Re: rDNS for RFC1918 network fails

2021-01-24 Thread Alex
Hi, On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 4:44 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > > Use the correct zone name. > > 1.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA > > You have the full /24 so you don’t need to use RFC2317 techniques. Thanks so much. That worked great. ___ Please visit

Re: rDNS for RFC1918 network fails

2021-01-24 Thread Mark Andrews
Use the correct zone name. 1.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA You have the full /24 so you don’t need to use RFC2317 techniques. -- Mark Andrews > On 25 Jan 2021, at 08:04, Alex wrote: > > Hi, I have a fedora32 system with bind-9.11.25 and having a problem > with setting up a reverse zone for a

Re: rDNS

2017-01-20 Thread Mark Andrews
5:37 EST 2017 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 145 Mark > - Kevin > > > -Original Message- > From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark > Andrews > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 3:55 PM > To: bind-us...@isc.org > Subject: Re: rDNS >

RE: rDNS

2017-01-20 Thread Darcy Kevin (FCA)
? - Kevin -Original Message- From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 3:55 PM To: bind-us...@isc.org Subject: Re: rDNS You have the netblock

Re: rDNS

2017-01-20 Thread Mark Andrews
You have the netblock 162.202.233.80-162.202.233.87 (162.202.233.80/29). When software performs a reverse lookup it constructs a DNS name from the address like 80.233.202.162.in-addr.arpa. Now as the netblock is not a full /24 you either have to create 8 zones, one for each PTR record, or

Re: rDNS

2017-01-20 Thread Ron Wingfield
So if the DNS resolver used is "OK", then is there a problem with my code for the in-addr.arpa zone file?  . . .rDNS is not working. On 1/20/2017 10:19 AM, Bob Harold wrote: On

Re: rDNS

2017-01-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 20.01.17 09:57, Ron Wingfield wrote: I am having difficulty configuring reverse DNS.  This has been a problem for over a year between my server(s) and my ISP, AT  Specifically, I cannot  eMail to any recipient that requires rDNS verification, e.g., SBCglobal.net, Comcast.net, or AOL. 

Re: rDNS

2017-01-20 Thread Bob Harold
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Ron Wingfield wrote: > I am having difficulty configuring reverse DNS. This has been a problem > for over a year between my server(s) and my ISP, AT Specifically, I > cannot eMail to any recipient that requires rDNS verification,

Re: rDNS

2017-01-20 Thread Alberto Colosi
& Security Architect & Admin From: bind-users <bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org> on behalf of Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 5:06 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: rDNS Am 20.01.2017 um 16:57 s

Re: rDNS

2017-01-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.01.2017 um 16:57 schrieb Ron Wingfield: I am having difficulty configuring reverse DNS. This has been a problem for over a year between my server(s) and my ISP, AT Specifically, I cannot eMail to any recipient that requires rDNS verification, e.g., SBCglobal.net, Comcast.net, or AOL.

Re: rdns for /20

2010-04-13 Thread Doug Barton
On 4/13/2010 6:42 PM, Jason Davis wrote: Hello, Is their an easy way to rdns a /20. I can only find examples for a /24 You need to create individual zones for each /24. -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads

Re: rDNS Round-Robin

2009-07-22 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Andrewsma...@isc.org wrote:        RRsets are unordered.  Software and configurations should        be prepared for this.  Where ordering is required it is        built into the RR type.        Mark On 14.07.09 14:02, Bryan Irvine wrote: I've think

Re: rDNS Round-Robin

2009-07-22 Thread Kevin Darcy
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Andrewsma...@isc.org wrote: RRsets are unordered. Software and configurations should be prepared for this. Where ordering is required it is built into the RR type. Mark On 14.07.09

Re: rDNS Round-Robin

2009-07-14 Thread Bryan Irvine
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Andrewsma...@isc.org wrote: In message 53d706300907081412r191946eeo5c9a66657bf8e...@mail.gmail.com, Bryan  Irvine writes: On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com wrote: Bryan Irvine wrote: Other than to really annoy me; =A0is

Re: rDNS Round-Robin

2009-07-08 Thread Bryan Irvine
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com wrote: Bryan Irvine wrote: Other than to really annoy me;  is there a valid reason for rr rDNS? Once upon a time, BIND specifically *disabled* round-robin behavior for non-address (A/) record types. PTR RRsets, among other

Re: rDNS Round-Robin

2009-07-08 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 53d706300907081412r191946eeo5c9a66657bf8e...@mail.gmail.com, Bryan Irvine writes: On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com wrote: Bryan Irvine wrote: Other than to really annoy me; =A0is there a valid reason for rr rDNS? Once upon a time, BIND

Re: rDNS Round-Robin

2009-07-06 Thread Kevin Darcy
Bryan Irvine wrote: Other than to really annoy me; is there a valid reason for rr rDNS? Once upon a time, BIND specifically *disabled* round-robin behavior for non-address (A/) record types. PTR RRsets, among other types, were always given in a fixed order. But, I just tried a quick

Re: rDNS for /20

2009-03-13 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 200903122311.24920.bli...@nobaloney.net, Jeff Lasman writes: I've read the relevant parts of DNS and Bind over and over again, and I'm still going crazy. I've searched this list going back about three years. I've googled. Each step confuses me more frown. I'm trying to set

Re: rDNS for /20

2009-03-13 Thread Doug Barton
Jeff Lasman wrote: I've read the relevant parts of DNS and Bind over and over again, and I'm still going crazy. I've searched this list going back about three years. I've googled. Each step confuses me more frown. It would help if you described in more detail what you've tried, and what

Re: rDNS for /20

2009-03-13 Thread Jeff Lasman
On Thursday 12 March 2009 11:23 pm, Doug Barton wrote: It would help if you described in more detail what you've tried, and what is confusing you. Haven't tried anything yet; still waiting for the assignment to us. I was hoping to get a headstart on understanding the job. I'm trying to

Re: rDNS for /20

2009-03-13 Thread Jeff Lasman
On Thursday 12 March 2009 11:17 pm, Mark Andrews wrote: Just set up each of the /24's which make up the /20. That's what I thought I had to do. I don't even have to assign the rDNS; I only have to set the nameservers. Do I still need lines for each individual IP# in each /24? Or is

RE: rDNS for /20

2009-03-13 Thread Ben Bridges
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org Subject: Re: rDNS for /20 On Thursday 12 March 2009 11:17 pm, Mark Andrews wrote: Just set up each of the /24's which make up the /20. That's what I thought I had to do. I don't even have to assign the rDNS; I only have to set the nameservers. Do I still

Re: rDNS for /20

2009-03-13 Thread Jeff Lasman
On Friday 13 March 2009 03:14 pm, Ben Bridges wrote: You can use one $GENERATE statement in each zone to generate all 256 CNAME records for that zone. I couldn't remember the name of that statement for the life of me. Thanks! Jeff -- Jeff Lasman, Nobaloney Internet Services P.O. Box 52200,