> From: "Douglas R. Reno"
> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 00:56:27 -0600
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail page - Think we are missing a command
>
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
> > On 01/12/2016 04:38, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Upon trying to run the newaliases command in the Configuration
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:53 AM, akhiezer wrote:
> > From: "Douglas R. Reno"
> > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 00:56:27 -0600
> > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail page - Think we are missing a command
> >
> > Pierre Labastie wrote:
> > > On 01/12/2016 04:38, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
>
On 01/12/2016 07:56, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
Pierre Labastie wrote:
On 01/12/2016 04:38, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
Hello,
Upon trying to run the newaliases command in the Configuration
Information page, I'll get the following error:
newaliases: cannot open /etc/mail/aliases: Group writable file
> From: "Douglas R. Reno"
> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 03:17:23 -0600
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Sendmail page - Think we are missing a command
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:53 AM, akhiezer wrote:
>
> > > From: "Douglas R. Reno"
> > > Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 00:56:27 -0600
> > > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] S
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Pierre Labastie
wrote:
> On 01/12/2016 07:56, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
>
>> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/12/2016 04:38, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
>>>
Hello,
Upon trying to run the newaliases command in the Configuration
Information page, I'll
On 01/12/2016 10:38, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Pierre Labastie
mailto:pierre.labas...@neuf.fr>> wrote:
On 01/12/2016 07:56, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
Pierre Labastie wrote:
On 01/12/2016 04:38, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
Hello,
Douglas R. Reno wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:37 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
Anybody else have issue with the pthread-stubs sed? Causes configure to be
generated with "then\n\nfi" (a syntax error) on my system.
IIUC, we want to make the check not required. I believe this is a more
correct sed to
Pierre Labastie wrote:
If I use "su", my umask as root is the same as that of pierre (0002)
If I use "su -", umask is correctly set to 0022 (but of course the working
directory is changed to /root)
what I use in my scripts is
sudo -E sh << ROOT_EOF
ROOT_EOF
If I do that, umask is 0022, and
On December 1, 2016 10:47:40 AM CST, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>Douglas R. Reno wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:37 PM, DJ Lucas
>wrote:
>>
>>> Anybody else have issue with the pthread-stubs sed? Causes configure
>to be
>>> generated with "then\n\nfi" (a syntax error) on my system.
>>>
>>> IIUC, w
DJ Lucas wrote:
On December 1, 2016 10:47:40 AM CST, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Douglas R. Reno wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:37 PM, DJ Lucas
wrote:
Anybody else have issue with the pthread-stubs sed? Causes configure
to be
generated with "then\n\nfi" (a syntax error) on my system.
IIUC,
On 12/01/2016 01:00 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
If we are looking for /pthread_stubs_possible=/ that will not match.
I guess I don't understand what you are saying, or I'm confused as to
which sed you are referring to, but if I'm reading above correctly,
/pthread_stubs_possible/ does match '
DJ Lucas wrote:
On 12/01/2016 01:00 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
If we are looking for /pthread_stubs_possible=/ that will not match.
I guess I don't understand what you are saying, or I'm confused as to
which sed you are referring to, but if I'm reading above correctly,
/pthread_stubs_possibl
On 12/01/2016 01:00 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
If we are looking for /pthread_stubs_possible=/ that will not match.
Holy cow! I'm sorry. This entire thread was a waste of time due to a
broken local copy of the book. Apparently I chose mc instead of tc at
some point when merging a conflicting
13 matches
Mail list logo
