DJ Lucas wrote:
> Also checking berkelydb now since I had no idea whether the problem
> still exists.
Just checking back, but no change necessary to db except that passing
LIBSO_LIBS and LIBXSO_LIBS to make is no longer necessary.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/b
Okay guys, fop appears to be good now and blfs.pdf looks good. I'm
reworking the OOo to install the large jdk-1.5 patch, and testing again.
Also checking berkelydb now since I had no idea whether the problem
still exists. Anyone have any additional objections that have not been
discussed yet? I
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I choose mwm, hands down. It is much easier to work with. Just because
> you don't use the window manager portion of the package, Matt, doesn't
> mean that others don't. :-)
>
> I really don't have a preference on where the package is located in
> the book, however. I just
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/17/05 17:58 CST:
> Yes but libgnomeprintui has a required dependency of libgnomeprint.
I've been thinking about this, and perhaps the easiest thing to
do is just substitute " then" for the "," in the list of depends.
Then, folks would install them in the requir
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> it probably doesn't need an immediate fix.
Agreed.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Actually, the instructions say that libgnomeprintui, not libgnomeprint
> is the dependency.
Yes but libgnomeprintui has a required dependency of libgnomeprint.
> There is a huge difference here. Much of GNOME will need to be
> installed to satisfy the dependency.
Perhaps
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/17/05 16:29 CST:
> I'm trying to install libgnomeprint-2.8.0.1. As a prereq for gnumeric.
> I have not installed gnome. The instructions say:
>
> ./configure --prefix=`pkg-config --variable=prefix ORBit-2.0` \
> --sysconfdir=/etc/gnome --disable-gtk-doc
>
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/17/05 16:29 CST:
> I'm trying to install libgnomeprint-2.8.0.1. As a prereq for gnumeric.
> I have not installed gnome. The instructions say:
Actually, the instructions say that libgnomeprintui, not libgnomeprint
is the dependency.
There is a huge difference
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'm trying to install libgnomeprint-2.8.0.1. As a prereq for gnumeric.
I have not installed gnome. The instructions say:
./configure --prefix=`pkg-config --variable=prefix ORBit-2.0` \
--sysconfdir=/etc/gnome --disable-gtk-doc
But ORBit-2.0 is not listed as a dependency. Wh
I'm trying to install libgnomeprint-2.8.0.1. As a prereq for gnumeric.
I have not installed gnome. The instructions say:
./configure --prefix=`pkg-config --variable=prefix ORBit-2.0` \
--sysconfdir=/etc/gnome --disable-gtk-doc
But ORBit-2.0 is not listed as a dependency. When I execute:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> "The primary objectives have been to develop the widget code of the
> LessTif Toolkit. Intermittently, the window manager (mwm) and the
> combination of UIL compiler and libMrm are being worked on."
I agree with Matt. In this case the primary purpose of the package is
as
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Is it a good idea to add manual installation of those NVidia drivers (and
> possibly fglrx, I can provide instructions) to the book, so that future
> readers don't step onto this problem?
OK. Send me what you have so I can review your proposal. I'm not
familiar
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> If you've any problems with the approach above, let me know.
No. Your approach seems great. We don't get dunned with gcc-4.0 issues
and both lfs and blfs get appropriate input. Thanks for the heads up.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 04/17/05 11:21 CST:
> Why not to add a mwm page in window managers like we already do in graphipcal
> browsers for Konqueror or in the mail/news clients pages for Kmail/Knode?
Excellent suggestion, Manuel. Something like, "The LessTif package
includes a Motif cl
El Domingo, 17 de Abril de 2005 18:10, Randy McMurchy escribió:
> I really don't have a preference on where the package is located in
> the book, however. I just wanted to throw this out, in case there
> were others that were thinking the same thing. I'll defer to your
> opinion and the fact that
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 04/17/05 10:42 CST:
> The only thing I have at the moment that uses Lesstif is `xpdf', and
> that certainly doesn't care about the window manager portion of Lesstif :-)
Well, to counter this, I'll say that at the moment on a system I
am building up, I have th
Randy McMurchy wrote:
In my opinion, the LessTif package belongs in the X Window Manager
section of the book, and not the X Libraries section. LessTif includes
the mwm Motif compatible window manager. Surely, we should move the
instructions, right?
What is Lesstif? http://www.lesstif.org/FAQ.html#
Hi all,
I'm finished with the LessTif update, but want to pass something by.
I didn't receive any comments about the test suite instructions, so
I'll just do what I think is best.
However, I have another question.
In my opinion, the LessTif package belongs in the X Window Manager
section of the
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I figured out what happened. I installed the Nvidia binary drivers. It
> overwrote:
Is it a good idea to add manual installation of those NVidia drivers (and
possibly fglrx, I can provide instructions) to the book, so that future
readers don't step onto this problem?
--
Hi guys,
Just thought I'd let you know that work on getting gcc-4.0 into the LFS
book will be going on in a new branch of the LFS repo. In an attempt to
reduce the number of support queries you may well get as a result of
this, I'll be putting a big fat warning on the gcc related pages saying
El Domingo, 17 de Abril de 2005 01:11, Randy McMurchy escribió:
> Doesn't matter to me. My question is, why do you want to go through
> all this work, for something that won't be seen by anyone after the
> book is rendered in either PDF or HTML or otherwise? It just seems
> like you're going to an
El Domingo, 17 de Abril de 2005 01:52, Bruce Dubbs escribió:
> You are suggesting dropping the . Is that something that has
> to be done for all or can we just do that as time allows?
Dropping the and adding in files creation command.
> Again, this looks like a huge task. I do not doubt that
Jeremy Utley wrote:
Randy - both of these are strictly cmmi installations - their configure
scripts will pick up deps just fine. I can take a look for the deps for
you guys, if you like.
I started looking into this, but soon got distracted unfortunately. As
you're probably already aware, Jeremy,
Jeremy Utley wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>>Jeremy Utley wrote:
>
>>>Having the Mesa 3d libs installed will break hardware 3D-rendering
>>>always - whether it be DRI-based, NVIDIA drivers, or ATI's FireGL
>>>drivers. People will be limited to software 3d rendering.
>>Thanks Jeremy. I can confi
24 matches
Mail list logo
