Re: [bess] WG Adoption Poll for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-uasge-16

I support adoption. Acee > On Oct 5, 2023, at 06:45, Matthew Bocci (Nokia) > wrote: > > WG > > This email starts a one-week WG adoption poll for > draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-uasge-16 [1] > > A little bit of history: A previous version was adopted, completed WG last > call, and

Re: [bess] IETF 117 BESS - IPv6 Only PE Design & IPv4 Only PE Design ALL SAFI Supported

I also support merger of the four documents with identification of common procedures. Thanks, Acee > On Aug 6, 2023, at 21:03, Jeff Tantsura wrote: > > As co-author I support the merge of the documents proposed, please do provide > any objections you might have. > > Cheers, > Jeff > >> On

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate early review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election-09

ussion of why the algorithm provides a good distribution of traffic this reference should be accompanied with text explaining how these benefits extend to individual multicast flows. Thanks, Acee > > Please let me know if you want only reference to be given or content to be > copi

[bess] Routing Directorate early review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election-09

Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election-09 Reviewer: Acee Lindem Review Date: 07/20/2023 IETF LC End Date: N/A Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: This document

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Last Call Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-07.txt

Hi Jeffrey, Thanks for addressing my comments. See some comments inline. From: Jeffrey Zhang Date: Monday, November 28, 2022 at 9:09 AM To: Acee Lindem , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mc...@ietf.org" , Routing ADs Cc: Routing Directorate , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: RE: Rout

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ac-aware-bundling

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Stephane Litkowski (slitkows)" Date: Monday, October 10, 2022 at 4:40 AM To: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-ac-aware-bundling Hello, This email

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery-03

I’ve reread the draft and support publication. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Monday, January 31, 2022 at 9:00 AM To: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-fast-df-recov...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-03 [1].

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 8:42 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-03 [1]. Hello,

Re: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question

There are a number of drafts that were waiting years on the IDR tunnel Encap draft – they will all be published together in this cluster: https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C349 Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of Gyan Mishra Date: Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 1:14 PM To: John

Re: [bess] [Idr] IDR WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01 (3/11 to 3/25/2021)

I just read the document and it seems reasonable. I support publication. Thanks, Acee From: Idr on behalf of Susan Hares Date: Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 7:12 AM To: IDR List , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [Idr] IDR WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01 (3/11 to 3/25/2021)

Re: [bess] [Idr] Type 1 RD for Pure IPv6 network -- EVPN

Hi Gyan, Agree with Jakob. There is no reason for the BGP Identifier to be a unique IPv4 address. Consider an IPv6 only AS. However, there is nothing precluding you from using an IPv4 address if you are uncomfortable. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" Date:

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01

Hi Ali, This should be updated automatically if the chairs update the “Replaced by” meta data for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility/ BTW, I support publication. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" Date: Tuesday,

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01

Hi Stephane, et al, I did another quick read of the draft and I support publication. I think it would be good to state in the introduction which sections of the draft our normative and which are informative. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Monday, January

Re: [bess] REMINDER: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw-01

t-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw-01 Resent-From: Resent-To: , , Acee Lindem , , John E Drake Resent-Date: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 at 11:39 AM Hi WG Thanks to those who have already read and commented on the draft. I would like to see a few more responses before moving this forward, so I will extend th

Re: [bess] REMINDER: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw-01

To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-...@ietf.org" Subject: REMINDER: WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw-01 Resent-From: Resent-To: , , Acee Lindem , , John E Drake Resent-Date: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 at 11:39 AM Hi WG Thanks

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw-01

ss-weighted-hrw-01 Resent-From: Resent-To: , , Acee Lindem , , John E Drake Resent-Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 at 4:22 AM Hello, This email begins a two-week WG adoption poll for draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw-01 [1]. Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working gr

Re: [bess] [Idr] IETF 109 draft idr agenda

Hi Linda, et al, +BESS, Isn’t this draft under the auspices of the BESS charter? Thanks, Acee From: Idr on behalf of Linda Dunbar Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 at 6:02 PM To: Jie Dong , IDR List Cc: "idr-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF 109 draft idr agenda Jimmy and IDR chairs,

Re: [bess] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04: (with COMMENT)

Hi Erik, On 8/17/20, 7:32 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: Hi Erik, On 8/16/20, 7:50 PM, "BESS on behalf of Erik Kline via Datatracker" wrote: Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04: No Obj

Re: [bess] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04: (with COMMENT)

Hi Erik, On 8/16/20, 7:50 PM, "BESS on behalf of Erik Kline via Datatracker" wrote: Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses

Re: [bess] problem to subscribe to bess mail list

With the BESS mailing list administer login, it is possible to add someone to the list using “Membership Management->Mass Subscriptions”. However, it seems that https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess should work. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" Date:

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-02

I support publication of the draft as a standards track RFC. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 at 6:56 AM To: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-fr...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for

Re: [bess] Request for IANA early allocation for draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services code points

As a designated expert for this registry, I approve these allocations. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of Gaurav Dawra Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 10:54 AM To: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] Request for IANA early allocation for draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services

Re: [bess] Shepherd review comment draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-04

Hi Mankamana, From: BESS on behalf of "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" Date: Saturday, April 11, 2020 at 4:41 PM To: "draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperat...@ietf.org" Cc: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] Shepherd review comment

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04

Support – though I’ve always thought MC-LAG was a hack, it is part of the landscape. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 9:51 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh...@ietf.org" , "bess-cha...@ietf.org"

Re: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03

Hi Stephane, BESS WG, I support publication as a proposed standard. The mechanisms require capability advertisement and these must be standardized. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 3:56 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" ,

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-00

I support publication. I have reviewed the document and have the following suggestions. 1. It would read better if the document simply used “Next Hop Address Family” or “Next Hop address AF” as opposed to “set of network-layer protocols to which the address in the Next Hop field may

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-03

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Monday, January 6, 2020 at 9:15 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multic...@ietf.org" , "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-controller

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Monday, January 6, 2020 at 9:13 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-controller Hello, This email

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

this helps, Acee From: Robert Raszuk Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 11:39 AM To: Acee Lindem Cc: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" , "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , "bess-cha...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Hi Robert, From: Robert Raszuk Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 8:25 AM To: Acee Lindem Cc: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" , "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , "bess-cha...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-l

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

. Anyway, I don’t wish to engage in a protracted debate and I don’t believe the WG wishes to delay publication of this draft. Your lone objection can be noted in the shepherds report. Thanks, Acee From: Robert Raszuk Date: Monday, December 2, 2019 at 6:37 PM To: Acee Lindem Cc: "slitk

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

Robert, What you’re suggesting doesn’t really solve the problem that all the currently deployed routers that do not follow RFC 5549. No known implementations follow RFC 5549. Were you on the meetecho when this was presented in the BESS meeting at IETF 106? There was clear consensus in the

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

I support WG adoption. This is update is desperately needed to reflect current implementations and deployments. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 7:37 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-mvpn-seamless-interop

Support From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" Date: Monday, October 28, 2019 at 6:10 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-mvpn-seamless-interop Hello, This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-dawra-bess-srv6-services-02

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Friday, September 27, 2019 at 6:01 AM To: "draft-dawra-bess-srv6-servi...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-dawra-bess-srv6-services-02 Hello, This

Re: [bess] RFC or Draft that lists all standards track rfc’s of all mvpn profiles

Hi Gyan, See one inline. From: BESS on behalf of Gyan Mishra Date: Saturday, September 28, 2019 at 2:06 PM To: Gyan Mishra , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] RFC or Draft that lists all standards track rfc’s of all mvpn profiles I did some research and theseare the main RFCs for MVPN

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

Support working group publication of this document. There are implementations. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski Date: Monday, June 17, 2019 at 4:56 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption call & IPR poll for draft-jain-bess-evpn-lsp-ping

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski Date: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 at 3:37 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption call & IPR poll for draft-jain-bess-evpn-lsp-ping Hi, This email begins a two-week poll for adoption of

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-04

I support WG adoption. The draft precisely defines the host mobility for EVPN IRB and the attendant route types. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 8:53 AM To: Stephane Litkowski , "bess@ietf.org" ,

Re: [bess] Encoding a 20 bit label in a 24 bit field.

Hi Stephane, No objection - I think the question on whether BOS should be encoded in those bits confirms that this should be specified. Thanks, Acee On 10/22/18, 9:47 AM, "BESS on behalf of stephane.litkow...@orange.com" wrote: Hi, Does anyone disagree with the additional

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 3:29 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group adoption

Re: [bess] new WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-05

Hi Stephane, Authors, I support advancement. This is a useful optimization that has been implemented . Two comments: 1. Call the new BGP Community “Router MAC” rather than “Router’s MAC”. 2. Consistently use “TSes” to refer to multiple Tenant Systems and “TS’s” to refer to an address

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski Date: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 9:38 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segment-03

I also support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" Date: Saturday, June 2, 2018 at 5:27 PM To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-virtual-eth-segm...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery-02

This draft solves a real problem with DF election and I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski Date: Monday, May 14, 2018 at 5:48 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption and

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-03.txt

I support WG adoption of this draft. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Monday, April 9, 2018 at 9:23 AM To: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-vpws-...@ietf.org" ,

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

Hi John, So I must surmise that all the MAC routes are associated with the more granular virtual ESs? If so, what is the purpose of the aggregate DC ES? Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of John E Drake Date: Friday, April 6, 2018 at 9:46 AM To:

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-01.txt

I support publication. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 8:50 AM To: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-in...@ietf.org" ,

Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework

I support publication. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 10:21 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working

Re: [bess] Pattern statements [was Re: [netmod] Query about augmenting module from submodule in YANG 1.0]

; Date: Monday, August 21, 2017 at 11:14 AM To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com<mailto:a...@cisco.com>>, "Ivory, William" <william.iv...@intl.att.com<mailto:william.iv...@intl.att.com>>, "'net...@ietf.org<mailto:'net...@ietf.org>'" <net...@ie

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp

Support On 6/12/17, 12:27 PM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >Hello Working Group, > >This email starts a Working Group Last Call on >draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-02 [1] which is considered mature and ready >for a final

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage

I support publication. Thanks, Acee On 6/6/17, 10:11 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >Hello Working Group, > >This email starts a Working Group Last Call on >draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04 [1] which is considered

Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-pref-df

I support WG adoption as the described mechanisms fully satisfy Service Provider (SP) EVPN DF election control requirements. Thanks, Acee On 6/6/17, 9:44 AM, "BESS on behalf of thomas.mo...@orange.com" wrote: >Hello working group, >

Re: [bess] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis

Hi Loa, et al, I support publication of this draft as a standards track document. It is well-written and handles previously unspecified details of single and multiple label BGP advertisement. Thanks, Acee On 4/4/17, 8:33 AM, "BESS on behalf of Loa Andersson"

Re: [bess] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane adoption following the IPR disclosure

Support. While I won’t comment on specifics, the IPR appears to only apply to one aspect of the proposed SFC mechanisms. Thanks, Acee On 4/13/17, 2:04 PM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >WG > >Given the IPR disclosed

Re: [bess] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-11: (with COMMENT)

Hi Spencer, On 4/7/17, 5:46 PM, "BESS on behalf of Spencer Dawkins" wrote: >Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for >draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-11: No Objection > >When responding, please keep the subject

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

ami Boutros" <sbout...@vmware.com> wrote: > >Hi Acee, > >Please find attached document with all comments addresses, if all >good will >Submit before the cut-off tomorrow. > >Please see comments inline. >On 3/12/17, 11:36 AM, "Acee Li

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

Hi Sami, This version satisfies all my comments. Thanks, Acee On 3/12/17, 2:36 PM, "BESS on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" <bess-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of a...@cisco.com> wrote: >Hi Sami, > >I think this version reads much better. I still have a couple comments and

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

r edits >below. > >Thanks, > >Sami > > > >On 3/3/17, 8:30 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <a...@cisco.com> wrote: > >>Hello, >> >> >> >>I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. >> >>The R

Re: [bess] BGP common parameter Yang module

Hi Dhanendra, From: "Dhanendra Jain (dhjain)" <dhj...@cisco.com<mailto:dhj...@cisco.com>> Date: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 4:12 PM To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com<mailto:a...@cisco.com>>, Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.i...@gmail.com<mailto:xufeng.liu.i...@gm

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-04

Support. Thanks, Acee On 2/13/17, 5:07 PM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: >Hello Working Group, > >This email starts a Working Group Last Call on >draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-04 [1] which is considered

Re: [bess] BGP common parameter Yang module

the models would use? Thanks, Acee From: Giles Heron <giles.he...@gmail.com<mailto:giles.he...@gmail.com>> Date: Friday, February 10, 2017 at 11:18 AM To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com<mailto:a...@cisco.com>> Cc: "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" <pbris...@cisco.co

Re: [bess] BGP common parameter Yang module

Hi Patrice - we are working fervently on a common IETF routing types model. We have both route-target and router-distinguisher types defined there. The work is being done in the Routing WG. Our intension is to accelerate standardization so it doesn't hold up standardization of the importing

Re: [bess] [Idr] Fwd: [mpls] Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis

In case it is not obvious, I support MPLS WG adoption of the subject draft in its current form ;^). I already supported it on the MPLS list. Thanks, Acee From: Idr > on behalf of Loa Andersson > Date: Wednesday,

Re: [bess] [mpls] [Idr] Fwd: Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis

Hi Robert, From: <rras...@gmail.com<mailto:rras...@gmail.com>> on behalf of Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net<mailto:rob...@raszuk.net>> Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 10:40 AM To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com<mailto:a...@cisco.com>> Cc: Eric C

Re: [bess] [mpls] [Idr] Fwd: Working Group adoption poll on draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis

Hi Robert, Currently, everything in draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis is pretty much backward compatible with our more than a decade old RFC 3107 implementations and deployments. What you are proposing is not and has implications in both the control and forwarding planes. If you really believe that

Re: [bess] [mpls] Question raised in the MPLS-RT review of draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis

Hi Loa, et al, Since I commented on the MPLS-RT review with respect to the IDR-specific content, there may be some confusion as to where I stand on the ownership of this draft. I’ve reviewed this document and agree with the approach described below. I’m convinced we will get the right level

Re: [bess] [Idr] draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis

Hi Robert, I think this would defeat the purpose of clarifying RFC 3101 multi-label behavior in a BIS draft. Let’s see if we can reach consensus first. Thanks, Acee From: Idr > on behalf of Robert Raszuk