hi,
can imapdir work on homeless people (in my case vmailmgr)? IMAPdir/INBOX
- ../ ?
how should i set path on .bincimap ?
thanks,
Alejandro Mery
$@
Thanks in advance,
Alejandro Mery
1694 execve(/opt/bincimap/bin/bincimap-up, [/opt/bincimap/bin/bincimap-up,
--logtype=multilog, --conf=/etc/opt/bincimap/bincimap.conf, --,
/opt/vmailmgr/bin/checkvpw, /etc/opt/bincimap/vmailmgr_wrapper, Maildir,
/opt/bincimap/bin/bincimapd], [/* 33 vars */]) = 0
Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
On Sun, 23 May 2004, Alejandro Mery wrote:
two questions:
- how can i (imap server) propose to the mua a foldername for
{sent,draft,...} special folders?
You can't.
oh
- what should i export, before calling bincimapd (or add to .bincimap),
to alter
,
Alejandro Mery
checkvpw set a nice bunch of vars which i can use in the wrapper.
i would love to tweak bincimap using env-vars too but those $hex
varnames
(and values) are not very intuitive.
Version 1.3
loading .bincimap from $HOME instead of $PWD is a kind of mandatory for
using it on vmailmgr, but who
Henry Baragar wrote:
On Sun, 23 May 2004 22:57:13 -0400 (CLT), Alejandro Mery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
loading .bincimap from $HOME instead of $PWD is a kind of mandatory
for
using it on vmailmgr, but who cares ;-) i'll use IMAPdir,path= on
bincimap.conf and the wrapper will do the rest
will 1.5 support threading and sorting?
Regards,
Alejandro Mery
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Alejandro Mery wrote:
will 1.5 support threading and sorting?
Hard to say; I haven't really started any planning for 1.5 yet. But THREAD
and SORT are on the todo-list for 1.3, so if we can get them in there,
then I'm pretty sure that 1.5 will support them too ;-).
i
of that folder.
there is anything i can do (e.g. crontab) to keep my server do this job a
bit better?
Thanks,
Alejandro Mery
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 08 July 2004 07:43 am, Peter Stuge wrote:
This is one thing that makes me glad I run gentoo, since it's source
based there are more frequent updates to the package, usually adding
patches that people want. :)
ugh, but gentoo's qmail is a big pile of poo.
so many
On Thursday 08 July 2004 09:42 am, Alejandro Mery wrote:
i'm using binc 1.2.7-final with squirrelmail(1.4.4-CVS). I'm having a
little problem with folders of not-small (more than 1k messages) where
bincimapd takes 80-98% of CPU for a couple of seconds (more than 10k
messages take minutes
I like the major.minor.patch versioning; 1.4.0, 1.4.1 and so on looks
good. Maybe using _rcX is the solution.
1.2.10-rcX is more standard :-) ... $extraversion with a leading minus
if not empty.
Alejandro
hi, i have been using 1.2 with qmail-ldap for a looong time flawlessly,
and i love it. but since monday i'm using 1.3.4.
i have two problems.
the first, when i try to move big mails using MUA it binc crashes:
@400043a18b3a387a6d6c terminate called after throwing an instance of
Peter Stuge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:27:57PM -0300, Alejandro Mery wrote:
This can really not be a binc problem since binc does not
change the content of the email.
pop give the mails right, the files are right, but on 6 different
MUAs via imap i get specific mails corrupted
Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Alejandro Mery wrote:
attached you can find a pristine sample,
i hope it's usefull. and i can give you more if you like ,-)
the borked result looks like:
[...]
Saturdays to watch cartoons.a href=/articles/2005/12/08/1133829713847.html
target
Jerry Lundström wrote:
Alejandro Mery wrote:
pop give the mails right, the files are right, but on 6 different MUAs via
imap i get specific mails corrupted.
Please try this patch and see if it helps.
yes! worked.
thanks a lot :)
Alejandro Mery
Jerry Lundström wrote:
Alejandro Mery wrote:
yes! worked.
Did you do some testing on the mails that broke before? I just want to
be sure this patch has been verified to work.
yes, i tried with previously corrupted mails, and new mails without
troubles. the problem seems to be solved
/uninitialized-fix.patch
http://svn.exactcode.de/t2/trunk/package/mail/bincimap/x86-64-compile-fix.patch
they are very simple, i hope you accept them.
long life to BincIMAP ,-)
Alejandro Mery
Bob Van Zant wrote:
Is this an issue of people replying to everyone vs. replying just to the
list? The last response I sent (that apparently was duplicated) was a
reply-all case.
Andreas: can you inject a Reply-To header so please gets forced to reply
to the list?
Thanks,
Alejandro Mery
19 matches
Mail list logo
