I've been looking at texlive and am trying to figure out how to proceed.
The first thing to note is that upstream distribution links their
binaries statically, at least as far as the texlive libraries go (there
are two).
There are a huge number of programs in the livetex distribution. I
don't
DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 12/03/2011 06:09 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> I had noticed functions up to des_crypt.c were removed in debian,
>> and was attempting to merge their changes with yours by hand.
>
> Actually, removal of des_crypt.c is all that is required if we avoid
> upstream's ridiculous pol
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> On 12/3/2011 8:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Option 1. Use the upstream installer but suggest the use /opt/texlive
>> or some variant instead.
>>
>> Option 3. Use the upstream installer for a base installation and also
>> build the executab
DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 12/04/2011 04:25 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> DJ Lucas wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2011 06:09 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>>
>>>> I had noticed functions up to des_crypt.c were removed in debian,
>>>> and was attempting to merge their c
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> On 12/3/2011 8:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Option 1. Use the upstream installer but suggest the use /opt/texlive
>> or some variant instead.
>>
>> Option 3. Use the upstream installer for a base installation and also
>> build the executab
DJ Lucas wrote:
> I just updated the wget files in SVN. Bruce, I think I recall you
> mentioning this the other day. Are you wanting to do the update? If not,
> I don't mind doing it, but I really do want somebody else to go through
> it as I fear it is getting kind of stale.
If you do it, I'll
Andrew Benton wrote:
> I've tidied that up a bit:
>
> sed -i 's#x)/docs#x)/share/doc#' Makefile.config.in
> touch tools/edis/EnhancedDisassembly.exports
> ./configure --prefix=/usr
> find . -name Makefile -exec sed -i -e '/^LIBRARYNAME/a SHARED_LIBRARY = 1' \
> -e 's#^BUILD_ARCHIVE :*= 1#NO_BUI
I'm starting to go through the book from the top and will do updates as
I go. Right now I'm reviewing the security chapter. Many of the
packages have been updated, but these are what are left:
console kit
Who uses this? Evidently KDE4 and gdm.
Cyrus SASL
I can build it but don't know h
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Linux-PAM
> No new sources on kernel.org. Is 1.1.3 still current?
> Anybody know where more recent sources are located? Debian
> shows 1.1.3 with 2Mb of changes, mostly docs.
Arg. Just as I sent this, I found
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/lin
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> On 12/5/2011 10:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Cyrus SASL
>> I can build it but don't know how to test it.
>
> Has there been a version increment?
Minor. 2.1.23 (2009) -> 2.1.25 (Sep 2011) It looks like
they skipped 2.1.24.
>> gpg
d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
> Author: dj
> Date: 2011-12-06 02:26:39 -0700 (Tue, 06 Dec 2011)
> New Revision: 9069
>
> Modified:
>trunk/BOOK/general.ent
>trunk/BOOK/general/genlib/libdrm.xml
>trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml
>trunk/BOOK/x/installing/installing.xml
DJ Lucas wrote:
> Whoops, I forgot.
No problem. I can do the easy stuff.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There are quite a few packages that I use every day that are not in
> BLFS. I think it's a shame that they're not in the book so I've started
> to knock up example pages that show what a BLFS page might look like
> for them. The first 4 are:
>
> http://www.linuxf
I'm working on pam and I'm getting undefined references to
__db_ndbm_{open,fetch,close} etc.
I can get around this with telling configure --enable-db=no. In the
configure log, I have:
checking for db_create... yes
checking db.h usability... yes
checking db.h presence... yes
checking for db.h..
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> On 07/12/11 16:59, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I'm working on pam and I'm getting undefined references to
>> __db_ndbm_{open,fetch,close} etc.
>>
>> I can get around this with telling configure --enable-db=no. In the
>> configur
Laurent Dard wrote:
> Le 06/12/2011 20:12, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>> Perhaps they should be in the book, but I'd like to put our emphasis on
>> updating what's in the book right now. There are also things that we
>> may want to remove, e.g. qt3/kde3 but I need
Laurent Dard wrote:
> With KDE4 in /opt/kde4 and Trinity in /opt/trinity, we have to put the
> right directory at the beginning of the path when starting one of these
> desktop. (Binary suffixes could be another solution, but that isn't the
> choice made by Trinity Team.) And we have to find a way
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:15:51 +1100
> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>
>> On 04/12/11 15:30, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> Impressive! Looks as if I might be putting pulse into this build,
>>> now that I've got something to work from. What's stopping you
>>> putting all this into the boo
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> On 08/12/11 15:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> I don't have a problem with adding Gnome 3, but would like it in a
>> completely separate section. We would not want to mix Gnome2 and Gnome3
>> packages. I agree with Andy that the pages
Laurent Dard wrote:
> Le 08/12/2011 05:42, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>> There are two issues. Qt3 and qt4 have completely different libraries,
>> but their build tools, moc and qmake, have the same names. The easy
>> solution there is to put the desired executables first in
DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 06:37 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:38:28 -0600
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> touch tools/edis/EnhancedDisassembly.exports
>> ./configure --prefix=/usr
>> find -name Makefile -exec\
> On 12/05/2011 06:37 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
>> touch tools/edis/EnhancedDisassembly.exports
>> ./configure --prefix=/usr
>> find -name Makefile -exec\
>>sed -ir -e '/^LIBRARYNAME/a SHARED_LIBRARY = 1'\
>>-e 's#BUILD_ARCHIVE :*= 1#NO_&#'
I noticed that libdrm-2.4.28 has been released, but it doesn't build
with the current instructions:
./configure
libdrm 2.4.28 will be compiled with:
libkms yes
Intel API yes
vmwgfx API no
Radeon API yes
Nouveau APIno
make
make[3]: Entering directory `/us
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:58:04 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Now on to Mesa-7.11.2.
>> It fails in make. There are evidently incompatible changes in llvm 3.0.
>>
>> gallivm/lp_bld_debug.cpp:30:40: fatal error:
>> llvm/Target/Ta
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>> On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:58:04 -0600
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Now on to Mesa-7.11.2.
>>> It fails in make. There are evidently incompatible changes in llvm 3.0.
>>>
>>> gallivm/lp_bld_debug.
k...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
> Author: ken
> Date: 2011-12-10 15:45:12 -0700 (Sat, 10 Dec 2011)
> New Revision: 9089
>
> Modified:
>trunk/BOOK/general.ent
>trunk/BOOK/general/graphlib/gegl.xml
>trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml
> Log:
> gegl-0.1.8
Change to lfs70_check
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I was preparing to update poppler to 0.18.2 (gimp-2.6.11 needs a
> patch, everything else I've built was ok with this version). But in
> checking the deps against the old 0.14.4 in the book I see that qt3
> used to be supported. Well it ain't now. So, I won't touch this
> un
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Hello Ken,
> Thanks for updating the gimp, it was on my todo list but I wanted to
> update webkit first as the gimp uses it to view the help files. At
> least, it does for me, however, I don't see webkit mentioned on the
> gimp page as an optional dependency? Should I add it
Mostly for DJ,
I finally finished going through Xorg. I always get a sense of
satisfaction when bringing it up for the the first time on a new system.
It's the same feeling when I start LFS for the first time after a major
update.
DRI and glxgears/glxinfo worked right off the bat. glxgears w
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:13:08 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Mostly for DJ,
>>
>> I finally finished going through Xorg. I always get a sense of
>> satisfaction when bringing it up for the the first time on a new system.
>> It'
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:13:08 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> BTW, I built in /opt/xorg. I like to do that so I can build another
>> version of xorg without changing the current programs that would be the
>> case if installing in /usr.
>
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 12:09:24 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> What you do is have a symlink of /opt/xorg -> xorg-7.6-2, build with a
>> different prefix and when ready to test, change the symlink. Works
>> great for kde, qt, gnome, fop, a
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 12:04:10 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> I thought it's primary use was a benchmark. I can't ever remember
>> running it at less than about 200 fps.
>
> http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Glxgears_is_not_a_Benchm
Todd Simpson wrote:
> That's one of the things I did to get it working. I built libdrm-2.4.23
> with this configure option, I rebuilt the kernel (version 3.1.0) with
> Nouveau as a module, and I built the nouveau driver module for X. As
> Andrew Benton observed, the latter has to be downloaded w
Forwarding to BLFS-dev
sparklerc...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear bdubbs:
>
> BLFS Chapter 12. Programming
> LLVM-3.0
>
> Install llvm by running the following commands:
>
> sed -ir -e '/^LIBRARYNAME/a SHARED_LIBRARY = 1' \
> -e 's#BUILD_ARCHIVE :*= 1#NO_&#' \
> -e '/^USEDLIBS/s# ([A-Za-z]*).a# -l
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:30:24 -0700 (MST)
> bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
>
>> Author: bdubbs
>> Date: 2011-12-11 22:30:20 -0700 (Sun, 11 Dec 2011)
>> New Revision: 9100
>>
>> Modified:
>>trunk/BOOK/general.ent
>>trunk/BOOK/general/genlib/libglade.xml
>>trunk
sparklerc...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Bruce:
>
> I don't know why the command resulted in an error: invalid reference
\1 on `s' command's RHS
> mm... maybe it's a bad idea to use -ir option and -e with the 'find'
command ?
>
> In order to make sure sed command executable,
> I try to remove -r op
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:08:58 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> \
>> sed -ir -e '/^LIBRARYNAME/a SHARED_LIBRARY = 1' \
>> -e 's#BUILD_ARCHIVE :*= 1#NO_&#' \
>>
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:16:39 +
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:34:42 -0600
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Then why is is working for me? Note 'sed -ir'
>> Sorry, I hadn't noticed the -r
>&g
Andrew Benton wrote:
> I've figured it out in the bath.
LOL.
> The -i and the -r need to be separated.
> This works without the brackets escaped:
>
> find -name Makefile -exec \
> sed -i -r -e '/^LIBRARYNAME/a SHARED_LIBRARY = 1'\
> -e
I installed seamonkey according to the new instructions. Overall, noce
job Andy.
I have a couple of comments.
First, the mozconfig is missing EOF. I'll fix that.
Second, I think we used to install enigmail with seamonkey. Has anyone
tried that?
Third, I think it would be better to be more
DJ Lucas wrote:
> This should work...
DJ, are you going to commit the change?
Also, s/staring/starting/ in a comment.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Laurent Dard wrote:
> Le 06/12/2011 20:12, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>> Perhaps they should be in the book, but I'd like to put our emphasis on
>> updating what's in the book right now. There are also things that we
>> may want to remove, e.g. qt3/kde3 but I need
DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> DJ Lucas wrote:
>>
>>> This should work...
>> DJ, are you going to commit the change?
>>
>
> I'm out for a few days. Just throwing up a quick suggested change
> while I had a few seconds to lo
Laurent Dard wrote:
> Le 14/12/2011 04:26, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>>I'm investigating Trinity. To start I need the libpng-15 patch for
>> qt3. Do you know where I can find it?
>
> I attach it.
Thanks.
> I posted it in this bug report:
> http://bugs.pearsonc
FYI.
There is a new page for basic references:
http://refspecs.linuxbase.org/
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Laurent Dard wrote:
> Le 14/12/2011 09:26, Laurent Dard a écrit :
>> Le 14/12/2011 04:26, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>>>I'm investigating Trinity. To start I need the libpng-15 patch for
>>> qt3. Do you know where I can find it?
>> I attach it.
Thanks.
I&
Wayne,
In the D-BUS instructions, what does this mean?
useradd -c "D-BUS Message Daemon User" -d /dev/null \
-u 18 -g messagebus -s /bin/false messagebus || [ $? == 9 ]
Accidental update from a script?
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http:/
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> On 15/12/11 16:28, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Wayne,
>>
>>In the D-BUS instructions, what does this mean?
>>
>> useradd -c "D-BUS Message Daemon User" -d /dev/null \
>> -u 18 -g messagebus -s /bin/false message
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:25:17 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Also, the construct is not explained. I think it should be removed.
>
> I agree it should be explained, then people can make an informed
> choice. I don't mind that it's di
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I'm just starting to look at bumping dbus to 1.4.16, I'll
> pick this up when I change it.
>
> As always, don't hold your breath waiting for me to do it :)
We'll have to figure out how we want ot present this:
wget http://dbus.freedesktop.org/releases/dbus/dbus-1.4.16.tar.
More on D_BUS. The install creates /var/run/dbus, but that will go away
with a reboot. We need to figure out a way to create it upon boot.
The first LFS boot script, mountvirtfs, does:
mkdir -p /run
mount -n /run || failed=1
mkdir -p /run/{var,lock,shm}
The /etc/sysconfig/rc.site is sourced s
DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 07:10 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> More on D_BUS. The install creates /var/run/dbus, but that will go away
>> with a reboot. We need to figure out a way to create it upon boot.
>>
>> The first LFS boot script, mountvirtfs, does:
>>
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> I'm just starting to look at bumping dbus to 1.4.16, I'll
>> pick this up when I change it.
>>
>> As always, don't hold your breath waiting for me to do it :)
>
> We'll have to
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:46:48 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> This is getting complicated. I can build and install dbus-1.4.16.tar.gz
>> without noticing any problems.
>>
>> In order to run the tests, I need:
>>
>> D-Bus G
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:10:04PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> More on D_BUS. The install creates /var/run/dbus, but that will go away
>> with a reboot. We need to figure out a way to create it upon boot.
>
> Is that a theoretical problem, or is it ac
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:54:30PM -0700, bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
>> Author: bdubbs
>> Date: 2011-12-16 12:54:18 -0700 (Fri, 16 Dec 2011)
>> New Revision: 9117
>>
>> Modified:
>>trunk/BOOK/general.ent
>>trunk/BOOK/general/genlib/gobject-introspection.xml
>>
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:54:30PM -0700, bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org
>> wrote:
>>> Author: bdubbs
>>> Date: 2011-12-16 12:54:18 -0700 (Fri, 16 Dec 2011)
>>> New Revision: 9117
>>>
>>> Modif
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:27:29 +
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>> Ah, I see, you build dbus but not the bootscripts. AFAIK, the
>> bootscript has been required for a long time. I see no obvious
>> reason to add dbus-launch to .xinitrc.
>
> I also see no reason to add dbus-lau
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 06:03:42PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I suspect (but am not sure) that dbus is not very useful on a non-gui
>> desktop or server. If that's the case, then launching via dbus-launch
>> to .xinitrc makes sense.
>>
>
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> Bruce,
> pycairo-1.10.0 is actually depended on Python3 so should it not be
> called py3cairo? The url is broken (should be bz2 rather than xz).
I didn't intend to update pycairo, only py2cairo. I left it at version
1.8.8. The link works for me. The naming is not up t
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:10:48 +1100
> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>
>> My preference is option 4) /etc (Something that Fedora and Ubuntu uses,
>> just to name a few)
>
> +1 for this. I install my gconf stuff --sysconfdir=/etc
I agree.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 05:12:38PM +, Andrew Benton wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:44:25 +
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, I should rephrase the question - *how* do you get the
>>> release tarball ?
>> Sorry, I used the ftp link. I didn't realise the http link
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 11:24 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Andrew Benton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:10:48 +1100
>>> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>>>
>>>> My preference is option 4) /etc (Something that Fedora and Ubuntu uses,
>&g
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:59:31 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Doesn't --sysconfdir=/etc imply /etc/gnome? I thought the problem was
>> moving it away from /usr/etc/gnome.
>
> It's /etc/gconf
That's fine.
-- Bruce
--
ht
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> On 21/12/11 05:36, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> On 12/20/2011 11:24 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Andrew Benton wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:10:48 +1100
>>>> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> M
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> Just looking at my gnome 2.30.2 installation. You can also argue that
> having /etc/gnome is not compliant because it has dbus in two locations
> /etc/gnome/2.30.2/dbus-1 and /etc/dbus-1.
Are they the same? In /etc/dbus-1 I have:
session.conf session.d system.conf
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On my partial-gnome installation (apart from the gnome2 packages
> previously mentioned, I built gcalctool, gucharmap,
> epiphany{,-extensions}, gstreamer/plugins, totem, yelp from 3.2 -
> plus their many required dependencies) I have the following
> directories in /etc/gnome:
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 05:50:31PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> My only concern is to keep something like the /etc directory at a
>> reasonable number of entries. Right now I have 90. Compare that to
>> ubuntu that has 217 or RHEL with 199. I think of
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I don't use gnome itself, but I have to build a lot of gnome packages
> to get to the few parts I use (as well as abiword and gnumeric, I use
> epiphany and epiphany-extensions, yelp, gcalctool, gucharmap). Until
> this build I've used totem, but now that totem uses clutter it
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I'll need to get a non-commitable
> copy of the book without the svn stuff,
Use:
svn export svn://linuxfromscratch.org/BLFS/trunk/BOOK BLFS
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscrib
Ken Moffat wrote:
> 3. Gdb - Useful if you have to debug a program, but not part of
> gnome. I've stopped building it, but arguably it should be in the
> book.
If you add this, it should be in Chapter 12, Programming. The packages
there are in alpabetical order.
Another package that's probabl
Nathan Coulson wrote:
> /sbin/setcap cap_setfcap=i /sbin/setcap
> Failed to set capabilities on file `/sbin/setcap' (Operation not supported)
> usage: setcap [-q] [-v] (-r|-|) [ ... (-r|-|)
> ]
Hmm, I didn't have any problems. I think you need EXT3_FS_XATTR set in
the kernel config, but I rea
Nathan Coulson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Nathan Coulson wrote:
>>
>>> /sbin/setcap cap_setfcap=i /sbin/setcap
>>> Failed to set capabilities on file `/sbin/setcap' (Operation not supported)
>>> usage: setcap [-
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 06:16:06PM -0800, Nathan Coulson wrote:
>> make -C progs install
>> make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/raid5/book/blfs/04/libcap-2.22/progs'
>> mkdir -p -m 0755 /sbin
>> for p in getpcaps capsh getcap setcap ; do \
>> install -m 0755 $p /sbin ; \
>> d
Has anyone done Iced Tea with LFS 7? Personally, I try to stay away
from Java, but some packages need it so I was going to install it.
There do seem to be some updates from what we have in the book.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfroms
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I must admit, it had slipped my mind once I got 7.0
> running, and I still don't grok why only some of us hit the problem.
> But there's *so much* still to do :)
Agree. I've been at it pretty solid ever since LFS 7.0 in late October.
On one hand, I'm happy with the progres
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 05:01:20PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> The largest part is, I think, Gnome.
>
> I do believe you are right - well over 200 packages
> changed/added/moved (includes old packages moved to obsolete/).
> Ever wish you hadn't
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:35:30 -0700 (MST)
> bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
>
>
>> -./configure --prefix=/usr
>> --docdir=/usr/share/doc/xine-lib-&xine-lib-version; &&
>> +./configure --prefix=/usr \
>> +--with-external-ffmpeg \
>> +--doc
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Looking at my build log, even though I didn't specify
> --with-external-ffmpeg configure detected the installed ffmpeg and used
> it:
> checking for FFMPEG... yes
> checking for FFMPEG_UTIL... yes
> checking for FFMPEG_POSTPROC... yes
> checking ffmpeg/avutil.h usability...
On Jan 2, 2012 8:52 PM, "Ken Moffat" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 09:04:27PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 08:16:33PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > >
>
> And since I'm replying to myself, a question for Bruce and anyone
> else building trinity - can trinity's kdegraph
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 09:05:08PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> On Jan 2, 2012 8:52 PM, "Ken Moffat" wrote:
>>> And since I'm replying to myself, a question for Bruce and anyone
>>> else building trinity - can trinity's kdegraph
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we think it can help, the French translation team wishes to report
> you 2 little issues in the book.
>
> The lest important is in the changelog. Since the reorganization of
> changelog, the changes between 2011, January and March have disappeared
> compl
According to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155472#c4
libart_lgpl is no longer being maintained. The Trinity guys have taken
it and made some corrections.
A look at the book shows libart_lgpl is also used by libgnomeprint and
libgnomecanvas. Is this use still relevant? Should I p
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 06:12:36PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> According to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155472#c4
>> libart_lgpl is no longer being maintained. The Trinity guys have taken
>> it and made some corrections.
>>
Denis Mugnier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we think it can help, the French translation team wishes to report
> you a little comment about the book.
>
> In the file libdbusmenuqt.xml, the lines 88 and 89 are repeated
> immediately after.
Fixed. Thanks.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mail
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> It seem there is a misprint.
>
> sed -i -e 's/python-3.2-docs-html.tar.bz2/python-3.2.2-docs-html.tar.bz2/'
The same problem in is Python2. Fixed. Thanks.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/bl
Denis Mugnier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we think it can help, the French translation team wishes to report
> you a little mistake in the changelog.xml file.
>
> it is written 2011 instead of 2012 in the modification dates.
OK, fixed. Thanks.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listi
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> $ uname -a
> Linux VMWLFS70 3.2.0 #1 SMP Sun Jan 8 22:25:33 BRT 2012 i686 i686 i386
> GNU/Linux
>
> These packages were successfully installed:
>
> $ paco -dd openssl gnutls sudo Linux-PAM | sort
> 07-Jan-2012 00:35 openssl-1.0.0f
> 07-Jan-2012 20:55 gnutls-3.0.10
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> --- Em seg, 9/1/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
>> actually current is
>>
>> gnutls-3.0.11.tar.xz
>
> I mentioned the packages becauseit was aked (I thought it was you) to
> inform when upgrading with respect to the boo
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Noting your $subject, you do realise that in blfs you are
> responsible for your own security ? Your distro, your rules.
Yes, but we don't intentionally put in things that are security issues.
> For --enable-shared --disable-static : anything linked to this will
> be lin
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I prefer to reduce my possible exposure.
That's understandable.
> After discovering
> sysvinit wanted a static libgcrypt (I think - see my previous posts
> on lfs-support in the thread about perl and libz)
I did a search back to Feb 2009 on lfs-support (my history) but c
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 04:28:48PM -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> I do care about security, so I should be worried abou that? Anyway, I will
>> remove PAM (after your and Bruce's comments).
>>
> I can't resist misquoting Paul Vixie - if I can persuade you to
> remove P
Has anyone done a kvm or qemu installation in LFS? Right now I'm
working on dracut so I can put in instruction for an initramfs in the
filesystems section of the book, but the testing wants either a kvm or
qemu installation to run.
I can back up and research these and put them in the book, but
Jeremy Henty wrote:
> The configure command for Cups-1.5.0 has an argument
> --with-docdir=/usr/share/doc/1.5.0 . Surely this should be
> --with-docdir=/usr/share/doc/cups-1.5.0 ?
Yes. The options also needed to be reformatted because they were
running way beyond the right side of the screen.
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Still creating individual diffs for the packages in Wayne's book.
> At gtk+3 I noticed that the book is newer, so obviously I won't use
> that diff, but both pages show
>
> Last updated on 2007-04-04 20:42:53 +0100
>
> I'm guessing the page was copied from a different page a
Nathan Coulson wrote:
> Not any time to proofread this, but this is what I use
>
> echo > /etc/qemu-ifup << "EOF"
> ip addr add 0.0.0.0 dev $1
> ip link set $1 up
> brctl addif br0 $1
> EOF
Nathan, this is exactly what I need. In the above, do you need
brctl addbr br0
or is qemu supposed t
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 04:32:39 -
> "BLFS Trac" wrote:
>
>> #1554: lm_sensors
>> -+--
>> Reporter: bdubbs@… |Owner: blfs-book@…
>>
>> Type:
Nathan Coulson wrote:
>> When I run the following on the host
>>
>> brctl addbr br0
>> ip addr add 0.0.0.0 dev br0
>> ip link set br0 up
>> brctl addif br0 eth0
>>
>> That last command kills my normal eth0 connection. I had to reboot to
>> get it back.
>
> br0, should act like a hardware
Qrux wrote:
> I'm also not a bridging expert, but Nathan's explanation sounds very
> reasonable: saying "br0 becomes a switch" is a good analogy with a
> nice visual image. I don't know the specifics of what's happening in
> the kernel, but when you form a bridge, the original hardware
> interfac
501 - 600 of 2977 matches
Mail list logo
