On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:14:42PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> Ok so I removed all packages and re-installed. No difference, however a new
> identical configuration seemed to work.. Odd
Since it happens right away, I'm going to assume this is an oddity
in the config, and an opensync level
Ok so I removed all packages and re-installed. No difference, however a new
identical configuration seemed to work.. Odd
One more question after a sync is complete, the BB still displayes the
'Connected to Desktop' screen.. is that a barry or opensync issue? I assume
since the sync is done it
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:26:33PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> > bad news... Since I played with your versions I can still use btool -l
> > however syncing ends in an error... with very little information...
> >
> > [g...@iridium ~]$ msyn
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:39:02PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> > Changing my /lib/udev/rules.d/69-blackberry.rules to the line you provide
> > seems to do the same yes as I can run the btool -l command successfully
> as a
> > normal user.
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:26:33PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> bad news... Since I played with your versions I can still use btool -l
> however syncing ends in an error... with very little information...
>
> [g...@iridium ~]$ msynctool --sync BlackberrySunbird
> Synchronizing group "Blackberr
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:39:02PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> Changing my /lib/udev/rules.d/69-blackberry.rules to the line you provide
> seems to do the same yes as I can run the btool -l command successfully as a
> normal user. I got the latest from your git repo, but the file wasn't there
bad news... Since I played with your versions I can still use btool -l
however syncing ends in an error... with very little information...
[g...@iridium ~]$ msynctool --sync BlackberrySunbird
Synchronizing group "BlackberrySunbird"
Error while synchronizing: (null)
It worked prior to trying your
Changing my /lib/udev/rules.d/69-blackberry.rules to the line you provide
seems to do the same yes as I can run the btool -l command successfully as a
normal user. I got the latest from your git repo, but the file wasn't there
as far as I could see.
-
I'm actually using the fedora rpm, just placed the file where I told you. I
have no qualms about building from your sources though, as long as the
makefile has an uninstall target ;)
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:06:43AM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> ACTION!="add", GOTO="blackberry_end"
> SUBSYSTEM!="usb", GOTO="blackberry_end"
>
> ATTR{idVendor}=="0fca", ENV{ACL_MANAGE}="1"
>
> LABEL="blackberry_end"
I'm about to add a file with the following line, which as I understand
it,
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:06:43AM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So I have it working now. Here's the deal.
Thanks Nathanael!
> You can remove the hal .fdi files, all access control has been moved back to
> udev.
>
> You place a file in /lib/udev/rules.d/69-blackberry.rules wit
Hello,
So I have it working now. Here's the deal.
You can remove the hal .fdi files, all access control has been moved back to
udev.
You place a file in /lib/udev/rules.d/69-blackberry.rules with the following
contents
ACTION!="add", GOTO="blackberry_end"
SUBSYSTEM!="usb", GOTO="blackberry_en
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 09:54:43AM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> Nada. One thing to note. This is a Blackberry Pearl, and I ran bcharge
> without any options however I see that it should be run with -o ? Also I
> forgot to reload the rules the first time I plugged it in, so the second
> time aft
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:22:18AM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> > To clarify.
> >
> > on F12, the stock rpm has *no* udev rules file. When I take the udev
> rules
> > from your sources, and place them in the rules.d folder, subsequent
> > i
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:22:18AM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> To clarify.
>
> on F12, the stock rpm has *no* udev rules file. When I take the udev rules
> from your sources, and place them in the rules.d folder, subsequent
> insertion of the blackberry no longer shows up in lsusb as a normal
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 01:30:08PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> > In playing around a bit more, I saw that lsusb and btool -l as a regular
> > user show no trace of the blackberry whatsoever, no error message
> nothing.
> > However as root
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 01:30:08PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> In playing around a bit more, I saw that lsusb and btool -l as a regular
> user show no trace of the blackberry whatsoever, no error message nothing.
> However as root, lsusb shows the Rim device as well as btool -l.
So, if I unde
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:23:40PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> Sorry to be spamming the list as I go...
It's ok, you're keeping it all in the same thread. :-)
> I also have access to two F11 systems... Their devices get
>
> crw-rw-r-- root:vboxusers for permissions...
Interesting. Must b
Sorry to be spamming the list as I go...
I also have access to two F11 systems... Their devices get
crw-rw-r-- root:vboxusers for permissions...
Recently on F12 the device gets root:plugdev ... However I'm not in that
group so that must be some HAL or *Kit thing?
---
So I've continued to try to see what is going on... Obviously some
permissions issues... If I copy your udev rules but still using the fedora
supplied packages, I get the same behaviour as 0.16.
In playing around a bit more, I saw that lsusb and btool -l as a regular
user show no trace of the blac
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Nathanael Noblet <
nathanaelnob...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Chris Frey wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 01:15:06AM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
>> >
>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=20090630093818.GA3
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 01:15:06AM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> >
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=20090630093818.GA31202%40foursquare.net
>
> Thanks! Yep, that's the June 30 thread. Good, we're on the same page.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 01:15:06AM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=20090630093818.GA31202%40foursquare.net
Thanks! Yep, that's the June 30 thread. Good, we're on the same page. :-)
> In anycase, it works, I just need to fix the permissio
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:57:43AM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> > So if I compile the latest code and test, the permissions stuff may be
> > working? I remember there was a long email from you about all the changes
> > necessary to make it
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:57:43AM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> So if I compile the latest code and test, the permissions stuff may be
> working? I remember there was a long email from you about all the changes
> necessary to make it work properly. I assume none of those were done
> correct?
H
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:31:45PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >I was just wondering where things where at with regards to the
> permission
> > issues of the usb device file on F11/F12 with the latest barry packages.
> I
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:31:45PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> Hello,
>
>I was just wondering where things where at with regards to the permission
> issues of the usb device file on F11/F12 with the latest barry packages. I
> know you had started to look at how they changed stuff from ude
Hello,
I was just wondering where things where at with regards to the permission
issues of the usb device file on F11/F12 with the latest barry packages. I
know you had started to look at how they changed stuff from udev/hal to
devicekit etc. Any progress there? Are there newer snapshots I coul
28 matches
Mail list logo
