Re: Why 95

2004-01-10 Thread Richard H. Gravelly
That is very interesting. Thank you. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Baha'i Studies Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:23 PM Subject: Re: Why 95 In a message dated 1/9/2004 6:45:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

Why 95

2004-01-09 Thread Jilla Simmons
There are several reasons why number 95 is significant in the Baha’i writings. However the most significant one in my IMHO is the following: The Abjad numerical value of the word Lel-Lah, meaning “for God”, is equivalent to 95. Therefore Baha’is repeat the blessed phrase “Allah’u-Abha” 95

Re: Why 95

2004-01-09 Thread Smaneck
In a message dated 1/9/2004 6:45:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is "Lel-Lah" the origin of the name "Leyla"in the stories of Leyla and Majnun? No, Layla means midnight. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as:

Re: Why do we hark back to a bygone era continually in order to discuss ideas...

2003-12-15 Thread Smaneck
In a message dated 12/15/2003 1:48:55 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "O listeners, know that the purpose of telling the story of this person and others like him is to give encouragement to the sympathisers in order to arise in the service of His cause. It also serves to

Re: Why?

2003-11-08 Thread Kendal
Dear Marlene, The main reason I stopped posting a few months back is because I ended up regretting half my posts because they were not well thought out, so I felt it more appropriate to observe silence. I am getting that feeling acutely again. My post was misplaced because it followed so

Re: Why?

2003-11-08 Thread Sheila Spatz
Hi all, I feel I want to put my two cents in here - although I may regret it:) I am not much of a scholar so I can't provide chapter and verse but, if I recall correctly - There is a Baha'i scripture that offers a perspective that might be helpful. It says to the effect That which appears to be

Re: Why?

2003-11-08 Thread Don Calkins
There have been some good points made in this discussion. I personally think that Abdu'l-Baha's statements on retribution should be taken at face value. How then do you deal with Marleen's objections? I think the answer is simple. It is mankind that is being punished. The individual(s) are

Re: Why?

2003-11-07 Thread Kendal
It makes no more sense to assume some people deserve their illnesses than it does to assume some criminals deserve to get away with their crimes just because they escape detection and justice. Dr Chase, I agree with you wholeheartedly and please dont interpret what I am about to write as

Re: Why?

2003-11-07 Thread M Chase
to of our life. This is a question that each of us can only answer for ourselves. My answer is that I accept such pronouncements by God, but I don't presume to understand the reasoning and the judgments behind them. Since I can never achieve omniscience, I can't presume to understand why some

Why?

2003-11-05 Thread Alvah Shepard
I have found it useful to think about this passage from the Gospel. It isn't as specific as the words of the Guardian, but it's worth remembering: John 91 And as Jesus passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth.2 And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or

Re: Why?

2003-11-05 Thread Evolvinghuman
I don't know if this is helpful but I wrote this as a piece on the problem of theodicy some time back. The diseases and afflictions have changed over the centuries. As our understanding of the disease process improves and newer treatments are initiated, we get better results. What appeared to be a

Re: Why?

2003-11-05 Thread M Chase
Regarding illness, consider Baha'u'llah's Tablet of Wisdom in the Tablets of Baha'u'llah where He states, Nature is God's Will and is its expression in and through the contingent world. Disease is part of the natural world, and when linked with contingency, you have a crap shoot. It makes no

Why?

2003-11-04 Thread David Friedman
It says in the Writings that mortal illnesses come to people to bring them closer to God. One might expect, therefore, that those getting diseases like cancer would be the ones who really need the spiritual benefit the illness could provide. In other words, the least spiritual people. One

Re: Why?

2003-11-04 Thread Mark A. Foster
David, At 11:08 AM 11/4/2003 +, you wrote: It seems to me that such things are totally random, and she simply had particularly bad luck. I don't think God directly intervenes in affairs as much as some Baha'is seem to believe. Is there anything in the Writings that can shed some light on

Re: Why?

2003-11-04 Thread Don Calkins
On 11/4/03 11:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It says in the Writings that mortal illnesses come to people to bring them closer to God. snip Nowhere in the Scriptures does it say that sinfulness is the sole cause of disease and misfortune. Therefore I understand the statements