Recently I have managed to run links -g (graphical links) and I just
allow read and write for all for /dev folder to all as work around.
But when I tried INX, definitely it is a huge task for me to make
similar setup on top of lfs:
http://inx.maincontent.net/announce-inx-1.0.html
I think blfs
Below is the list of packages to build INX. It looks like not so huge after all:
http://inx.maincontent.net/1.0-versions-package-list
abcde 2.3.99.6-1ubuntu2
antiword 0.37-2
bsdmainutils
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 03:04:54PM +0700, David Kuntadi wrote:
Below is the list of packages to build INX. It looks like not so huge after
all:
http://inx.maincontent.net/1.0-versions-package-list
I have no interest in this, but it looks like the sort of thing that
might have fitted into
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 05:12:57PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
I have no interest in this, but it looks like the sort of thing that
might have fitted into a hint, so perhaps you could put it in the
wiki (dunno, maybe packages not in BLFS don't fit there).
Among other things, to get into the
David Kuntadi wrote:
Recently I have managed to run links -g (graphical links) and I just
allow read and write for all for /dev folder to all as work around.
Um, workaround for what?
But when I tried INX, definitely it is a huge task for me to make
similar setup on top of lfs:
Below is my response to both Ken and Chris.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Among other things, to get into the book you need to engage an
editor's interest. I find it hard to see why anyone would use a
desktop without X nowadays.
That is what I differ.
David Kuntadi wrote:
Below is my response to both Ken and Chris.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Kuntadi wrote:
Um, workaround for what?
links -g do not have write access to /dev/fb0, and requires to run as root.
BLFS is just a guide for
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I'm just clueless, but can you explain specifically what it is you
are proposing, and how this is any different from, say, building a
standard LFS system and a few select packages from BLFS?
I am suggesting a complete
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, you're suggesting a new livecd, based on LFS, without X?
No. I am suggesting a chapter in BLFS to create complete desktop
environement without x.
David
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ:
David Kuntadi wrote:
If we
could have desktop without x, that would be marvellous. We could have
very fast desktop that could run on very old hardware, and even faster
on new hardware.
Hmm. Browser based management tools from server console is nice use of
fb, but double clicking links
10 matches
Mail list logo
