On Mon, Apr 09, at 02:49 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> On 04/09/2018 02:18 PM, Richard Melville wrote:
>
> > Well, I disagree. Joel Sing has made it clear that he wants libressl to
> > be a drop-in replacement for openssl. He has also stated publicly that
> > he thinks opaque data structures (the basis
On April 7, 2018 5:42:26 PM CDT, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>It's disturbing that openssh still requires a 60K patch to build with
>openssl-1.1.0. openssl-1.1.0. has been in release since August 2916.
Memory is fuzzy, but IIRC, this was due to lack of FIPS, which has weak
On 04/10/2018 10:29 AM, Richard Melville wrote:
On 9 April 2018 at 21:59, Tim Tassonis > wrote:
On 04/09/2018 09:18 PM, Richard Melville wrote:
On 9 April 2018 at 17:31, Tim Tassonis
On 9 April 2018 at 21:59, Tim Tassonis wrote:
> On 04/09/2018 09:18 PM, Richard Melville wrote:
>
>> On 9 April 2018 at 17:31, Tim Tassonis st...@decentral.ch>> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/09/2018 09:47 AM, Richard Melville wrote:
>>
>> On 7 April
On 9 April 2018 at 20:49, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> On 04/09/2018 02:18 PM, Richard Melville wrote:
>
> Well, I disagree. Joel Sing has made it clear that he wants libressl to
>> be a drop-in replacement for openssl. He has also stated publicly that he
>> thinks opaque data
On 9 April 2018 at 17:31, Tim Tassonis wrote:
> On 04/09/2018 09:47 AM, Richard Melville wrote:
>
>> On 7 April 2018 at 23:48, Tim Tassonis st...@decentral.ch>> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/08/2018 12:42 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>> It's disturbing
On 04/09/2018 09:47 AM, Richard Melville wrote:
On 7 April 2018 at 23:48, Tim Tassonis > wrote:
On 04/08/2018 12:42 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
It's disturbing that openssh still requires a 60K patch to build
with openssl-1.1.0.
On 7 April 2018 at 23:48, Tim Tassonis wrote:
> On 04/08/2018 12:42 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> It's disturbing that openssh still requires a 60K patch to build with
>> openssl-1.1.0. openssl-1.1.0. has been in release since August 2916.
>>
>
> I guess that's probably
On Sun, Apr 08, at 12:48 Tim Tassonis wrote:
> On 04/08/2018 12:42 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > It's disturbing that openssh still requires a 60K patch to build with
> > openssl-1.1.0. openssl-1.1.0. has been in release since August 2916.
>
> I guess that's probably because they just concentrate
On 04/08/2018 12:42 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
It's disturbing that openssh still requires a 60K patch to build with
openssl-1.1.0. openssl-1.1.0. has been in release since August 2916.
I guess that's probably because they just concentrate on their own libressl.
Tim
--
It's disturbing that openssh still requires a 60K patch to build with
openssl-1.1.0. openssl-1.1.0. has been in release since August 2916.
The patch from Arch seems to work well.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
11 matches
Mail list logo