[blfs-dev] openssh-7.7p1

2018-04-10 Thread ag
On Mon, Apr 09, at 02:49 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 04/09/2018 02:18 PM, Richard Melville wrote: > > > Well, I disagree.  Joel Sing has made it clear that he wants libressl to > > be a drop-in replacement for openssl.  He has also stated publicly that > > he thinks opaque data structures (the basis

Re: [blfs-dev] openssh-7.7p1

2018-04-10 Thread DJ Lucas
On April 7, 2018 5:42:26 PM CDT, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >It's disturbing that openssh still requires a 60K patch to build with >openssl-1.1.0. openssl-1.1.0. has been in release since August 2916. Memory is fuzzy, but IIRC, this was due to lack of FIPS, which has weak

Re: [blfs-dev] openssh-7.7p1

2018-04-10 Thread Tim Tassonis
On 04/10/2018 10:29 AM, Richard Melville wrote: On 9 April 2018 at 21:59, Tim Tassonis > wrote: On 04/09/2018 09:18 PM, Richard Melville wrote: On 9 April 2018 at 17:31, Tim Tassonis

Re: [blfs-dev] openssh-7.7p1

2018-04-10 Thread Richard Melville
On 9 April 2018 at 21:59, Tim Tassonis wrote: > On 04/09/2018 09:18 PM, Richard Melville wrote: > >> On 9 April 2018 at 17:31, Tim Tassonis st...@decentral.ch>> wrote: >> >> On 04/09/2018 09:47 AM, Richard Melville wrote: >> >> On 7 April

Re: [blfs-dev] openssh-7.7p1

2018-04-10 Thread Richard Melville
On 9 April 2018 at 20:49, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 04/09/2018 02:18 PM, Richard Melville wrote: > > Well, I disagree. Joel Sing has made it clear that he wants libressl to >> be a drop-in replacement for openssl. He has also stated publicly that he >> thinks opaque data

Re: [blfs-dev] openssh-7.7p1

2018-04-09 Thread Richard Melville
On 9 April 2018 at 17:31, Tim Tassonis wrote: > On 04/09/2018 09:47 AM, Richard Melville wrote: > >> On 7 April 2018 at 23:48, Tim Tassonis st...@decentral.ch>> wrote: >> >> On 04/08/2018 12:42 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >> It's disturbing

Re: [blfs-dev] openssh-7.7p1

2018-04-09 Thread Tim Tassonis
On 04/09/2018 09:47 AM, Richard Melville wrote: On 7 April 2018 at 23:48, Tim Tassonis > wrote: On 04/08/2018 12:42 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: It's disturbing that openssh still requires a 60K patch to build with openssl-1.1.0. 

Re: [blfs-dev] openssh-7.7p1

2018-04-09 Thread Richard Melville
On 7 April 2018 at 23:48, Tim Tassonis wrote: > On 04/08/2018 12:42 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> It's disturbing that openssh still requires a 60K patch to build with >> openssl-1.1.0. openssl-1.1.0. has been in release since August 2916. >> > > I guess that's probably

[blfs-dev] openssh-7.7p1 and libressl

2018-04-08 Thread ag
On Sun, Apr 08, at 12:48 Tim Tassonis wrote: > On 04/08/2018 12:42 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > It's disturbing that openssh still requires a 60K patch to build with > > openssl-1.1.0.  openssl-1.1.0. has been in release since August 2916. > > I guess that's probably because they just concentrate

Re: [blfs-dev] openssh-7.7p1

2018-04-07 Thread Tim Tassonis
On 04/08/2018 12:42 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: It's disturbing that openssh still requires a 60K patch to build with openssl-1.1.0.  openssl-1.1.0. has been in release since August 2916. I guess that's probably because they just concentrate on their own libressl. Tim --

[blfs-dev] openssh-7.7p1

2018-04-07 Thread Bruce Dubbs
It's disturbing that openssh still requires a 60K patch to build with openssl-1.1.0. openssl-1.1.0. has been in release since August 2916. The patch from Arch seems to work well. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: