Re: [PATCH] small Makefile tweaking

2006-06-17 Thread VMiklos
Additionally, you already use install -d, so why not for this line? i've just changed mkdir to mkdir -p, of course install -d would be ok, too udv / greetings, VMiklos -- Developer of Frugalware Linux, to make things frugal - http://frugalware.org __

Re: [PATCH] small Makefile tweaking

2006-06-16 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Freitag, 16. Juni 2006 20:58 schrieb Michael Buesch: > On Friday 16 June 2006 18:32, VMiklos wrote: > > resending, sent directly to Martin by mistake.. > > > > 2006/6/14, Martin Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Please write against the SVN version. You will see that install the > > > manpage is

Re: [PATCH] small Makefile tweaking

2006-06-16 Thread Imre Kaloz
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:43:51 +0200, Erik Mouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 06:32:20PM +0200, VMiklos wrote: the optimization is important when you want to build for example on an i686 machine with -march=i586, if CFLAGS is ignored, the binary will contain invalid (for i5

Re: [PATCH] small Makefile tweaking

2006-06-16 Thread Michael Buesch
On Friday 16 June 2006 18:32, VMiklos wrote: > resending, sent directly to Martin by mistake.. > > 2006/6/14, Martin Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Please write against the SVN version. You will see that install the > > manpage is already part of the SVN version since weeks. > > here is an updat

Re: [PATCH] small Makefile tweaking

2006-06-16 Thread Erik Mouw
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 06:32:20PM +0200, VMiklos wrote: > the optimization is important when you want to build for example on an > i686 machine with -march=i586, if CFLAGS is ignored, the binary will > contain invalid (for i586) instructions Could you explain why one would want to optimize an app

Re: [PATCH] small Makefile tweaking

2006-06-16 Thread VMiklos
resending, sent directly to Martin by mistake.. 2006/6/14, Martin Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Please write against the SVN version. You will see that install the manpage is already part of the SVN version since weeks. here is an updated patch: http://helicon.frugalware.org/~vmiklos/bcm43xx-fw

Re: [PATCH] small Makefile tweaking

2006-06-14 Thread Martin Langer
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:38:54PM +0200, VMiklos wrote: > hi > > i've made a little patch to fwcutter's Makefile to install the > manpage, too and respect the user's cflags: Please write against the SVN version. You will see that install the manpage is already part of the SVN version since week

Re: [PATCH] small Makefile tweaking

2006-06-14 Thread Michael Buesch
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:24, Erik Mouw wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 03:58:40PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Tuesday 13 June 2006 22:38, VMiklos wrote: > > > hi > > > > > > i've made a little patch to fwcutter's Makefile to install the > > > manpage, too and respect the user's cflags

Re: [PATCH] small Makefile tweaking

2006-06-14 Thread Erik Mouw
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 03:58:40PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Tuesday 13 June 2006 22:38, VMiklos wrote: > > hi > > > > i've made a little patch to fwcutter's Makefile to install the > > manpage, too and respect the user's cflags: > > Modifying CFLAGS is one of the most stupid things peopl

Re: [PATCH] small Makefile tweaking

2006-06-14 Thread Michael Buesch
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 22:38, VMiklos wrote: > hi > > i've made a little patch to fwcutter's Makefile to install the > manpage, too and respect the user's cflags: Modifying CFLAGS is one of the most stupid things people are doing. Except from adding -Os on small systems perhaps. But virtually no

[PATCH] small Makefile tweaking

2006-06-13 Thread VMiklos
hi i've made a little patch to fwcutter's Makefile to install the manpage, too and respect the user's cflags: http://darcs.frugalware.org/repos/vmiklos/source/bcm43xx-fwcutter/bcm43xx-fwcutter-004-makefile.diff please consider for inclusion thanks, VMiklos -- Developer of Frugalware Linux, to