Re: [blfs-support] Can no longer build Pth-2.0.7
On 19/04/14 11:58, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> On 19/04/14 09:56, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have a strange issue. After successfully building LFS 7.5 + Gnome >>>> 3.12. I've been running on the new build for about a week now with no >>>> issues. I've now come across an issue where I cannot build Pth-2.0.7. It >>>> hangs during configure, just after >>>> 'checking for stack setup via sigaltstack...' >>>> I can see a process conftest running at 100% which was compiled and >>>> executed by the configure script. >>>> Has anyone come across this issue? >>>> The strange thing is that it was built successfully once during the >>>> initial build. >>>> >>>> Not sure if this is related: >>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-11/msg00107.html >>> >>> Don't know about the hang, but I just went and rebuilt pth without issues. > >> Can you please confirm if its was on a 32 or 64 bit build. Mine is a 64 >> bit build. > > Yes it was a 64-bit build. However if the problem is a race condition, > then that wouldn't be determinative. > >-- Bruce > After further investigation, I've narrowed down the issue. It seems that the conftest (checking for stack setup via sigaltstack) hangs when executing from a gnome-terminal (pts/0). From a console (tty2), it works fine, (even though Gnome is still running in the background). Anyone have any ideas on why this would be the case. Thanks. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Can no longer build Pth-2.0.7
On 19/04/14 09:56, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a strange issue. After successfully building LFS 7.5 + Gnome >> 3.12. I've been running on the new build for about a week now with no >> issues. I've now come across an issue where I cannot build Pth-2.0.7. It >> hangs during configure, just after >> 'checking for stack setup via sigaltstack...' >> I can see a process conftest running at 100% which was compiled and >> executed by the configure script. >> Has anyone come across this issue? >> The strange thing is that it was built successfully once during the >> initial build. >> >> Not sure if this is related: >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-11/msg00107.html > > Don't know about the hang, but I just went and rebuilt pth without issues. > >-- Bruce > Can you please confirm if its was on a 32 or 64 bit build. Mine is a 64 bit build. Thanks. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] Can no longer build Pth-2.0.7
Hi, I have a strange issue. After successfully building LFS 7.5 + Gnome 3.12. I've been running on the new build for about a week now with no issues. I've now come across an issue where I cannot build Pth-2.0.7. It hangs during configure, just after 'checking for stack setup via sigaltstack...' I can see a process conftest running at 100% which was compiled and executed by the configure script. Has anyone come across this issue? The strange thing is that it was built successfully once during the initial build. Not sure if this is related: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-11/msg00107.html Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] pycairo 1.10.0 build issues
On 03/27/14 00:58, m...@pc-networking-services.com wrote: >> On 03/26/14 21:20, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I'm having trouble building pycairo. I have both Python 2.7 and 3.4 >>> installed. >>> When executing PYTHON=/usr/bin/python3 ./waf configure --prefix=/usr, I >>> get the following error: >>> >>> ./options() >>> Setting top to : /sources/pycairo-1.10.0 >>> Setting out to : >>> /sources/pycairo-1.10.0/build_directory >>> ./configure() >>> Checking for 'gcc' (c compiler) : ok >>> Checking for program python : /usr/bin/python3 >>> python executable '/usr/bin/python3' different from sys.executable >>> '/usr/bin/python' >>> Checking for python version : (3, 4, 0, 'final', 0) >>> Checking for library python3.4 in LIBDIR : not found >>> Checking for library python3.4 in python_LIBPL : not found >>> Checking for library python3.4 in $prefix/libs : not found >>> Checking for library python3.4m in LIBDIR : yes >>> Checking for program python3.4-config : >>> /usr/bin/python3.4-config >>> command ['/usr/bin/python3', '/usr/bin/python3.4-config', '--includes'] >>> returned 1 >>> >>> Has anyone else come across this issue? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Wayne. >>> >> >> I've just found this: >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504342 >> I'll raise a ticket. >> >> Wayne. >> -- >> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page >> > > Hello Wayne, > > I got the same issue when I attempted to install the first time. I > re-installed python 3.3.4 as per the instructions and was able to > successfully install. > > Regards, > > Christopher. > > I have Python 3.4.0. I did try re-installing Python but it did not resolve the issue. The Gentoo patches fixed the issue. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] pycairo 1.10.0 build issues
On 03/26/14 21:20, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm having trouble building pycairo. I have both Python 2.7 and 3.4 > installed. > When executing PYTHON=/usr/bin/python3 ./waf configure --prefix=/usr, I > get the following error: > > ./options() > Setting top to : /sources/pycairo-1.10.0 > Setting out to : > /sources/pycairo-1.10.0/build_directory > ./configure() > Checking for 'gcc' (c compiler) : ok > Checking for program python : /usr/bin/python3 > python executable '/usr/bin/python3' different from sys.executable > '/usr/bin/python' > Checking for python version : (3, 4, 0, 'final', 0) > Checking for library python3.4 in LIBDIR : not found > Checking for library python3.4 in python_LIBPL : not found > Checking for library python3.4 in $prefix/libs : not found > Checking for library python3.4m in LIBDIR : yes > Checking for program python3.4-config : /usr/bin/python3.4-config > command ['/usr/bin/python3', '/usr/bin/python3.4-config', '--includes'] > returned 1 > > Has anyone else come across this issue? > > Regards, > Wayne. > I've just found this: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504342 I'll raise a ticket. Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] pycairo 1.10.0 build issues
Hi All, I'm having trouble building pycairo. I have both Python 2.7 and 3.4 installed. When executing PYTHON=/usr/bin/python3 ./waf configure --prefix=/usr, I get the following error: ./options() Setting top to : /sources/pycairo-1.10.0 Setting out to : /sources/pycairo-1.10.0/build_directory ./configure() Checking for 'gcc' (c compiler) : ok Checking for program python : /usr/bin/python3 python executable '/usr/bin/python3' different from sys.executable '/usr/bin/python' Checking for python version : (3, 4, 0, 'final', 0) Checking for library python3.4 in LIBDIR : not found Checking for library python3.4 in python_LIBPL : not found Checking for library python3.4 in $prefix/libs : not found Checking for library python3.4m in LIBDIR : yes Checking for program python3.4-config : /usr/bin/python3.4-config command ['/usr/bin/python3', '/usr/bin/python3.4-config', '--includes'] returned 1 Has anyone else come across this issue? Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Polkit configure doesn't recognize PAM
On 07/08/13 12:39, Dave Wagler wrote: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk > wrote: > >> On 07/08/13 04:42, Dave Wagler wrote: >>> I'm trying to install Polkit-0.111 with PAM support; the configure >> command >>> prints these messages (among many others): >>> >>> checking security/pam_modutil.h usability... yes >>> checking security/pam_modutil.h presence... yes >>> checking for security/pam_modutil.h... yes >>> checking security/pam_ext.h usability... yes >>> checking security/pam_ext.h presence... yes >>> checking for security/pam_ext.h... yes >>> checking for pam_vsyslog in -lpam... yes >>> PAM support:no >>> >>> I have installed Linux-PAM-1.1.6, and a Shadow-4.1.5.1 installation does >>> recognize PAM. >>> >>> Any thoughts on what might be wrong? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >> >> You will need to remove the --with-authfw=shadow parameter from >> configure. If you want to be doubly sure, you can replace it with >> --with-authfw=pam. >> >> Regards, >> Wayne. >> > > I read a later post from Bruce first, so it took me a while to read yours. > This did fix the problem. Sorry about that. > > What does replacing --with-authfw=shadow with --with-authfw=pam do for my > system? > > Dave > Its actually mentioned in the book under Command Explanations. --with-authfw=shadow: This parameter configures the package to use the Shadow rather than the Linux PAM Authentication framework. Remove it if you would like to use Linux PAM. By default, without the --with-authfw paramter, it will build using pam authentication (I presume). >From confingure --help: --with-authfw=Authentication framework (none/pam/shadow) Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Polkit configure doesn't recognize PAM
On 07/08/13 04:42, Dave Wagler wrote: > I'm trying to install Polkit-0.111 with PAM support; the configure command > prints these messages (among many others): > > checking security/pam_modutil.h usability... yes > checking security/pam_modutil.h presence... yes > checking for security/pam_modutil.h... yes > checking security/pam_ext.h usability... yes > checking security/pam_ext.h presence... yes > checking for security/pam_ext.h... yes > checking for pam_vsyslog in -lpam... yes > PAM support:no > > I have installed Linux-PAM-1.1.6, and a Shadow-4.1.5.1 installation does > recognize PAM. > > Any thoughts on what might be wrong? > > Thanks, > Dave > > > You will need to remove the --with-authfw=shadow parameter from configure. If you want to be doubly sure, you can replace it with --with-authfw=pam. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Trouble building LibreOffice-4.1.0
On 05/08/13 19:59, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:57:24PM +1000, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>>
>> I've narrowed down the issue.
>> I was setting --with-lang="en-GB en-US" (which is what I had set with
>> the previous version), this resulted in the above error. Even with just
>> en-GB or en-US by itself causes the error. I could only resolve the
>> issue by having this option set to an empty string.
>> What is the implication of having --with-lang="" ?
>>
> According to the Arch wiki, you will only have Afrikaans (assuming
> that you manage to install at least one language pack), e.g. in the
> help files and perhaps in the menus.
>
> I assume that you have built Python-3 ? In 4.0 it was needed for
> the translations.
>
> ĸen
>
Yes, Python-3 was built.
I have another issue now, It seems to not like neon-0.30.0.
The following error occurs:
[build CXX]
unotest/source/cpp/unobootstrapprotector/unobootstrapprotector.cxx
/sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon/NeonSession.cxx:
In member function 'void webdav_ucp::NeonSession::Init()':
/sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon/NeonSession.cxx:793:85:
error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(void*, const char*, const char*,
int, char*, char*)' to 'ne_auth_creds {aka int (*)(void*, const char*,
int, char*, char*)}' [-fpermissive]
In file included from
/sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon/NeonSession.cxx:37:0:
/usr/include/neon/ne_auth.h:132:6: error: initializing argument 3 of
'void ne_add_server_auth(ne_session*, unsigned int, ne_auth_creds,
void*)' [-fpermissive]
/sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon/NeonSession.cxx:794:85:
error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(void*, const char*, const char*,
int, char*, char*)' to 'ne_auth_creds {aka int (*)(void*, const char*,
int, char*, char*)}' [-fpermissive]
In file included from
/sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon/NeonSession.cxx:37:0:
/usr/include/neon/ne_auth.h:134:6: error: initializing argument 3 of
'void ne_add_proxy_auth(ne_session*, unsigned int, ne_auth_creds,
void*)' [-fpermissive]
[build MOD] xmlreader
[build CUT] binaryurp_test-cache
[build CXX] comphelper/qa/string/test_string.cxx
[build CUT] cppu_qa_any
[build CUT] cppu_qa_recursion
[build CUT] cppu_qa_reference
[build CUT] cppu_qa_unotype
make[1]: ***
[/sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/CxxObject/ucb/source/ucp/webdav-neon/NeonSession.o]
Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make: *** [build] Error 2
Reverting back to neon-0.29.6 overcomes this issue.
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Trouble building LibreOffice-4.1.0
On 05/08/13 07:40, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > On 05/08/13 07:17, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> On 04/08/13 18:30, Armin K. wrote: >>> On 08/04/2013 04:34 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I'm having trouble building LibreOffice-4.1.0. Soon after 'make build' >>>> after all the src files are downloaded, I get the following error: >>>> >>>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources >>>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 >>>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/src/libreoffice-translations-4.1.0.4.tar.xz >>>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources: Permission denied >>>> make: *** [get-submodules] Error 126 >>>> >>>> These are the permissions of >>>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources: >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 10003 100 2124 Jul 23 20:40 >>>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources >>>> >>>> If I chmod 755 this file, I then get the following error: >>>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources >>>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 >>>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/src/libreoffice-translations-4.1.0.4.tar.xz >>>> Error: /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 is not a valid LibreOffice core >>>> source directory >>>> make: *** [get-submodules] Error 1 >>>> >>>> This is all done in a chroot environment. >>>> Has anyone else had a similar issue? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Wayne. >>>> >>> >>> I've built it on a running system, so I can't be of much help there. >>> But, did you extract the sources and create the symlinks as instructed >>> in the book? >>> >> >> Yes, all the symlinks have been created as per book. >> > I've actually re-ran the instructions and it has gone past that point. > I'll need to re-view what I have done tonight when I come back from work. > > Thanks, > Wayne. > I've narrowed down the issue. I was setting --with-lang="en-GB en-US" (which is what I had set with the previous version), this resulted in the above error. Even with just en-GB or en-US by itself causes the error. I could only resolve the issue by having this option set to an empty string. What is the implication of having --with-lang="" ? Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Trouble building LibreOffice-4.1.0
On 05/08/13 07:17, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > On 04/08/13 18:30, Armin K. wrote: >> On 08/04/2013 04:34 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I'm having trouble building LibreOffice-4.1.0. Soon after 'make build' >>> after all the src files are downloaded, I get the following error: >>> >>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources >>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 >>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/src/libreoffice-translations-4.1.0.4.tar.xz >>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources: Permission denied >>> make: *** [get-submodules] Error 126 >>> >>> These are the permissions of >>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources: >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 10003 100 2124 Jul 23 20:40 >>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources >>> >>> If I chmod 755 this file, I then get the following error: >>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources >>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 >>> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/src/libreoffice-translations-4.1.0.4.tar.xz >>> Error: /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 is not a valid LibreOffice core >>> source directory >>> make: *** [get-submodules] Error 1 >>> >>> This is all done in a chroot environment. >>> Has anyone else had a similar issue? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Wayne. >>> >> >> I've built it on a running system, so I can't be of much help there. >> But, did you extract the sources and create the symlinks as instructed >> in the book? >> > > Yes, all the symlinks have been created as per book. > I've actually re-ran the instructions and it has gone past that point. I'll need to re-view what I have done tonight when I come back from work. Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Trouble building LibreOffice-4.1.0
On 04/08/13 18:30, Armin K. wrote: > On 08/04/2013 04:34 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm having trouble building LibreOffice-4.1.0. Soon after 'make build' >> after all the src files are downloaded, I get the following error: >> >> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources >> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 >> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/src/libreoffice-translations-4.1.0.4.tar.xz >> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources: Permission denied >> make: *** [get-submodules] Error 126 >> >> These are the permissions of >> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources: >> -rw-r--r-- 1 10003 100 2124 Jul 23 20:40 >> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources >> >> If I chmod 755 this file, I then get the following error: >> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources >> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 >> /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/src/libreoffice-translations-4.1.0.4.tar.xz >> Error: /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 is not a valid LibreOffice core >> source directory >> make: *** [get-submodules] Error 1 >> >> This is all done in a chroot environment. >> Has anyone else had a similar issue? >> >> Thanks, >> Wayne. >> > > I've built it on a running system, so I can't be of much help there. > But, did you extract the sources and create the symlinks as instructed > in the book? > Yes, all the symlinks have been created as per book. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] Trouble building LibreOffice-4.1.0
Hi All, I'm having trouble building LibreOffice-4.1.0. Soon after 'make build' after all the src files are downloaded, I get the following error: /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/src/libreoffice-translations-4.1.0.4.tar.xz /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources: Permission denied make: *** [get-submodules] Error 126 These are the permissions of /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources: -rw-r--r-- 1 10003 100 2124 Jul 23 20:40 /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources If I chmod 755 this file, I then get the following error: /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/bin/unpack-sources /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4/src/libreoffice-translations-4.1.0.4.tar.xz Error: /sources/libreoffice-4.1.0.4 is not a valid LibreOffice core source directory make: *** [get-submodules] Error 1 This is all done in a chroot environment. Has anyone else had a similar issue? Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Cannot build gjs-1.36.1 with JS-17.0.0
On 03/08/13 18:18, Armin K. wrote: > On 08/03/2013 07:04 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I get the following error: >> >> checking for GOBJECT... yes >> configure: error: Package requirements (gobject-introspection-1.0 libffi >> gmodule-2.0 gthread-2.0 gio-2.0 >= 2.36.0 mozjs185) were not met: >> >> No package 'mozjs185' found >> >> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if >> youinstalled software in a non-standard prefix. >> >> Has anyone successfully built this package with JS17? >> >> Wayne. >> > > You can't build official one. Book has different url. > Oh, I didn't notice that. I have another package (0AD) that requires mozjs185 as well. It looks like I'll have to revert. Can the two versions of JS co-exist? Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] Cannot build gjs-1.36.1 with JS-17.0.0
Hi, I get the following error: checking for GOBJECT... yes configure: error: Package requirements (gobject-introspection-1.0 libffi gmodule-2.0 gthread-2.0 gio-2.0 >= 2.36.0 mozjs185) were not met: No package 'mozjs185' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if youinstalled software in a non-standard prefix. Has anyone successfully built this package with JS17? Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Polkit-0.111 dependency question
On 30/07/13 01:20, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Dave Wagler wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Armin K. wrote: >> >>> >>> Current book has JS-17.0.0 instead of SpiderMonkey-1.0.0. And you need >>> JS. It is required. >>> >>> Tried to install JS-17.0.0, but the link to the file seems to be broken; >> wget output is: >> >> --2013-07-29 10:04:53-- >> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/js/js17.0.0.tar.gz >> Resolving ftp.mozilla.org... 63.245.215.56 >> Connecting to ftp.mozilla.org|63.245.215.56|:80... connected. >> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found >> 2013-07-29 10:04:54 ERROR 404: Not Found. > > That should be > > http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/js/mozjs17.0.0.tar.gz > ^^^ > It was just inserted yesterday and I catch those things when I update > the repository. Haven't done that yet today. > > >-- Bruce > Speaking of typos, I think there is another on the JS page. The find command has libmzjs-17.0.a instead of libmozjs-17.0.a. Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] GNOME
On 22/07/13 09:33, Esben Stien wrote: > Fernando de Oliveira writes: > >> Removed from the book. Only what is needed by other packages remained. > > How about announcing this to your users?. I've just spent several days > building everything up to requiring gnome-session. Now you're telling me > that all this was useless and I won't get GNOME up and running on this > build?. > Try this. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/systemd/ You should still be able to salvage your build from here. Curious to know why we have no link from the main page. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Kernel entries for video capture driver
On 20/07/13 04:42, Richard Melville wrote: > I'm trying to use a BT878 video capture card with my BLFS system. > Unfortunately I chose, in a moment of parsimony, a cheap version that does > not have an eeprom. This means that although I have added the correct > driver information to the kernel tree the card won't work. Are there any devices under /dev/dvb/? The only way > I've been able to test it was to run Linux Mint from a USB flash drive and > create the following bttv.conf file to add to the Linux Mint > /etc/modprobe.d directory:- > > alias char-major-81 bttv > options bttv gbuffers=16 card=133,132,133,133 tuner=4,4,4,4 > options i2c-algo-bit bit_test=1 > > This forces the BTTV driver into the correct configuration. > > As I'd really like to maintain a static kernel, rather than a modular > version, does anybody know how I can add the above driver information > directly into the kernel tree so that I can keep my static kernel and not > have to bother with modules. > > Any help would be much appreciated. > > Richard > > > I've recently retired my DVBT project, but just to compare, this are the kernel options I had to set above the default values to get my BT878 card to work. CONFIG_MEDIA_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_VIDEO_DEV=y CONFIG_DVB_CORE=y CONFIG_DVB_NET=y CONFIG_RC_CORE=y CONFIG_V4L_PCI_DRIVERS=y CONFIG_VIDEO_CAPTURE_DRIVERS=y CONFIG_VIDEO_BT848=y CONFIG_VIDEO_BT848_DVB=y CONFIG_DVB_CAPTURE_DRIVERS=y CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV=y CONFIG_I2C=y I'm not sure if my 2 cards had eproms or not, but I did not require an extra options. However, I do know that when I first started using these cards many years ago, I initial had to use modules and some tweaks, but over the years the kernel drivers had improved to such a point where I could just statically build everything into the kernel. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection
On 29/06/13 23:19, Armin K. wrote: > On 06/29/2013 03:12 PM, Armin K. wrote: >> On 06/29/2013 05:38 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >>> On 13/06/13 01:36, Armin K. wrote: >>>>> > Also, forgot to add that I used the temp. instructions with GCC 4.7.2 > ... I don't know what has changed with GCC 4.8 nor if you will need c++ > compiler and libstdc++ library but I believe that for 32bit glibc > bootstrap you only need a static C compiler, for gcc build you either > use original /tools gcc or your final gcc from chap6 lfs. > Thanks for the tips, I'll try them out in the coming weeks/months. This is a long term project for me that has been on my TODO list for the past two years. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection
On 13/06/13 01:36, Armin K. wrote: >> > > I see nothing wrong there. It can be that your ldd is part of 32bit > glibc (was it you that was building multilib CLFS?) and it can't check > 64bit libraries. My practice for multilib LFS (yes LFS) is only to > install 32bit libraries into /lib32 and/or /usr/lib32 and maybe some > required executables to /usr/bin with -32 suffix - gio-querymodules-32, > gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders-32, gtk-query-immodules-2.0-32, > pango-querymodules-32 and so on. (everything is done using DESTDIR method). > Hi Armin, I would be very interested in how you achieved this. Have you got some kind of guide you can post? I too myself would like to install some 32 bit libs, in my case I use ICA Client which is 32 bit only. Currently, I have an old 32bit tarball of libraries which I complied, maybe 5 years ago on a 32 bit system which I just un-tar on my 64bit system. That seems to work fine, but I would like to build a fresh set. I can successfully build a 32 bit glibc onto my 64 bit system using some of the CLFS (cross-tools) instructions, but that is as far as I got. I cannot build gcc with multi lib as I'm not to sure about the prerequisites. Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] glib-2.36 will not build with pcre-8.33
On 04/06/13 17:10, Armin K. wrote: > On 06/03/2013 11:38 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> Hi All, > mv -v /usr/lib/libpcre.so.* /lib && > ln -sfv ../../lib/libpcre.so.1.2.0 /usr/lib/libpcre.so > > This looks wrong to me. > > It should be: ln -sfv ../../lib/libpcre.so.1.2.1 /usr/lib/libpcre.so > > $ ls -l /usr/lib/libpcre.so* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 29 03:40 /usr/lib/libpcre.so -> > libpcre.so.1.2.1 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 29 03:40 /usr/lib/libpcre.so.1 -> > libpcre.so.1.2.1 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 439804 May 29 03:40 /usr/lib/libpcre.so.1.2.1 > > This is what I got on Archlinux. > Thanks Armin, The symlink fixed the issue. Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] glib-2.36 will not build with pcre-8.33
Hi All, I get the following error: checking for Unicode support in PCRE... no configure: error: *** The system-supplied PCRE does not support Unicode properties or UTF-8. It builds fine with pcre-8.32 This issue only arises on a clean build. If installing pcre-8.33 on top of pcre-8.32, then building glib is fine. (unless libpcre.so.1.2.0 is removed). Has anyone else had this issue? Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] MySQL-5.6.11 - Cannot create a new database
On 30/04/13 02:19, Armin K. wrote: > On 04/29/2013 02:01 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> On 29/04/13 20:41, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >>> On 28/04/13 22:51, William Harrington wrote: >>>> On Apr 28, 2013, at 5:19 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: . > Should be fixed now. > Thanks Armin. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] MySQL-5.6.11 - Cannot create a new database
On 29/04/13 20:41, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > On 28/04/13 22:51, William Harrington wrote: >> >> On Apr 28, 2013, at 5:19 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> >>> mysql_install_db --basedir=/usr --datadir=/srv/mysql --user=mysql >>> FATAL ERROR: Could not find my-default.cnf >> >> I don't have my-default.cnf in /usr/share/mysql/support. >> >> I have my-huge.cnf, my-innodb-heavy-4G.cnf, my-large.cnf, my-medium.cnf, >> and my-small.cnf > > I can see these in the 5.5.30 tarball, but there not in the 5.6.11 > tarball. The only file I can see in the 5.6.11 tarball is my-default.cnf . > >> >> When I installed 5.6.11, I used databases I had previous. Today, I >> backed them up, and created them from the book commands to see if I >> could replicate your error, but I didn't have any issues. You may want >> to double check your build commands with the book and see if any typos >> were made. > > I copied and pasted into 2 separate chown environments, both with the > same result. > There is also a minor flaw in the instructions. cat > /etc/mysql/my.cnf > << "EOF" will fail due to a non existent /etc/mysql directory. > >> >> Sincerely, >> >> William Harrington >> >> > > I'll keep Googling for the answer. > > Wayne. > I think there is an issue with the mysql_install_db script itself. On line 433, if I change my $cfg_template= find_in_basedir($opt,"file","my-default.cnf", "share","share/mysql","support-files"); to my $cfg_template= find_in_basedir($opt,"file","my-default.cnf", "share","share/mysql/support","support-files"); then it seems to fix the issue. Not sure how you could not reproduce the error. Can you confirm that you used the mysql_install_db script form 5.6.11. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] MySQL-5.6.11 - Cannot create a new database
On 28/04/13 22:51, William Harrington wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2013, at 5:19 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > >> mysql_install_db --basedir=/usr --datadir=/srv/mysql --user=mysql >> FATAL ERROR: Could not find my-default.cnf > > I don't have my-default.cnf in /usr/share/mysql/support. > > I have my-huge.cnf, my-innodb-heavy-4G.cnf, my-large.cnf, my-medium.cnf, > and my-small.cnf I can see these in the 5.5.30 tarball, but there not in the 5.6.11 tarball. The only file I can see in the 5.6.11 tarball is my-default.cnf . > > When I installed 5.6.11, I used databases I had previous. Today, I > backed them up, and created them from the book commands to see if I > could replicate your error, but I didn't have any issues. You may want > to double check your build commands with the book and see if any typos > were made. I copied and pasted into 2 separate chown environments, both with the same result. There is also a minor flaw in the instructions. cat > /etc/mysql/my.cnf << "EOF" will fail due to a non existent /etc/mysql directory. > > Sincerely, > > William Harrington > > I'll keep Googling for the answer. Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] MySQL-5.6.11 - Cannot create a new database
Hi, I've have tried building this new version but failed on the following command: mysql_install_db --basedir=/usr --datadir=/srv/mysql --user=mysql FATAL ERROR: Could not find my-default.cnf If you compiled from source, you need to run 'make install' to copy the software into the correct location ready for operation. ... 'make install' was definitely run, and the files is located at: /usr/share/mysql/support/my-default.cnf Anyone else had this issue? Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] For {,anti}systemd folks
On 27/01/13 15:49, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > It's perfectly possible to build udev alone. We do that now. Our > Makefile really isn't that complicated. It's just that they have > specifically turned down patches that do just that. The systemd build > system requires intltool (needs XML::Parser), gperf, libcap2, dbus, and > glib (needs libffi and Python). Not exactly the minimal needs for LFS. > You don't need glib to build a minimal systemd system. The minimal requirements are dbus, kmod, util-linux, libcap, xz-utils, gperf, intltool, and linux-headers. What that boils down to are the following extra packages that I needed to build a base LFS system: attr libcap expat XML-Parser intltool gperf dbus systemd The following packages where mot needed: sysklogd sysvinit udev That comes down to 5 more packages to build a systemd system. On top of this, I did not need to install the lfs-bootscripts. Can we count that as a package? That comes down to only 4 more packages. To be fair, I had to replace the 23 scripts from lfs-bootscripts with a single network@.service file to get my network connectivity up and running. A nice feature I really like about systemd is in point 20, that is, all sdtout/stderr of any system service is captured by the journal and each log entry is related back to a process name and pid. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] gnome-terminal
On 11/01/13 11:23, Armin K. wrote: > Dana 11.1.2013 0:37, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL je napisao: >> Hi, >> >> I try building gnome-terminal 3.6 (blfs) and I get, at configure step: >> >> configure: error: gtk-builder-convert not found >> >> It seems that this script only exists in GTK2. So I added on configure line: >> -with-gtk=3.0 >> >> I only installed required dependencies, i.e. not rarian. >> >> Here's ym config.log. >> >> Thanks for your help. >> >> Best regards, >> > > Indeed, gtk-builder-convert is part of GTK+2. I have no idea why > gnome-terminal configure script looks for it. Should we add GTK+2 dep to > gnome-terminal or use --with-gtk=3.0 (I don't remember seeing this switch). > Found this on Gentoo: # gtk+:2 needed for gtk-builder-convert, bug 356239 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356239 Not sure if it has been reported upstream. Using --with-gtk=3.0 does not fix the problem. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] [blfs-dev] spice (libvirt)
On 09/01/13 09:56, Tobias Gasser wrote: > Am 08.01.2013 02:42, schrieb Wayne Blaszczyk: >> >> What happens if you try?: >> --with-gtk=3.0 >> --with-x11 > > checking What rendering backend to use. configure: error: X11 SHM > backend is not compatible with GTK3 > > > >> Can you post your full configure command that you used for spice-gtk and >> for gtk3 and also the configure summaries for both. > > i tried to mail them. as the mail did not reach the list, i put them on > my server: > > http://ebp.dyndns.biz/lfs/libvirt/ > > > thanks for your help > tobias > I think the issue is this: checking X11/XKBlib.h usability... no checking X11/XKBlib.h presence... no checking for X11/XKBlib.h... no I've replicated your error by renaming /usr/include/X11/XKBlib.h to something else and rebuilding spice-gtk. You will need to find out why XKBlib.h is missing. It is part of the libX11 package. Check and see if XKB support was included in your libX11 build. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Problem building firefox-16.0.1
On 21/12/12 08:17, Richard wrote: > > I think I've installed all the required and recommended > packages, plus I installed the optional SQLite-3.7.14.1, > NSPR-4.9.3 and NSS-3.14 packages. I am trying to build > firefox-16.0.1 in LFS-7.2 without using Xulrunner-16.0.1. > When I try to compile I get an error message that it can't > find something called "pysqlite" - should that be part > of SQLite? > > > > Have you re-built Python after installing sqlite? Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] mount /dev/pts problem
On 12/10/12 08:51, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:38:43PM +0100, spiky wrote: >> I have a running blfs system (built on lfs 70) and I then installed >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~wblaszcz/blfs-book-xsl/general/udev.html as >> part of cups dependencies ( No package 'gudev-1.0' found ). >> Now that i ran the udev install I have A problem. "Unable to start >> shell:/bin/bash" >> I can temporary fix by mkdir -v /dev/pts then mount devpts to it, but >> on restart it,s gone >> I have found that there is no /dev/pts. Is there away to fix this maybe >> reinstall udev 173 as per LFS ??? > > Reverting to the same version as in LFS sounds like a good idea : > current BLFS *hopefully* indicates how to rebuild the existing > version of udev for gudev. > > I'm surprised you aren't using the current BLFS book for this : I > merged Wayne's gnome-3.0 things into the book some months ago, since > then Armin has moved it on through 3.2 and 3.4. > > ĸen > I've removed that version of the book so that people don't accidentally start using it. Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] NetworkManager was: Re: Gnome 3.4
On 07/04/12 18:25, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > Has anyone successfully built Gnome 3.4 yet? > I've built it, but I'm having trouble logging into it via GDM. > After putting in my credentials, it seems to start a session, then tries > something in quick succession before throwing me back to the logon > screen. This is whilst I have the nvidia drivers installed. > Without the nvida drivers, I can successfully login in fallback mode. > Unfortunately there a many errors and warnings in the logs so I'm not > sure what is what. > One of the errors that stands out is: > :0-greeter.log.4:gdm-simple-greeter[7353]: CRITICAL: get_column_number: > assertion `i < gtk_tree_view_get_n_columns (treeview)' failed > which has been logged here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=809210 > > Has anyone come across this? > Thanks, > Wayne. > After 2 days of hair pulling, I've finally located a fix for this. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?id=8bb278944496102a4afad46b53e1e8279425aaac I must say that there are a few issues with NetworkManager, namely with the policies. There are a few "Rejected send message" entries in auth.log. Also, starting the NetworkManager daemon causes my network interfaces to go down. Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] Gnome 3.4
Has anyone successfully built Gnome 3.4 yet? I've built it, but I'm having trouble logging into it via GDM. After putting in my credentials, it seems to start a session, then tries something in quick succession before throwing me back to the logon screen. This is whilst I have the nvidia drivers installed. Without the nvida drivers, I can successfully login in fallback mode. Unfortunately there a many errors and warnings in the logs so I'm not sure what is what. One of the errors that stands out is: :0-greeter.log.4:gdm-simple-greeter[7353]: CRITICAL: get_column_number: assertion `i < gtk_tree_view_get_n_columns (treeview)' failed which has been logged here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=809210 Has anyone come across this? Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] open-vm-tools
On 06/04/12 17:23, Thomas de Roo wrote: > On 04/06/12 00:10, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Thomas de Roo wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I’m trying to compile open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-651368. I get this error: >>> >>> ../lib/guestRpc/.libs/libGuestRpc.a(nicinfo_xdr.o): In function >>> `xdr_uint32': >>> /usr/src/blfs/open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-651368/lib/include/vmxrpc.h:190: >>> undefined reference to `xdr_uint32_t' >>> /usr/src/blfs/open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-651368/lib/include/vmxrpc.h:190: >>> undefined reference to `xdr_uint32_t' >>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status >>> make[1]: *** [libvmtools.la] Error 1 >>> make[1]: Leaving directory >>> `/usr/src/blfs/open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-651368/libvmtools' >>> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >>> >>> I checked that >>> /usr/src/blfs/open-vm-tools-2012.03.13-651368/lib/include/vmxrpc.h has >>> "#include". /usr/include/rpc/xdr.h has a line "extern bool_t >>> xdr_uint32_t (XDR *__xdrs, uint32_t *__up) __THROW;". >>> >>> Where should I look for a solution? >> Have you installed libtirpc? >> >> You may have to add -ltirpc to the libraries linked. >> >> -- Bruce > I have libtirpc installed. I tried adding -ltirpc using: > LIBS="-ltirpc" ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --without-x > --without-icu > The Makefile has a line "LIBS = -ltirpc". But I still get this error. > > Thanks, > Thomas Looks like a similar problem I had with libvirt. Try installing portablexdr. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/portablexdr/files I also had a conflict problem with portablexdr and libtirpc, so I uninstalled libtirpc. On a side note, I think the instructions for copying the rpc header files in LFS 7.1 is wrong, well at least the rpc.h file seemed wrong, it had a "config.h" reference in it. Copying the header files from the libtirpc instructions fixed my other problem. (I had to ignore the if statement which checked for the rpc.h file in the first place). Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Problems building gnome-terminal-3.4.0.1 with gtk3.
On 05/04/12 02:23, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:24:57 +0100 > John Burrell wrote: > >> >> >>> >>> checking for SMCLIENT... yes >>> checking for gconftool-2... /usr/bin/gconftool-2 >>> Using config source xml:merged:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults for schema >>> installation >>> Using $(sysconfdir)/gconf/schemas as install directory for schema files >>> checking for gtk-builder-convert... false >>> configure: error: gtk-builder-convert not found >>> >>> >>> Anyone ran into this problem? >>> I'm using the --with-gtk=3.0 switch, and I don't want to use gtk2. >> >> But gtk-builder-convert is installed by gtk+2 so I don't think you have an >> option - > > So does that mean that Gnome-3 requires gtk+-2? > > Andy Looks like it. I haven't completed my 3.4 build yet, but it looks like Metacity still requires gtk+-2. Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Problems building gnome-terminal-3.4.0.1 with gtk3.
On 05/04/12 00:15, John Burrell wrote: > > >> >> checking for SMCLIENT... yes >> checking for gconftool-2... /usr/bin/gconftool-2 >> Using config source xml:merged:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults for schema >> installation >> Using $(sysconfdir)/gconf/schemas as install directory for schema files >> checking for gtk-builder-convert... false >> configure: error: gtk-builder-convert not found >> >> >> Anyone ran into this problem? >> I'm using the --with-gtk=3.0 switch, and I don't want to use gtk2. > > But gtk-builder-convert is installed by gtk+2 so I don't think you have an > option - > > jb. > I know. But according to the NEWS file, version 3.2.0 dropped GTK 2 support. That with the --with-gtk=3.0 switch and the releng JHBuild files not specifying a gtk2 dependency, I thought this might be some kind of bug. Oh well. Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] Problems building gnome-terminal-3.4.0.1 with gtk3.
Hi All. I've started to look at Gnome 3.4 and have ran into a problem with building gnome-terminal. I get the following error: checking for SMCLIENT... yes checking for gconftool-2... /usr/bin/gconftool-2 Using config source xml:merged:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults for schema installation Using $(sysconfdir)/gconf/schemas as install directory for schema files checking for gtk-builder-convert... false configure: error: gtk-builder-convert not found Anyone ran into this problem? I'm using the --with-gtk=3.0 switch, and I don't want to use gtk2. Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] ALSA Utilities-1.0.24.2 won't build
On 23/12/11 23:24, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 19:01:42 +1100 > Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > >> Hi, >> I get the following when trying to build alsa-utils. >> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../include -Wall -I../include >> -I../../alsa-lib/include-g -O2 -MT usecase.o -MD -MP -MF >> .deps/usecase.Tpo -c -o usecase.o usecase.c >> usecase.c:40:27: fatal error: alsa/use-case.h: No such file or directory >> compilation terminated. > > My logs show /usr/include/alsa/use-case.h was installed by > alsa-lib-1.0.24.1. Did you install alsa-lib? > > Andy Found the problem. I had installed an earlier version of alsa-lib (1.0.21). Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] ALSA Utilities-1.0.24.2 won't build
Hi, I get the following when trying to build alsa-utils. gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../include -Wall -I../include -I../../alsa-lib/include-g -O2 -MT usecase.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/usecase.Tpo -c -o usecase.o usecase.c usecase.c:40:27: fatal error: alsa/use-case.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. Anyone else have this problem? Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Problems with a (partial) gnome3 install
On 08/12/11 08:22, Ken Moffat wrote: .. > 1. 'help' no longer works in applications. I had this in the past, > and the solution was to add gvfs. Searching google only finds that > recommendation. But, I've *got* gvfs (1.10.1). Looking at the > build log for an older version on my previous system, GConf support > has been entirely removed [ I guess this used to be the important > part with gnome2/GConf2 ] and FTP/HTTP/WebDAV support is now > enabled. > > Curiously, if I open yelp directly, I can get to all of the > installed application help, but 'Help -> Contents' gives me > Could not display help: Operation not supported > I tried this out myself and I get the same message. This is with a full Gnome 3 install. I'll let you know if I find anything. > 2. 'totem' now uses clutter libraries, and if started from a > terminal it lets you know it (dies immediately): ... > > (totem:8077): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_signal_connect_data: > assertion `G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE (instance)' failed > > (totem:8077): Clutter-CRITICAL **: clutter_stage_set_color: > assertion `CLUTTER_IS_STAGE (stage)' failed > Segmentation fault > I get the same message when I'm in fallback mode (using nv drivers) Using nvidia drivers and the error no longer occurs. So I suspect it is related to not having gnome-shell running. Not that it should not work without it. I did read somewhere about using the latest clutter-gst might fix this. > So, anyone got totem-3 working ? > Yes and no. Under LFS 6.8 it worked fine. Under LFS 7.0, I'm having problems. The following error comes up when launching Totem. shm_open() failed: Permission denied It looks like /run/shm is the culprit. It's permissions are 755. Should it not be 1777? When is /run/shm created and by what? Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] nouveau to radeon transition help needed
On 04/12/11 01:33, luxInteg wrote: > Greetings, > > I have never used ati/radeon graphic cards on amd64 until now. I have used > nvidia gpu's with the opensource nouveau driver. My baptism with > ati/radeon/amd64 is proving a little difficult hence thie email soliciting > help. > advice would appreciated for xorg woking correctly on XORG2. > > yours sincerely > lux-integ Not sure if this will help as I don't have a Radeon card, but I came across this the other day when reviewing my xorg build. Rebuild libdrm with the parameter --enable-nouveau-experimental-api, then rebuild xf86-video-nouveau and see what happens. Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] firefox-8.0.1 on LFS-7.0 : black text on black backgrounds
On 01/12/11 09:01, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:32:53AM +1100, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> I can confirm that I don't have the problems you are describing. >> I think your problem was different to mine. >> I'll let you know if I find something else. >> The only outstanding minor issue I have is a funny character just after >> the word Firefox on the title bar. >> Regards, >> Wayne. > Thanks for confirming it's only me - I'll try disabling pango as > the next step. Cheers. > > ĸen FWIW, I did not have pango disabled. This is my config: --enable-application=browser --enable-optimize --enable-system-sqlite --enable-system-cairo --with-system-jpeg --with-system-nspr --with-system-nss --with-system-png --with-system-zlib --disable-accessibility --disable-gnomevfs --disable-necko-wifi --disable-installer --disable-tests --disable-updater --enable-official-branding --enable-safe-browsing --with-system-libxul Version of some packages: GLib-2.30.2 gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0 gtk+-2.24.8 cairo-1.10.2 with --enable-gl and --enable-tee Pango-1.29.4 atk-2.2.0 pixman-0.20.2 Fontconfig-2.8.0 FreeType-2.4.4 MesaLib-7.9 Regards. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] firefox-8.0.1 on LFS-7.0 : black text on black backgrounds
On 30/11/11 18:31, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > On 30/11/11 13:00, Andrew Benton wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:44:43 + >> Ken Moffat wrote: >> >>> Again, this makes zero difference. What really worries me is that >>> there are similar reports for other gtk+-2 applications. Help, >>> please ! >> >> I'm afraid I'm at a loss. Wayne reported a similar problem and said it >> was solved by installing gtk-engines. When you installed gtk-engines, >> what prefix did you use? Did the shared libraries end up >> in /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines ? >> >> Andy > I must stress that I only got as far as flicking through the menu > without actually launching anything as a test. Next time I boot up my > test box, I'll have a closer look. > Wayne. I can confirm that I don't have the problems you are describing. I think your problem was different to mine. I'll let you know if I find something else. The only outstanding minor issue I have is a funny character just after the word Firefox on the title bar. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] firefox-8.0.1 on LFS-7.0 : black text on black backgrounds
On 30/11/11 13:00, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:44:43 + > Ken Moffat wrote: > >> Again, this makes zero difference. What really worries me is that >> there are similar reports for other gtk+-2 applications. Help, >> please ! > > I'm afraid I'm at a loss. Wayne reported a similar problem and said it > was solved by installing gtk-engines. When you installed gtk-engines, > what prefix did you use? Did the shared libraries end up > in /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines ? > > Andy I must stress that I only got as far as flicking through the menu without actually launching anything as a test. Next time I boot up my test box, I'll have a closer look. Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] firefox-8.0.source -- Mozilla BUG!
On 24/11/11 18:01, Simon Geard wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 22:42 +0100, Claus Regelmann wrote: >> This code can never run on a unix system. Correct me if I'm wrong !!! >> There are further bugs in this source. Mozilla has to solve them. >> We have a work around, and I'll quit. > > This looks like a relic from when /usr/bin/firefox was a shellscript, > wrapping the real binary at /usr/lib/firefox-bin. I'd heard that the > wrapper was no longer present in newer releases... > > Simon. > A bit of an update. If I add a symbolic link: ln -fsv /usr/lib/xulrunner-8.0.1 /usr/lib/firefox-8.0.1/xulrunner Then executing /usr/include/firefox-8.0.1/firefox (with full path) works. Executing firefox or /usr/bin/firefox still doesn't work. However, adding /usr/lib/firefox-8.0.1 to $PATH, then executing firefox does work. The symlink above gets rid of the "Could not find the Mozilla runtime." error. Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] firefox-8.0.source
On 23/11/11 20:30, Jaime Cabrera wrote: > As a workaround, I invoke xulrunner with the path and filename of firefox > application.ini as argument instead of invoking firefox. It seems it works > Can you give the exact command sequence. Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] gdb and Cairo
On 23/11/11 11:23, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:11:55 +1100 > Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > >> Hi, >> Has anyone successfully built Cairo with GDB (GNU Debugger)? >> I've have gdb 7.3.1 installed which is the latest and I get the >> following error when building Cairo: >> >> >> CC libcairo_trace_la-lookup-symbol.lo >> CCLD libcairo-trace.la >> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libbfd.a(format.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S >> against `binary_vec' can not be used when making a shared object; >> recompile with -fPIC >> /usr/lib/libbfd.a: could not read symbols: Bad value >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> make[4]: *** [libcairo-trace.la] Error 1 >> make[4]: Leaving directory `/sources/cairo-1.10.0/util/cairo-trace' >> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/cairo-1.10.0/util' >> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 >> make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/cairo-1.10.0/util' >> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/cairo-1.10.0' >> make: *** [all] Error 2 >> >> I've tried versions 1.10.0 and 1.10.2 with the same result. >> Any ideas on a fix? > > Hi Wayne, > I'm sorry it's taken me so long to get around to answering your > mmessage, I've had a busy day. > Does it work if you configure gdb with CFLAGS-fPIC? > eg: > > CFLAGS=-fPIC ./configure --prefix=/usr > make > make install > > Andy Yes it did work. Thanks. However after further investigation on how other ditros manage this package, Paldo had the best solution. That is, ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-werror make make -C gdb install This only installs the binaries and one of the libraries which is not shared by binutils. Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] firefox-8.0.source
On 23/11/11 06:54, Claus Regelmann wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 01:43 PM, Martin Ward wrote:
>> On 22/11/11 11:49, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>>> On 11/11/11 00:33, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>>> On 11/09/2011 06:07 PM, Jeremy Henty wrote:
>>>>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>>>>> Andrew Benton wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes, with wget I downloaded
>>>>>>> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/8.0/source/firefox-8.0.source.tar.bz2
>>>>>>> It compiled on a 3.1 kernel without patching.
>>>>>> I'd appreciate knowing the instructions you used. I can't do it yet
>>>>>> because I haven't put X on my development system yet.
>>>>> I'm not the person you replied to, but here are my notes on
>>>>> Firefox-[78]* anyway...
>>>>>
>>>>> You must configure cairo with --enable-tee .
>>>>>
>>>>> If you haven't installed yasm then you must disable webm video.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeremy
>>>> Guys, just in case you are not aware, we should probably consider using
>>>> external npapi. We can of course, fix anything that is using the
>>>> incorrect version scheme, but looking to the future, that might be a bit
>>>> of work (OpenJDK specifically will be a PITA, don't know about other
>>>> open source plug-ins).
>>>>
>>>> -- DJ Lucas
>>>>
>>> I am having problems with Firefox 8 myself.
>>> I've built xulrunner and firefox separately with no problems, but when I
>>> try to execute firefox, it comes back with the following message:
>>> Could not read application.ini
>>> Googling comes up with a lot of hits, but no real solutions.
>>>
>>> Strace produces the following:
>>> mmap(0x7f5a2c60, 1048576, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
>>> MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7f5a2c60
>>> stat("/usr/local/bin/firefox", 0x7fff5744a408) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
>>> or directory)
>>> stat("/bin/firefox", 0x7fff5744a408)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or
>>> directory)
>>> stat("/usr/bin/firefox", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=65128, ...}) = 0
>>> lstat("/usr", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
>>> lstat("/usr/bin", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=36864, ...}) = 0
>>> access("/usr/bin/xulrunner/libxpcom.so", R_OK) = -1 ENOTDIR (Not a
>>> directory)
>>> open("/usr/bin/application.ini", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
>>> directory)
>>> write(2, "Could not read application.ini\n", 31Could not read
>>> application.ini
>>> ) = 31
>>> exit_group(1)
>>>
>>> Not sure why it would be checking /usr/bin/xulrunner/libxpcom.so since
>>> /usr/bin/xulrunner is a symbolic link to a script.
>>> Anyway copying the application.ini file to /usr/bin, just takes it to
>>> the next problem:
>>> Could not find the Mozilla runtime.
>>> It seems to me that it is confusing /usr/lib with /usr/bin ?
>>> The mozconfig I used is pretty much the same as what is current in the
>>> BLFS book with slight alterations.
>>>
>>> Any pointers to what the problem might be?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Wayne.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Sounds like you need to put in a symbolic link from /usr/bin/firefox ->
>> /usr/lib/firefox/firefox or similar, I believe this was missing in 8.0,
>> but fixed in 8.0.1
>>
>>
>>
>> martin
> I got the same problem. I think it's a mozilla bug.
> I'm just compiling xulrunner with the following patch. Be patient or try it
> yourself!
> --
> --- mozilla-release/xulrunner/stub/nsXULStub.cpp2011-11-15
> 08:25:26.0 +0100
> +++ mozilla-release-cr/xulrunner/stub/nsXULStub.cpp 2011-11-22
> 18:39:00.0 +0100
> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@
> strncpy(tmpPath, argv[0], sizeof(tmpPath));
> lastSlash = strrchr(tmpPath, '/');
> if (lastSlash) {
> -*lastSlash = 0;
> +// *lastSlash = 0;
> realpath(tmpPath, iniPath);
> } else {
> const char *path = getenv("PATH");
> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@
> nsINIParser parser;
> rv = parser.Init(iniPath);
> if (NS_FAILED(rv)) {
> -fprintf(stderr, "Could not read application.ini\n");
> +fprintf(stderr, "Could not read application.ini: '%s'\n",iniPath);
> return 1;
> }
>
>
> Claus
I'll be patient, I'm just heading off to work.
BTW, version 8.0.1 did not fix the problem.
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] firefox-8.0.source
On 11/11/11 00:33, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 11/09/2011 06:07 PM, Jeremy Henty wrote:
>>
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Andrew Benton wrote:
Yes, with wget I downloaded
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/8.0/source/firefox-8.0.source.tar.bz2
It compiled on a 3.1 kernel without patching.
>>>
>>> I'd appreciate knowing the instructions you used. I can't do it yet
>>> because I haven't put X on my development system yet.
>>
>> I'm not the person you replied to, but here are my notes on
>> Firefox-[78]* anyway...
>>
>> You must configure cairo with --enable-tee .
>>
>> If you haven't installed yasm then you must disable webm video.
>>
>> Jeremy
>
> Guys, just in case you are not aware, we should probably consider using
> external npapi. We can of course, fix anything that is using the
> incorrect version scheme, but looking to the future, that might be a bit
> of work (OpenJDK specifically will be a PITA, don't know about other
> open source plug-ins).
>
> -- DJ Lucas
>
I am having problems with Firefox 8 myself.
I've built xulrunner and firefox separately with no problems, but when I
try to execute firefox, it comes back with the following message:
Could not read application.ini
Googling comes up with a lot of hits, but no real solutions.
Strace produces the following:
mmap(0x7f5a2c60, 1048576, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7f5a2c60
stat("/usr/local/bin/firefox", 0x7fff5744a408) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
stat("/bin/firefox", 0x7fff5744a408)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
stat("/usr/bin/firefox", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=65128, ...}) = 0
lstat("/usr", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
lstat("/usr/bin", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=36864, ...}) = 0
access("/usr/bin/xulrunner/libxpcom.so", R_OK) = -1 ENOTDIR (Not a
directory)
open("/usr/bin/application.ini", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
write(2, "Could not read application.ini\n", 31Could not read
application.ini
) = 31
exit_group(1)
Not sure why it would be checking /usr/bin/xulrunner/libxpcom.so since
/usr/bin/xulrunner is a symbolic link to a script.
Anyway copying the application.ini file to /usr/bin, just takes it to
the next problem:
Could not find the Mozilla runtime.
It seems to me that it is confusing /usr/lib with /usr/bin ?
The mozconfig I used is pretty much the same as what is current in the
BLFS book with slight alterations.
Any pointers to what the problem might be?
Thanks,
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] gdb and Cairo
Hi, Has anyone successfully built Cairo with GDB (GNU Debugger)? I've have gdb 7.3.1 installed which is the latest and I get the following error when building Cairo: CC libcairo_trace_la-lookup-symbol.lo CCLD libcairo-trace.la /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libbfd.a(format.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `binary_vec' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/lib/libbfd.a: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [libcairo-trace.la] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/sources/cairo-1.10.0/util/cairo-trace' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/cairo-1.10.0/util' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/cairo-1.10.0/util' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/cairo-1.10.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 I've tried versions 1.10.0 and 1.10.2 with the same result. Any ideas on a fix? Thanks, Wayne. PS. gdb is a dependency of nemiver, which is part of Gnome 3.2. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
dbus and other services under LFS 7.0
I'm currently looking at getting dbus to start under LFS 7.0 as I was getting the following error: Failed to bind socket "/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket": No such file or directory I did manual re-create the dbus directory under /run and it seemed to fix the problem, but I'm worried that there might be more to do? With this new virtual /run filesystem, is it a matter of getting the startup scripts to re-create the appropriate directories under /run or is there more to it? Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
On 19/11/11 08:42, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Thanks, the reason why I asked for the md5sums was that I'm not familar >> with this sign concept. >> When I run the verify command,I get the following warning message: >> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! >> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the >> owner. >> >> Should there be concern with this? >> This is after doing the following command: >> gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0x517D0F0E > > You have to tell gpg which keys *you* trust. > >-- Bruce Thanks Bruce, I did the follow (Idiot's guide): gpg --edit-key 0x517D0F0E >trust and selected option 5, 'I trust ultimately' ... That got rid of the warning message. Selecting option 4 - 'I trust fully' did not get rid of the warning message. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
On 19/11/11 02:02, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > --- Em sex, 18/11/11, Wayne Blaszczyk escreveu: ... >> Can >> some please post the md5sum for Linux-PAM-1.1.4.tar.bz2. I >> just want to >> make sure I've downloaded the correct version. >> Thanks, >> Wayne > > > > wget -c > http://ftp.df.lth.se/pub/linux/libs/pam/documentation/Linux-PAM-1.1.4-docs.tar.bz2.sign > && > wget -c > http://ftp.df.lth.se/pub/linux/libs/pam/documentation/Linux-PAM-1.1.4-docs.tar.bz2 > && > wget -c > http://ftp.df.lth.se/pub/linux/libs/pam/library/Linux-PAM-1.1.4.tar.bz2.sign > && > wget -c > http://ftp.df.lth.se/pub/linux/libs/pam/library/Linux-PAM-1.1.4.tar.bz2 && > gpg --verify Linux-PAM-1.1.4-docs.tar.bz2.sign Linux-PAM-1.1.4-docs.tar.bz2 && > gpg --verify Linux-PAM-1.1.4.tar.bz2.sign Linux-PAM-1.1.4.tar.bz2 > > > []s, > Fernando de Oliveira > Natal, RN, BRAZIL Thanks, the reason why I asked for the md5sums was that I'm not familar with this sign concept. When I run the verify command,I get the following warning message: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Should there be concern with this? This is after doing the following command: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0x517D0F0E Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
On 18/11/11 03:01, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:06:06 +1100 > Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm now having trouble with Linux-PAM. >> I get the following error: >> >> pam_unix_passwd.c:57:21: fatal error: rpc/rpc.h: No such file or directory >> compilation terminated. >> make[3]: *** [pam_unix_passwd.lo] Error 1 >> make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_unix' >> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules' >> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3' >> make: *** [all] Error 2 >> >> Not sure which package rpc.h belongs to. >> Any help would be appreciated. > > Try configuring pam with --disable-nis > > Andy Thanks for all the suggestions. I think I'll stick with the --disable-nis with Linux-PAM-1.1.4 since I will never use NIS. FYI, version 1.1.3 did not work. Does any one know where the official download site for Linux-PAM is located? It seems that all the kernel.org links are still broken. Can some please post the md5sum for Linux-PAM-1.1.4.tar.bz2. I just want to make sure I've downloaded the correct version. Thanks, Wayne -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: iso-codes - was Re: pkg-config and glib
On 18/11/11 17:32, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > >> Speaking of whitespaces, the first url on the iso-codes page has a >> whitespaces at the end. > > I don't see that. Can you be more specific. > >-- Bruce diff --git a/BOOK/general/genlib/iso-codes.xml b/BOOK/general/genlib/iso-codes.xml index e3c7e06..2ec2121 100644 --- a/BOOK/general/genlib/iso-codes.xml +++ b/BOOK/general/genlib/iso-codes.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ %general-entities; - http://pkg-isocodes.alioth.debian.org/downloads/iso-codes-&iso-codes-version;.tar.bz2 "> + http://pkg-isocodes.alioth.debian.org/downloads/iso-codes-&iso-codes-version;.tar.bz2";> -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
iso-codes - was Re: pkg-config and glib
On 18/11/11 03:37, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> On 17/11/11 00:27, Matijn Woudt wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk >>> wrote: > >> The failure was due to trailing white spaces on the second line of the >> command instructions. i.e. after the backslash. > > Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. > >-- Bruce NP. Speaking of whitespaces, the first url on the iso-codes page has a whitespaces at the end. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0
Hi, I'm now having trouble with Linux-PAM. I get the following error: pam_unix_passwd.c:57:21: fatal error: rpc/rpc.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[3]: *** [pam_unix_passwd.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_unix' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3' make: *** [all] Error 2 Not sure which package rpc.h belongs to. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: pkg-config and glib
On 17/11/11 00:27, Matijn Woudt wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk > wrote: >> Hi, >> I've just finished building LFS 7.0, and thought I start on some BLFS >> packages. I'm trying to build pkg-config (0.26) which requires glib >> (2.30.1), but when I run glib's configure script, It complains that >> pkg-config script could not be found. Has anyone come across this >> dilemma? or am I doing something wrong? >> On a side note, what was the reason to move pkg-config back to BLFS? >> Regards, >> Wayne. > > Hi Wayne, > > The BLFS page for Glib-2.30.1 has a note under Command Explanations: > "PCRE_* and LIBFFI_*: Glib is a prerequsite for pkg_config, but it > wants to use pkg_config during the build process. These environment > variables work around not having pkg_config available." > > Are you sure you took the exact configure line as described in the BLFS book? > > Matijn Thanks for all the replies. The failure was due to trailing white spaces on the second line of the command instructions. i.e. after the backslash. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
pkg-config and glib
Hi, I've just finished building LFS 7.0, and thought I start on some BLFS packages. I'm trying to build pkg-config (0.26) which requires glib (2.30.1), but when I run glib's configure script, It complains that pkg-config script could not be found. Has anyone come across this dilemma? or am I doing something wrong? On a side note, what was the reason to move pkg-config back to BLFS? Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: FYI: using jhbuild to install X
On 13/05/11 06:44, bsquared wrote: > I then downloaded modulesets form x.org and installed. > > If anyone expresses interest, I'll write up more detail. > > Reply to BLFS list. I'm curious to know which moduleset file you used. Can you send me the url link or actual file. The only file I can find is xorg.modules within the git repository which doesn't seem to be version specific, so I can only assume it will install the latest dev versions rather than the 7.6 release. Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Configuration files
On 09/05/11 05:16, Pol Vangheluwe wrote: > The script to create the configuration file for sudo-1.7.4p5 (Version > svn-20110417) contains "&&" at the end of the first line. > I normally copy/paste the instructions from BLFS when building something on > my target machine. > I had to remove this "&&" to create successfully the configuration file. > > Same problem with the scripts to create the configuration files for > xinetd-2.3.14. > > pvg > > > That is the correct syntax. I did a quick test and it works fine. Are you sure the cat command was not returning some kind of an error? Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
libcanberra 0.18 with LFS 6.7 64bit
Hi, Has anyone successfully built libcanberra on LFS 6.7 64bit? I'm getting the following error: Makefile:936: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?). Stop Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: xsltproc segmentation fault
On 07/10/10 01:41, Stuart Stegall wrote: > There's a problem with 64bit, zlib, and libxml2. Libxml2 was linked > with the problematic Zlib. Rebuild libxml2 with --disable-zlib and > the problem goes away. > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Mark Mark wrote: >> Hi All >> I already successfully compiled x-window on a X86 machine (32 bit), now >> while trying to compile libxcb on a X86_64 bit , I have the following error >> : >> >> Note that I patched the source using the command : patch -Np1 -i >> ../libxcb-1.0-sloppy_lock-1.patch >> >> root:/sources/xc/libxcb-1.0# make >> Making all in src >> make[1]: Entering directory `/sources/xc/libxcb-1.0/src' >> /usr/bin/xsltproc --stringparam mode source \ >> --stringparam base-path /usr/share/xcb/ \ >> --stringparam extension-path /usr/share/xcb/ \ >> -o xproto.c ./c-client.xsl xproto.xml >> make[1]: *** [xproto.c] Segmentation fault (core dumped) >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/xc/libxcb-1.0/src' >> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> >> -- >> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page >> I too had a similar problem just this morning (segmentation fault) but with compiling docbook-xsl. Re-compiling libxml2 with the --with-zlib=no option fixed the problem for me. Regards, Wayne -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Hal-0.5.14 svn-20100831 /gz/bz2/
On 06/09/10 08:35, Craig Jackson wrote: > on page http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/hal.html > > In the section "Install the HAL hardware data with the following commands:" > > hal-info-20091130.tar.gz should be hal-info-20091130.tar.bz2 > > because the above hal-info link points to a .bz2. > > Thanks, > > Craig Jackson > craigmjack...@gmail.com > 253-459-5384 cell Thanks, I've updated the Book. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Auto mounting USB thumb drives and CD/DVD
On 11/04/10 22:25, Baho Utot wrote: > On 04/10/10 22:38, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> On 11/04/10 11:42, Baho Utot wrote: >>> On 04/10/10 20:21, Andrew Benton wrote: >>>> On 10/04/10 22:30, Baho Utot wrote: >>>>> On 04/10/10 17:20, Andrew Benton wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [putolin] >>>>> >>>>>> Does it work if you specify the device? eg: >>>>>> >>>>>> cdrecord dev=/dev/cdrom vista.iso >>>>>> >>>>>> Andy >>>>> >>>>> Nope >>>>> >>>>> I still get cdrecord: No such file or directory. Cannot open '/dev/sg*'. >>>>> Cannot open SCSI driver. >>>>> >>>>> ls /dev/sg* >>>>> /dev/sg0 /dev/sg1 /dev/sg2 /dev/sg3 >>>>> >>>> What are the permissions on those? They should be group cdrom and you >>>> should >>>> be a member of the cdrom group, or you could burn the cd as root >>>> >>>> Andy >>> >>> blfs [ ~ ]$ ls -la /dev/sg* >>> crw-rw 1 root disk 21, 0 Apr 10 17:39 /dev/sg0 >>> crw-rw 1 root disk 21, 1 Apr 10 17:39 /dev/sg1 >>> crw-rw 1 root disk 21, 2 Apr 10 17:39 /dev/sg2 >>> crw-rw 1 root cdrom 21, 3 Apr 10 17:39 /dev/sg3 >>> >>> Those are set by udev correct? >> Can you post the following results. >> ls -la /dev/cd* >> ls -al /dev/sr* >> Also, do have the following set in your kernel config? >> Block devices >> Packet writing on CD/DVD media: Y or M >> >> Wayne. >> >> > > blfs [ /boot/LFS-6.5 ]$ ls -la /dev/cd* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 11 08:20 /dev/cdrom -> sr0 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Apr 11 08:20 /dev/cdrw -> sr0 > blfs [ /boot/LFS-6.5 ]$ ls -al /dev/sr* > brw-rw 1 root cdrom 11, 0 Apr 11 08:20 /dev/sr0 > > A grep of the config for the kernel does return anything > grep for CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG If it's not set, then this is most likely your problem. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Auto mounting USB thumb drives and CD/DVD
On 11/04/10 11:42, Baho Utot wrote: > On 04/10/10 20:21, Andrew Benton wrote: >> On 10/04/10 22:30, Baho Utot wrote: >>> On 04/10/10 17:20, Andrew Benton wrote: >>> >>> [putolin] >>> Does it work if you specify the device? eg: cdrecord dev=/dev/cdrom vista.iso Andy >>> >>> Nope >>> >>> I still get cdrecord: No such file or directory. Cannot open '/dev/sg*'. >>> Cannot open SCSI driver. >>> >>> ls /dev/sg* >>> /dev/sg0 /dev/sg1 /dev/sg2 /dev/sg3 >>> >> What are the permissions on those? They should be group cdrom and you should >> be a member of the cdrom group, or you could burn the cd as root >> >> Andy > > blfs [ ~ ]$ ls -la /dev/sg* > crw-rw 1 root disk 21, 0 Apr 10 17:39 /dev/sg0 > crw-rw 1 root disk 21, 1 Apr 10 17:39 /dev/sg1 > crw-rw 1 root disk 21, 2 Apr 10 17:39 /dev/sg2 > crw-rw 1 root cdrom 21, 3 Apr 10 17:39 /dev/sg3 > > Those are set by udev correct? Can you post the following results. ls -la /dev/cd* ls -al /dev/sr* Also, do have the following set in your kernel config? Block devices Packet writing on CD/DVD media: Y or M Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Problems with GDM
On 22/03/10 07:47, Thomas Sapp wrote: > Hello, > I have compiled GDM 2.28.2 using the instructions in the BLFS SVN version > and everything appeared to go smoothly until I launch GDM. > > When I do I get an xwindows session that just has a window in the middle > of it with a computer icon, the hostname, and three buttons (suspend, > restart, shut down). None of the buttons work and there are no > username/password fields at all. There is also a gray bar across the > bottom that has an accessibility icon, a power icon, and the date and > time. > > I have a picture of it that I took with my cell phone because I wasn't > sure how to take a screen shot of it. It's pretty crappy quality but > it is clear enough to see what I am talking about. The picture can be > found at http://code.sappsworld.com/0321001037.jpg > > I've tried re-compiling and verified that all the files the directions > said were correctly modified/created. I'm kinda stumped with this one > and hope someone can help. It's no rush though as I am still able to > get in to X using the startx command. > > Thanks, > Tom Sapp > http://www.sappsworld.com Have you installed ConsoleKit? If not, then that would explain why the buttons don't work. Have you created another user account that you can use? GDM should list all users except for root although there should be a 'other' option. What happens when you press the up and down arrow keys? Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: GVFS isn't loading at session start
On 08/03/10 13:52, Maginot Junior wrote: > My session-local.conf has the follow information: >> I've also seen this before but cannot remember the cause. Can you let me >> know what you have in /etc/dbus-1/system-local.conf, and also have a >> look at the log files under /var/log/gdm. >> Can you also let us know what optional dependencies you had installed >> for both gvfs and gdm. >> Thanks, >> Wayne. >> -- >> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page >> Maginot, I did ask for /etc/dbus-1/system-local.conf and not session-local.conf. If you don't have system-local.conf then this could be your problem. It should contain: http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/dbus/1.0/busconfig.dtd";> /etc/gnome/2.28.2/dbus-1/system.d Substituting the correct Gnome version. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: GVFS isn't loading at session start
On 08/03/10 04:24, Maginot Junior wrote: > Hi. > > > I have built gnome 2.28.1 with gdm 2.20.8 (I notice that 2.28.1 is > missing gdm-setup) and gvfs-1.4.1 (I have updated to gvfs-1.4.3 trying > to fix my problem, no success), my dbus version is 1.2.16 and I'm > using X11R7.5. > > I build gnome using prefix=/opt/gnome, and gvfs was configured with > this parameters: ./configure --prefix=/opt/gnome > --sysconfdir=/etc/gnome/2.28.1 --libexecdir=/opt/gnome/lib/gvfs > > To make dbus start gvfs I included inside /etc/dbus-1/session-local.conf this: > > "-//freedesktop//DTD D-BUS Bus Configuration 1.0//EN" > "http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/dbus/1.0/busconfig.dtd";> > > > > /opt/gnome/share/dbus-1/services > /usr/share/dbus-1/services > > > I've also seen this before but cannot remember the cause. Can you let me know what you have in /etc/dbus-1/system-local.conf, and also have a look at the log files under /var/log/gdm. Can you also let us know what optional dependencies you had installed for both gvfs and gdm. Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: DBus configuration issues: system.d
On 04/02/10 18:43, James Richard Tyrer wrote: > BLFS SVN says to install various GNOME packages with: > > --sysconfdir=/etc/gnome/2.28.2 > > Th9is results in files being installed in: > > /etc/gnome/2.28.2/dbus-1/system.d/ > > I presume that it is necessary to configure something somewhere so that > those files will be found and used. It appears that this is configured in: > > /etc/dbus-1/system.conf > > Or, I should add a file: > > /etc/dbus-1/system-local.conf > > I note that I haven't found any instruction in BLFS SVN on how to do > this. I haven't read the whole book, but I haven't seen anything. If > it is there, please point me to it. > > If not, the question is how to do this. The "system.conf" file has this > line: > > system.d > > This is somewhat confusing since it does not use the full path. > > So, what do I do so that the files in: > > /etc/gnome/2.28.2/dbus-1/system.d/ > > will be found and uses? > > Can I add additional "system.d" directories using a full path? Is this > necessary? > See the BLFS SVN GConf-2.28.0 page, there is a section there that describes how to set this up using the /etc/dbus-1/system-local.conf file. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: gnome-session-2.28.0 install different from blfs svn-20100128
On 31/01/10 06:09, John Burrell wrote: > > The configure command includes these lines: > > --with-at-spi-registryd-directory=$(pkg-config \ > --variable=prefix ORBit-2.0)/lib/at-spi > > configure doesn't recognise these: > > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: > --with-at-spi-registryd-directory > > Also program 'at-spi-registryd-wrapper' > isn't installed and there is no AT-SPI Registry daemon. > > Can anyone tell me if any of these differences from the book matter? > I get a load of warnings from gnome-session on exiting gnome > but gnome itself seems to behave much as expected. > > Thanks for your time. > > jb > > p.s. if this gets marked as spam, as happened with my previous post, it isn't! > > > > _ > Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now > http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/ > The --with-at-spi-registryd-directory option no longer exists so you can ignore that warning. I'll amend the book accordingly when I get the chance. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Thunderbird 3.0 and Xulrunner
On 20/01/10 21:04, Lars Bamberger wrote: > Hm, I have mdb.h installed in $PREFIX/include/thunderbird-2.0.0.23/mork > but not in any TB-3-related directory. However, mdb.h can be found in > the TB-3-source tarball: comm-1.9.1/mozilla/db/mdb/public/mdb.h > > I'd suggest to double-check the include paths used during compilation, > maybe you need to set a custom CFLAG? > > HTH > Lars > After reading previous posts on this subject, it looks like you cannot build against Xulrunner at this point in time. I've built Thunderbird 3.0.1 as a standalone successfully. Thanks, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Thunderbird 3.0 and Xulrunner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just wondering if anyone has successfully built Thunderbird 3.0 with Xulrunner? I'm having trouble. I get the following error during the build: In file included from /sources/comm-1.9.1/mailnews/base/src/nsMsgFolderCacheElement.h:42, from /sources/comm-1.9.1/mailnews/base/src/nsMsgFolderCache.cpp:41: /sources/comm-1.9.1/mailnews/base/src/nsMsgFolderCache.h:45:17: error: mdb.h: No such file or directory ... Any pointers? Thanks, Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLVsvPhfgHoRhX2wIRAln+AKDXgmzcWR79OEjePkhsGZa7Xv7yQACePE6B LT3SiNn6V8lF7xu/N0+2keI= =AnFG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: JUnit and Apache Ant issues
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sagara Wijetunga wrote: > BUILD FAILED > apache-ant-1.7.1/build.xml:1106: The following error occurred while executing > this line: > apache-ant-1.7.1/build.xml:912: We cannot build the test jar unless JUnit is > present, as JUnit is needed to compile the test classes. > > CLASSPATH is set as above. > > Why Apache Ant cannot find JUnit? > > Kind regards > Sagara > Have you set the ANT_HOME and JAVA_HOME environment variables correctly? Regards, Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLTl7fhfgHoRhX2wIRAsSnAJ94KzyiShRAkW8+WfbtFv1JYIWUVQCfSYAf fHO+02/z0/GgPPWdT8pEOwA= =dJpz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: blfs svn book page errors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 stosss wrote: > Beyond Linux® From Scratch - Version svn-20100110 > Chapter 16. Basic Networking Programs > > Rsync-3.0.7 Client > > Chapter 24 – rsync-3.0.7. > should be > Chapter 22 – rsync-3.0.7. > > Beyond Linux® From Scratch - Version svn-20100110 > Chapter 16. Basic Networking Programs > > Samba-3.0.30 Client > > Chapter 21 – Samba-3.0.30. > should be > Chapter 19 – Samba-3.0.30. I've submitted the changes. Thanks, Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLSb08hfgHoRhX2wIRAoHZAKDfk4zPHR/pBN3St7vWcReyKD9B5QCeNx80 hbBzpWtiD0moloDmfmdmHII= =Q3Uw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: pth-2.0.7 step in book different from...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 stosss wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:03 AM, stosss wrote: >> blfs-book-svn-html-2009-12-14 chpater 8 pth-2.0.7 >> >> At the end of the make command, the last line on screen says: Now >> please type 'make test' to run a quick test suite. Hope it works. >> >> The book says run make check. >> > > Beyond Linux® From Scratch - Version svn-20100110 > Chapter 8. General Libraries > > ./configure --prefix=/usr && > make > > To test the results, issue: make check. > ^^^ > this should be make test according to the screen instructions at the > end of the make command. I had a quick look at this, either check or test will work. Regards, Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLSb3KhfgHoRhX2wIRAtmhAJwOQPwfJBV0GVOE2znkKCROyounewCcDib6 F0SAOCwHeGsGWKjpKmUU9WY= =Kj+R -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Networkmanager in Gnome 2.28
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote: > Hi > > I'm installing Gnome 2.28. Am I right in saying that installing > Networkmanager is not possible with the version of Polkit-0.94 that > I've installed? 0.94 is necessary for > DeviceKit-power-012 because of libpolkit-gobject, but the API has > changed since policykit-0.9. Please advise > > thanks > > MAC > > Last time I looked at NetworkManager, it required you to specify a distro during the configuration phase. This was the main reason I gave up on it. I'm curious if you are using the --with-distro= parameter and what value you are setting this too. Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLRo5EhfgHoRhX2wIRAuU8AJ4mPAgxJe0yqNqkMuww0aQ7ic0cvgCgkpQI 9edyhW9WRdon35ROlE0nJA0= =leoZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: gpm help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 stosss wrote: >> stosss wrote: >>> Starting with a base LFS 6.5 system, I have compiled and installed GPM >>> >>> I have an IntelliMouse Optical USB and PS2 Compatible mouse >>> >>> I have tried several combinations in the config file and so far >>> nothing appears to be working. I am also not sure If my config file is >>> complete. >>> >>> MDEVICE="/dev/input/mice" # I also tried /dev/mouse >>> PROTOCOL="msc" # I also tried ms+ >>> GPMOPTS="" # I am assuming something has to go in here but I don't know >>> what. >>> >>> I have read the man page, searched with Google and found nothing to help me. >>> >>> Is GPM the best option that can provide mouse operation in a text terminal? >>> >>> My current system is just LFS 6.5 with GPM and nothing more. >> Two things to check for. >> First go into the /dev directory and make sure a mouse device actually >> exists and set MDEVICE accordingly. >> Secondly, make sure that the gpm daemon is actually running. >> Also try setting PROTOCOL to imps2. >> Regards, >> Wayne. > checked and /dev/mouse is a link to /dev/input/mice. my mouse is a > usb. The book said that usb mice should be /dev/input/mice. I have > tried both MDEVICE="/dev/mouse" and MDEVICE="/dev/input/mice". I have > tried PROTOCOL="msc" PROTOCOL="ms+" PROTOCOL="imps2" this one should > be for a PS2 mouse but I have the mouse plugged into a usb port. Yes > gpm is running. It is the last entry on the screen before the login > prompt and when I ps-e I see it in the list. I'm not sure, but you might want to check the kernel build options and see if there was a usb and or mouse option that needed to be set. Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLIDKdhfgHoRhX2wIRArBwAJ97rr9OK8d6spzXF60RoAvedAQR9ACg7HUO gY9bAxJeVqgjc2Pc3Pp6dAk= =ovRY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: gpm help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 stosss wrote: > Starting with a base LFS 6.5 system, I have compiled and installed GPM > > I have an IntelliMouse Optical USB and PS2 Compatible mouse > > I have tried several combinations in the config file and so far > nothing appears to be working. I am also not sure If my config file is > complete. > > MDEVICE="/dev/input/mice" # I also tried /dev/mouse > PROTOCOL="msc" # I also tried ms+ > GPMOPTS="" # I am assuming something has to go in here but I don't know what. > > I have read the man page, searched with Google and found nothing to help me. > > Is GPM the best option that can provide mouse operation in a text terminal? > > My current system is just LFS 6.5 with GPM and nothing more. Two things to check for. First go into the /dev directory and make sure a mouse device actually exists and set MDEVICE accordingly. Secondly, make sure that the gpm daemon is actually running. Also try setting PROTOCOL to imps2. Regards, Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLIBO3hfgHoRhX2wIRAu4xAJ4yNpGu8JpNj8iP+qeXcukZlpBSMwCfXMf/ yMjmZQjgVk2sByPnlPSFOA8= =wyxm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Gnome misbehavior
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alonso Graterol wrote: > $XDG_CONFIG_DIRS=/etc/gnome/xdg:/etc/xdg:/usr/share:/etc/kde/xdg:/etc/xfce/xdg > $XDG_DATA_DIRS=/usr/share:/opt/gnome/share:/opt/kde/share:/opt/xfce/share > And the only xdg subdirectory I can find is /etc/xdg. > Best regards, > Alonso I presume then that you did not follow the BLFS book precisely as you don't have a /etc/gnome//xdg directory? Can you tell me if you have autostart/gnome-settings-daemon.desktop under the xdg directory. My guess at this stage would be that your gnome-settings-daemon is not starting up. Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLDOyChfgHoRhX2wIRAhrlAJ99lYpz96BslkDqvk50BStP10FQyQCgokX0 BAE3WeWGBbLcrJd3WSQGAaI= =PeFB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Gnome misbehavior
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alonso Graterol wrote: cess%20%278020%27 > process 8030: type array 97 not a basic type > D-Bus not built with -rdynamic so unable to print a backtrace > process 8040: type array 97 not a basic type > D-Bus not built with -rdynamic so unable to print a backtrace > > (Last two lines repeated several times to the end for different process > numbers) Alonso, Make sure the XDG_CONFIG_DIRS and XDG_DATA_DIRS environment variables are set correctly. e.g: XDG_CONFIG_DIRS=/etc/gnome/2.28.1/xdg XDG_DATA_DIRS=/usr/share:/usr/share:/usr/local/share:/opt/gnome-2.28.1/share Regards, Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLCvXBhfgHoRhX2wIRAgB4AJ47AvirZSAWPc33klqUdFXHH4PviwCePTbU iZtP64CQZaQSQPFoR23RSV8= =05zr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Xorg-Server-1.7.1 and openssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm trying to build Xorg-Server-1.7.1 as per the book's instruction, but it keeps failing due to openssl not being installed. Should openssl be a required dependency? Regards, Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLAwkShfgHoRhX2wIRAhUuAJwJei4QBn+3l7jUg0UAtu31Lx5XbwCg61tj sB+NRpOTNZ8BZRCj2yaTXic= =kCZK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: PolicyKit and polkit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lars Bamberger wrote: > Hi, > > in the current devel blfs there are these two packages: > PolicyKit-0.9 and polkit-0.94 > > Are those two the same except for the version and the different > spelling? That's not quite clear to me. > > If so, I guess the older PolicyKit-0.9 should be removed from the book. > > Lars Both versions are needed. There was a url link posted not to long ago explaining the differences between the two versions. Regards, Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFK3tRGhfgHoRhX2wIRApJGAJ9Xe7VefU4gO7rn6g6gvK4lpPY9LACeOqKw vFqRy5eNoA2/1SA2Cv9rBQw= =TDp2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: xulrunner and LFS6.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Guy Dalziel wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 02:27:45PM +1000, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> I have a problem with building xulrunner after upgrading to LFS 6.5 with >> the following error: >> /sources/mozilla/toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp:1462:6: error: #elif with >> no expression > > Change the #elif to #else and that should fix it. This problem also > exists in firefox. > That would work, but I have the feeling that the #elif was put in there on purpose to fail if the platform was not known. The next line has '#error Oops, you need platform-specific code here'. My C/C++ is a bit rusty, but I would say, doing the above would make XRE_GetBinaryPath return aResult as null all the time. Not sure if that's a good thing. Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKmhTzhfgHoRhX2wIRAqsrAKCSvBzU3lcUiJd+VWmkg1fHrUpAaACffHK6 P/wYJal9a63xBBMbbSl197Y= =w+O/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
xulrunner and LFS6.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have a problem with building xulrunner after upgrading to LFS 6.5 with the following error: /sources/mozilla/toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp:1462:6: error: #elif with no expression . It looks like XP_UNIX is not being defined. Has anyone come across this problem or would know what it could be. Thanks, Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKmK5AhfgHoRhX2wIRAqQNAJ9x/nioANrDCjYd3Zi21KJTrY0I1wCfY0HQ V3Ct3Y9Ai0aUiPqCeweShrk= =mE5S -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
xulrunner and LFS6.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have a problem with building xulrunner after upgrading to LFS 6.5 with the following error: /sources/mozilla/toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp:1462:6: error: #elif with no expression . It looks like XP_UNIX is not being defined. Has anyone come across this problem or would know what it could be. Thanks, Wayne. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKmLwzhfgHoRhX2wIRAm5yAJ9uNHphnxyhr5iWFBLcDmH+OYPF4wCeNG6A O5atKO7o5KSEftqGV60cX7c= =QHzC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
