Circa 2002-Jan-23 22:18:12 -0800 dixit Sean 'Shaleh' Perry:
: Not bbkeys, I think. There'd have to be some way to tel blackbox to
: ignore the window and not pass focus to it. Bbkeys is trying to get the
: focus on whatever you chose in the menu. As long as bbkeys is separate
: from
Um. This has never made sense to me. Is there any good reason that
blackbox should overwrite its rc-file every time it exits? I really,
really think this needs to be changed. At some point, I'm going to add
a bbconf plugin that lets the user make changes to his/her blackbox
rc-file. This
Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper [EMAIL PROTECTED] felt like writing:
Um. This has never made sense to me. Is there any good reason that
blackbox should overwrite its rc-file every time it exits? I really,
really think this needs to be changed. At some point, I'm going to
add a bbconf plugin that
That's what I was thinking too. Sean--wouldn't it be better if blackbox
rewrote its rc-file if and only if and immediately after blackbox
changed any of its config options?
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 08:11, Guido 'lenix' Boehm wrote:
Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper [EMAIL PROTECTED] felt like writing:
Um.
Sean--are you open to changing this? Does anyone have a good reason why
it shouldn't change? I understand the importance of blackbox trying to
make sure it has a good rc-file for the next time it opens, but I think
the current implementation of the solution for whatever problem this was
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 12:25:47AM -0500, scott wrote:
Marco wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Marco wrote:
There is no need for *both* toolbar *and* slit in BB,
meaning that for the end user they functionally overlap, [...]
It *is* absolutely true.
Not at all.
The toolbar tells
* Anh Lai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
hello, I am new to Blackbox, but not to linux. Some themes come with
ansi fonts(.pcf), I have no problems installing them to allow Eterm
and Xterm to use them correctly.
I do this:
cp them to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc as root
mkfontdir as root
as
Hello,
Long time listener, first time caller here.
I was wondering : I use BBpager a lot, but I find that I absolutely hate
my middle-mouse-button for pushing, since it's a scroll-button.
Is it possible to assign one of the other two mousebuttons to BBPager,
using a configuration option
I use wmsetbg to set my background. it comes from windowmaker. You could install
LibPropList and then build windowmaker and install wmsetbg manually. works like a
charm.
* Anh Lai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
oh man, that sucks, i refuest to install GNOME. oh well, I can live
without it.
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:22:37 +0100
Maarten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Long time listener, first time caller here.
I was wondering : I use BBpager a lot, but I find that I absolutely hate
my middle-mouse-button for pushing, since it's a scroll-button.
Is it possible to assign one
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 10:22:37PM +0100, Maarten wrote:
Hello,
Long time listener, first time caller here.
I was wondering : I use BBpager a lot, but I find that I absolutely hate
my middle-mouse-button for pushing, since it's a scroll-button.
Is it possible to assign one of the
Don't know if too many people are aware of my project but I thought
there might be some newbies or experts alike which would be interested.
I have been working on a configuration tool for blackbox for about a
year now in my spare time (which is not so plentiful). Its at a point
where I think its
On 24-Jan-2002 Arvid Warnecke wrote:
Hello,
I just found in my dselect of Debian Potato 'bbmail' and 'bbpager'.
I use blackbox 0.61.1-1.1. bbmail is version 0.6.2-2 and bbpager is
0.1.6-1.
So, I installed both and tried to start those tools. But nothing
happened. No message, nothing.
On 25-Jan-2002 Luke Freeman wrote:
Don't know if too many people are aware of my project but I thought
there might be some newbies or experts alike which would be interested.
I have been working on a configuration tool for blackbox for about a
year now in my spare time (which is not so
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 13:22, Maarten wrote:
Hello,
Long time listener, first time caller here.
I was wondering : I use BBpager a lot, but I find that I absolutely hate
my middle-mouse-button for pushing, since it's a scroll-button.
Is it possible to assign one of the other two
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 11:56, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Not to jab, but other than it being GTK based, why not use bbconf?
Well, if you are looking purely at the configuration aspects (menu/style
editors) of blackbox there is no real difference between bbconf and
whiteBOX. I think as a menu
And, let me just say, nice job Luke! =:) I'd had bbconf in mind for
the last year (didn't know there was a whiteBOX in the world) before I
wrote it, and if it wasn't for xOr's help, bbconf would have taken MUCH
longer than the month we took to crank out the first release. So, I
definitely
On 25 Jan 2002, Luke Freeman wrote:
SNIP
Well, if you are looking purely at the configuration aspects (menu/style
editors) of blackbox there is no real difference between bbconf and
whiteBOX. I think as a menu editor and style editor they are pretty much
evenly matched.
bbconf does
Hi all,
Have anyone run blackbox as a 64 bit binary? I'm having some quite
psychedelic color effects on my x86-64 (AMD Sledgehammer) simulation running
on X in 16 bpp.
There are other problems that I don't see in TWM (again compiled as a 64 bit
binary):
- windows can't be moved by grabbing
I haven't played too much around with it, so there might be more issues. But
it compiles cleanly and it at least runs and some of the psychedelic colors
looks cool enough that AMD will show it running in LinuxWorld next week.
sweet (-:
Seriously now. No one has ever reported on the 64
I haven't played too much around with it, so there might be more issues. But
it compiles cleanly and it at least runs and some of the psychedelic colors
looks cool enough that AMD will show it running in LinuxWorld next week.
Would a sparc ultra 1 be able to run in 64 bit mode under
I use blackbox on an dec alpha machine and don't have any of those
problems.
__
Yes, but I love gatherings. Isn't it ironic?
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned for Sega.
http://wckn.clarkson.edu/~cohentl/
On Fri, 25
Consider this a report then :) Freebsd 4.4 AXP.
AlphaStation 200 4/233, 233MHz
Blackbox works perfectly.
__
Yes, but I love gatherings. Isn't it ironic?
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned for Sega.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:56:37PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 25-Jan-2002 Luke Freeman wrote:
Its GTK based so its pretty quick. It can be found at
http://whitebox.sourceforge.net/. Give it a try and let me know what you
think.
P.S. Sorry for the plug .. but it might be useful
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 18:56, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Not to jab, but other than it being GTK based, why not use bbconf?
One reason that jumps to mind is the default window size. The laptop I
use (C1VN) has a odd-ball screen size (1024x480) and the default screen
from whiteBOX (690x451) fits
Ï´Ô¡±£½¡µÄÐÂÂôµã--ÖÐÒ©Ô¡
ÂåÑôÇÇÊ¿ÖÐÒ©Ô¡£¬ÔÚÈ«¹úÐí¶à´ó³ÇÊÐÉèÓаìÊ´¦£¬ÓÉ30¶à¼ÒºÏ×÷µ¥Î»£¬ÉúÒâÐË¡¡£ÒòΪÕâÊÇÕý¹æµÄÒ½ÁƱ£½¡ÏîÄ¿£¬ÅäºÏÕý¹æµÄÒ½ÁƱ£½¡°´Ä¦£¬Êdz¤¾ÃµÄ·¢Õ¹·½Ïò¡£
Ò»£®Èý´óÌص㣺
1£®¹ÅµäʽľͰ£º ¡´1¡µÆÓʵµäÑÅ£¬¹ÅÏã¹ÅÉ«£»
On 25-Jan-2002 Marc Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:56:37PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 25-Jan-2002 Luke Freeman wrote:
Its GTK based so its pretty quick. It can be found at
http://whitebox.sourceforge.net/. Give it a try and let me know what you
think.
P.S. Sorry for
27 matches
Mail list logo
