On 8/26/2019 7:22 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
The solution, is to "hardcode" the fact glibc is gnu hash
compatible by inserting "Provides: rtld(GNU_HASH)" within
glibc spec file (a simple marker).
Not exactly. I think you've misunderstood my suggestion here. Let me try
to
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:22:34PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> Well.
> rtld(GNU_HASH) is not something really existing, it is an rpm marker.
>
> glibc provide 2 kind of hashing functions to access libraries header.
> the sysv and the gnu one.
>
> objdump -h /usr/bin/vi |
Hello Guys,
I really appreciated your help on this story, I (strongly)
believe I found the solution and restarted the full (800) build
(no laughs in the back of the room please) again. It is a 3 hours
process (before I can get the expected result/proof), I am confident
enough about the analyze
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> Still find 75 by grepping 'saved ' (with a space after, otherwise there are
> false positive compiled filenames)
>
Yes, I typo'd ' saved ' in my earlier post.
> A lot of of fonts, but several other packages, and
Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 02:41:19PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
On 08/26/2019 02:23 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 02:05:07PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
thanks for all your comments...
Ken comment about
Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
On 08/26/2019 09:23 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello guys (Ken, DJ and Pierre),
Thanks to have bring your "pint of brain juice".
On 08/26/2019 01:50 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 25/08/2019
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 02:41:19PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 08/26/2019 02:23 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 02:05:07PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > thanks for all your comments...
> > > Ken comment about using
On 08/26/2019 02:23 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 02:05:07PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
thanks for all your comments...
Ken comment about using 38 external parts instead of 77
is having wide implications.
- You can have a decent libreoffice,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 02:05:07PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> thanks for all your comments...
> Ken comment about using 38 external parts instead of 77
> is having wide implications.
> - You can have a decent libreoffice, without java,clucene and openldap
You misunderstood -
On 08/26/2019 01:24 PM, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
My worry (Hoping to be paranoiac) and this concern the book:
- Libreoffice Book directives are such, that 77 components are
added/downloaded within external/tarballs
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 05:41:15PM +0200, Armin K. via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> You seem to be missing one important piece of software in this
> discussion, and that's the one and only device manager, the (E)Udev.
> (E)Udev is responsible for "tagging" a device that can be accessed
> through a seat
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
My worry (Hoping to be paranoiac) and this concern the book:
- Libreoffice Book directives are such, that 77 components are
added/downloaded within external/tarballs directory, this
between the configure phase and the build
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:11:59PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 08/26/2019 09:23 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > Hello guys (Ken, DJ and Pierre),
> > >
> > > Thanks to have bring your "pint of brain juice".
> > >
Just a
On 08/26/2019 09:23 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello guys (Ken, DJ and Pierre),
Thanks to have bring your "pint of brain juice".
On 08/26/2019 01:50 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 25/08/2019 21:49, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev
Armin K. via blfs-dev wrote:
On 25. 8. 2019. 19:38, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/25/19 12:18 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
[snip]
/dev/input/xxx. Actually, I don't think polkit is involved for
accessing
those: it is the whole purpose of dbus to provide access to hardware
On August 26, 2019 7:31:54 AM CDT, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev
wrote:
>Hello guys (Ken, DJ and Pierre),
>
>Thanks to have bring your "pint of brain juice".
>
>On 08/26/2019 01:50 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
>> On 25/08/2019 21:49, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
>>> Hello guys
On 8/26/19 10:41 AM, Armin K. via blfs-dev wrote:
On 25. 8. 2019. 19:38, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/25/19 12:18 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
[snip]
/dev/input/xxx. Actually, I don't think polkit is involved for accessing
those: it is the whole purpose of dbus to provide
On 25. 8. 2019. 19:38, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/25/19 12:18 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
[snip]
/dev/input/xxx. Actually, I don't think polkit is involved for accessing
those: it is the whole purpose of dbus to provide access to hardware
devices
for normal users.
Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello guys (Ken, DJ and Pierre),
Thanks to have bring your "pint of brain juice".
On 08/26/2019 01:50 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 25/08/2019 21:49, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello guys (and girls).
I need your wisdom... Let's
Hello guys (Ken, DJ and Pierre),
Thanks to have bring your "pint of brain juice".
On 08/26/2019 01:50 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 25/08/2019 21:49, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello guys (and girls).
I need your wisdom... Let's share a pint of brain juice.
Here's the
20 matches
Mail list logo
