Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-12 Thread Scott Furt
Personally, i really like Mozilla's email client. I used to use Kmail, and i really liked it. but after trying to upgrade a few things using RPMs, half of KDE stopped working because of dependancy issues... i *hate* RPMs. it's nearly impossible for me to upgrade anything w/o having a whole

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-12 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 12-May-2002 Scott Furt wrote: Personally, i really like Mozilla's email client. I got burned by netscape's mailer too many times. It would simply sigbus on me due to my mail load )-:

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-12 Thread Guido 'lenix' Boehm
On Sat, 11 May 2002 20:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12-May-2002 Adam Hooper wrote: Sylpheed does it all, and FAST. I want a mail program that loads instantly, and Sylpheed does it, even when I'm compiling. Even if you're gonna switch to kmail, you

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-12 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 02:58:13AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On 12-May-2002 Scott Furt wrote: Personally, i really like Mozilla's email client. I got burned by netscape's mailer too many times. It would simply sigbus on me due to my mail load )-: That's what keeps me using mutt...

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-12 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 12-May-2002 Glyn Millington wrote: Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That's what keeps me using mutt... no matter what you throw at it, it just keeps chugging along. Ho hum! For a situation where you are handling lots of mail then Gnus takes a lot of beating... It handles mail

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-12 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 04:51:39PM +0100, Glyn Millington wrote: Ho hum! For a situation where you are handling lots of mail then Gnus takes a lot of beating... It handles mail like news, so you can read what you want and simply zap the rest with a keystroke; and adaptive scoring means that

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-12 Thread Glyn Millington
Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm not the slightest bit interested in starting yet another emacs-vs-the-rest-of-the-world war... Nor I! Emacs is so against the normal *nix philosophy of specific tools for specific ends... This appears to be true - though I suppose one could

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-12 Thread Glyn Millington
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I converted to emacs about this time last year. Have not moved past this this is a nice editor phase to the emacs is my shell phase yet. I have heard good things about Gnus, maybe I should try it. If you do usenet, it might be worth sampling

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-11 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On a similar note, snapping to the edge of the screen seems to be out by a couple of pixels on the top and right edges. heh. Snapping is now done to the strut, not the screen edge. Just like in kwin.

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-11 Thread Matt Wilson
On Sat, 11 May 2002 00:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On a similar note, snapping to the edge of the screen seems to be out by a couple of pixels on the top and right edges. heh. Snapping is now done to the strut, not the screen edge. Just like in

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-11 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
So where is the strut placed? why is the strut not placed right on the edge of the screen? (not counting the full maximisation thing) On the right hand side, there is a 1px gap. at the top, where it snaps to the toolbar there is a 1 px overlap... with the slit there is no overlap, on the

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-11 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 07:39:43AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: I have to remove the person from my mailer's recipient list every time i start a new message. I often forget. Mutt is quite sophisticated and can delete the duplicates on command, so it's not big deal here, but perhaps it's

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-11 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Mutt is quite sophisticated and can delete the duplicates on command, so it's not big deal here, but perhaps it's time to use something other than XFMail. ^_^ as soon as KDE 3 shows up in Debian I plan to try converting to kmail. mutt just doesn't work for me and my mail is in MH folders

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-11 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: as soon as KDE 3 shows up in Debian I plan to try converting to kmail. mutt just doesn't work for me and my mail is in MH folders so I need a mailer capable of handling MH/maildir. Sylpheed uses MH. My wife has been using it for about a month;

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-11 Thread Philip M. Johnson
Kmail is very nice -- my only beef is that there are no options to change the mail folder, it has to be ~/Mail. I assume that's the standard for MH type mail programs or something, but a minor drag all the same. :) -- Philip M. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 11 May 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-11 Thread Adam Hooper
Sylpheed does it all, and FAST. I want a mail program that loads instantly, and Sylpheed does it, even when I'm compiling. Even if you're gonna switch to kmail, you should at least try sylpheed - you might like it. Adam Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, 12 May 2002 00:33:32 -0230 (NDT) Philip

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-11 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 12-May-2002 Adam Hooper wrote: Sylpheed does it all, and FAST. I want a mail program that loads instantly, and Sylpheed does it, even when I'm compiling. Even if you're gonna switch to kmail, you should at least try sylpheed - you might like it. nah, sylpheed is a serious hack and

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-10 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 10-May-2002 Ciprian Popovici wrote: Something strange over here with BlackBox 0.62.1. If I move the mouse fast towards the right edge of the screen, then right click, the menu doesn't pop-up. Try slamming it against the edge, and be careful to keep it stuck to it, because usually there's a

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-10 Thread Marc Wilson
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:31:14PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: Looks like the am I on the screen detection is a little off. How is the mouse supposed to get off the screen in the first place? -- Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-10 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 11-May-2002 Marc Wilson wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:31:14PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: Looks like the am I on the screen detection is a little off. How is the mouse supposed to get off the screen in the first place? there is a little bit of space a few pixels wide, just

Re: Slam the mouse

2002-05-10 Thread Matt Wilson
On Fri, 10 May 2002 22:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11-May-2002 Marc Wilson wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:31:14PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: Looks like the am I on the screen detection is a little off. How is the mouse supposed to get off