I have worked with bind 9 in single thread,but i want to upgrade my server
to solaris 10 and bind 9.5.1-P1(my machine has 4Gig Ram and 2 cpu(900mhz))
Based on practical experience:
does enable multithreading for Bind 9.5.1 is good or not?
(with considering stability and simple management)
Regards
I installed fresh installation of solaris 10 on sparc machine with latest
bind v9,this server is behind the hardware Firewall(policy from out to in is
udp53from in to out is any).
But my cisco IDS always announces this alarm from my server to other
external clients or servers:
Fragment Flags
Hello
I have SunFire V880 (2 cpu +4G Ram) and installed bind 9.6.1-P1 on solaris
10.
but my cpu load is very high!(above 90% during the pick time)
bash-3.00# prstat -a
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
562 root 2517M 2498M cpu0 00 1503
% named
why does top show these and is it normal operation or i made a mistake?
Regards
Iman
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-Original Message-
From: Bind b...@dci.ir
To: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 09:55:03 +0430
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Difference between netstat rndc status
Thanks for your best support and answers all the time.
Could u explain more about this list. how it built
is the reason?
thx
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
.
Using 9.7.3-P3 from ISC sources, here, too.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
unsubscribe from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Manish Rane wrote:
Hi Guys,
Is there any ISO or virtual appliance available for BIND? Which ease out
the deploy and configuration task.
Free, or commercial?
I know Infoblox has this, though I have no direct experience with that
side.
http://www.infoblox.com/products
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
Hi, I know this is the BIND list but I???m thinking folks who deal with
DNS probably may be able to answer this question about whois.
We recently transferred and renewed a domain by 2 years which pushed its
expiration to 01/25/2025. The order
contains the nameserver
SOA, and
authority NS records in. If this zone with delegation NS records is a subdomain
of a TLD, then one adds these delegation NS records by using the registrar's
interface to the TLD registry.
--
regards,
Tom
___
Please visit https:/
e:
example.comIN NS ns.otherdomain.com
ns.example.com IN A x.x.x.x (glue record?)
otherdomain.comIN NS ns.example.com
ns.otherdomain.com IN A x.x.x.x (glue record?)
--
thanks,
Tom
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman
egation NS record belongs is a TLD,
one adds the delegation NS record using the registrar's tool that
interfaces w/the TLD registry.
--
Tom
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-user
org>
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
or the good examples Tony.
Nice to learn your "+noall +answer" dig syntax also.
--
What is a domain registrar with good support, that can guide me through
getting this to work under linux (fedora 24 and bind 9.x)? I can buy a new
domain
if need be.
My current registrar may respond wi
public, reachable
> addresses.
They are public.
--snip
THANKS Niall for the help and good words!
--
regards,
Tom
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
th good support pls let
me know.
--
thanks/regards,
Tom
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
:
> rhsoft.net. 86400 IN NS ns2.thelounge.net.
> rhsoft.net. 86400 IN NS ns1.thelounge.net.
--snip
On Tue 7/11/17 21:33 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
--snip
> > What is a domain registrar with good support, that can guide me through
> &
ive server.
Though, I find it interesting, that the TTL of the google dns server
*increases* between the queries - are you sure, the order is right?
regards,
Erich
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of t
tomers who ask for it, the
better (I hope). And now that DNSSEC is so much easier
to use than in the past, maybe more people will start
asking for RFC7344.
cheers,
raf
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this soft
bind user wrote:
Hi All: I installed 9.6.0 alongside FreeBSD7's default 9.4.2, and it's
working fine when i start it manually, but I'm having trouble getting it
to start automatically. I edited etc/rc.d/named
Don't do that. :) The rc.d system is designed to be configured with
rc.conf. You
Hi All,
I'm trying to query for A record, like this :
# dig @a.gtld-servers.net ns1.ats-com.com +short
203.130.232.235
# dig @203.130.232.235 ns1.ats-com.com +short
(No A Record)
What is happen if that NS be used for authoritative some domain(s) ?
Thanks
Fulan
--
Bind DNS sen
)
;; WHEN: Fri Mar 20 15:22:36 2009
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 115
Is it possible if the information for A record (ns1.ats-com.com) get from the NS
parent ?
Which the problem ? (cache dns or the domain)
Thank You.
--
Senmi sen...@telkom.net.id
___
bind
Hello Mark,
Thank you for your response.
Best Regards,
Arpad
Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org írta:
In message freemail.20090801231709.18...@fm10.freemail.hu, bind jack writes:
Hello,
My question is about the fields in the dynamic update response.
As RFC 2136 describes there are 2
is the
solution?
I use BIND version 9.7.2_p3-r1.
regards
Daniel
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Hi.
My bind v980-p1 svr is DNSSEC-enabled, and signed zones are publishing
as DNSSEC-valid.
I've both internal and external views:
-- internal is authoritative and provides recursion for LAN clients
-- external serves only as an authoritative hidden-primary feeding
slaves via AXFR.
all good
I'm getting the same errors with bind-9.10.0b2.
Just a guess but I think it's related to using a HE IPv6 Tunnel and the
updated root servers.
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Paul A wrote:
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 16:25:43 -0400
From: Paul A ra...@meganet.net
To: 'Kevin Darcy' k...@chrysler.com, bind-users
Hi,
lastly I've discovered the new python tool dnssec-keymgr included in
BIND 9.11 alpha release. I'm seeking for simple tools to handle key
rollovers unattended. And the lightweight dnssec-keymgr could be the
right one.
Are there any future plans or milestones out there (expect of 'remaining
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Am 21.11.2019 um 11:47 schrieb Bind Mailinglist:
> Hello Ondřej
> Interesting case and not so easy to detect. But I was able to get a
> few steps further.
> As I have always to clear cache for host
> tm.inregion.waas.oci.oraclecloud.net I focused monitoring on that.
> 1.
>
Hello list
I'm glad there is such an active list. Hope there is anybody out there
who can help me with my little problem. :-)
We are running six bind server ( all Ubuntu LTS 18.04 with bind 9.11.3
), so they are pretty up to date.
Three of them have authoritative zones, one is for testing and two
{
// 213.160.41.2;
// 213.160.40.34;
// };
About the answer. Does it matter if I query A or if there is
only a CNAME as an answer?
My last test shows me following cache entry. This has happend around
20min after restarting bind with my forwarders enabled
ays wrong.
>
> Do the similar for the top of all other private namespaces you are using.
>
> Mark
>
>> On 4 Apr 2020, at 03:06, bind-li...@iano.org wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In summary, my question is whether there is a way to configure a bind
&g
020, at 4:09 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> Add delegations if they are missing. This is how DNS is designed to be
> managed.
>
> This should have been done as part of allocating the address space
> initially.
> --
> Mark Andrews
>
>> On 8 Apr 2020,
ton wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2020, at 9:06 AM, bind-li...@iano.org wrote:
>> Because the AD domain controllers already own 10.in-addr.arpa, they refuse
>> to allow us to configure conditional forwarding for its subdomains. So we
>> delegated the subdomains to the
Hi,
In summary, my question is whether there is a way to configure a bind caching
server to provide recursion in response to iterative queries for records in a
forward type zone.
The background is that we have:
- AD domain controllers that are authoritative for all of 10.in-addr.arpa. in
our
in my effort to end racism, which I do support, and quite heavily so.
>
> On 6/15/20 8:00 PM, DeCaro, James John (Jim) CIV DISA FE (USA) wrote:
>> Or you can call the slave servers 'secondary' servers.
> --
> Met vriendelijke groet / Best regards,
> Michael De Roover
_
, though.
Patrick
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information
o refresh my
> certificates.
Not perfect? What issues did you see? Thanks!
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for m
Description: PGP signature
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
i've bind9 running as a primaryhost to a number of bind-andb-other
slaves.
i'm trying to set up to use different TSIG keys with different
secondaries.
in my named.conf, i've
...
acl acl_slave_1 { 1.1.1.1; };
acl acl_slave_2 { 2.2.2.2; 3.3.3.3; 4.4.4.4; 5.5.5.5
to have the
IPs mentioned here?
the goal is to have both IP- key- restrictions in place.
fwiw, the orig example i found for this was @:
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2009-April/075985.html
thanks!
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users
to initiate any
transfers, as if it's not getting any notify.
still poking around ...
I wrote an explanation of BIND ACLs on this list a few years back that
you may find helpful in explaining the syntactic insanity:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bind-users@lists.isc.org/msg00045.html
yes
1 2017.
The replacement keys published as expected and haven't been used for
signing yet as expected.
I woke up last Friday Dec 23rd to find my zones failing validation. When
I investigated I found the existing signatures expired on the 22nd and
bind never resigned the records
-evans ] [
https://github.com/jakedevans ] [ https://keybase.io/jacobdevans ]
- Original Message -
From: "Niall O'Reilly" <niall.orei...@ucd.ie>
To: "bind-users" <bind-users@lists.isc.org>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 2:40:49 PM
Subject: Re: delegation NS reco
On 6/27/17 12:13 PM, Michael W. Fleming wrote:
We're setting up a wireless printing service that uses
Zeroconf/bonjour/rendevouz dns entries. The product, Presto, has it's
own dns server for a private, on-campus only zone (presto.). We're
running bind 9.9 with a master server, three slaves
I think it's sorted, thanks all.
-Kevin
From: "Tony Finch" <d...@dotat.at>
To: bind-us...@isc.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:50:32 AM
Subject: Re: head scratcher: nsupdate, Bind views, and TLSA record updates
Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote
I'm running into an odd issue with Bind 9.9.4 whereby I'm trying to run a
scripted nsupdate to rotate TLSA records. I'm running nsupdate via a Bash
script that executes the following nsupdate batch commands which are directed
to a Bind "view" that is accessible from the wider internet
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin" <bind-users...@thesandiegos.com>
> To: "Warren Kumari" <war...@kumari.net>
> Cc: "Kevin" <bind-users...@thesandiegos.com>, "bind-users"
> <bind-users@lists.isc.org>
> Sent
From: "Warren Kumari" <war...@kumari.net>
To: "Kevin" <bind-users...@thesandiegos.com>
Cc: "bind-users" <bind-users@lists.isc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 11:28:58 AM
Subject: Re: head scratcher: nsupdate, Bind views, and TLSA record upda
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin" <bind-users...@thesandiegos.com>
> To: "Kevin" <bind-users...@thesandiegos.com>
> Cc: "Warren Kumari" <war...@kumari.net>, "bind-users"
> <bind-users@lists.isc.org>
> Sent
- Original Message -
> From: "Warren Kumari" <war...@kumari.net>
> To: "Kevin" <bind-users...@thesandiegos.com>
> Cc: "bind-users" <bind-users@lists.isc.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 12:47:06 PM
> Subject: Re: head
: fatal: failed loading zone from : CNAME and other data
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018, 5:56:01 PM EDT, Carl Byington
<c...@byington.org> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 21:06 +, praveen via bind-users wrote:
> Is an "A" rec
All,
Operating BIND version "BIND 9.9.10-P1 (Extended Support Version)" DNSSEC
signing in place. DKIM, SPF and DMARC records are also in place for top-level
domain (zone).
Is an "A" record mandatory entry for top-level domain (zone) when using DNSSEC,
DKIM, SPF and DMARC c
way to split?
I tried looking at local-data but i was not able to perform this.
Thank you,
F
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.
Have anyone check where to get an important identification of your documents.
now this is a solution if you lost 1 check it out. Where Fake ID
<http://www.bogusbraxtor.com> is more Real
-
Bogus-Braxtor
--
Sent from: http://bind-users-forum.2342410.n4.nabb
from boxA with +dnssec and as expected these are
secure(d).
boxA does allow-transfer boxB
What is the problem, what I got wrong there?
many thanks, L.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-use
visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On 22/09/18 17:04, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.09.18 um 17:53 schrieb lejeczek via bind-users:
is it possible to update domain(not hosts of/in the domain) records?
there is nothing like "not hosts of/in the domain"
Something like
domain.local A 10.1.1.100
which is simply a
/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Thank you for the https://www.isc.org/blogs/bind-9-packages/ blog post
and various binary distributions mentioned in it.
I am an end user, not a programmer, and I rely on Linux distributions
and application packages and so having up-to-date content from
authoritative sources is both helpful
10.3.1.100#12046/key nsupdate_key: updating zone
'dom.local/IN': attempt to add CNAME alongside non-CNAME ignored
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users
, I tried to move the .signed file aside, thinking maybe thaw might recreate
it, But no, it complains the file doesn’t exist, so I put it back.
Is it possible for me to edit the zone file (as in with vim) and have bind
update, or do I have to do everything through nsupdate and never access
> On 21 Feb 2019, at 13:41, Grant Taylor via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> On 02/21/2019 01:34 PM, @lbutlr via bind-users wrote:
>> I edited a zone file after issuing a rndc freeze command, added two new sub
>> zones, changed the serial number, saved the file, and then
On 21 Feb 2019, at 20:43, Grant Taylor via bind-users
wrote:
>
> On 2/21/19 6:28 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>> rndc reload did not recreate (or at least update the time stamp) on the
>> .signed file.
>
> Hum. Maybe it's something different about how you're doing DNSSEC tha
hose is my example.com.signed file?
Is nsdiff a separate package? It’s not on my FereeBSD 11.2 system with Bind 9.12
--
Well boys, we got three engines out, we got more holes in us than a
horse trader's mule, the radio is gone and we're leaking fuel and if we
was flying any lower why we'd need
nd Ladies
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Hi Mark,
>Given the message says "ran out of space” it indicates that a fixed buffer was
>too small. The lookup also works with current versions of BIND so I would
>say the solution is to stop running EoL’d software and upgrade.
I have upgraded to 9.14.3 and that has so
elates here in some capacity, as there is no public .local domain, obviously?
disabling dnssec [dnssec-enable no;] seems to support this, as when doing so,
queries work.
that said, i'm wondering why this is happening - e.g. why bind seems to be
consulting public dns for this zone, if i'
xists that does not provide a fully signed path
>> from root to zone, i.e. .com.au , co.za etc, how would an
>> administrator enable / implement DNSSEC validation for these zones ?
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Please visit https://
or the ".com.au" zone.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Dear Wil,
Your email was fascinating. Thank you
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 3:15 AM,
wrote:
> Send bind-users mailing list submissions to
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Wo
Bind 9.7.1 - 9.14.5 - 9.14.7 and 9.15.3 is dropping this into sys.log, but
still runs fine:
named[459]: unable to set effective uid to 0: Operation not permitted
named[459]: generating session key for dynamic DNS
named[459]: unable to set effective uid to 0: Operation not permitted
named[459
I have some other issues that I'm trying to work through, but I wanted to ask
about a specific issue.
I'm trying to see what BIND currently thinks all of the zones are, so I issue
the "rndc dumpdb -zones" command.
I get the following output:
Nov 27 07:36:26 DNA-DNS1 n
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Lee"
To: isc-bind-us...@ics-il.net
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 8:59:51 AM
Subject: Re: Debugging Information Lacking?
On 11/27/19, i
On 23 Feb 2020, at 07:57, @lbutlr wrote:
> (9.11.6 should be coming really soon)
9.11.16, and I appear to be behind a touch, it is already released.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this l
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 20:07:47 +
Tony Finch wrote:
> Shaun via bind-users wrote:
> >
> > The 9.16.0 version of delv seems to have trouble reading the root trust
> > anchor from the bind.keys file.
>
> I see this too. The bug is that dns_client_addtrustedkey()
sure I didn't goof something on my end.
Thanks,
Shaun
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
mentation!
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
that a standard DNS
resolver should have.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
some don't even exist,
so i'm curious about seeing these messages. what am i not understanding,
and/or what can i do to troubleshoot further?
thanks!
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
thanks-
we're running 9.14.8, courtesy of the isc ubuntu ppa
[https://launchpad.net/~isc]:
>named -v
BIND 9.14.8-Ubuntu (Stable Release)
>dpkg -s bind9
Package: bind9
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: net
Installed-Size: 872
Maintainer: Debian DNS Team
Archit
:44:20 +
"Bhangui, Sandeep - BLS CTR via bind-users" wrote:
> Hello
>
> Trying to compile Bind 9.16.1 on RHEL 7.X and RHEL 6.X and getting compile
> errors hopefully someone can point me in the right direction.
>
> The download for the source code from the ISC
L.
--
"I know she's in there," said Verence, holding his crown in his hands
in the famous Ai-Se-or-Mexican-Bandits-Have-Raided-Our-Village
position
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsub
ps!)
>Let's stop the leaks.
>--
>Fred Morris
>
>___
>DNSfirewalls mailing list
>dnsfirewa...@lists.redbarn.org
>http://lists.redbarn.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsfirewalls
>
___
esolver sees
will be the one
that got clamped in the view resolver, but I'm not positive about that.
You will also get double the number of cache entries for each lookup, of course.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsub
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 10:22 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
>> On 16.10.20 09:56, Bob Harold wrote:
> >The BIND ARM (9.16.2) says:
> >"There may be one or more forwarders, and they are queried in turn until
> >the list is exhausted or an answer is found."
&
interpreted as relative to the current origin.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://li
inside the chroot.
NAMED_CONF_INCLUDE_FILES mentioned in the OP seems to be a SuSE-ism
and I didn't dig into whatever bearing it might have for maintenance
of the chroot.
--
tale
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsub
same but for a little bit
around the edges.
And for what it's worth, not all systems moved away from "named" to
"bind9". I've been running FreeBSD for decades, and I can't remember
ever calling the service "bind9".
___
Please vis
] reloading configuration failed:
failure
Bind is currently running just fine and has been since 8 June.
The bind.keys file has:
# See https://data.iana.org/root-anchors/root-anchors.xml for current trust
# anchor information for the root zone.
But that URL does not load and gives an XML error
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 3:48 AM Prasanna Mathivanan (pmathiva) via
bind-users wrote:
> Whenever we have broken delegation as domain owners didn't follow proper RFC,
> the default behaviour of the query hits " _." which
> doesn’t exist.? And we get NXDOMAIN or SERVFAIL re
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:30 AM Wilfred Sarmiento via bind-users
wrote:
> Is DNS Bind SRV record can detect the Server's availability? If yes, how?
Could you provide more information about your goal? I don't fully
understand the question.
For my reading, the answer is basica
, but I'd say the answer is a
qualified yes. If you are not providing open recursive services and
are not authoritative for the root domain, BIND will respond with
REFUSED just like it would if someone asked you about example.com when
you're not authoritative for that. In the old days you'd get a root
re
On 02/02/2021 12:10 am, @lbutlr wrote:
> I've been using alg-7 for DNS, but that is no longer recommended. How
> difficult is it to change the signing algorithm and what is the process (Bind
> 9.16.11)?
I migrated recently from Alg8 to Alg13, no drama.. My registry does not
ha
On 6/15/21 11:54 PM, G.W. Haywood via bind-users wrote:
Hi there,
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Re: My FC33->FC34 bind-chroot upgrade notes
I hope this is the last time I have to revise this!
...
Unfortunately perhaps not.
:'(
...
# means root
$ means user
...
Someti
On 15-06-2021 07:46, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
On 6/14/21 9:30 PM, Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote:
On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 14:27 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.16.16/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.pdf
The modern-day RTFM :-)
-Jim P.
"Just G
1 - 100 of 1725 matches
Mail list logo
