AIM > > > -Original Message- > > From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday,

Re: [Bacula-users] Interrupted Backup

2007-03-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 04:11, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Holden Hao wrote: > > Whay happens when a backup is interrupted like when a user turns off > > or reboots the computer when a backup job is running? > > > > What happens to the partial data that was saved? Are the files saved > > recoverabl

Re: [Bacula-users] Unable to truncate volume

2007-03-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 10:19, Silver Salonen wrote: > On Tuesday 13 February 2007 18:45, Brian Debelius wrote: > > Windows. > > > > Ok I have 5 volumes. full- through full-0004. They all were > > migrated last night. When I run the backups today, and 0001 were > > recylced ok. 0002 a

Re: [Bacula-users] nagios check_bacula plugin and Bacula 2.0.1

2007-03-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 14:07, Masopust, Christian wrote: > Hello, > > a while ago i already sent a modified check_bacula.tgz to Kern > (the changes to check_bacula were neccessary as there are some > changes in authentication) so that he could add it to the 2.0.x > distribution

Re: [Bacula-users] Feature Request : Implement NDMP protocol

2007-03-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 17:40, Alan Davis wrote: > Item n:   Implement NDMP protocol support >   Origin: Alan Davis >   Date:   06 March 2007 >   Status: Submitted > >   What:   Network Data Management Protocol is implemented by a number of > NAS filer vendors to enable >           backups using t

Re: [Bacula-users] Feature Request: Append Period

2007-03-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 18:55, Brian Debelius wrote: > Item n:Implement an 'Append Period' > Origin: Brian Debelius (bdebelius @ intelesyscorp dot com) > Date:06 March 2007 > Status: Submitted > > What: Implement an 'Append Period'. An append period is a window of > time after the

Re: [Bacula-users] Feature Request: Append Period

2007-03-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 21:23, Brian Debelius wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 March 2007 18:55, Brian Debelius wrote: > >> Item n:Implement an 'Append Period' > >> Origin: Brian Debelius (bdebelius @ intelesyscorp dot com) > &

Re: [Bacula-users] SCSI cards

2007-03-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 22:06, Jansen,Quinton [PYR] wrote: > Would that be the LSI22320-R? I take it the RAID is not causing any > problems. Advice from several users recently indicate that you would probably eliminate all your headaches if you use a dedicated SCSI controller for your tape dri

Re: [Bacula-users] SCSI cards

2007-03-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
evice on the bus). Not so good. I've never heard that before. I'll be interested to hear your final resolution of the problem. > > The hard drive RAID is on a separate controller. OK, that is certainly the best practice :-) > > > -Original Message- > >

[Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3

2007-03-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
backup and disconnect as quickly as possible. On a different subject: the new bat (Qt4 console) is progressing slowly but surely. The current version has roughly the same features as the gnome-console. Hopefully, in the near future, it will have many more features. Best regards, Kern

Re: [Bacula-users] You have been unsubscribed from the Bacula-users mailing list

2007-03-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
has a limit of bounces or retries that becomes exceeded for some user. I forget what Mailman does, but I think it also disables the user's account, though it is possible it unsubscribes the user. Considering the complexity of keeping a mailing list running, these actions seem at le

Re: [Bacula-users] nagios check_bacula plugin and Bacula 2.0.1

2007-03-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 19:58, Zakai Kinan wrote: > Where can I the latest code for check_bacula? It is in release version 2.0.3 on the Source Forge site -- in the examples/nagios directory. > > ZK > > --- DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Masopust, Christian wrote: > > >>> /usr/bin/g++ -O

Re: [Bacula-users] rpm error

2007-03-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Scott, Is this problem related to the fact that he was upgrading two database versions? I.e. can a 2.0.x rpm do a double database upgrade? I wonder if he should first try updating to 1.38.11 then do the update to 2.0.x?? On Thursday 08 March 2007 00:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'

Re: [Bacula-users] Bweb minimum requirements

2007-03-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 08 March 2007 13:53, Troy Daniels wrote: > Hi again, > > Forgot to mention I'm using bweb from the 2.0.3 tarball available on > Sourceforge currently. > > Troy. > > Troy Daniels wrote: > > Hiya, > > > > I'm in the process of setup up bweb on my bacula server as the last step > > in upgr

Re: [Bacula-users] Feature request: more flexible TLS cert validation

2007-03-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Unless I am mistaken, even if there is a duplicate CN as you fear, it seems to me it should pose no problems because the certificate would not match. Does someone more experienced with TLS know the answer to that? Best regards, Kern On Thursday 08 March 2007 15:00, Jorj Bauer wrote

Re: [Bacula-users] rpm error

2007-03-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
b upgrade script for you. Regards, Kern > > On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 13:57 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Hello Scott, > > > > Is this problem related to the fact that he was upgrading two database > > versions? I.e. can a 2.0.x rpm do a double database upgrade? I wonder

Re: [Bacula-users] Bweb minimum requirements

2007-03-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 09 March 2007 03:34, Troy Daniels wrote: > Hi, > > > For exactly the reason you state, I believe that it is not possible for > > bweb to work with MySQL version 3, which is *very* old (by Open Source > > standards) now. It will probably work with version 4, which does > > implement subqu

Re: [Bacula-users] Migration: last full backup to archive?

2007-03-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 09 March 2007 02:33, Mike Seda wrote: > Hi All, > I too have switched off a few machines lately, and wish to save their > last complete backup to an Archive pool. Basically, I want to migrate a > few jobs from my "Weekly" pool to my "Archive" pool. Fortunately, I too > have one last full

Re: [Bacula-users] Migration: last full backup to archive?

2007-03-10 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 10 March 2007 19:25, Mike Seda wrote: > Hi Kern, > My proposed method may be feasible, but do you recommend a more elegant > solution to accomplish a migration job between two different tape pools > based on the storage resources at my disposal? I just want to make sure >

Re: [Bacula-users] winbacula 2.0.3 signature alert

2007-03-11 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 11 March 2007 17:08, Pierre Bernhardt wrote: > Hello, > > the signature file don't corrospond to the file: > > $ /cygdrive/c/Programme/Internet/GnuPT/GPG/gpg.exe -d > winbacula-2.0.3.exe.sig gpg: Signature made 03/01/07 10:03:11 using DSA key > ID 10A792AD > gpg: BAD signature from "Bacul

Re: [Bacula-users] Change in verification job tape selection time - deliberate or accidental?

2007-03-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
o control when > it performs it's tape selection, or even which job it verify? I've scanned > the Jobs section of the latest manual but didn't see anything obvious. > > For now I can either work around it(With a Run script runni

Re: [Bacula-users] Re : ***************URGENT************Need Help !***************

2007-03-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 12 March 2007 13:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > thanks for the remark Florian, > but the problem is : without a backup server we can not make backups nor > restore ! so it's realy urgent given that the production has started in a > new country ! the version already running is under openS

Re: [Bacula-users] Limitations of Running 2.02 Server with 1.36 Clients

2007-03-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
o versions. I personally would not trust any important data to such a configuration ... Best regards, Kern - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get

Re: [Bacula-users] upgrade from 1.38.9 to 2.0.3 and moving to a new server

2007-03-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
simply shutdown the new Bacula restart the old Bacula and the next day, move and upgrade the database again and work on it until you are satisfied. Once it works, you either keep the new Volume you used for testing, or simply move and upgrade the old d

Re: [Bacula-users] Change in verification job tape sel ection time - deliberate or accidental?

2007-03-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 03:03, Troy Daniels wrote: > Hi, > > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Monday 12 March 2007 04:05, Troy Daniels wrote: > >> Greetings Listers, > >> > >> Last week I upgraded my Bacula install to 2.0.2 without any issues > >> dur

Re: [Bacula-users] Question on mailcommand

2007-03-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
Please read the section in the manual that describes the bsmtp program. It explains these kinds of problems and how to debug them. On Tuesday 13 March 2007 16:22, John BORIS wrote: > I am having a bit of a problem getting the mailcommand setup properly. > Here is what I have now: > > mailcomma

Re: [Bacula-users] Difference Between "Archive" and "Read-Only" Volume Status?

2007-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 21:57, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > I could be wrong, but I don't believe either one is implemented. :-P Do > I win? :) Yes, you win. However, there is a new Enable mode in 2.0.0, which has an Archive status, which, if I remember well, prevents pruning. > > =R > > Jason Ki

Re: [Bacula-users] Difference Between "Archive" and "Read-Only" Volume Status?

2007-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 22:27, Mike Seda wrote: > Well, I think VolStatus=Archive is implemented. The latest > rel-bacula.pdf says: > > "If the Volume has another status, such as Archive, Read-Only, Disabled, > Busy, or > Cleaning, the Volume status will not be changed to

Re: [Bacula-users] Change in verification job tape selection time - deliberate or accidental?

2007-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
d question. I'll look at this when I am looking at the problem. > > If I get time today I'll look into the documentation and see if I can come > up with a suitable addition explaining this situation. I might even throw > in a feature request if one doesn't already exis

Re: [Bacula-users] autochanger still requesting a volume/tape?

2007-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 18:40, Jonathan Fine wrote: > Ok, I am using debian sarge(both client and server) and bacula version > 2.0.2. I've figured out my problem, which was I didn't have Drive Index > defined for both tape drives in the autochanger. After fighting this > for a day and a half

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Feature request: more flexible TLS cert validation

2007-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Landon, On Wednesday 14 March 2007 20:34, Landon Fuller wrote: > Sorry for the late arrival. An opendarwin.org e-mail hiccup ate my > subscription. > > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Well, I care, and I don't trust DNS at all. From what I read here, > > IMO the curr

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Change in verification job tapeselection time - deliberate or accidental?

2007-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 15:11, David Boyes wrote: > > I also think that for a longer term, "cleaner" solution it might be a > > good > > > idea to add a RunAfterJob, which runs one or more jobs after the > > current > > > job, > > and by "runs", I mean it starts the job within Bacula, not throug

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Feature request: more flexible TLS cert validation

2007-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
hod doesn't solve a similar problem, though: what if a > > device has to change name for a non-technical reason? For example, an > > office move in an organization where the DNS names are tied to > > geographic location. Using non-DNS information embedded in the > > certi

Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring for file comparison

2007-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
hen look for and restore each of the JobId, FileId pairs. Note, if you want to restore multiple copies of the same file, you will need to run multiple restores since if you restore two or more different copies of the same file, they will simply overwrite e

Re: [Bacula-users] possible bug found

2007-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 15 March 2007 04:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Upon running a migration job, bacula asked me to load one of my > cleaning tapes... Then, I updated the MediaId in the Media table to > correspond with the tape that bacula should have been looking for... > This caused bacula to successful

Re: [Bacula-users] legal "Selection Pattern" for migration job

2007-03-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 15 March 2007 02:09, Mike Seda wrote: > Is the following legal syntax for a migration job? > > Selection Type = SQLQuery > Selection Pattern = " > Where /var/bacula/migration-query.sql is a file that contains a single > sql command that returns a single jobId result? No it is not valid

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Feature request: more flexible TLS cert validation

2007-03-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 15 March 2007 16:46, Jorj Bauer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:04:00AM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 March 2007 22:29, Landon Fuller wrote: > > > On Mar 14, 2007, at 13:41, Jorj Bauer wrote: > > > > Let's take the DNS security

Re: [Bacula-users] damaged database (was Re: possible bug found)

2007-03-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
orarily restored database as you propose doing (I personally wouldn't do this). 3. Scan in the needed volumes into the new "clean" database -- terribly time consuming. At some point manually recycle the old Volumes when they would have been automatically recycled, and start re-using t

Re: [Bacula-users] Couple of Newbie Questions

2007-03-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 15 March 2007 15:45, David Romerstein wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Lonny Selinger wrote: > > I've been having an issue doing restores and I know it has to be > > something I'm missing but I can't put my finger on it just yet. The > > problem is the job completes successfully but the di

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Feature request: more flexible TLS cert validation

2007-03-15 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 15 March 2007 16:40, Jorj Bauer wrote: > > Bacula does its normal HMAC-MD5 password authentication > > I never meant to imply that it did not, although my message was > obviously interpreted that way by at least two people. > > > The FD address cannot be part of the certificate (CN or a

Re: [Bacula-users] Migration: last full backup to archive?

2007-03-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
ave one tape drive It is nice to hear that migration is actually being used. You might try a "test" restore from the final tape just to be sure. I don't expect any problems, but with something new like this, it is always conforting to have a confirmation. > > Kern Sibbald wro

Re: [Bacula-users] Authorization Errors after upgrade to 2.0.2 (Workaround)

2007-03-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, This is a nice solution to the problem, and something that you might want to keep indefinitely. However, the "problem" should be fixed in version 2.0.3. Regards, Kern On Friday 16 March 2007 19:45, Darien Hager wrote: > > On Thursday 01 February 2007 18:02, Jero

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 16 March 2007 12:45, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/14/2007 11:30 AM, Alan Brown wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Xeos Laenor wrote: > > > >> Congratulations to him (and surely the others) and thanks a lot to you ;-) > >> Great Job guys ! > > > > Seconded. > > > > Has anyone built

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Config For Autochanger

2007-03-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
ss, I consider that a mistake (not totally correct/honest), but something that unfortunately seems to be prevelant with some corporations. Regards, Kern On Friday 16 March 2007 10:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Mr Robert, > I don't want to waste your time, nor the other

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon building

2007-03-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 16 March 2007 15:19, Richard Adams wrote: > I know this is likely a dumb question, but it was my understanding > that the storage daemon was independent of the SQL database, but I > have been unable to figure out a way to build additional storage > daemons on other machines without

Re: [Bacula-users] Tapedrive stops and rewinds too often

2007-03-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
Bacula never rewinds either the input or output tape after it has started reading or writing unless it is going to change the tape, or in the case of reading, if there is a new job. On Friday 16 March 2007 17:15, Damian Lubosch wrote: > Hello dear Bacula users! > > I have a problem: during a mi

Re: [Bacula-users] Experience with brestore.pl

2007-03-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
I'm not sure that Eric reads this list. I recommend that you either copy him directly on bweb/brestore questions or copy the bacula-devel list. On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:22, Lonny Selinger wrote: > Still playing around. I managed to get brestore loading etc but I'm not sure > I'm doing it rig

Re: [Bacula-users] Could not connect to Storage daemon - ERR=No error

2007-03-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:29, Jeff Dickens wrote: > I'm testing a new bacula server, running 2.0.3 installed from the el4 > rpm from sourceforge. > > My client is running WinXP, with the 2.0.3 winbacula from sourceforge. > > The client and the server both have each other's addresses in their

Re: [Bacula-users] memory leak?

2007-03-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
have allocated on which devices, and if you have several swap devices, make sure that they are all turned on. Regards, Kern On Sunday 18 March 2007 08:57, SITKEI Attila wrote: > Dear list, > > I use bacula since one year and found to be an excellent backup > solution, thank y

Re: [Bacula-users] Migration: last full backup to archive?

2007-03-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
isted for a long time (not new code), so I expect it to be quite solid. > > > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Thursday 15 March 2007 20:44, Mike Seda wrote: > > > >> Fyi, my double migration was successfull... First I ran a job called T2D > >> and then ran a j

Re: [Bacula-users] memory leak?

2007-03-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
al swap = 2003272kB > > > > which I take to mean that it is using 2GB of swap space not the 6 that are > > shown above. Obviously 2GB of swap space is totally inadequate if you have > > 3GB of memory. I recommend checking what swap you have allocated on which > >

[Bacula-users] Bacula release strategy.

2007-03-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
to this email. Comments? Regards, Kern - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through bri

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula release strategy.

2007-03-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 18 March 2007 17:28, Eric Bollengier wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm considering the following ideas for the next couple of Bacula releases, > > and would like your ideas. > > > > 1. Release version 2.0.4 in the next week or two with a couple more bug > > fixes. > > > > 2. Release either version

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula release strategy.

2007-03-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
xt you show for disk_check.sh is incorrect. I'm sorry, but I cannot respond any more to reqests to help debug scripts. If you can tie the problem down to a bug or a change in 2.0.2, I will be very interested. Regards, Kern On Sunday 18 March 2007 18:19, Ondrej PLANKA wrote: > Hi Kern and

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula release strategy.

2007-03-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 18 March 2007 18:22, Dan Langille wrote: > On 18 Mar 2007 at 16:27, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm considering the following ideas for the next couple of Bacula releases, > > and would like your ideas. > > > > 1. Relea

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula release strategy.

2007-03-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 18 March 2007 20:27, David Boyes wrote: > > > I'm a fan of frequent releases. Smaller changes each time is a good > > > thing. Both from a user and a sysadmin point of view. > > In principle this is a great idea. Can I suggest a minor variant? > > Frequent releases benefit sites that

Re: [Bacula-users] Change in verification job tape selection time - deliberate or accidental?

2007-03-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
o be controlled thru scripting) This is an idea that I think given a bit of careful thought and good specification could be very useful. This idea would need to be submitted as a feature request. > > Option 1 is probably the simplest, and hopefully easiest, to implement. >

Re: [Bacula-users] Change in verification job tape sel ection time - deliberate or accidental?

2007-03-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
h restore, which still lets the user specify a jobid. What I was thinking of is not implemented. The code does let you specify a Verify Job name, but that is not useful for what you want. This would be a feature request rather than a bug report. Regards, Kern > > >> 2) Add th

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula release strategy.

2007-03-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
limited to those that are stable and cause no compatibility problems. Major features updates will continue to be spaced at approximately 12-18 month intervals. Basically this means maintaining the status quo. If someone has some problems with this, now is the time to speak up. Best rega

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon building

2007-03-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 02:41, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > The SD does not "currently" need/use the DB (this will probably chang). > > However, some of the other tools that are built with the SD do need the DB, > > therefore the dependence. I

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula release strategy.

2007-03-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 00:49, Steen wrote: > Mandag 19 marts 2007 19:34 skrev Kern Sibbald: > > After receiving somewhat conflicting input (some pro quick releases, some > > against), I've decided roughly to follow the following strategy: > > > > For the imme

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage Daemon building

2007-03-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 12:51, Jorj Bauer wrote: > > > Out of curiosity, what -- down the line -- would the -sd require a > > > database for? Config info? > > > > Config info in the database -- never. Only people who have never done a bare > > metal recovery would think of such an implementati

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 11:12, Alan Brown wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote: > > > Ok, I have an FD for SuSE 9.2 which should also work on SLES9. > > Statically linking was not possible, after some playing around, I always > > ended up with: > > > I can not find static .a librarie

Re: [Bacula-users] disk volume issues: seek - too large volumes - truncate - fragmentation

2007-03-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 13:02, HM wrote: > Hello, folks! > > Sorry for this ugly $subject. > > I've been playing with bacula and noticed a strange behaviour. I have > configured a Pool with disk volumes of size 100MB each. On one run I > wrote three tapes. Then I've deleted the catalog and recre

Re: [Bacula-users] "Block checksum mismatch" on restore

2007-03-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 14:39, Ekkehard Burkon wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get a backup server up and running with debian sarge as > base system and approx 2TB of disk storage on a raid 5 array on a > 3ware 9000 controller. > > The backups seem to be OK. But each restore fails with something

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 14:51, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/20/2007 2:15 PM, Alan Brown wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > >> What I don't understand is why you don't build your own current (non-static) > >> version

Re: [Bacula-users] Any experience with Quantum DLT-S4 ?

2007-03-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 15:14, Michael Proto wrote: > Mehmet Soysal wrote: > > Hi, > > is somebody using a Quantum DLT-S4 drive with Bacula ? > > I'm looking for a tape drive with a huge uncompressed capacity on a > > single tape and > > the DLT-S4 drive seems to have the most capacity. > > > > Bu

Re: [Bacula-users] Fw: Rif: Re: Change tape problem

2007-03-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
#x27;t see any reason to apply your patch. I suspect that your patch is serving to cover up some sort of driver or hardware problem. Regards, Kern On Friday 16 March 2007 09:39, Ferdinando Pasqualetti wrote: > Hi Kern, > sorry to ask you directly. Some days ago I sent the same emai

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 14:15, Alan Brown wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > What I don't understand is why you don't build your own current (non-static) > > version of Bacula on your older systems. > > Because in several cases they won&

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >