-Original Message-
From: Brent Poirier
My recollection is that when the Baha'is were choosing
the design for the Wilmette Temple, Remey's and
Bourgeois' designs tied. Remey then graciously
withdrew his design. The Master stated that because
of this act, Remey would design the
Has the House actually confirmed that the Remey design will be built?
Given that the Master and Guardian approved Remey and his design before
he broke the covenant, it would seem that the House would have grounds
to alter the decision. Does it seem credible or consistent that either
the
'Abdu'l-Baha
permitted the covenant breaker to live at the mansion at Bahji, even
paying their expenses. In contrast, Shoghi Effendi could not wait to
get them out and bulldoze their shanty appendages. How do we view
Shoghi Effendi's actions in light of 'Abdu'l-Baha's?
It's my view
In a past posting, Brent said:
Further, since the Master had designated Remey as the architect for the
Mashriqu'l-Adhkar to be built in the future on Mount Carmel, and since
Shoghi Effendi approved the design, it will be built by the House of
Justice, to carry out the decisions of the Master and
Has the House actually confirmed that the Remey design will be built?
Given that the Master and Guardian approved Remey and his design before
he broke the covenant, it would seem that the House would have grounds
to alter the decision. Does it seem credible or consistent that either
the
Has the House actually confirmed that the Remey design will be built?
Given that the Master and Guardian approved Remey and his design before he
broke the covenant, it would seem that the House would have grounds to
alter the decision. Does it seem credible or consistent that either the
Given what Susan was told and Mark's reasoning, I hope the House might
at some point consider changing its decision about building the Remey
design, but if not, I guess future generations will have to live with
it, as strange as this seems.
Susan Maneck wrote:
[Marleen] Has the House
Would have grounds or would not have grounds?
- Original Message -
From: Susan Maneck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Baha'i Studies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:30 AM
Subject: Re: Temple Designs by Mason Remey
Has the House actually confirmed that the Remey design
Would have grounds or would not have grounds?
Dear Richard,
I was told that Mason Remey's plan for the Haifa Temple *would* be used.
warmest, Susan
--
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
