Daniel: please post to ML and do not top post.
-- Wiadomość przekazana dalej --
Od: Daniel Kuehn enha...@gmail.com
Data: 5 stycznia 2010 12:46
Temat: Re: The newest Macbook 13.3 wireless
Do: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
@Rafal
Well, I could try and check what chip it gets
W dniu 5 stycznia 2010 12:58 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki
zaj...@gmail.com napisał:
Daniel: please post to ML and do not top post.
-- Wiadomość przekazana dalej --
Od: Daniel Kuehn enha...@gmail.com
Data: 5 stycznia 2010 12:46
Temat: Re: The newest Macbook 13.3 wireless
Do:
2010/1/5 Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
2010/1/5 Daniel Kuehn enha...@gmail.com:
I am sorry, I am very new to this system with mailing lists, could you
explain what a top post is (maybe in a private mail so we dont clutter
the
ML)
Okay, well then I know that work has been started,
On Monday 04 January 2010 22:51:40 Oncaphillis wrote:
Did any of the patches for a device without a sprom make it
into the 2.6.33-rc2 ?
No we decided that the patches were not acceptable and need a rewrite towards
firmware loading mechanism.
Nobody's currently doing that, though.
--
On Monday 04 January 2010 23:34:19 Rafał Miłecki wrote:
W dniu 4 stycznia 2010 21:36 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki
zaj...@gmail.com napisał:
Next there is a lot of code after b43_nphy_workarounds(dev); call
that I can not recognize. Let's just take some lines for example:
On 01/05/2010 11:21 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
Well, just do the thing that makes most sense.
In general we all agree that we should _not_ implement crap, just because
broadcom does so, if we can do better. So, in this case, if we can do a
subfunction call and that function does make sense,
W dniu 5 stycznia 2010 13:34 użytkownik Kalle Valo kalle.v...@iki.fi napisał:
Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com writes:
Michael said many times he prefers smaller patches posted more
frequently. So there this go.
However if you think it's too small, just let me know please.
I always post very
Replace TODOs based on old specs with more current ones.
From 328cf91018178723574031585b447bb849ccddba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= zaj...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:35:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] b43: N-PHY: update TODOs in init part
Update b43_nphy_reset_cca to match current specs and add rssi_cal calls to init
code.
From 71c10442cd0b1b277f483a81db7f2e8f579b3d59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= zaj...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:52:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] b43: N-PHY:
On 01/05/2010 08:27 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
On 01/05/2010 11:18 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Monday 04 January 2010 22:51:40 Oncaphillis wrote:
Did any of the patches for a device without a sprom make it
into the 2.6.33-rc2 ?
No we decided that the patches were not
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:00 AM, John Daiker daikerj...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a BCM4312 rev 01 (14e4:4315) card in my HP Mini netbook. I am having
troubles connecting to any WEP secured AP.
I know the trick about having to load with pio=1 for the device to stay
happy (and forget about
2010/1/6 John Daiker daikerj...@gmail.com:
On 01/05/2010 03:48 PM, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:00 AM, John Daikerdaikerj...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a BCM4312 rev 01 (14e4:4315) card in my HP Mini netbook. I am
having
troubles connecting to any WEP secured AP.
I know
I'm not sure if this is a b43 problem or a Fedora problem.
After the advice given previously, I grabbed a nightly Fedora 13 spin
that has a 2.6.32.2-15.fc13.x86_64 kernel and ran from the live DVD.
going through dmesg it eventually gets to
b43-phy0: Broadcom 4312 WLAN found (core revision 15)
On 01/05/2010 09:55 PM, Jim Haynes wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a b43 problem or a Fedora problem.
It is a problem with Broadcom.
When I get the firmware from the web site I get ucode5.fw, ucode13.fw,
ucode11.fw but no ucode15.fw(and other stuff with number 5, and 13)
I have revised
14 matches
Mail list logo
