Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > On 08/12/11 15:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I don't have a problem with adding Gnome 3, but would like it in a >> completely separate section. We would not want to mix Gnome2 and Gnome3 >> packages. I agree with Andy that the pages should be marked. It's easy >> enough to define an entity in general.ent and just place it in each page >> like we do &lfs70_checked; >> >> At some point when Gnome3 is stable and everyone agrees, we could then >> just drop Gnome2 from the book. >> >> -- Bruce > > That is a lot of work having two versions of Gnome in the same book. > There are a lot of duplicated packages (ids) that need to be separated > out, and I'm not just talking about the packages within the Gnome > sections. e.g gvfs, libunique,... and then there are all the other refs. > I'm prepared to drop the pages in as is replacing gnome2, and I can > probably start this weekend, but having a separated version would > require applying new unique ids and index refs to all the existing pages.
I see your point. I'm not generally a Gnome user, so it doesn't really affect me. I'd say that you should use your judgment about how much it will affect other users and drop it in when you think it's ready. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
