David Ciecierski wrote:
Cairo is meant to speed up things
quite a bit, and that's why it's luring me so much.
My experience is that it actually slows things down a bit. It can be a bit of a
resource hog.
She was running 2.8
just a month ago - and from what I read and hear, there should be a
This isn't really my place to say, but is you're sister going to know
the difference between GNOME 2.10 and 2.12, GTK 2.6 and 2.8 and ATK
1.10?
Sure not! It's just me wanting to toy with cutting edge software to be
honest. On the other hand I'm trying to find something that will somehow
justif
On 8/31/05, David Ciecierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, you might be right. The only problem is that I really need to get
> this PC done as soon as possible - my sister has been waiting for it for
> almost a month now :-)
This isn't really my place to say, but is you're sister going to kn
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> >Is ATK showing in /usr/lib/pkgconfig?
> >I would delve and try to isolate how configure checks for atk and then
> >check that out yourself in a root console.
>
> Yes, it does exist according to pkgconfig. And I did try to have a look
> in the conf
> [code]
> AC_TRY_LINK_FUNC(atk_object_get_type, : ,
> AC_MSG_ERROR([
> *** Cannot link to Accessibility Toolkit.
> Accessibility
> *** Toolkit is required to build GTK+]))
> [/code]
I hit what was probably a variant of this problem when I
upgraded ATK yesterday. For some reason,
It's old but perhaps it's still relevant?
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list/2001-December/msg00251.html
It... would be relevant. But I compiled packages in proper order, and
even just rebiult them in exact same one as stated on the page. Still no
success...
Best regards,
David Cieciers
Is ATK showing in /usr/lib/pkgconfig?
I would delve and try to isolate how configure checks for atk and then
check that out yourself in a root console.
Yes, it does exist according to pkgconfig. And I did try to have a look
in the config script and that's why I only quoted a small part of it
t
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> >My advice it to just wait a few more days for GNOME-2.12 to come out.
> >Sure, it is probably very similar to what you are working with now,
> >but the GTK folks are probably working overtime to get their stuff
> >right before the release.
>
> Hmm,
mutilated misquotes
from David Ciecierski's 1 Sep 2005 classic prose
may follow:
[...]
" It's been great until now: GTK+ (2.8.3, but I also tried 2.8.2 that
" worked well the first time) configure fails on the following check
" (pasted from configure.in):
"
" [code]
" AC_TRY_LINK_FUN
My advice it to just wait a few more days for GNOME-2.12 to come
out. Sure, it is probably very similar to what you are working with
now, but the GTK folks are probably working overtime to get their
stuff right before the release.
Hmm, you might be right. The only problem is that I really need t
David Ciecierski wrote these words on 08/31/05 20:17 CST:
> Yes, it's me once again buggering all of you... A little update for
> those who read some of my previous: I've uninstalled almost all packages
> relating in any way to Gnome
My advice it to just wait a few more days for GNOME-2.12 to co
Yes, it's me once again buggering all of you... A little update for
those who read some of my previous: I've uninstalled almost all packages
relating in any way to Gnome (down to Gtk, libIDL, libarl, etc.) and are
now happily recompiling them + spying on each and every *.err produced
(pkg-user
12 matches
Mail list logo
