Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-25 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
What was the operating system running the Director?How were the postgres client libraries compiled?My latest postgres libraries was built with this configuration on Solaris 10 sparc:./configure --prefix=/iserver --without-readline --enable-thread-safety Gabriele Bulfon - Sonicle S.r.l.

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-25 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
@lists.sourceforge.net Data: 25 settembre 2006 14.20.45 CESTOggetto: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1 What was the operating system running the Director?How were the postgres client libraries compiled?My latest postgres libraries was built with this configuration on Solaris 10 sparc

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-25 Thread Dan Langille
On 25 Sep 2006 at 15:45, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: While googling I've found this: http://groups.google.it/group/linux.debian.bugs.dist/browse_thread/thread/34e9ffb7d8d2a1ea/1ae2be653af8e4d8%231ae2be653af8e4d8 Maybe my problem is connected to this bug? I don't have a bacula unix user though, and

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-25 Thread Magnus Hagander
How can I be sure bacula is using the correct credentials I specified in the conf file? Test it. Configure PostgreSQL such that it accepts connections only from that which you specify. Or you could monitor the connections. PostgreSQL allows you to monitor connections. There are

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-21 Thread Magnus Hagander
Sorry for not resending the needed informations, I already sent them when I first encountered the problem. But then I could solve this by moving the Director together with the DB (I had another Solaris machine in that situation). I'm appending the original infos here. On postgres, I just

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-21 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
onicle.com --Da: Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED]A: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gabriele Bulfon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Data: 21 settembre 2006 10.22.22 CESTOggetto: RE: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1 Sorry for not resending the needed informations, I al

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-21 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry for not resending the needed informations, I already sent them when I first encountered the problem. But then I could solve this by moving the Director together with the DB (I had another Solaris machine in that situation). I'm

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-21 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
I really doubt it's a network issue, in this case.I would find the problem on all the other applications using the same postgres.And consider that I can replicate the problem ALWAYS.Any Bacula installation I have (10-12) will react the same once I move the DB away from localhost.I will do

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-21 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
nicle.com Da: Gabriele Bulfon [EMAIL PROTECTED]A: Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Data: 21 settembre 2006 16.08.48 CESTOggetto: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1 I really doubt it's a network issue, in this case.I

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-21 Thread Bill Moran
This foray has gotten very frustrating for me. Please excuse if the following replies seem inflammatory, but it comes from an honest desire to _really_ help. In response to Gabriele Bulfon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: That postgres db is being used on the network all day long. - I use it from web apps

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-21 Thread Dan Langille
On 21 Sep 2006 at 16:13, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: ..I did the test. Specifying localhost and 5432 on DB Address and DB Port works fine. Gabriele: There is something, somewhere, odd/wrong about your configuration. I do not know if it is Bacula or PostgreSQL or something else. Within the past

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-20 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Data: 19 settembre 2006 14.53.29 CESTOggetto: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1 In response to Gabriele Bulfon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, I open again the question about Bacula working on Postgres. This time, I really need to have Director and Postgres

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-20 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Data: 19 settembre 2006 14.53.29 CESTOggetto: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1 In response to Gabriele Bulfon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, I open again the question about Bacula working on Postgres. This time, I really need to have Director and Postgres

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-20 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Gabriele Bulfon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry for not resending the needed informations, I already sent them when I first encountered the problem. But then I could solve this by moving the Director together with the DB (I had another Solaris machine in that situation). I'm

[Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-19 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Hello,I open again the question about Bacula working on Postgres.This time, I really need to have Director and Postgres run on two different machines.The reason: I only have one Solaris machine and one Windows machine, so I cannot move the Director to the Windows machine together with Postgres

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Postgres 8.1

2006-09-19 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Gabriele Bulfon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, I open again the question about Bacula working on Postgres. This time, I really need to have Director and Postgres run on two different machines. The reason: I only have one Solaris machine and one Windows machine, so I cannot move