Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
John H. wrote: I ended up just using the following... http://www.howtoforge.com/kernel_compilation_fedora Can I get a patched version of the bcm43xx source and just compile that? I scanned the reference quickly, but I think you have downloaded the Fedora kernel sources. If so, in step

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
David Woodhouse wrote: But really, even if you _wanted_ to rebuild your kernel that reference is giving bad advice; you'd do better to check the RPM sources out from CVS and make them that way. It's doubly bad for not starting with YOU REALLY DON'T WANT TO BUILD YOUR OWN KERNEL in big

Re: [RFC] PHY setup in v4 specs implementation

2007-04-09 Thread Michael Buesch
On Monday 09 April 2007 04:07, Stefano Brivio wrote: I'm going to move all v4 workarounds needed for the A and G PHY setup into a separate file (draft inlined here), as it'll easily get to ~1000 lines, and I wouldn't really want to make a mess out of _phy.c. These workarounds are strictly

Re: [RFC] PHY setup in v4 specs implementation

2007-04-09 Thread Stefano Brivio
Thanks for your comments. But it's a draft. It wasn't supposed to build or to be correct. I just asked to comment about the whole thing. Thanks. -- Ciao Stefano ___ Bcm43xx-dev mailing list Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de

Re: [RFC] PHY setup in v4 specs implementation

2007-04-09 Thread Stefano Brivio
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 12:41:32 +0200 Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Put () around the bitwise . (I think the compiler even complains about this). Not needed, anyway. gcc doesn't complain and has precedence over . -- Ciao Stefano ___

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 01:18 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: I have started a project to build an out-of-tree version of bcm43xx, but it isn't ready for prime time. 'cp -r drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx ~/bcm43xx-for-hacking-on' usually works for me. Then it's just $ cd ~/bcm43xx-for-hacking-on $

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
John H. wrote: I ended up just using the following... http://www.howtoforge.com/kernel_compilation_fedora Can I get a patched version of the bcm43xx source and just compile that? I just put a standalone tarball for the latest version of bcm43xx-softmac onto my FTP site at

Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Report correct wireless statistics

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
Dan Williams wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 00:43 -0400, Michael Wu wrote: Yes, I did reverse your conventions, but it makes more sense this way. (R)SSI is always valid to assign to (struct iw_quality).level and signal ((struct iw_quality).qual) is quite arbitrary and cannot be specified in

[PATCH] ieee80211-crypt: Make some TKIP and CCMP error logging conditional on IEEE80211_DEBUG_DROP

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
There are messages arising from ieee80211_crypt that spam the logs of casual users. These are changed to be logged only if the user specifically requests the IEEE80211_DEBUG_DROP messages. In either case, the error/drop count is incremented. Signed-off-by: Larry Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
Ehud Gavron wrote: Feedback: the make files work. However... this version of the driver is unusable. It's worse than the one I downloaded March 30th (latest 2.6.20). Dell 1390 (BCM4311). By worse I mean that I won't stay associated with an AP; it reverts to previous ESSID even after

Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Report correct wireless statistics

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
Michael Wu wrote: rt2x00 does not use qual. All other drivers in tree that use qual (zd1211rw-mac80211, rtl8187) use the current convention. I don't see anything in those 4 points that would argue against the current conventions in mac80211. In fact, it sounds like you are arguing for it

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Ehud Gavron
Possibly. I'll ensure an ifdown before rmmod in the future. Upon my return to home it associated and wep'ized but was still unable to exchange traffic (rxcount and txcount incrementing on if, wireshark sees traffic, but the interface refuses to stay ifconfig'd up with an ip. Turns radio

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
Ehud Gavron wrote: Possibly. I'll ensure an ifdown before rmmod in the future. Upon my return to home it associated and wep'ized but was still unable to exchange traffic (rxcount and txcount incrementing on if, wireshark sees traffic, but the interface refuses to stay ifconfig'd up with

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 10:08 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: John H. wrote: I ended up just using the following... http://www.howtoforge.com/kernel_compilation_fedora Can I get a patched version of the bcm43xx source and just compile that? I just put a standalone tarball for the latest

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 14:10 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: I have not tested trying to change AP's. What support software were you using? Was it just plain ifup/ifdown or something else like NetworkManager? Have you been able to associate with several AP's with the older version? I've seen

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Ehud Gavron
Removed module.symvers. Make; make install. rmmod bcm43xx hung (yes I forgot to ifconfig down ;) reboot... module now works perfectly. I am unable to see the behavior I saw before: namely ifconfig rxcount goes to 0, txcount goes low, radio off, radio on, rxcount+, txcount+++, dhcp works,

Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Report correct wireless statistics

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
Michael Wu wrote: Absolutely - it is confusing since dBm can also be specified in addition to RSSI. Renaming signal to qual or something along those lines would also be useful IMHO, but if you're okay with it as it stands, I don't mind it. I changed signal to qual and (r)ssi to level. Once

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 17:52 -0700, Ehud Gavron wrote: Removed module.symvers. Make; make install. rmmod bcm43xx hung (yes I forgot to ifconfig down ;) reboot... module now works perfectly. This means that you already have CONFIG_BCM43XX_DEBUG defined in .config, right? I guess you had to

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Ehud Gavron
Yes, it's a kernel from source, renamed to the current fc6 uname-r for a closed video driver. [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux]# cd /usr/src/linux grep -i bcm .config | grep -i debug CONFIG_BCM43XX_DEBUG=y CONFIG_BCM43XX_MAC80211_DEBUG=y Ehud Pavel Roskin wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 17:52 -0700,

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
Pavel Roskin wrote: Thanks for the feedback. I knew it wasn't ready, but I appreciate your comments. Just a quick feedback on that package. Please don't include Module.symvers, your version is not useful for anyone else. It will be generated is needed. Done. I'm getting a compile

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
Pavel Roskin wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 17:52 -0700, Ehud Gavron wrote: Removed module.symvers. Make; make install. rmmod bcm43xx hung (yes I forgot to ifconfig down ;) reboot... module now works perfectly. This means that you already have CONFIG_BCM43XX_DEBUG defined in .config, right?

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
Pavel Roskin wrote: I realize that it's an issue with softmac, and that softmac in the kernel is not the latest. Perhaps it should be upgraded, but I'm not very good at convincing people, and I'm vary of starting another massive tread before I catch up with my e-mail queue. Would you

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 21:12 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: Pavel Roskin wrote: I realize that it's an issue with softmac, and that softmac in the kernel is not the latest. Perhaps it should be upgraded, but I'm not very good at convincing people, and I'm vary of starting another massive

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Ehud Gavron
I am also unable to get bcm43xx to connect to my WRT54G (which I pulled out of the network kit to do this test). It connects just fine to the Buffalo WBR54Gs. (The case does not have any ID other than WRT54G... no version number or anything.) Ehud Larry Finger wrote: Do you think that

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 20:48 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: Speaking of the build system, you may want to have a warning in case if anything that is compiled as a module (either bcm43xx or softmac) is already available and linked into the kernel. Make sure the checks don't affect make clean

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 20:58 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: Pavel Roskin wrote: Yes, the current bcm43xx is pretty good at data transfer. And it doesn't crash my Mac anymore, even though I put my oldest card there, just to make things harder. And it works with a bizarre Linksys AP to which

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 19:33 -0700, Ehud Gavron wrote: I am also unable to get bcm43xx to connect to my WRT54G (which I pulled out of the network kit to do this test). It connects just fine to the Buffalo WBR54Gs. (The case does not have any ID other than WRT54G... no version number or

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Larry Finger
Pavel Roskin wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 21:12 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: Pavel Roskin wrote: I realize that it's an issue with softmac, and that softmac in the kernel is not the latest. Perhaps it should be upgraded, but I'm not very good at convincing people, and I'm vary of starting

Re: bcm-43xx HORRIBLY slow with 4311 card and 2.6.20

2007-04-09 Thread Stephen Sinclair
For the record, i am using my 4311 with bcm43xx and my WRT54G v6 router. it works fine for me. Though previously it often stopped working and I would have to reset it (the router that is), but it has worked far better since I just recently updated its firmware from the linksys website. Steve