Yes/support
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 02:06 Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> I support WG adoption.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
>
>
> *From: *BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski <
> stephane.litkow...@orange.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 3:29 AM
> *To: *"bess@ietf.org"
> *Subject: *[bess] WG
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
> On Sep 24, 2018, at 11:21, Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
> wrote:
>
> Agreed.
>
> From: BESS on behalf of Jorge Rabadan
>
> Date: Monday, 24 September 2018 at 17:16
> To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , "bess@ietf.org"
>
> Subject: Re: [bess] Second W
+1
Cheers,
Jeff
On Oct 15, 2018, 4:41 PM -0700, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
, wrote:
> I personally agree that it is good to make this explicit (although many
> implementations already interpreted it this way).
> Thanks,
> Jorge
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: BESS on beh
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
> On Oct 30, 2018, at 01:22,
> wrote:
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group adoption
> draft-zzhang-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-01 [1]
>
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list,
> st
Yes/suport
Cheers,
Jeff
> From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)"
>
> Date: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 2:23 AM
> To: "bess@ietf.org"
> Cc: "draft-salam-bess-evpn-oam-req-fr...@ietf.org"
>
> Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
> draft-salam-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On Feb 18, 2019, 7:53 AM -0800, stephane.litkow...@orange.com, wrote:
> This email begins a two-week poll for adoption of
> draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02
> [1]
>
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.
>
> We
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On Mar 20, 2019, 5:51 AM -0700, stephane.litkow...@orange.com, wrote:
> Hi WG,
>
> Apart from the authors, we haven’t received a lot of feedback for this draft
> (positive or negative).
> I would like to expand the poll to an additional week (ends at 26th March) to
> see
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On Apr 5, 2019, 10:53 AM -0700, Sami Boutros
, wrote:
> Support, Please progress the document.
> Thanks,
> Sami
> Hi WG,
> draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-controlplane has passed WGLC and its finishing the
> shepherd's review phasis (I-D update required). It is in a good shape t
Stephane,
I support the adoption.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Jun 5, 2019, at 11:53,
> wrote:
>
> Hi WG,
>
> We are currently missing the IPR reply from Sam to clear the IPR poll.
> In addition, we lack of significant support for this draft, however we
> haven’t seen any objection yet.
> We, chairs
In general I support the adoption.
Could the authors please clarify how a company that doesn’t have OUI assigned
should populate the OUI field and how interdependency between IEEE registration
and EVPN implementation would be handled.
Informal references for IEEE OUI handling process would be u
Yes/support adoption
Regards,
Jeff
> On Sep 2, 2019, at 07:29,
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
> draft-snr-bess-evpn-loop-protect-04 [1]
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.
>
> We are also polling for kn
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On Sep 4, 2019, 1:36 AM -0700, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
, wrote:
> This email begins a two-week poll for adoption for
> draft-keyupate-bess-evpn-virtual-hub-02
>
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.
>
> We are also polling fo
+1
Every technology has a number of trade-offs associated with it, one can’t
assess gain/loss of a particular technology without understanding the
architecture as a whole.
As long as we are comparing the technologies in the right context and based on
their technical merits we come up with a gr
Support the adoption, thanks for doing this work!
Regards,
Jeff
> On Nov 27, 2019, at 04:37, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
> draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00 [1] .
>
> Please review the draft and post any
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jan 6, 2020, 6:13 AM -0800, slitkows.i...@gmail.com, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for and
> draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-controller-02 [1] ..
> For information, it’s companion document (draft-zzhang-bess-bgp-multicast-03)
> is
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jan 17, 2020, 12:56 AM -0800, slitkows.i...@gmail.com, wrote:
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-03 [2]
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please
> indicate if
Support,
Same question on comment #1
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jan 21, 2020, 9:19 AM -0800, Krzysztof Grzegorz Szarkowicz
, wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I have two comments regarding section 4.2
>
>
> Comment 1:
>
> draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04: “ES-Import RT community inherits from ESI
> only byte 1-7,”
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
> From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com"
>
> Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 12:56 AM
> To: "bess@ietf.org" ,
> "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb.auth...@ietf.org"
>
> Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
> Subject: [bess] WGLC , IPR and implementation poll for
>
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Feb 26, 2020, at 09:26, slitkows.i...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-04 [2]
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please
> indica
Gyan,
On open source side of things - FRR supports EVPN on the host.
Any vendor virtualized NOS would provide you the same (at least Junos/cRPD or
XRv).
EVPN ESI load-sharing eliminates need for MLAG (basic thought, the devil is in
the details :))
ECMP vs LAG load-balancing - the algorithms sup
James,
ESI multihoming (load-sharing) works just fine with VxLAN encapsulation (when
supported), there’s no need for additional (proprietary) mechanisms (at least
with basic synchronization).
Gyan - the devil is in the details (as always) - I’m looking at multivendor
EVPN VxLAN ESI designs as
Gyan,
"Multi site” is not really an IETF terminology, this is a solution implement by
NX-OS, there’s a draft though. Its main functionality is to localize VxLAN
tunnels and provide segmented path vs end2end full mesh of VxLAN tunnels
(participating in the same EVI). We are talking HER here.
The
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jul 13, 2020, 7:46 AM -0700, slitkows.i...@gmail.com, wrote:
>
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
> Hello WG,
>
> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-01 [1].
>
> This poll runs until * the 27th Of July *..
>
Yes/support
>
>
> From: BESS
> Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 12:43 PM
> To: bess@ietf.org
> Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
> draft-nr-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-03
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
>
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On Dec 1, 2020, 1:31 AM -0800, slitkows.i...@gmail.com, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
> draft-skr-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source [1].
>
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.
>
> We are al
yes/suport
Cheers,
Jeff
On Dec 9, 2020, 1:22 AM -0800, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This email begins a two-week WG adoption poll for
> draft-mohanty-bess-weighted-hrw-01 [1].
>
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list.
>
> We are also p
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On Dec 1, 2020, 4:31 AM -0800, slitkows.i...@gmail.com, wrote:
>
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
> Hello,
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
> draft-skr-bess-evpn-redundant-mcast-source [1].
>
> Please review the draft and post any comment
Yes/support
>
>
> From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
> Date: Monday, January 4, 2021 at 12:13 PM
> To: bess@ietf.org , draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-...@ietf.org
>
> Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-02
>
> This ema
yes/support publication
Cheers,
Jeff
On Dec 11, 2020, 7:53 AM -0800, slitkows.i...@gmail.com, wrote:
> This email starts a two-week working group last call for
> draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-04 [1]
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please
>
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On Mar 11, 2021, 4:12 AM -0800, Susan Hares , wrote:
> This begins a 2 week WG last call for
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01 from 3/11 to 3/25.
>
> You can find the draft at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry/
>
> This draft su
Hi Gyan,
It doesn’t and has a very different purpose.
BGP work in IDR is meant to facilitate bringing up BGP peering
session(discovery/config/etc).
RIFT work is specifically for fabrics that run RIFT as the underlay routing
protocol and wish to use EVPN for overlay. Auto-evpn facilities bringing
Support as co-author.
Not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
Thanks,
Jeff
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
> From: BESS On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 5:37 AM
> To: draft-mishra-bess-deployment-guide-ipv4nlri-ipv...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
> Subject: [bess]
Very useful document!
Support the adoption
Regards,
Jeff
> On Apr 19, 2021, at 11:06, slitkows.i...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
> draft-krattiger-evpn-modes-interop-03 [1].
>
> Please review the draft and post any comments to the BE
t;>
>>
>> Juniper Business Use Only
>> From: Gyan Mishra
>> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 6:21 PM
>> To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) ; BESS ; Jeff
>> Tantsura ; John E Drake ;
>> Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
>> Subject: Fwd: [be
Hi,
As co-author - I support the adoption of this document, and not aware of any
IPR related to this draft.
Cheers,
Jeff
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Hi,
I support adoption of the draft as Informational, please note, that request to
change transitivity characteristics of the community is requested in another
draft.
Gyan - please note, while pretty much every vendor has implemented the
community and relevant data-plane constructs, initial dr
+1
Regards,
Jeff
> On Jun 4, 2021, at 14:16, John E Drake
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Please use time synchronization only – it’s a much simpler and more robust
> solution.
>
> Yours Irrespectively,
>
> John
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
> From: BESS On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail
Dear authors,
Gven the current state of the draft, it should be a Standards Track document.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jun 5, 2021, 1:35 PM -0700, internet-dra...@ietf.org, wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of t
ity. It is
> a new community that is being generated on the AS boundary.
> The community value is not carried over, but is calculated based on an
> cumulative value of other received communities, and then advertised as a
> new value across the AS boundary.
>
> Tnx,
> Arie
>
gt;> unchanged) although it also applies to Option B deployments (next-hop-self).
>>
>> There is no notion of aggregating bandwidth here.
>>
>>
>>
>> HTH.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> --Satya
>>
>>
>>
&g
I’m planning to have a presentation in RTGWG that would explain RTO based
header changes/ aka self healing fabie (flow label in v6/ overlay transport
layer source port in v4, in linux kernel since 2016), stay tuned.
This is mostly relevant to DC domain and while host based still a very
importa
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
> From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)"
>
> Date: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 8:42 AM
> To: "bess@ietf.org"
> Cc: "draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-...@ietf.org"
>
> Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for
> draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-03 [1].
>
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Sep 28, 2021, at 07:04, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
> wrote:
>
>
> As co-author, I support this document for publication as standards track RFC.
> Not aware of any relevant IPR.
>
> Thanks.
> Jorge
>
> From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
> Date
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
@tools.ietf.org"
Subject: Re: Adoption of draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-04
Resent-To: , John Drake , Jeff
Tantsura , ,
Ali Sajassi , Sami Boutros ,
,
>>[initially sent to l2vpn instead of bess]
>>
>>Hi everyone,
>>
>>Before formally adopting this in BES
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Ali Sajassi
Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2015 at 10:17 AM
To: Martin Vigoureux ,
"bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-rabadan-l2vpn-evpn-prefix-advertisem...@tools.ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption:
draft-rabadan-l2vpn-evpn-prefix-a
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Robert Kebler
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 9:13 AM
To: Martin Vigoureux ,
"bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-morin-bess-multicast-damp...@tools.ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-morin-bess-multicast-damping
>Hi,
>
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Morin
Organization: Orange
Date: Monday, February 2, 2015 at 6:02 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-et...@tools.ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree
>Hello working gro
Very useful, support!
Cheers,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Eric C Rosen
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 12:27 PM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "ero...@juniper.net"
Subject: [bess] draft-rosen-bess-pta-flags
>The PMSI Tunnel attribute defined in RFC6514 contains a "flags" octet.
>R
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Martin Vigoureux
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 at 12:22 PM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-et...@tools.ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree
>Hello working group,
>
>This email sta
Hi Martin,
Yes, indeed, https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2085/
Cheers,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Martin Vigoureux
Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 8:10 AM
To: Alissa Cooper , Loa Andersson
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" , IESG ,
"bess@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-bess-spbm-e...@ietf.
Martin,
Sounds like solid and reasonable approach!
Regards,
Jeff
> On Dec 14, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Martin Vigoureux
> wrote:
>
> WG,
>
> we have reviewed the different comments posted on the list in response to our
> initial proposal.
> After thinking further about that, we'd like to propose t
Hi Martin,
Support, very much needed document.
Cheers,
Jeff
On 1/5/16, 06:48, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote:
>Hello Working Group,
>
>This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
>draft-ietf-bess-pta-flags-01 [1] which is considered mature and ready
>for a final working
Yes/support.
Cheers,
Jeff
On 1/11/16, 01:07, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote:
>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-df-election-02 [1] as a working group item.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (
Hi,
Support, very much needed to complete definition of MEF services over EVPN.
Cheers,
Jeff
On 1/19/16, 09:51, "BESS on behalf of Thomas Morin" wrote:
>Hello Working Group,
>
>This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree [1] which is considered mature and
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
>On 26/01/16 09:12, "BESS on behalf of Thomas Morin" behalf of thomas.mo...@orange.com> wrote:
>
>>Hello working group,
>>
>>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>>draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-optimized-ir-02 [1] as a working group item.
>>
>>Please send comments
Yes/support
On 5/4/16, 7:18 AM, "BESS on behalf of Thomas Morin" wrote:
>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>please a
Yes/support
On 5/4/16, 7:17 AM, "BESS on behalf of Thomas Morin" wrote:
>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>please also
Yes/support
-Original Message-
>>From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 10:18 AM
>>To: bess@ietf.org
>>Cc: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
>>Subject: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang
>>
>>Hello wo
Hi Martin,
I’m not aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR.
Thanks,
Jeff
On 5/5/16, 3:54 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote:
>Hello Working Group,
>
>Please read carefully, this e-mail contains new elements compared to
>other WG LCs.
>
>This email starts a Working Group Last Call
We have been talking about removing it since we started...
Regards,
Jeff
> On May 29, 2016, at 8:44 PM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)
> wrote:
>
> Sami,
>
> I'm ok to remove it too.
> Thanks.
> Jorge
>
> On 5/29/16, 6:35 PM, "Sami Boutros" wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I am ok to remove the B
Yes/support
On 5/4/16, 7:18 AM, "BESS on behalf of Thomas Morin" wrote:
>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-brissette-bess-evpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>please also
Yes/support
On 5/4/16, 7:17 AM, "BESS on behalf of Thomas Morin" wrote:
>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-yang [1] as a working group document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>please also sta
Hi,
Support as co-author
Not aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR.
Thanks,
Jeff
>Hello working group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-01 [1] as a Working Group Document.
>
>Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
>
Support!
>
>> On 6/13/16, 5:25 AM, "BESS on behalf of thomas.mo...@orange.com"
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Working Group,
>>
>> (Please read carefully, this e-mail contains new elements compared to WG
>> LCs we were doing in a still recent past.)
>>
>> This email starts a Working Group Last Call
Support, good start!
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Aug 16, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Thomas Morin wrote:
>
> Hello working group,
>
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
> draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang [1] as a working group item.
>
> Please send comments to the list and state if you support ad
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On 8/16/16, 05:47, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote:
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction-04 [1].
¤ Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent
version yet, and
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:37 AM -0700, "Martin Vigoureux"
> wrote:
>
>> Hello working group,
>>
>> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>> draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group
>> Document.
>>
>> Please state on the lis
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Aug 30, 2016, at 4:47 PM, Thomas Morin wrote:
>
> Hello working group,
>
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
> draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-ac-df-05 [1] as a Working Group document.
>
> Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both ca
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
>> -Original Message-
>> From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 9:58 AM
>> To: bess@ietf.org
>> Cc: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org
>> Subject: [bess] Call for ad
Yes/support
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 00:06 Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
wrote:
>
> Support as a co-author. Cisco has implemented this draft and it has
> deployments based on some sections of this draft. I am not aware of any
> IPR that hasn’t already been disclosed.
>
> Cheers,
> Ali
>
> On 2/6/17, 5:14 A
I’d prefer common grouping in draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types and references
from any other model using it
Cheers,
Jeff
From: BESS on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)"
Date: Friday, February 10, 2017 at 08:42
To: Giles Heron
Cc: "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" , "Shah, Himanshu"
,
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On 2/13/17, 5:07 PM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
>Hello Working Group,
>
>This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
>draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-04 [1] which is considered
>mature and ready for a final w
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On 2/13/17, 11:07 PM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03 [1] which is considered
mature and
Martin,
Support the adoption, useful and well written document.
Cheers,
Jeff
On 3/6/17, 03:55, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane-04 [1] as a Working Gro
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
> On Apr 13, 2017, at 11:04, Martin Vigoureux
> wrote:
>
> WG
>
> Given the IPR disclosed [1] against
> draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane, we are starting a call for
> comment specifically to let people express a revised opinion on how
> draft-ietf-bess-nsh-
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 05:33 Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Groups,
>
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call in four working
> groups on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis-01.
>
> According to agreement when we decided to host this document in the
> MPLS working group, this last call is
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 10:11, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
>
> Hello Working Group,
>
> This email starts a Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04
> [1] which is considered mature and ready for a final working group review.
>
> Please read this document i
Yes/support
Thanks,
Jeff
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 06:44 wrote:
> Hello working group,
>
> This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
> draft-rabadan-bess-evpn-pref-df-02 [1] as a Working Group Document.
>
> Please state on the list if you support the adoption or not (in both
> cases, pleas
Yes/support
Thanks,
Jeff
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 07:11 Martin Vigoureux
wrote:
> Hello Working Group,
>
> This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04 [1] which is considered mature and ready
> for a final working group review.
>
> Please read this document if y
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
> On Jun 12, 2017, at 23:40,
> On 6/6/17, 10:11 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Working Group,
>>
>> This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
>> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04 [1] which is considered mature and ready
>> for a final
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On 6/12/17, 9:27 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
>Hello Working Group,
>
>This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
>draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-02 [1] which is considered mature and ready
>for a fi
yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On 9/12/17, 12:35 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
draft-snr-bess-evpn-na-flags-07 [1] as a Working Group Document.
Please
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
>
>> On Sep 25, 2017, at 2:42 AM, Martin Vigoureux
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello working group,
>>
>> This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
>> draft-drake-bess-datacenter-gateway-05 [1] as a BESS Working Group Document.
>>
>> Please state on the list if you su
Support
Regards,
Jeff
>
> John Scudder, 2017-10-06 14:39:
>> [resending with corrected draft alias in cc, sorry about that]
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> A working group last call has been requested for draft-ietf-idr-
>> tunnel-encaps-07. Please reply to the list with your comments. As
>> usual note we
+1
Regards,
Jeff
> On Dec 1, 2017, at 13:08, Dolganow, Andrew (Nokia - SG/Singapore)
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Andrew
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 1, 2017, at 11:27 AM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Welcome Stephane!
>> And Thomas, thank you very much
+1 Martin.
By removing it you assume right interpretation, by wording it unambiguously you
provide
the right interpretation.
Cheers,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux
Date: Friday, December 15, 2017 at 10:24
To:
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-
Yes/support
Document provides very much needed clarifications wrt multicast use in EVPN.
Cheers,
Jeff
On 1/11/18, 02:12, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
draft-lin-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-04 [1] as a
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
> On Jan 29, 2018, at 13:16, Nagaraj, Kiran (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
> wrote:
>
> Support this draft as well.
> Thanks
> Kiran
>
> From: Sathappan, Senthil (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
> [mailto:senthil.sathap...@nokia.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 10:13
Martin - thank for all the great work done!
Matthew – welcome!
Cheers,
Jeff
From: BESS on behalf of Alvaro Retana
Date: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 08:11
To:
Subject: [bess] New bess WG Co-Chair
Dear bess WG:
As you know, Martin has been selected as a Routing AD starting next m
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
On Feb 26, 2018, at 8:01 AM, "stephane.litkow...@orange.com"
wrote:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
draft-zzhang-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-01 [1] as a BESS Working Group
Document.
Please state on the list if
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
From: BESS on behalf of
Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 07:21
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-electi
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)"
Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 5:50 AM
To: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-in...@ietf.org"
, "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for
draft-ietf-bess
Yes/support
From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)"
Date: Monday, April 9, 2018 at 9:23 AM
To: "draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-vpws-...@ietf.org"
, "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-vpws-fxc-03.txt
This email begins a two-week
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
From: BESS on behalf of
Date: Monday, May 14, 2018 at 02:48
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-fast-df-recovery-02
Hi WG,
This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group adoption of
draft-saja
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 14:07, Krishna Muddenahally Ananthamurthy (kriswamy)
> wrote:
>
> I support for WG adoption.
>
> Cheers
> Kris
>
>
> From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)"
>
> Date: Friday, June 1, 2018 at 5:48 AM
> To: "bess@ietf.org"
>
Robert/Linda,
RTGWG chairs have been thinking of starting SD-WAN discussion in RTGWG.
Service data modeling(data modeling in general)is an obvious candidate (at ONUG
we started, there’s some early effort, but IETF help is needed).
Control plane interworking is another interesting topic.
Please br
.
However - an abstraction on top would be very useful.
Regards,
Jeff
> On Jul 6, 2018, at 14:23, Ron Bonica wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Let’s follow up on this discussion in Montreal.
>
> From: Linda Dunbar
> Sent: Friday, July 6, 2018 4:33 PM
> To: Jeff Tantsura ; Robe
Hi Jim,
This is a general statement applicable to overall SD-WAN effort.
Cheers,
Jeff
From: "UTTARO, JAMES"
Date: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 05:22
To: Jeff Tantsura , Ron Bonica
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" , RTGWG , Eric Rosen
, Robert Raszuk , Linda Dunbar
Subject:
Yes/support
Jeff
>> From: BESS On Behalf Of
>> stephane.litkow...@orange..com
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 9:38 AM
>> To: bess@ietf.org
>> Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll and IPR poll for
>> draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election
>>
>> Hi WG,
>>
>> This email begins a tw
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
